>
> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/02 Sun PM 10:11:03 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT: Website Help Needed
>
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, mike wilson wrote:
>
> > The PUG works excellently because it oonly opens the one new window, which
> > continu
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/02 Sun PM 09:41:51 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: D'oh
>
> On 2/4/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Don't do *UV* filters.
> >Couldn't get by without the occasional polarizer, myself...
>
> Yah, I'll give you that.
>
Expect it not to. Pre-flash based TTL and Auto-Thyristor flash are both
more reliable with Digital than plain TTL. It's remarkable that TTL ever
worked with the *ist's (the only other recent DSLR to support TTL flash
was the Fuji S2 Pro, all others use a pre-flash based system like E-TTL,
iTTL,
Hi Tim
Maybe I misunderstood you but what has all this "photoshopping" to do with
your original bird project?
I strongly dislike the way you have choosen here and hope you have read my
last post ;-)
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent:
Hi all
to my surprise the Pentax SFXn gives me focus confirmation with the SP
Tamron F8 mirror lens. A feature that should only work with lenses faster
than F4 I thought ;-)
greetings
Markus
Why? What advantage do you see that the 70/2.4 has over the 77/1.8? Size,
perhaps?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
> > SMC Pentax-FA 77mm f/1.9 Limited
> > Pros: Image quality, build quality, convenient focal length.
> > Cons: What amateur can honestly justify its price t
Thanks for your remarks Godfrey; always informative. I think I'll start
working toward getting the DA14/2.8 and eventually a DA70/2.4Ltd (when
available). The latter sounds absolutely ideal. Where does it fall on
the roadmap?
A couple people have mentioned that I ought to just get my use ou
I can't speak to your idea of value or address your budgetary concerns.
However, the 77 Ltd is a great lens, it works beautifully on the DS, and is
worth every penny you'll pay for it. It's the first auto focus lens I've
ever used, and the first I've used on the DS. Go for it!
As for price, ther
Crippled or not.
If the new 10 MP Pentax body doesn't support ordenary TTL flash, I won't be
buying it.
I have too many flashes - I guess 7 or 8 TTL flahses, one of which is a Metz
60-CT2.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailt
On Apr 2, 2006, at 8:02 PM, David Oswald wrote:
But where I'm always feeling a need is in my non-zoom lenses.
First, I don't have anything that I would consider to be in the
range of wide angle, mounted on the *ist-DS. I've considered the
following options, but have been hesitant to jump
On Apr 3, 2006, at 12:53 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://www.stenquist.com/Paul/Paul.htm
It looks nice but takes far too long to load. The background pic
crawled in. Being a 260kb animated gif, I'd say that the file is too
big. The other page backgrounds were similarly large. For this
On Apr 3, 2006, at 3:08 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks for the input. I don't know why the opening sound is so
flaky. Can any of you web gurus guess why a sound effect would
play on some browsers/systems and not on others?
Nature's way of telling you not to put sound into web pages. Mak
On 2 Apr 2006 at 20:02, David Oswald wrote:
> SMC Pentax-FA 20mm f/2.8 AL
>Pros: Compact. Wide-ish angle. Not prohibitively expensive.
>Cons: Used on a DSLR, it's not really all *that* wide.
I don't believe that this lens has AL elements, it's a pretty old design, it's
the same formula
- Original Message -
From: "David Oswald"
Subject: Wide Angle advice for *ist-DS
SMC Pentax-FA 20mm f/2.8 AL
Pros: Compact. Wide-ish angle. Not prohibitively expensive.
Cons: Used on a DSLR, it's not really all *that* wide.
I get no use at all from my 20 on the digital. I
I like the increased sharpness of the bird.
Compositionally, it still has issues that distract from the image - bird
merging with mountain line and inclusion of water @ the bottom.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 02
I currently have the following assortment of lenses:
Zooms:
SMC Pentax-DA 16-45 f/4 ED AL
SMC Pentax-FA 28-105 f/3.2-4.5 IF AL
SMC Pentax-FA 80-320 f/4.5-5.6
Single focal length:
SMC Pentax-FA 28mm f/2.8 AL
SMC Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4
SMC Pentax-FA 135mm f/2.8 IF
I find that my zooms get a workout
Plus, the act of removing and installing a filter may, in and of itself,
change the focus somewhat. Perhaps a better test might be to use a film
camera, so the entire frame can be used.
I'm pretty much with Godders about using filters. Long ago I stopped using
UV and Skylight filters for "prote
Bruce wrote:
Shot at Monterey Aquarium - not sure how I'd feel in open water
having one of these guys swimming so close.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2938.htm
--
As a 16 or 17 year old kid, I was diving off Santa Cruz Island
(southern California), and got ahead of my dive part
Camera managed to survive, so that's a plus.
I have a junk SMC F 35-80 you're welcome to.
Eric said something about the helicoil not being so good.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/2/06, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> T.V. having left us a while ago, I guess I feel the need to take over his
> roll as
From;
Dave Kennedy
Sun, 02 Apr 2006 18:37:21 -0700
Pentax Canada doesn't seem to be big on rebates.They figure they have me,
and that's enough.William Robb
I remember the time my cat - suffering from a bladder infection -
took a leak on top of my camera bag.
The contents survived. The bag did not.
--
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
US only. Sigh I was hoping that that the DA14/2.8 might be a
little sooner than originally expected.
Pentax Canada doesn't seem to be big on rebates.
dk
On 4/1/06, Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Savage wrote:
>
> >On 4/2/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Aaaar
I think it is much better. Nice work - EXCEPT - the white line around the
bottom of the wings and body has to go! Not sure how it got there. If you
can't get rid of it by changing your PS technique then go to 400% and clone
it out with a small brush.
Powell
>I have done a makeover on the Arist
T.V. having left us a while ago, I guess I feel the need to take over his
roll as chief Pentax equipment destroyer.
In today's episode, we again featured the *ist D but this time with a
different leading lady.
My SMC-F 35-80 lens was actually broken in half! The D suffered a dislodged
flash and
Bob W wrote:
Don't forget Mill either.
Well, dammit, I guess I'm going to have to post the whole thing. :-)
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
who was very rarely stable.
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
who could think you under the table.
David Hume could out consume
Wilh
Don't listen to Bob, he is full of it ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2.
On Apr 1, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
What do you say?
Nicely done.
Godfrey
On Apr 1, 2006, at 12:25 PM, frank theriault wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4285748
Good shot, Frank. Full of character and expression.
Godfrey
I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture.
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580
This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same
standpoint, and from the same "session".
The result is a "new" head ;-) and a improved(?) composition.
This
On Apr 2, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Cotty wrote:
What sort of test did you have in mind?
I've got the Pentax 77mm and 112mm filters, and one prime and one
zoom
that take those filter sizes. But I probably don't have a tripod
that's
good enough to produce meaningful test results.
Basically, on a
...mirror up and enough light for a sorta fast shutter.
J
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/4/06, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >What sort of test did you have in mind?
> >I've got the Pentax 77mm and 112mm filters, and one prime and one
> zoom
> >that take those filte
On 2/4/06, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What sort of test did you have in mind?
>I've got the Pentax 77mm and 112mm filters, and one prime and one zoom
>that take those filter sizes. But I probably don't have a tripod that's
>good enough to produce meaningful test results.
Basicall
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 10:41:51PM +0100, Cotty wrote:
> On 2/4/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Don't do *UV* filters.
> >Couldn't get by without the occasional polarizer, myself...
>
> Yah, I'll give you that.
>
> Some guys did some tests over on a Canon list recently and the
On 2/4/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>So, anyway, a PDML. I will mull over a suitable place and time. Is anybody
>up for a weekend one, or do you prefer a weekday evening? We have a number
>of bank holidays on the horizon - one of those might be suitable. The
>location needs to be reasona
Cotty wrote:
On 2/4/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Don't do *UV* filters.
Couldn't get by without the occasional polarizer, myself...
Yah, I'll give you that.
Some guys did some tests over on a Canon list recently and the shots
with filters on were not as sharp as those wi
Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060331154927
The second I saw this disturbing PINK house I knew I gotto do something
about it. I'm not a demolition expert, although I aim and shoot and
practice street shooting allot...
The actual reason was testing for lense performance at f/8
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, mike wilson wrote:
The PUG works excellently because it oonly opens the one new window, which
continuously loops the images.
Not on IE6 over XP SP2. I get as many windows as clicks.
Kostas
Yep, been there, done that! I've lost two or three Hoya filters that way,
and a couple of times it's been because the retaining ring has unscrewed
through friction with my clothing (I always carry the camera with the lens
pointing into my body - it feels better balanced that way), and the first
On 2/4/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I like taunting foreigners over the internet...
Is that why you bait the yanks?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 2/4/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Don't do *UV* filters.
>Couldn't get by without the occasional polarizer, myself...
Yah, I'll give you that.
Some guys did some tests over on a Canon list recently and the shots
with filters on were not as sharp as those without. I'd like to
Paul,
probably I repeat something as I haven't read all the replies, my bed is
calling for me, nevertheless just a few thoughts.
Nothing weird on Mozilla 1.7.12, but I have sound never on, so I don't
know if it works. Unnecessary anyway, IMHO.
I hate windows subsequently popping up. If it w
Thanks for all the kind comments.
I was out shooting some more infrared this morning. This time I used
the DA18-55mm lens in autofocus mode. I was a little surprised that
autofocus worked, but it sure makes life easier when the viewfinder is
almost completely dark.
It was a cloudless morning
Thanks for the comments. I don't want accolades. i didn't build the
site :-). Your comments are very helpful. I'll pass them along to my
web designer/daughter/supplier of free labor.
Generally, this site will be used only by potential employers and
clients who have the url through other communic
Paul,
I know, when asked for comments, I tend to provide more criticism
than accolades. So, sorry for this in advance, and I hope it will be
helpful to you.
1. When I first opened the web-site, - I only saw the background
image and I was able to scroll down to where the background image was
sta
Thanks for all the advice and tips!
Dan
keith_w wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shot at Monterey Aquarium - not sure how I'd feel in open water having
one of these guys swimming so close.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 16mm, Handheld
ISO 3200, 1/10 sec @ f/4.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2938.htm
Comments welcome
Mako shark?
A
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "keith_w" Subject: Re: Daylight
Savings, Aussie (well, NSW and VIC) digital cameras
Okay. What do you save your silly game time for?
I like taunting foreigners over the internet...
William Robb
Like Chris Matthews* says, "Te
Ditto. A UV filter to protect a lens is counterproductive.
On Apr 2, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 2, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Cotty wrote:
Has this ever happened to you? Sportin' a new Hoya Super HMC Pro UV
filter. Walk around town doin' stuff, hoping for some good street
shots
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
What do you say?
I'd say you succeeded in making a very cool image. Nicely done.
I'd really like to see the "original" if that's possible.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Hi Bob,
No problem. Thanks for the kudos on the photos, but they're not mine.
This is my advertising website, not photography. (In real life, I'm an
advertising hack.) The site is aimed at a very narrow audience of
headhunters and creative directors. They will know exactly what it is.
They app
- Original Message -
From: "keith_w"
Subject: Re: Daylight Savings, Aussie (well, NSW and VIC) digital cameras
Okay. What do you save your silly game time for?
I like taunting foreigners over the internet...
William Robb
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 08:59:56PM +1000, Derby Chang wrote:
>
> Has this ever happened to you? Sportin' a new Hoya Super HMC Pro UV
> filter. Walk around town doin' stuff, hoping for some good street shots,
> but none eventuate. Come home, and find the lens sans filter.
>
> Screw those filters
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: OT: Website Help Needed
I agree. But I don't know if my daughter knows how to fix that:-). You
know what they say about free help :-))
Take the "target =_blank" tag out of subsequent page links will do it.
I think Charles me
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bob Sullivan" Subject: Re: Daylight
Savings, Aussie (well, NSW and VIC) digital cameras
I noticed last week that my camera was never re-set from daylight
savings time. Well, it is correct now! Regards, Bob S.
Har!!! In Saskatche
Thanks Charles! That's the kind of help we need.
On Apr 2, 2006, at 11:53 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Apr 2, 2006, at 7:53, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm hoping to take advantage of those on the list who know much more
about html and web design than do I. (Which means just about
everone:-). My
I agree. But I don't know if my daughter knows how to fix that:-). You
know what they say about free help :-))
Paul
On Apr 2, 2006, at 11:50 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: OT: Website Help Needed
But, after the third new page opened in
Hello Paul,
When I launched it on XP and Firefox 1.5 - the sound didn't come on
like you described. It turns out that I didn't have a quicktime
plugin - that is probably the cause of the sound issue.
I thought it loaded a bit slow even over DSL and was kind of surprised
how big the page was for
Is is time for the filters/no filters argument again?
man, I gotta pay more attention to the schedule.
On Apr 2, 2006, at 1:45 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 2/4/06, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
Has this ever happened to you? Sportin' a new Hoya Super HMC Pro UV
filt
Still shooting only film.
I'd have difficulty doing without a polarizer or ND graduated. I have,
forever, removed the UV/daylight when the light angle made it seem like
a good idea or if the scene were "special" to the point where I didn't
want two additional dispersion surfaces in the way.
Jack
Cotty wrote:
>On 2/4/06, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>
>>Has this ever happened to you? Sportin' a new Hoya Super HMC Pro UV
>>filter. Walk around town doin' stuff, hoping for some good street shots,
>>but none eventuate. Come home, and find the lens sans filter.
>>
>>Screw those
I'm with Bob on this. I never want sound from a web page unless I
request it specifically.
The animation graphics here are cute once but tiresome. Imagine a
prospective client going to the site several times in the course of
discussing you with colleagues and having to sit through the
sim
On Apr 2, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Cotty wrote:
Has this ever happened to you? Sportin' a new Hoya Super HMC Pro UV
filter. Walk around town doin' stuff, hoping for some good street
shots,
but none eventuate. Come home, and find the lens sans filter.
Screw those filters on tight, kids.
Better so
On Apr 2, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The question is, how much resolution do you need for your output
print? The few 4x5 negs I've scanned on the Epson make very nice 16x20
inch prints. I'm sure quality drum scans would be even better, but
there is a point of diminishing retur
On Apr 2, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Cotty wrote:
Cotty is The Stig!
You *are* joking. I'm at least a foot too tall to be a racing driver.
And I have more intelligence.
Hmm. Dan Gurney was taller than you are, I think he's done all right.
And he's pretty smart too...
Godfrey
Even film scanner vs Epson 2450 flatbed scanner shows the film
scanner to be superior, as can be seen by clicking on this comparison
of scanning a Minox 8x11mm negative with Minolta Scan Dual II vs
Epson 2450:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/scannercmp/
The question is, how much resolutio
Even better solution - use the problem as an excuse to buy a new lens,
with metal filter threads, and be careful not to screw them on too
tightly.
Jack
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/4/06, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >
> >Has this ever happened to you? Sportin' a n
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 April 2006 17:16
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: LONDON PDML SPRING 2006
>
> On 2/4/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Did I?
>
> It came to me in a dream !
>
I dreamt the other night that I was walking
Hi Paul
forgot to say that I have no sound as well here with Avant Browser (based on
IE 6) under Windows XP.
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: David J Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 4:13 PM
>>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>>Subject: Re: OT: Websi
Hi Paul
I agree with Dave's comment about navigation, a close button and home button
should be added at least to each subsite.
The background picture starts repeating itself here at a resolution of
1280x960, which does not look good.
The grey text looks nice but is hardly readable on high resolutio
On 2/4/06, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Cotty is The Stig!
You *are* joking. I'm at least a foot too tall to be a racing driver.
And I have more intelligence.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 2/4/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Did I?
It came to me in a dream !
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 2/4/06, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>Has this ever happened to you? Sportin' a new Hoya Super HMC Pro UV
>filter. Walk around town doin' stuff, hoping for some good street shots,
>but none eventuate. Come home, and find the lens sans filter.
>
>Screw those filters on tight, kid
Please forgive if this already came through. I didn't see it show up
or in the archives.
Shot at Monterey Aquarium - not sure how I'd feel in open water having
one of these guys swimming so close.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 16mm, Handheld
ISO 3200, 1/10 sec @ f/4.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/P
Actually, I'll probably have the same image scanned on a 3200 and on my
Sprintscan from b&w 6x7 in a few weeks. I'll ask the photographer if I
can use samples to demonstrate the difference between the two machines.
(He has a 3200 that he uses to proof his work, and then I do the scans
for the
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: OT: Website Help Needed
But, after the third new page opened in as many clcks, I stopped
looking. I hate that. YMMV.
I did that with the PUG, on the theory it encourages browsing the entire
gallery using
On Apr 2, 2006, at 11:20 AM, William Robb wrote:
Har!!! In Saskatchewan, we don't play those silly games with the time.
Good to know you do one thing right there. ;-)
Bob
Maybe I'm just an old fogey, Paul, but I find web sites with sound
effects just annoying. I'm usually listening to music when I'm
browsing. I'd prefer a button to turn the sound off.
I don't like the main page at all, since I can't tell what it's
supposed to be. The photos in your portfo
On Apr 2, 2006, at 7:53, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm hoping to take advantage of those on the list who know much
more about html and web design than do I. (Which means just about
everone:-). My daughter made a website for my advertising
portfolio. I'm hoping to show it to some headhunters nex
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: OT: Website Help Needed
But, after the third new page opened in as many clcks, I stopped looking.
I hate that. YMMV.
I did that with the PUG, on the theory it encourages browsing the entire
gallery using the image page navi
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm hoping to take advantage of those on the list who know much more
about html and web design than do I. (Which means just about everone:-).
My daughter made a website for my advertising portfolio. I'm hoping to
show it to some headhunters next week, but I'm not sure if i
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>http://www.stenquist.com/Paul/Paul.htm
I get a nice (large) opening image, but no sign of links to anything
else (and nothing happens if I click on the main image).
- Original Message -
From: "Derby Chang"
Subject: D'oh
Has this ever happened to you? Sportin' a new Hoya Super HMC Pro UV
filter. Walk around town doin' stuff, hoping for some good street shots,
but none eventuate. Come home, and find the lens sans filter.
Rejection. It happe
Looks good on Firefox 1.5. Everything opened as it should - sound on
the opening page OK, all the Quicktimes that I played worked well.
I echo Dave's feelings on the navigation. I don't like to have a lot of
windows open and would prefer navigating the site with forward/back
buttons and dire
Thanks for the input. I don't know why the opening sound is so flaky.
Can any of you web gurus guess why a sound effect would play on some
browsers/systems and not on others?
Car guy? Yes, I'm afraid so. Although it was a good thing at one time,
it can be a negative, particularly when the car b
Paul,
No sound with opening page here on microsoft internet explorer.
Most of the stuff played fine on my DSL line, only a few had pauses.
You really are a car guy!
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/2/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm hoping to take advantage of those on the list who know mu
Apparently both of your accounts are bouncing mail from me now. Got
any more?
-Aaron
On Apr 2, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I would agree with that. Although compared to even a drum scan of a
6x7 neg, the Epson scan of a 4x5 is superior.
Yow -- that must've been a lousy drum scan!
My biggest issue with the 3200 is image noise. Like I said before in
this thread,
Hi Paul.
Opening page loaded fine. No typing sound. I'm using the ibook OSX
right now though i'll check it on windows a bit later.
However, and maybe i didi not wait long enough, but the contact,
portfolio and resume pages did not load. A sub window popped up then
nothing. As a say after seein
It's a nice shot indeed, but the funniest thing is that I was wondering the
same thing, and plus the possibility of duck feathers jacket!
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: sábado, 1 de Abril de 2006 21:38
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assun
Not since disposing of an early A-28~80 one-touch with "plastic" lens
barrel and limited filter threads. Attaching a filter was a constant
threading frustration. Lost a couple through impatience, mainly.
Jack
--- Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has this ever happened to you? Sportin'
On 4/2/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm hoping to take advantage of those on the list who know much more
> about html and web design than do I. (Which means just about
> everone:-). My daughter made a website for my advertising portfolio.
> I'm hoping to show it to some headhunte
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060331154927
The second I saw this disturbing PINK house I knew I gotto do something
about it. I'm not a demolition expert, although I aim and shoot and
practice street shooting allot...
The actual reason was testing for lense performance at f/8.0 that is
opt
I would agree with that. Although compared to even a drum scan of a 6x7
neg, the Epson scan of a 4x5 is superior.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Having seen one neg scanned on both a Heidelberg drum scanner and on an
Epson, I'd suggest that a 4x5 neg scanned on a high-en
Sorry. Should have mentioned that this is NOT dial-up friendly beyond
the opening page.
On Apr 2, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm hoping to take advantage of those on the list who know much more
about html and web design than do I. (Which means just about
everone:-). My daughter ma
I'm hoping to take advantage of those on the list who know much more
about html and web design than do I. (Which means just about
everone:-). My daughter made a website for my advertising portfolio.
I'm hoping to show it to some headhunters next week, but I'm not sure
if it works on PC browsers
Hi Boris,
As I said in an earlier reply, I cropped the shot, because it looked
unbalanced. Here's the next frame. She's posing now. Perhaps not as
much fun as when she was preening. But she does still show that big
toothy grin.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4288507
On Apr 2, 2006
Having seen one neg scanned on both a Heidelberg drum scanner and on an
Epson, I'd suggest that a 4x5 neg scanned on a high-end drum scanner would
deliver ~superb~ results, and that results from an Epson are a few steps
below superb.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Paul Stenquist
> My Epson
I hadn't had a coney in almost a year, but I had two yesterday. I think
I'll wait at least another year before indulging again. But they were
good in that sloppy coney way. Of course the truly good ones are too
messy to pick up and eat and require a fork :-).
Paul
On Apr 2, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Sa
My Epson 3200 has a film holder for 4x5, so moire is not a problem. I'm
sure the newer Epsons come similarly equipped. I've scanned 4x5 at 3200
dpi, and the results are superb.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2006, at 6:10 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Apr 1, 2006, at 12:05 AM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
There ar
Darn...
> Has this ever happened to you? Sportin' a new Hoya Super HMC Pro UV
> filter. Walk around town doin' stuff, hoping for some good street shots,
> but none eventuate. Come home, and find the lens sans filter.
>
> Screw those filters on tight, kids.
I noticed few times that a filter would
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
