Frank, wer'nt those two also involved in the free the TOPDML 7 march.lol
I like this one Frank.Its well framed and the OOF face on the left frames it up
nicely.(or were you
focusing on himVBG)
Nice tones.
Dave
Even in the midst of mass protest, the
Not me, but Tanja has done quite a few. I'm restricted by the output of
my Epson 2200. However, I think one of the agencies I work with has an
Epson 4000, so I may give it a try.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2004, at 4:03 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 24/9/04, Sung Nee, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hello everybody
I
David, your lanscape stuff just amazes me everytime you submit one. I like how the
curve
in the
mountain tops work against the bright blue sky. The cloud definetly makes it.
BTW i know what you mean about the 6x7.Love mine.:-)
You should do a calendar :-)
Dave
Jhon. Nicely composed and the colours lokk very good on my screen.Good one for the
mantel.
Dave
Paul, belated congratulations on becoming a
grandfather: this one typifies
just why you'll have to get over to Scotland (or bring them the other way)
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] shared:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2725774size=lg
Hi Frank,
I really like this one, despite its proper focusing and lack of
shake... :-)
Well done!
Ciao,
Gianfranco
=
_
__
Do
Larry Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like some recommendations from users who have personally used fine
art papers for printing. What papers have you used and liked or disliked? I
have some 13x19 Velvet Fine Art from Epson, so I know about it. Hahnemuhle
has a large number of papers but
Nice photo John. Now we know you shoot more than beautiful landscapes. Regards, Bob
S.
Paul, belated congratulations on becoming a grandfather: this one typifies just why
you'll have to get over to Scotland (or bring them the other way) just as often as
possible!
http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
Click on A Brief History link - on the left.
Good read, lotsa wonderful tidbits of information here.
Shel
Well, as I told you all a few weeks ago, I finally got around to
installing Photoshop (version 6.0) a couple of weeks ago. Although I
haven't yet gotten around to getting a Photoshop for Dummies type
manual (Shel's going to send me something, and I've been very lazy
about getting to a library),
Saturday, September 25, 2004, 6:00:20 AM, frank wrote:
ft On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:57:10 -0500, Maris V. Lidaka Sr.
ft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Click on the Full Size button at the bottom-right of the screen (not on
Previous or Next) and you'll see the full monti!
ft I did that already. What I
With Mozilla Firefox I can select full size and get what Frank gets.
Then zoom in by clicking on the image and it goes full screen. Then I
can scroll the length of the photo. Interesting, learn something new
everyday...
Interesting photo as well.
--
Jens Bladt wrote:
Right Maris.
Furthermore,
IMO planos like that are not intended to be viewed as a whole anyway.
The need to be printed big. They do tend to dominate a room however (grin).
Frantisek wrote:
Saturday, September 25, 2004, 6:00:20 AM, frank wrote:
ft On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:57:10 -0500, Maris V. Lidaka Sr.
ft [EMAIL
Oh the OT stuff comes and goes. CN bashing went out with digital. They
are all basically the same camera after all (grin). Mafud has not been
heard from in a long, long while. Nice to see you back, Chris.
--
Chris Brogden wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:57:35 -0400, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 06:38:42 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
Click on A Brief History link - on the left.
Good read, lotsa wonderful tidbits of information here.
Shel
Outstanding read, Shel!! I only skimmed it, but it's just chock full
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:36:40 CDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steady responded to knarf's post thus:
Some good ideas here. I especially like the food gallery and the
anachronisms. I'm not much of a food photographer, but I'm very fond of
food :-).
I agree -- good ideas. I
The new version is a huge improvement. Congratulations. It's hard to
say if you could pull up any highlights in that hair without playing
around a bit, but I think you might have to rescan at a different
exposure. There doesn't appear to be any highlights there to work with.
If you had a dull
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:13:35 -0400, Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fooling around with photoshop:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/Santa.html
For the yankees that don't believe in reindeers ;-)
Finally got to look at the image.
Paul's right. It would make a nice Christmas card!
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:38:02 -0400, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip. Nice to see you back, Chris.
Yeah, welcome back, Chris!! What's shakin'?
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Well, I missed the Pug this month so I've decided to make up for it with
a few PAW's.
Here's yet another of those tiresome waterfall photos.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_Waterfall4.html
As usual comments and criticisms are welcome, more or less...
--
I can understand why mankind
I gotta say this, maybe you do focus properly after all, your scanning
software must have been really bad.
I won't post a sample but you might try a bit less brightness and a
touch less contrast, the best results I got was using
-4 on brightness and -2 on contrast.
frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:11:16 +1200, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Panoramas have been the subject of some discussion lately so here's one
that I took a few years ago.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=25-Sep-2004
I didn't use large format, and I didn't
This is a really good shot, which would make a great poster.
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
Panoramas have been the subject of some discussion lately so here's
one that I took a few years ago.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=25-Sep-2004
I didn't use large format, and I didn't
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:11:09 +1000, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul, belated congratulations on becoming a grandfather: this one typifies
just why you'll have to get over to Scotland (or bring them the other way)
just as often as possible!
Indeed!
What really gets to me is the so frequent and seemingly well accepted, and
trite use of long exposures and blurred, smooth moving water. How much
more interesting moving water photos might be if they showed the water more
like we see it, which, of course, would require shorter shutter
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:13:21 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I missed the Pug this month so I've decided to make up for it with
a few PAW's.
Here's yet another of those tiresome waterfall photos.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_Waterfall4.html
As usual
Hi Keith ...
In response to your privet mail, I sent a quick test message. Here's the
result:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:25:54 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gotta say this, maybe you do focus properly after all, your scanning
software must have been really bad.
I won't post a sample but you might try a bit less brightness and a
touch less contrast, the best results
Rob Studdert wrote:
The capture latitude of the *ist D is very similar to most
other cameras of the same age ... but
you won't really get to see what it can do if you don't
shoot RAW and use a good post processing tool like PS CS.
The output differences between the Pentax Photolab program
http://www.pentax.co.uk/hints_tips/index_slr.shtm
http://www.pentax.co.uk/hints_tips/index_digital.shtm
Shel
I previously wrote:
Does that mean PS CS will read Pentax's RAW files?
I shoulda thought to just google it...
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0402/04021302adobecsfoveon.asp
Amy
You mean like these.
http://www.mindspring.com/~palling/photography/gallery8/photographs/Kent_State_Falls(Double_Falls).jpg
http://www.mindspring.com/~palling/photography/gallery6/photographs/Bash_Bish_Falls.jpg
The Devils Hopyard State park in Hadlyme(sp?) Connecticut.
Another example taken with the LX and Vivitar 35-85 f2.8. I'm really
likin' this lens.
frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:13:21 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I missed the Pug this month so I've
A little more interesting but still quite derivative of most waterfall
pics. Peter, I just KNOW you're more creative than what these pics show.
From my bookmarked URL's comes this page:
http://www.apogeephoto.com/sept2004/jaltengarten9_2004.shtml
Should you do what the author suggests? Well,
- Original Message -
From: Gianfranco Irlanda
Subject: Re: PAW: Young Commies in Love
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] shared:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2725774size=lg
Hi Frank,
I really like this one, despite its proper focusing and lack of
shake... :-)
- Original Message -
From: Amy Hughes
Subject: Photoshop *istD RAW files?
Does that mean PS CS will read Pentax's RAW files?
You have to download and install the most recent RAW converter from
the Adobe website.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: RE: PAW--Yet Another Waterfall
Indeed!
What really gets to me is the so frequent and seemingly well
accepted, and
trite use of long exposures and blurred, smooth moving water. How
much
more interesting moving water photos might
Hi Frank,
Since your post fits in, I take the opportunity to revive the WOW (Workshop of
theWeek) idea.
Hope you don't mind.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: OT: Photoshop Thoughts and a Question for you
I have just acquired the Sigma EF-500 DG Super flash for use with my *ist D. My first
external flash. I have to say that it is superb. The manual make specific reference to
the *ist D in several places and the gun is very much designed to work closely with
the camera.
The wireless mode is
... in a current eBay ad:
When I was a photo student I used an MX and look where it got me. My daughter just
graduated with a bachlors in science/art and works at Starbucks!
Sincerely,
C.Brendemuehl
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I
- Original Message -
From: CRB
Subject: Interesting reading
... in a current eBay ad:
When I was a photo student I used an MX and look where it got me.
My daughter just graduated with a bachlors in science/art and works
at Starbucks!
What I find amazing is that all these well
Here's something special for the collector:
Das Asahi Pentax-Buch
Yes, Mr. Keppler's book in German!
(My first German garage sale)
And because it's so special to we Pentax collectors,
$2 + shipping.
Also got ...
Pippi Langstrumpf
Pippi Langstrumpf geht an bord
Pippi in Taka-Tuka-Land
Lassie
Does that mean PS CS will read Pentax's RAW files?
Yes, as does Paint Shop Pro 9 (built in capability). Note that PSP9 does not have the
colour space capabilities of Photoshop though.
--
Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strikes me as a modern day equivalent of a Pentax 110.
Tom C.
From: Andreas Wirtz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: First K mount non Pentax DSLR?
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
look at:
http://new.dpnow.com/691a.html
Andreas
William Robb wrote:
What I find amazing is that all these well educated multi degree'd
people end up working minumum wage jobs when if they had chosen more
wisely they could be making $25.00/hr. or more working in a trade,
with less stress.
I have several co-workers in my store with 2 and
Funny, the assumptions people make, eh Bill? :)
Tom C.
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Robb-Cakalic Expedition Book 1
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:38:48 -0400
Also known as a bitch-wagon. Wonder how a real man like Bill could have
I have a daughter who got a degree in fine arts from UCLA.
Over the next several years, it too looked like such a waste, as she
flitted from job to job...
In time she got a job as a travel agent for a major company, and she was
a good one, still... the only benefits were her familiarization
A shot with a cold isolated windy feeling. The cloud strikes me a a ghostly
horse galloping through the shot(s) from right to left. I like it.
Tom C.
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - Clouds
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:11:16
Thanks Frank... Wow, that's the most generous complement I've received in a
long time (aside from Bill who wasn't referring to my photography).
Glad you liked it.
Tom C.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW - Valhalla
Date:
This arrived yesterday. It is blazingly fast -- the *ist D will write a
raw file to it in about 9 seconds.
It now accompanies my Lexar 1 GB 40X -- to which the *ist D will also
write a raw file in about 9 seconds.
In other words, don't bother with faster CF cards. The limit is the D's
Never underestimate the value of an education.
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Like, whoever uses what they went to college for?
Saturday, September 25, 2004, 4:32:53 PM, Graywolf wrote:
G IMO planos like that are not intended to be viewed as a whole anyway.
G The need to be printed big. They do tend to dominate a room however (grin).
I agree. As a window, it would probably work well. I saw some
printed circular
To tell you the truth I find most water fall shots that DON'T use a slow
shutter speed to be boring snapshots that only
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW--Yet Another Waterfall
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:15:57 -0600
Hi,
I am interested in others' experience with wireless flashes. Wireless
as wireless-TTL by means of short preflash communicating the info the
the wireless flash. P-TTL, Minolta, Nikon iTTL.
In what I tried (Nikon's iTTL), the exposure was very good, but the
problem for me was with preflash
To tell you the truth, I find most water fall shots that DON'T use a slow
shutter speed to be boring snapshots that only document the fact that one
was at a waterfall. It's the blur-effect of slow shutter speeds that makes
the shots more artful.
To each his own, but there's some kind of shots
Okay people I have to take 22 portraits of my doughter's synchro skating team
today. I was going to use a point and shoot digital but decided I trust the
MZS
more and I want to take advantage of the contrast control lighting. My
Question, I will be using the on-camera flash along with the
KW Like, whoever uses what they went to college for?
Although many people do not use their college knowledge actively, good
college education should help them assess the world better, search for
relevant information, and make better informed choices (and that
includes politics and advertisement
KW Like, whoever uses what they went to college for?
And second, colleges were a lot of fun weren't they ;-) ?
Good light!
fra
You could melt them down to make monopods for 1Ds Mark II's. vbg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/24/2004 11:50:06 PM
Nah. Most Leicas haven't been used in the last 20 years. I don't
think unavailability of film would present any problem with most
owners. :)
Chris
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:04:21 -0400,
IMO, a degree does not make a person smart, being smart makes a person
smart. I've seen plenty of degreed, 'educated' people that are idiots, and
plenty of 'non-degreed' folk that are sharp as can be.
Remember the scarecrow and the Wizard of Oz?
Not knocking a higher education, but in this day
Keith posted:
Like, whoever uses what they went to college for?
Not me.
ERN
B.S. Geology
stay-at-home
mother
I have 1GB Lexar 80x, 1GB Sandisk extreme and 1GB Sandisk Ultra II.
The Ultra II seems to be a fraction of a second slower than the two
others, both of them approximately 9s.
I usually prefer the Sandisk cards, as they have a smoother surface
making them easier to get out of the camera...
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Lexar 2 GB 80X
Has anyone timed how fast the D will write a raw file to a normal
speed
SanDisk? Does someone want to time it to find out? I am wondering
whether there is any point in buying the faster cards for the D.
12 seconds
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: The Robb-Cakalic Expedition Book 1
Funny, the assumptions people make, eh Bill? :)
I'm still trying to figure out what the frig they are talking about.
William Robb
From: Caveman
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:38:48 -0400
Also known as
Interesting and concise list of events.
Any photographers visiting Britain could satisfy various desires by
visiting the home of Fox Talbot, which is now a museum of photography.
The house, Lacock Abbey, is set in a village which is wholly-owned by the
National Trust. No signs of modern life
Last week I was in San Fancisco for the Peoplesoft Connect computer
conference. We had a free day so myself and two co-workers rented a
car and drove to Yosemite for a very brief visit.
I took my Optio 33L, my Pentaz MZ-7 with FA280-90mm lens, and
my Ricomatic TLR medium format camera (so I
Pretty shot. The light on the road and its long perspective make it
interesting. Hope you're having fun. Are you headed east or west?
Paul
On Sep 25, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
This is a miss or near-miss I think, but there's something about it
that I still like:
They used to be anyway.
Frantisek wrote:
KW Like, whoever uses what they went to college for?
And second, colleges were a lot of fun weren't they ;-) ?
Good light!
fra
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of
I would think they could be used on the *istD, although I can't think
of any reason why I would ever want to. My cards never leave my person,
and if they did, I would want whoever received it to be able to access
the data. Why would anyone encrypt a CF card?
Paul
On Sep 25, 2004, at 2:53 PM,
Hi,
KW Like, whoever uses what they went to college for?
Although many people do not use their college knowledge actively, good
college education should help them assess the world better, search for
relevant information, and make better informed choices (and that
includes politics and
Hi,
Saturday, September 25, 2004, 8:03:59 PM, DagT wrote:
This is not the way it is interpreted here. They only conclude that
the royals have some right to privacy.
Usually, you can photograph anywhere and anybody, but you can´t publish
without permission if the person is important or
Yeah it's MY gas-guzzling bitch-wagon. I'm still not sure why it's referred
to as a bitch-wagon (my wife is usually nice). It didn't cost all that
much. I bought it when it was 5 years old and it had depreciated 2/3 of
it's original value.
Would do it again but next time I'd go with a
If you publish for , let's say commercial purposes - asveticing, you need
permission. If people say or give a sign meaning no photographs,
photographing in spite of this is illeagal.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Bob W
That's about what I was able to achieve, I think that you could do
better with an original scan not resized for the web.
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Hi Frank,
Since your post fits in, I take the opportunity to revive the WOW (Workshop of
theWeek) idea.
Hope you don't mind.
From: frank theriault
Oh yeah... nice. Next time stop the car man and get out :)
Tom C.
From: Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Somewhere in Utah
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:22:24 -0700
This is a miss or near-miss I think, but there's something about it
Phase One works absolutely great, when you first get to know it. It does
batch conversions, that is - you can apply the same settings (White Balance,
Exposure, Sharpness) to all photographs in one session. See:
http://support.phaseone.com/.
This is great for panoramas as well as other photographs,
Nice shots Fred... I particulary enjoyed 2, 3, and 6.
BTW, what do you do with Peoplesoft? I do SAP ABAP HR.
Tom C.
From: Fred Widall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Yosemite
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:00:56 -0400 (EDT)
Last week I was in San
Hi,
Saturday, September 25, 2004, 8:48:02 PM, Jens wrote:
If you publish for , let's say commercial purposes - asveticing, you need
permission.
yes, indeed. Same here.
If people say or give a sign meaning no photographs,
photographing in spite of this is illeagal.
Not the case over here.
Frank,
I'm new to Photoshop myself. I've looked around and come across the
following:
1. PHOTOSHOP USER Magazine
2. THE PHOTOSHOP CS BOOK FOR DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHERS, by Scott Kelby
Hope this proves helpful.
Alexander Grigolia
Arlington, Virginia
On Saturday, September 25, 2004, at 09:05 AM,
I was heading west. I'm back in San Francisco now, drove all the way
to Cleveland, stayed there three days or so, and headed back.
It was great to see more of this country, however hectic the trip was.
j
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:16:48 -0400, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pretty shot.
PhotoShop User magazine is great, but it's targeted at experienced
users and is rather expensive. (About $10 a copy on newsstands.)
Paul
On Sep 25, 2004, at 5:06 PM, Alexander Grigolia, Jr wrote:
Frank,
I'm new to Photoshop myself. I've looked around and come across the
following:
1.
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:48:44 -0600, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh yeah... nice. Next time stop the car man and get out :)
Point taken :-) I was kind of in a rush to get back, but you're right...
--
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
blog at http://www.jbuhler.com/blog
I just loaded up a few more images. The latest ones were taken
with the MZ-7 and FA28-90mm lens.
William - thanks for the kind words. I think Yosemite
is one of those places where its almost impossible to
take bad photographs - its just too beautiful.
Tom - I'm a PeopleSoft developer at the
Hi Charles,
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 06:29:42 +1000, Charles Wilson wrote:
I will be travelling to Holland, Amsterdam in the the next month. I want to
purchase a DA 14 lens, does anyone know where I might purchase one.
By coincidence, I just bought a DA 14mm F/2.8 last week :-)
I got it from
Hi,
Oh yeah... nice. Next time stop the car man and get out :)
Point taken :-) I was kind of in a rush to get back, but you're right...
You're in good company:
http://tinyurl.com/6w39q
http://tinyurl.com/4hscf
--
Cheers,
Bob
http://www.cameraquest.com/voigt4014.htm
OK, it's not for the Pentax line, but there are a number of Leica users
here. Apart from the speed of this puppy, note the comments about the
variety of coatings available.
Shel
No it's not.
Bob W wrote:
This is a very bad decision.
Here they tend to be used by grumpy mid-aged ladies that have a profound
despise of any and all traffic rules.
Tom C wrote:
I'm still not sure why it's
referred to as a bitch-wagon
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:47:45 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A ruling by the European court looks (to me) as though it could outlaw
publication of almost any type of photograph which includes people without
their consent:
Reminds me of some of Annie Liebowitz's unpublished photos that she made on
her initial trip and move to the West Coast.
Shel
From: Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a miss or near-miss I think, but there's something about it
that I still like:
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL
to get 1/30 second exposures at a reasonable aperture for good depth of
field on days where the contrast isn't too high means shooting really high
ISO film. the effect is a consequence of the conditions where contrast and
depth of field are within reasonable limits. under those conditions, it's
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: No more photography in Europe?
The implication of it seems to me that few of the great classics by
people like Erwitt, HCB, Doisneau and so on could be published in
Europe. This is a very bad decision.
It may be, but it is an
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: Re: No more photography in Europe?
that's not the way it is/was in the UK. If you take a photograph of
somebody in a public place then you don't need their permission to
pulish. Now we will have to enact this stupid ruling.
It appears
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Interesting reading
Sounds like $100/hour. Real common for contractors these days. Too
bad
they don't pass some of it on to their employees. I understand that
skilled trades make about $65/Hour in NYC, but then a basic
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: RE: PESO: Somewhere in Utah
Oh yeah... nice. Next time stop the car man and get out :)
At least it looks like a safe place to pull over.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: The Robb-Cakalic Expedition Book 1
On 25/9/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm only guessing, but...someone must have bought a Range Rover.
One of the few vehicles Cotty waxes ecstatic about!
There was a Land Rover
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Yetta Nother 40mm Lens
http://www.cameraquest.com/voigt4014.htm
OK, it's not for the Pentax line, but there are a number of Leica
users
here. Apart from the speed of this puppy, note the comments about
the
variety of coatings
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: The Robb-Cakalic Expedition Book 1
Yeah it's MY gas-guzzling bitch-wagon. I'm still not sure why it's
referred
to as a bitch-wagon (my wife is usually nice).
I think Linda was way beyond nice.
William Robb
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:03:38 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.cameraquest.com/voigt4014.htm
OK, it's not for the Pentax line, but there are a number of Leica users
here. Apart from the speed of this puppy, note the comments about the
variety of coatings available.
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007
none of the high speed cards show much gain over something in the 20X range.
that's why i decided that Microdrive was feasible for my *istD. some cameras
will run much faster.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:59:40 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're in good company:
http://tinyurl.com/6w39q
http://tinyurl.com/4hscf
Erwitt is one of my favorite photographers.
Let's face it, if there is one country that is meant to be seen from a
car, it is the US...
j
--
Juan
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
