I imagine it's out of your price range, but I've been very pleased with
Sigma's 15mm fisheye.
It's well worth looking for the original Sigma 16mm f2.8 IMHO, a fine lens at
a reasonable price. Different optical design and of course no AF but would
you actually need AF on a ultawide lens.
John
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:20:22 +0200, Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
Greg Cooper a écrit :
Hi everyone.
I recently purchased an AF360 FGZ and although I have read the manual,
I can't find a proper explanation of the wireless mode switch (lowest
switch on the bottom. There are 3 positions - M, C,
I used 1.1.1 for that image.
OK, I'm going to try 1.1.2 asap (not now, because I have to leave).
Thanks
Dario
- Original Message -
From: David Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Pixmantec Rawshooter 2005 - my review
Are
Hi all,
Now that I've done my new PAW site I might as well add something to it.
I'm pretty sure I've shown this one before but not as a PAW. I have
some new slides to scan but I don't have time tonight to get the
scanner running. Maybe next week :)
Here's the link:
From 7dayshop, one of the UK's premier suppliers.
=
Owing to popular demand, we are now restocking many Kodak film lines, including
the brand new Elite Color Print film and the new version of BW400CN. Most lines
are available as 35mm
On Apr 25, 2005, at 1:31 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
Remarkably - the processor and memory chips survived. Evertyhing else
was cooked.
The CPU has its own regulator which must have been tough enough to
protect it from the upstream nastiness. I guess the memory must either
run off the CPU supply
On Apr 24, 2005, at 10:44 PM, Frits Wüthrich wrote:
In the Netherlands it is called a tram.
Same here. We have one in my city but it was constructed specifically
as a tourist attraction.
A trolley bus here is an electrical bus, it it powered through power
lines
that hang above the pavement,
While it's nice to know how to figure out all these technical things, I
feel that nothing beats making a photograph to get to the truth when it
comes to lenses and all their characteristics.
True, but if you don't have the lens to try and you have to commit
to buying it, I'd rather have an idea
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In any case I can't explain the data loss unless it was corruption on the
card,
which as you say you've checked (I assume you executed a surface scan
also?)
The X'sDrive shouldn't just omit data like that but as you say there is
Charming image Dave!
My only criticism is that I'd love the image to be larger!
Cheers,
David
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
Now that I've done my new PAW site I might as well add something to it.
I'm pretty sure I've shown this one before but not as a PAW. I have
some new slides to scan but I don't
* (P)Z-1 (not p model) in very good state.
* P3(0)t in good state.
* SuperA / ProgramA in good state. Comes
with the MotorA and BatteryPack A.
* MX
* Ricoh KR10x
* SMCP-M 50mm f1.4 in a good state.
* I can also supply with the SuperA a Metz SCA372 (provides TTL with
SuperA and up)
Mark,
Here's a test if you can figure out how to do it:
Place some files including one stinker file (you don't by chance still have
the original bad one from your event, do you?) on the CF card and try to
upload them to the X-drive. If it coughs and stops the transfer at the
stinker file, you
On 4/25/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to Gonz's sharp eye and attention to detail, I brought down the
highlights on the woman's jacket, which I think improves the photo
somewhat. What do you think, Gonz? Other comments?
Modified photo:
Colin Miller wrote:
I'm interested in buying an ist D and came across this bargin at
amphotoworld.com.
http://www.amphotoworld.com/product.asp?id=pnistdigitall=PriceArrow
See here: http://donwiss.com/pictures/BrooklynStores/h0049.htm
In other words, give it a pass.
Has anyone dealt with this site
On 4/24/05, Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tram, cable tram, trolley, trolley bus, cable car...
In Toronto, streetcar (but not named desire)... vbg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2629172
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From 7dayshop, one of the UK's premier suppliers.
=
Owing to popular demand, we are now restocking many Kodak film lines,
including the brand new Elite Color Print film and the new
On 4/23/05, Jim Colwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ciao
...later...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
When it becomes difficult to obtain goods locally, one turns naturally to
mail order. So yes, this does amount to evidence of film's slow but
continuing demise.
John
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:38:45 +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/24/05, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip(I think that was written
about Apple) snip
Ah...
Apple: the Pentax of computers. g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Hoo Roo
Dave S
On 4/24/05, Jim Colwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ciao
Good grief. A bug and flower picture in one.
Beautifully done, with the focus spot on.
John
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:14:25 +0100, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
Now that I've done my new PAW site I might as well add something to it.
I'm pretty sure I've shown this one before but
On 4/25/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I sometimes say things like that WRT photos I see, I don't
believe that I viewed and commented on this particular photo until
today, April 23, whereas you posted on April 9.
I know you weren't trying to mislead, but I just
On 4/23/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Frank. I didn't do anything to place the seed pods, just spent
a little time on framing them as found.
Good. I appreciate found shots more than contrived or placed ones.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
On 24 Apr 2005 at 20:24, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You're right of course. I just didn't understand what Cory was saying on
the first and second round, but when he finally rephrased the statement I
got it. Anyway, my style is not to do math to figure out what result I'll
get from a lens. The
On 4/25/05, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Now that I've done my new PAW site I might as well add something to it.
I'm pretty sure I've shown this one before but not as a PAW. I have
some new slides to scan but I don't have time tonight to get the
scanner running. Maybe
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p14115207.html
I can't see there's any problems
...and I can't, either. g
Fred
On 25 Apr 2005 at 20:47, David Mann wrote:
On Apr 25, 2005, at 1:31 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
Remarkably - the processor and memory chips survived. Evertyhing else
was cooked.
The CPU has its own regulator which must have been tough enough to
protect it from the upstream nastiness. I
Boris,
Does the soft lens readily allow AF?
Thanks,
Jack
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
FWIW, McKeown's Guide says the lighter reatiled for about $35 in 1983.
Lewis
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Pentax Camera Illegal on US Airlines
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:15:28 -0600
Hi!
Some time ago, which unfortunately, I cannot pinpoint with any
accuracy, my F 85/2.8 has developed a very strange problem. Most
recently it has manifested again on my *istD, and finally it forced me
to seek for help.
The problem is with infinity focus. By the way, yes, this lens allows
Hi,
Saw this:
On Grandfather Mountain in western North Carolina, known for its
extreme weather, about 5 inches of snow fell, the temperature dipped to
16 degrees and wind gusted to 139 mph, meteorologists said.
Dave
--
Dave Sprinkle
Indiana University Physics Dept.
Swain West Building Manager,
From a million years ago, Cory dredges up a phrase that was instilled deep
into his mind by people whose names he's forgotten.
Be Prepared.
CW
was interrupted during the typing of this message by a pair of Jehovas
Witnesses at the door.
- Original Message -
From: David Sprinkle [EMAIL
Hi Mark,
Can't say that I'm surprised, and you don't seem to be either. Good thing
that they were not important pics. I'm sure you'll figure out the problem,
but more important is to make sure that the work flow and gear that you're
using will minimize the chance of this happening again.
Of
No, I'm not telling anyone what picture should be made. I'm only
suggesting that there may be other ways of interpreting the scene. The
idea of these commentaries is to explore the photograph, discuss their
potential and possibilities, look for other ways of seeing and expressing
one's self.
Not often a big fan of Bill but I wish his well on this one.
http://www.creativepro.com/story/news/22830.html?cprose=daily
The jacket looks much better to my eye. It doesnt take much. Now it
looks closer leather than rubber. Her expression is priceless.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Thanks to Gonz's sharp eye and attention to detail, I brought down the
highlights on the woman's jacket, which I think improves the photo
Boris,
I understand that soft focus lenses, on some systems,
will not come to focus within the limits of the AF
program.
I've read of a number of problems with infinity focus
which have had to do with critical mirror alignment
and bumper wear. Seems these aspects tend to reveal
themselves at the
I think it comes down to what you are trying to say. If you are showing the juxtaposition of the old and the new, it is perfect as it is. If you are trying for a timeless look then the vapor trail needs to go. It works for me either way, but they would be two different photos.
This points up a
Have you tried to adjust the heads' alignment ?
Andre
cbwaters wrote:
From a million years ago, Cory dredges up a phrase that was instilled
deep
into his mind by people whose names he's forgotten.
Be Prepared.
CW
was interrupted during the typing of this message by a pair of Jehovas
Witnesses at the door.
what? You should have been prepared.
---
The record wind speed, IIRC, is 179 mph. The road from the nature museum to
the summit is closed during periods of high wind, snow and ice. I've been
on the summit with winds exceeding 70 mph. No fun! The reason for the
extreme wind speeds appears to be that the rock formations running more
I understand that Bill Fortney will be returning to GFM for this year's
camera clinic, the 3rd weekend in August.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: Re: GFM recap from 2004 - Bill
Thanks Godfrey!
Your graphic puts the difference in good perspective - except at the
wide end, the difference is fairly insignificant. I think I'll probably
pick up the 28-105 when BH open again, along with a hand-strap and
polarizer. (All in all, I think the lesson is that I should spend
We teach several courses at my college based on traditional film
photography. They are inevitably overfilled with long wait-lists. The
funny part is that the camera of choice is (still) the K-1000. (I have
let student borrow lenses and even gave my old Tak 135 2.5 to I student
I knew.) I think
I don't hope film is dead or dying.
I just bought (Joe Wilensky's) MZ-S - I want to shoot slides again! :-)
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. april 2005 19:12
Til:
We have many professional and high-quality labs in the area, some with
international reputations and others known and respected throughout the US.
I'm on good terms with many of the people who work in and run some of these
labs. A few days ago I was talking with a woman at the lab that does some
It's not dead. I just bought 32 rolls of 220 and they're alive in my
refrigerator. :)
Tom C.
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Film is dead...
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:27:08 +0200
I don't hope film is dead or dying.
I
Jens Bladt wrote:
I don't hope film is dead or dying.
I just bought (Joe Wilensky's) MZ-S - I want to shoot slides again! :-)
I never stopped 8-))) You won't find the raw material any cheaper than
this:
http://www.7dayshop.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=777_1_101_1016products_id=6226
mike
Something that is dying/already dead is consumer color negative film.
I work at a smallish minilab and development is down like, 70%.
A couple of years ago, a good day we got in 30 rolls. A good day today
is like over 5 rolls.
I'm not sure how long we will be able to stay in business, because
That would just make film very sluggish, rather than dead grin.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, April 25, 2005, 10:37:14 AM, you wrote:
TC It's not dead. I just bought 32 rolls of 220 and they're alive in my
TC refrigerator. :)
TC Tom C.
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
It came with the prism with no hotshoe, but upon
switching prisms with my old one, flash engagement is now a reality
again. And, I have a second body (my old one) that does everything
but flash.
frank the happy boy
Good news. I was to suggest trying to find a FA-2 (no hot-shoe) for
your first
Hi,
When it becomes difficult to obtain goods locally, one turns
naturally to mail order. So yes, this does amount to
evidence of film's slow but continuing demise.
I don't think you can necessarily come to that conclusion. 7dayshop is so
much cheaper than mainland UK prices that
I guess we have to continually revisit these film is dead
discussions/debates/opinions/etc for the foreseeable future. I like
film, it's just not what I use to do the bulk of my photography
anymore.
Whether it is or not, I have a freezer full of film which I'm planning
to inventory and offer
Hi,
To make things worse, people don't buy their cameras in a
shop anymore.
They come to the shop, look at the cameras, touch and feel
and ask questions, then they say straight out that they will
go home and order one from the net because it's alot cheaper.
People have been doing
No, there isn't. Old Pentax lenses and TTL-flashes work just fine. MAtrix
metering isn't everything.
This one was made (without a flash) but with a M*4/300mm on the *sit D:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/10710619/
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
After scanning a 6x6 neg this past weekend that looks to be incredibly
sharp (thank you Carl Zeiss); I think I'm intent on going out and buying
some more film and giving it the Walt Disney treatment - I'll be putting
it on ice ;-)
Cheers
Dave
In fairness to Shel, although I didn't explicitly invite comments on this
pic, I have done so on the last two, both posted quite recently, and Shel
(and others) rightly inferred that I would welcome comments of all kinds
on this one too. After all, why post otherwise?
I have no problem
Sure, but why do you care about the employment situation in NYC? Worry
about the employment situation closer to home, and where you live will be a
nicer place.
William Robb
I don't really. But I also don't think I'm personally responsible for
keeping someone else gainfully employed while
Q=1
Have you ever seen something that will let you change the angle to looking
down? I saw one in an e-bay listing but they did not give a name to it. I
could send the picture of the listing if that might help.
Q=2
The best filter's to buy are ?
Hi, I am new to the list, I have a K1000 and in a week wil be purchasing an MX.
As an avid polaroid enthusiast as well, i can tell you that film will
never die out completely. There is still new packs of film being made
for polaroid cameras they stopped making in the seventies. And it
costs
No, there isn't. Old Pentax lenses and TTL-flashes work just fine. MAtrix
metering isn't everything.
Whew! - that's good, since I have never used matrix metering in my whole
life - g.
This one was made (without a flash) but with a M*4/300mm on the *sit D:
Linux actually owes rather more to Christian thinking, but I'd not expect
Collin to know that.
John
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:32:16 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
While I have no love for the Marxist thinking behing Linux, I
That's one of the funniest things I've read all week - thanks,
frank theriault wrote:
Most of the time, however, I think much along your lines: When you're
an amateur, you don't have deadlines, you shoot to please yourself,
and there's no pressure. Maybe becoming a pro would take all the fun
out of it, and that would be a shame.
Once upon a time, I
Monday, April 25, 2005, 8:18:08 PM, Dario wrote:
DB Hello David,
DB You are right. The problem is due to 1.1.1, while 1.1.2 fixed this issue,
DB see:
DB http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0190_RSE112.jpg
Ciao Dario, what settings did you use for that picture in RSE
(sharpening, noise,...),
Hi,
While I have no love for the Marxist thinking behing Linux, I
That's one of the funniest things I've read all week - thanks, Collin,
you've made my day!
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Tom C Subject: RE: Film is dead...
And if buy mail-order/web like at BH, aren't I indirectly keeping their
sales staff on the floor in a job? I'm not sure that I am, but one could
make that argument.
Sure, but why do you care about the employment situation
I am no fan of Microsoft. But at least they do create code. Forgent
bought a company because it had a tenuous patent on some code used in jpeg
with the intention of making money off of what was intended to be an open
standard.
Other companies found it easier (cheaper) to pay than to fight.
So
- Original Message -
From: Henri Toivonen
Subject: Re: Film is dead...
To make things worse, people don't buy their cameras in a shop anymore.
They come to the shop, look at the cameras, touch and feel and ask
questions, then they say straight out that they will go home and order one
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Film is dead...
With film, both pixelation and grain can become an issue. Sometimes the
mix is not very nice. That's why for extremely large prints, you'd want to
go MF if using film. Or, if printing from 35mm film, an optical
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Medium format or large format film would be a better choice than 6 MP
digital. 35mm won't buy you much. Perhaps a little if you shoot Velvia or
another fine grain film that resolves well. I haven't printed larger than 13
x19 from 6 MP
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4481789.stm
Thanks for the link. I'll give them a try. I wouldn't doubt that the 6.1 MP
results are comparable to or better than 35mm film. I've seen that at 13 x 19.
However, MF or LF film. would undoubtedly be a better solution for very large
prints.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
Frantisek wrote:
DD of priority or for deletion during a slideshow. My only niggles at the
DD moment are that there's no direct access to curves (although the
DD highlight/shadow contrast sliders and appearance selector appear to
DD apply pre-set curves), and that the converted images look
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 7:18 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: is it a bubble?
On 4/22/05, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My limited, local, experience, is that most camera
salespeople that I
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=1087sid=aqX7ltgTZ578refer=top_world_news
Kodak stock drops, pulls rest of market with it
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2005/04/24/2003251807
Kodak shares downgraded to junk bond status by SP
Sales of consumer and professional film
I suppose I shouldn't say this... I would prefer to buy my photoghraphy
equipment at a retail store where I could develop a relationship with a real
human being. The times I have attempted that, I found the salesmen were
only after one thing, my wallet, and would tell me anything even
Hello David,
You are right. The problem is due to 1.1.1, while 1.1.2 fixed this issue,
see:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0190_RSE112.jpg
Thanks,
Dario
- Original Message -
From: David Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 6:13 PM
Hi!
Thanks to Gonz's sharp eye and attention to detail, I brought down the
highlights on the woman's jacket, which I think improves the photo
somewhat. What do you think, Gonz? Other comments?
Modified photo:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/cable1a.html
Original photo:
Medium format or large format film would be a better choice than 6 MP digital.
35mm won't buy you much. Perhaps a little if you shoot Velvia or another fine
grain film that resolves well. I haven't printed larger than 13 x19 from 6 MP
digital (which is quite excellent), but Tan and some others
Thanks Paul. Most of these prints would be designed for viewing at a
distance of 8 feet or more, and I wouldn't necessarially mind that they
'degrade' visually up close (most everything does).
I'll ask you an ignorant question. With film, grain would typically become
an issue at some point
With film, both pixelation and grain can become an issue. Sometimes the mix is
not very nice. That's why for extremely large prints, you'd want to go MF if
using film. Or, if printing from 35mm film, an optical print would probably be
better. Of course with digital, both noise and pixelation
A=1:
Ref. converter.
You could possibly also get away with right-angle viewfinder or
periscope eyepiece. :-)
A=2:
Pentax.
What was Q=2 again?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: MOY MACGILL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 9:14 PM
Subject:
Hi!
Just a fun little snap taken while waiting to meet a friend for a day of
photography in San Francisco.
Details: Leica M3, 50mm Summicron, Tri-X, Ilford ID-11
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/caught.html
Call it wild, but two cups on the table next to the couple align in my
mind along with
Hi!
Now that I've done my new PAW site I might as well add something to it.
I'm pretty sure I've shown this one before but not as a PAW. I have
some new slides to scan but I don't have time tonight to get the scanner
running. Maybe next week :)
Here's the link:
I'm sure that film will continue to be made and developing services
available, even if its only by mail. It could get expensive, of course.
What will be really interesting is what the 35 mm SLR offerings look
like in 5 years.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Jon Paul Schelter (R* Toronto) wrote:
Odd about the 24/2 - http://stans-photography.info/Intro6.html has it
listed as the top of the favoritesic lenses of the PDML crowd.
It is not great on digital (purple fringing), and the site has
opinions predating the *ist-D. It was
NO WAY!
They're getting bucks for every memory module that uses
their format. Even if no code of theirs was used in
any system to create the format.
Back in the old days Univac initiated plug-compatible
was the beginning of open connectivity.
But now the lawyers are winning instead of the
I haven't considered this in a while, but I'm looking at doing some very
large work (to me)... at least 30 - 40 in the largest dimension. I
suspect film will be a better choice for capture medium than a 6 MP camera.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Very good! I just wonder, did you soften the area around the bug, or
is it just natural shallow DOF ;-) Anyway, it looks great. I don't
like macro photography usually, but the shot in Science World by Mark
and your photograph I liked both. Well done.
Frantisek
Hi Paul and Godfrey,
I have not used ACR that much, but when I tried it for the week with
my cameras (caveat - the cameras might matter a lot - Nikons so it
might be different with Pentax DSLRs), I found this:
1) colour was different from Nikon's program or C1 (both were truer).
Shadows had a
Shadow contrast 0 (middle)
Highlight contrast -40
Sharpness -50 (far left)
Detail extraction 0 (middle position)
Noise 0 (far left)
Color noise 0 (far left)
But I didn't mean that to be a well-tuned conversion. I just wanted to see
open shadows.
Dario
- Original Message -
From:
Q=2
The best filter's to buy are ?
Pentax SMC
B+W MRC
HeliopanSH-MC
HoyaSuper HMC
Photoshop plug-ins?
A polarizer is a must, even for digital photography...
Andre
Thank you, I just could not think of a name to start looking for them.
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Viewfinder's
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:41:29 +0200
A=1:
Ref. converter.
You could possibly also get away with
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I try to focus just a
tad closer than infinity - voila - proper focus, nothing fancy.
It is possible the focus of the lens has been shifted a little over the years
(loosen set screws inside the lens). It happened to my FA100/2.8 macro some
years
On 25/4/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
The only comment I don't appreciate is a bald I don't like it
Oi, I resemble that remark!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Any job becomes work. Working as a pro can be enjoyable if you can have
some control and artistic input. When I have worked full time as a
photographer expectations and controls always made most picture taking
boring and repetitive.
I learned to dislike weddings working as a wedding
Henri Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something that is dying/already dead is consumer color negative film.
I work at a smallish minilab and development is down like, 70%.
Even though I'm doing grad school full time and getting an increasing
volume of freelance work (more about that in another
Man, am I the only one to think that this is *really sad*?
It's not easy to get people to understand the consequences either.
/Henri
Mark Roberts wrote:
Henri Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something that is dying/already dead is consumer color negative film.
I work at a smallish minilab and
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: Filling the 50-85mm gap.
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Rob Smith wrote:
I use an old DOI 1.4 converter that is stunningly good and a fraction of
the
http://www.oekonux.org/texts/marketrelations.html
and there's more, if you want to talk seriously.
Collin
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
