Discussing batteries and chargers, what does trickle charge mean exactly?
Apparently, some manufacturers (e.g. Quantum) mean a charger function for
maintaining the batteries charged after the normal charging cycle is
complete. That means that if you need the batteries you can use them after
Maybe some of you expected this:
Now that and a F-100 macro is on its way, I'll probably be selling that
other macro thingy - the Vivitar KA macro focusing 2X teleconverter. I'
thinking of listing it on That Auction Site, but I'll run it through
this list first. It's in rather good condition,
Tom C wrote:
Hot pixels are photosites on the sensor that are, in layman's terms,
more sensitive to the light striking them, than average pixels.
Therefore they turn 'ON' sooner and tend to be more visible during
long exposures. Cold or dead pixels are photosites that are always
turned
Yo Sid, good to hear from you.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/02 Fri AM 03:22:17 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: FedEx Hoovers!
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: FedEx Hoovers!
This is the third or fourth time I've had delivery problems with FedEx.
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/02 Fri AM 03:41:03 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: FedEx Hoovers!
My previous employer shipped between 400 and 1700 packages per day.
About 10% (give or take) were USPS. The rest were UPS. The USPS lost
more total
On 31/8/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just for the sake of posting something different. Statues are not
really my thing, but this was kind of interesting. Take it as a set of
tourist pics:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbuhler/sets/858094/
istD, FA16-45 for most of them. Skies
On 30/8/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
A Pentax Pixel Party LOL
Pentax Pixies more like ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
According to Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle_charging
Trickle charging means charging a battery at the same rate as it is self
discharging, thus maintaining a full capacity battery. One must be
careful, however, that the charge rate is not more than the self
discharge, or
On 30/8/05, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
On 8/30/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will you be at the NPW next June?
You know it.
--
Scott Loveless
Hi Scott,
Apologies for late reply - just got back from a few days filming in Berlin.
I plan on being there so look
On 1/9/05, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:
That is close to 7.3
kilos. That is about the weight of my bowling ball. Would I want to
attach my camera to a bowling ball and carry the combination around for
a day? (Cotty could probably make an adapter for me...)
I'll get to work on
yes of course, I'm simply lazy to do it,
Indeed I use it in the night shots, but I prefer not to use it, if
it's possible (I'm just lazy ;)
On 9/1/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
30 second camera limit? Just go to Bulb and hold the shutter open
as long as you need.
Godfrey
On 1/9/05, AvK, discombobulated, unleashed:
folks,
i uploaded the PUG it can be viewed on pug.komkon.org, but i am not able to
access the server via this laptop i am working right now.
so it sits on http://pug.komkon.org/05sep
and on my website http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/05sep as usual.
Toil
Pedantry
Askew
Protrude
Forgotten
Close
Tarnish
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
...
THAT much... it's because i have a lot of gear for it 3 lenses...
...
but now it's the go go selling thing that
bothers me
...
which lenses do you have?
how much are you looking for them?
danilo.
even SCSI-2 is faster in actual performance. bus speed is only one part of
the equation. otherwise USB 2 ought to be faster than FireWire 400, but it
is at most half the speed for external hard drives.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
most of my lenses that were pretty good on film became unusable on the
*istD. not sharp enough. those lenses now sit on the film bodies only. only
the best lenses remained usable.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday,
On 31/8/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
In this case I decided to try something different and see what kind of
reaction I'd get. Except for Cotty (if that's his real name!), the
reaction has been very positive (discounting the jab at my choice of gear)
which I really wasn't
Toralf Lund wrote:
Maybe some of you expected this:
Now that and a F-100 macro is on its way,
ARGH! I still haven't learned to write, apparently. Wrote something,
decided to modify it a bit, and ended up halfway between the original
text and what I wanted to change it to. As I often do.
Hi,
Sorry about the OT, but I'd like to tap into the giant electronic brain of
the PDML, if I may.
I seem to be being spam-bombed at the moment. I have received over 1,000
spam emails in the last 8 hours. The overwhelming majority of these emails
claim to be 'Delivery Status Notifications',
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Glad to hear it. The USPS often amazes me at how quickly they get letters and
small packages delivered.
Henry's take pride in using USPS; they think they are delivering
superior service to their customers. I have seldom bought from the US,
but
Henry's take pride in using USPS; they think they are
delivering superior service to their customers. I have seldom
bought from the US, but have always asked for USPS; small
values (50 pounds max?), but never paid import duties either.
As a UK recipient, I hate couriers with a passion; I
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the face of it, it appears that my machine is being used as a zombie to
forward spam to other domains
Could it be that someone *else's* machine is being used as a zombie to
forward spam and it's forging your domain in the From: header so that
you receive all the
On 9/2/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbuhler/sets/858094/
Excellent work as always Juan. Some of those pictures are amongst the
best I have ever seen exhibited here on the PDML, and indeed anywhere.
You're awfully nice, Cotty, thanks! Maybe if you qualify
On Thursday, September 1, 2005, at 06:30 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I went out to run a few errands and when I returned there was a FedEx
door
tag indicating that they attempted to deliver the package.
When I originally learned that the package was going to be delivered
tomorrow, I changed
On 9/2/05, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're awfully nice, Cotty, thanks! Maybe if you qualify that with
the best pics of Stalin statues I'll believe it!
Uh, I meant Lenin. Nice photojournalist I would be.
:)
--
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
photoblog at
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
So I guess that the spammer is using my domain name as the return address on
the spam they send out. The recipient must then send the delivery status
notification to me instead of the spammer, rather like a ricochet causing
'collateral damage'.
Does
I've been thinking about this for a while.
Typically, in program modes with a FA lens, the camera will keep the
shutter speed high enough to avoid blurry pictures when handheld. On a
35mm sized filmplane camera, this is roughly the inverse of the focal
length, as we all know. So if you have a
On Thursday, September 1, 2005, at 11:41 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
My latest horror story involved a DHL shipment from Philadelphia.
This is a three hour drive. For those who may not know, residential
deliveries from DHL are dropped at the local post office and then the
USPS makes the actual
Don't worry about it. Truth and accuracy have nothing to do with
journalism in this day age. VBG
BTW I agree with Cotty, those are some of the best BW shots I've seen
recently. Nicely done.
Dave
On 9/2/05, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/05, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something similar happened to me. Someone sent me a very spendy Pentax
lens which was delivered by FedEx when I wasn't at home. The package was
just dropped at my door. This was on a day that a lot of maintenance
people were working around my house - gardeners, utility company people,
and
Bob W wrote:
If you had any common sense you'd have known the address printed on the
card was wrong.
Nice to see the money spent on customer care courses has paid off.
Malcolm
How about Off-topic as a PUG theme? :-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I can't complain about the USPS. Sending cameras and lens via USPS
Priority Mail - a small box, is great and cheap. Three day delivery
is what they advertise and they usually beat that.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/2/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Godfrey
How about Off-topic as a PUG theme? :-)
Sure - it's sadly often the theme on the PDML - g.
Fred
Problem solved, I think. Nothing in the last 5 minutes, anyway.
After giving it a bit more consideration, I decided that I should be able to
set my pop3 mailbox to bounce email whose address it doesn't recognise,
rather than redirecting it to the postmaster account. This seems to work, so
Hi!
It seems my FA 28-70/4 AL is going to see its creator... I mounted it on
*istD after about a month or so of no use. What I see is this:
1. Very visible (in viewfinder) pink/magenta warm cast.
2. Sometimes it looks as if I am looking through a dirty window filter...
Is this *it*?
If so,
Hi!
There is rather positive (I think 50/50) chance that I'll be in
Vancouver towards the end of September or beginning of October...
Anyone willing to meet? Contact me off-list if you please.
Thanks.
Boris
Not only that, but they supply the box, shipping label, and packaging tape
;-)) In the last couple of years I've encountered ZERO problems sending
and receiving packages using Priority Mail.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob Sullivan
I can't complain about the USPS. Sending cameras and
Thanks David!
So, now the question is: is there a word for defining the slow-rate charging
at the end of the process, as done by some microprocessor-controlled
chargers?
Dario
- Original Message -
From: David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday,
So why don't you explain it ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Toralf Lund
Inexpensive consumer glass, mediocre image quality?
To repeat something I've said on the list earlier, I believe the J is
short for jalla, but that may not mean a lot to most of you...
- T
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 09:59:30 +0100, Bob W wrote:
So I guess that the spammer is using my domain name as the return
address on the spam they send out. The recipient must then send
the delivery status notification to me instead of the spammer,
rather like a ricochet causing 'collateral damage'.
Yes; the Chicago meeting is Thursday and Friday next
week. On the whole, I'd rather go to France!
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Shel, you are physiologically incorrect.
The sphincter you have in mind (the anal one, I
presume)
Agreed, cheap and reliable.
Out of 300+ packages I've sent only 1 wasn't perfect.
And it was just a 4 day unexplained delay on a package
sent from US to Canada.
The savings on packaging material is very substantial.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep, sounds like you've been hit by the AL element
seperation demon! ;-)
I replaced mine with a Tamron 28-75/2.8.
Rather expensive and I'm still undecided as to
whether I really like it.
One of the harshest Bokehs I've seen.
Kind of a double image, not very pleasing if
the background contains a
Oh, DUH!
I forgot to add the line that says the delay was finally explained.
Priority mail is US only, this one slipped thru, going out of
country without customs forms.
Since it was the PO's mistake they delivered anyway!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/02 Fri PM 12:03:30 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: OT: Zombie, or hit by a ricochet?
Problem solved, I think. Nothing in the last 5 minutes, anyway.
After giving it a bit more consideration, I decided that I should be able to
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/02 Fri PM 12:59:07 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Demise of my 28-70/4
Hi!
It seems my FA 28-70/4 AL is going to see its creator... I mounted it on
*istD after about a month or so of no use. What I see is this:
1.
Shel my only advice is to stay away from them, they will eventually
break your heart.
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I recall seeing some discussions about these things, but never paid much
attention to them.
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Re: FedEx Hoovers!
I think I see a pattern there.
They take turns.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Norman Baugher
Subject: Re: What Are Hot Pixels?
Shel my only advice is to stay away from them, they will eventually
break your heart.
Cats are like that too.
William Robb
Have you visited the Hot Pixels in Hot Pants web site?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Norman Baugher
Shel my only advice is to stay away from them, they will eventually
break your heart.
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I recall seeing some discussions about these things, but never paid
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem solved, I think. Nothing in the last 5 minutes, anyway.
After giving it a bit more consideration, I decided that I should be able to
set my pop3 mailbox to bounce email whose address it doesn't recognise,
rather than redirecting it to the postmaster
Yesterday I was at a shop that had two FA 28-70/4 new in the box. They
probably want too much for them but I could ask...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I'll check in with you all in a week or so. :)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Mark Roberts a écrit :
I'll check in with you all in a week or so. :)
Bienvenue en France, Mark.
Don't forget your 50mm lens...
have fun
Mark Roberts wrote:
I'll check in with you all in a week or so. :)
Mark Roberts wrote:
Are you rejecting at SMTP (I think that's the proper way of describing
it) rather than bouncing the entire email including message body? The
reason I ask is that some spammers are using servers that include the
message body in the bounce as de facto relays: Spammer wants to
I thought some readers might like to see me defending good old SMC - from
another (unmentionable) list :
-
On 2/9/05, James B.Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
My experience are that Canon makes top notch lenses and I do not see
why people try and
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll check in with you all in a week or so. :)
have fun and take note:
http://www.beard-redfern.com/photos/pyr/pis.jpg
Wendy
Wendy Beard
Ottawa, Canada
I don't know if it any kind of official terminology, but I always
call that a tapered, as in 'tapered off'.
Godfrey
On Sep 2, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Thanks David!
So, now the question is: is there a word for defining the slow-rate
charging at the end of the process, as
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Henry's take pride in using USPS; they think they
are delivering
superior service to their customers.
Henry's? From Canada?
W.
Wendy Beard
Ottawa, Canada
In a message dated 9/2/2005 4:40:52 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
can't complain about the USPS. Sending cameras and lens via USPS
Priority Mail - a small box, is great and cheap. Three day delivery
is what they advertise and they usually beat that.
Regards, Bob S.
Hi!
I realize that this has been discussed to dust (if there is such a
term)... So let's make it brief, shall we. :-)
How good/bad performs SMC FA 28-105/4-5.6 (not power zoom, but Tamron
rebadged lens) compared to 28-70/4 AL. I do realize that it is going to
be 35 mm longer. I am however
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, wendy beard wrote:
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Henry's take pride in using USPS; they think they
are delivering
superior service to their customers.
Henry's? From Canada?
Yes. I thought about that, (US rang a bell :-). I thought I had seen
this
You can tell the quality of a Postal Service based on how much bullet
proof glass they need
to protect the employees from their customers...
Bob W wrote:
Henry's take pride in using USPS; they think they are
delivering superior service to their customers. I have seldom
bought from the US,
On Sep 2, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
How good/bad performs SMC FA 28-105/4-5.6 (not power zoom, but
Tamron rebadged lens) compared to 28-70/4 AL. I do realize that it
is going to be 35 mm longer. I am however interested in the rest of
the differences.
I've never had either
Actually your FA 28-70/4 is going to limbo, Pentax won't take it back...
Sounds like the rear element separation got it. Mine died in the lens
cabinet as well.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
It seems my FA 28-70/4 AL is going to see its creator... I mounted it
on *istD after about a month or
On 2/9/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
I can't complain about the USPS. Sending cameras and lens via USPS
Priority Mail - a small box, is great and cheap. Three day delivery
is what they advertise and they usually beat that.
Regards, Bob S.
I'll second that. I've had many pieces
On 2/9/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
And I just accepted an offer from a
certain company
Congratulations. PIXelAtion Rules :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
This is really an unfortunate problem. Pentax ought to do a recall
frankly. That lens had a reputation as one of the sharpest in its class
(ie, best in its price range). Now it has a reputation as one of the
highest failure rate in its class. Who cares that it's failing out of
warranty;
Since all these lenses were made before 2000, and God, (and Pentax),
only know when the rear Aspheric element that
causes the trouble was actually manufactured, (and they're not
telling). I would be very hesitant to buy one of these lenses
new in a box at this point in time since the
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
I realize that this has been discussed to dust (if there is such a
term)... So let's make it brief, shall we. :-)
How good/bad performs SMC FA 28-105/4-5.6 (not power zoom, but Tamron
rebadged lens) compared to 28-70/4 AL. I do realize that it is going to
be 35
I haven't actually shot any photos with one but I have handled them a
few times in camera stores, I was very impressed with it's build quality
and manual focusing. What it reminded me of most was the smc-P FA
28-200 which was also made by Tamron. Looks and feels like it's little
brother.
If
Oh, yea, (hate to answer my own post, but), try to get a black one.
The silver just looks plain silly on a black camera body...
P. J. Alling wrote:
I haven't actually shot any photos with one but I have handled them a
few times in camera stores, I was very impressed with it's build
quality
Do any of you guys use some kind of watermarks to protect agains
unauthorized copying of you images on the internet?
Do you use a brand name watermark and at what price?
Does anybodyu use: http://www.digimarc.com ?
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: OT: Copyright
Do any of you guys use some kind of watermarks to protect agains
unauthorized copying of you images on the internet?
Do you use a brand name watermark and at what price?
Does anybodyu use: http://www.digimarc.com ?
If
LOL I sometimes bring some home made chocolates to the clerks at my post
office (and I don't wait for Xmas). We have a great relationship anyway,
but they seem to appreciate the extra attention. We're all on a first name
basis, share personal anecdotes at times, and always have a smile for one
I saw those in ebay and almost bid. Just to learn how to take lenses
apart, but they went for more than I was willing...
I wonder if you could use some type of high temperature grease, that way
it wont melt down into other components when it gets too warm, like in
the sun.
rg
Don
The Almighty Google told me:
``Jalla Jalla means faster faster. In Turkey it is a stomach complaint...''
:-)
Igor
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 05:23:51 -0700
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So why don't you explain it ...
Shel
[Original Message]
- Original Message -
From: Igor Roshchin
Subject: Re: FA J Lenses
The Almighty Google told me:
``Jalla Jalla means faster faster. In Turkey it is a stomach
complaint...''
The feeling I get looking at pictures taken with Minolta glass.
HAR!!
WW
No - it's not getting as far as my SMTP. My pop3 host rejects it on receipt,
so I never even see it. I use a respectable provider so I have to assume
that they are well-behaved in their rejection.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are
Hi Don,
This page may be helpful: http://tinyurl.com/cgcxz
The fellow who put it together mentions a couple of types of grease, but
only one specifically by name. He has a lint to email at the bottom of the
page. If you drop him a line he may be able to give you specifics. He
mentions that
And they get bounced again, then you rebounce them Hey,
you could be responsible for singlehandedly bringing the
internet to a stop! 8-)
I imagine them bouncing round the globe eternally, like pool balls with no
friction.
Anyway, the problem has gone away as far as I'm concerned.
Thanks William, I guess what you say makes a lot of sence.
The reason I'm asking is that I just found one of my images on a folk music
band's web site. It's kinda OK, but it made me wonder how many of my images
is illegally being used by others.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt Subject: RE: Copyright
Thanks William, I guess what you say makes a lot of sence.
The reason I'm asking is that I just found one of my images on a folk
music
band's web site. It's kinda OK, but it made me wonder how many of my
images
is
I have the Tamron (ProMaster Badge) and I think it's one
of the best Bang for the Buck lenses I have.
It's the reason I haven't bought the 3.2-4.5 Pentax.
This one is good enough that I can't see replacing it.
At the $99.00 I paid, it was a very good deal.
Don
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks Shel!
D
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 11:25 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Grease for lens helix?
Hi Don,
This page may be helpful: http://tinyurl.com/cgcxz
The fellow who put it
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:33:17AM +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Discussing batteries and chargers . . .
The batteries are supposed to stay in the charger only for their recharge
cycle (with or without trickle charge depending on the urgence of using
them).
Not if you have a smart enought
Another alternative if they are linking to your image is to change the image
but keep the same name. See how long it takes them to notice.
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 9:53 AM
Subject: Re:
Boris,
It costs a bit, but you should really look closely at
the 24-90. The extra 4mm at the wide end open lots of
interesting compositional opportunities, it's sharp,
handles well, and has nice bokeh.
Rick
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I realize that this has been
Never thought about this before. I pulled out the FA20-35/4, FA35/2,
F50/1.7 and FA135/2.8 to see what the P mode did on the DS.
Results --
FA20-35/4: @20mm, starts closing down the aperture at f/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/40
FA35/2: starts closing down the aperture at f/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/25
Have a good trip!
BTW: I checked the lens from that package last night. Seems to be fine.
Godfrey
On Sep 2, 2005, at 6:43 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I'll check in with you all in a week or so. :)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
All my work is under a Creative Commons license:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/
So people are in principle free to grab images from my website and use
them, within the constrains of the license.
Haven't seen any of my images used illegally. I think the excess of
watermarks,
If you make it over to the Island I have a spare room just south of Nanaimo.
You would be more than welcome.
Powell
At 06:00 AM 02/09/2005 , you wrote:
Hi!
There is rather positive (I think 50/50) chance that I'll be in
Vancouver towards the end of September or beginning of October...
Jens,
I've found both articles/posts I wrote for web forums and mailing
lists as well as pictures I've posted re-used on other sites several
times
What I do when I've found this kind of thing is contact the person in
charge of the page and simply request that proper attribution be
From another thread:
How about:
hot
communication
blue
container
display
tall
creature
technology
history
tragedy
pretend
reflection
sight
surface
knowledge
rg
Tom C wrote:
Some suggestions just throw out there:
1. What is it?
2. Purple
3. Where am I?
4. 2-toned
5. Panorama
6.
Hello again...
It just occurred to me... If you need my 28-70 for parts such as mount
pieces or electronic contacts, do contact me... I can send it out easily
:-).
Boris
Sadly Boris, most of them have the same problem and the electronics are
fine.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hello again...
It just occurred to me... If you need my 28-70 for parts such as mount
pieces or electronic contacts, do contact me... I can send it out
easily :-).
Boris
--
When
Thought the glass was to protect the customers from the employees? ;-)
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
You can tell the quality of a Postal Service based on how much bullet
proof glass they need
to protect the employees from their customers...
Bob W wrote:
Henry's take pride in using USPS; they
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
