What about Rodinal 1:50 for 12 minutes? On the other hand if you over
develop -- say 20 minutes -- a ferri-cyanide solution could be used to
reduce the density. What do you think might be on the film -- something
valuable? In that case I'd cut off a short piece and try it first.
Don
P. J.
In a message dated 8/2/2006 10:21:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Aug 3, 2006, at 4:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/other.htm
A simple, slightly odd shot, but I sort of like it.
I'm curious... why
Of course, they sell images of what we want nature to look like, not how it
really is .-)
We don't want reminders, we want dreams.
DagT
Fra: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But velvia never did have anything to do with reality anyway .-)
Yeah, so I guess that explains why it was the
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/04 Fri AM 12:46:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photography = obstruction of justice?
You say tomato, and I say dentist.
-Aaron
Mark! Wisest words so far this year..
-Original
From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/04 Fri AM 01:24:54 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A few questions on a Zeiss Ikon, an old film and a studio
lighting
peace
1) The F and M are to match the shutter timing to the peak output
of
Hi list,
I offer for sale a somewhat worn genuine LX ever-ready case. The leather
is not detoriating or chipping.
But the top half is worn, both inside and out, see the pics. It´s still
usable, doesn´t release any dirt on the camera... Luckily, the lower
half is in much more nice condition.
He should simply throw away the cable and DL using a card reader. Far
more reliable, and less hassle. He can upload firmware the same way.
John
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:27:56 +0100, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Mi friend's DL has developed a problem related to the
PC
Hi all,
I've recently finished a long-overdue update to my gallery viewer.
On the surface not a lot has changed except a little prettifying, but
I've made some significant changes under-the-hood.
With all the work I've put into it I really should show a gallery
every now and then, so I've
I find the buttons too small and indistinct. They are also not where you
would expect them to be. The pictures are great.
Don
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently finished a long-overdue update to my gallery viewer.
On the surface not a lot has changed except a little prettifying,
On 8/4/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Not much time for photography, but had fun anyway.
Bloody family...!
:-)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks for the suggestion John athough...
...I always thought that it was better not to move the
memory card a lot, if not needed, in order to preserve
its contacts and so... or this was more oriented to CF
cards, with more contacts to damage?
--- John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
He
Great images despite some lose in the digitalization
process.
The prints must be awesome.
--- Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I've put up about 20 images as a portfolio at
Photo.net.
Almost all of them are taken a few km from home,
which is in Northern
Norway. Most are taken at
Absolutely Beatiful
Dave
On 8/4/06, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently finished a long-overdue update to my gallery viewer.
On the surface not a lot has changed except a little prettifying, but
I've made some significant changes under-the-hood.
With all the work
Thats a CF card problem.
I agree with John, get a card reader.
Dave
On 8/4/06, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion John athough...
...I always thought that it was better not to move the
memory card a lot, if not needed, in order to preserve
its contacts and
Sorry if this has been already mentioned.
Concerning Sigma EF-500 DG Super and EF-500 DG ST
It says that Sigma offers a free upgrade on the
flashes.
From the Spanish site with the offending logo ;-)
http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/pentax-k100d-flash-sigma,1_2623
Works OK,but took me a little while to locate the navigation arrows.
Nice crisp loading.
Some pretty stuff.
Jack
--- David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently finished a long-overdue update to my gallery viewer.
On the surface not a lot has changed except a little
It's the choice of a large segment of the viewing public. I've always
noticed that Pop Photo's Pentax 645 shooting Fitzharris (sp) or the
editor's, 'real' them down considerably. Resolution is, IMO, the only
reason to shoot Velvia.
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But velvia
On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
It's the choice of a large segment of the viewing public. I've always
noticed that Pop Photo's Pentax 645 shooting Fitzharris (sp) or the
editor's, 'real' them down considerably. Resolution is, IMO, the only
reason to shoot Velvia.
Used when
On Aug 3, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
1) Regarding the Zeiss Ikon Nettar front piece: You can see this red
little thingy set at F.
Now what does this red thing do there? What does F and M mean?
This is the flash synch setting. I believe M is for bulbs and F for
electronic
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: A few questions on a Zeiss Ikon,an old film and a studio
lighting peace
From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few questions on a Zeiss Ikon, an old film and a
studio lighting
peace
1) The F and M are to
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: Some images...
It's the choice of a large segment of the viewing public. I've always
noticed that Pop Photo's Pentax 645 shooting Fitzharris (sp) or the
editor's, 'real' them down considerably. Resolution is, IMO, the only
reason to
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/04 Fri PM 01:12:46 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A few questions on a Zeiss Ikon,
an old film and a studio lighting peace
On Aug 3, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
1) Regarding the Zeiss
In a message dated 8/3/2006 9:51:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Terrorists without bombs.
William Robb
=
You complain people are complaisant and don't protest about infringement on
freedoms. And yet you call activists, who do protest, terrorists without bombs?
John Forbes wrote:
I think I need to eat my words on this subject.
The August PUG is the best for a long time. I especially liked Bruce D's
Oakland Temple, Greg Cooper's Church Top, Dag T's @ (my favourite), and
Anne S's wonderfully whimsical (and cleverly named) Under construction,
just
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Actually F is fast sync and M is medium sync. Fast sync bulbs need
to be fired about 5 milliseconds (not sure of the exact figure on F)
after the shutter is triggered, and medium sync fires at 20
milliseconds. These delays allow the shutter to be fully opened at the
time the M type sync bulb
Exactly! Depicting nature is what drives many. Well prior to PS, I
gave it up as a lab horror.
Jack
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
It's the choice of a large segment of the viewing public. I've
always
noticed that Pop Photo's
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: A few questions on a Zeiss Ikon,an old film and a studio
lighting peace
From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few questions on a Zeiss Ikon, an old film and a
studio lighting
peace
Totally agree!
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: Some images...
It's the choice of a large segment of the viewing public. I've
always
noticed that Pop Photo's Pentax 645 shooting Fitzharris (sp) or the
X is not the same as M. Although both can be used at low shutter speeds.
X fires the flash when the shutter is fully open, the others fire the
flash before the shutter is fully open.
The idea with M sync is that the flashbulb fires, the shutter opens, the
shutter closes, the flashbulb burns
So, who, besides me*, uses flashbulbs any more? But it would be nice if
people would not present their guesses as authoritative fact, but that
is the Internet for you grin.
*Aways accepting donations of large flashbulbs.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
This talk of Flash sync got me interested in using photo flash with
digital, so I googled it. This page turned up. Yes I was wrong M and X
sync aren't necessarily the same. But all this seems to be dependent on
the manufacture. I'm sure there were standards but they were probably
honored in
The problem is with the terminology. It is spoken of as delay, because
the shutter is tripped and a gear train delays the firing of the bulb
until the right point. But that point is before fully open. M bulbs are
normally fired 20ms before the shutter is fully open, F bulbs 5ms. So it
is
I have a box of FP flash bulbs in my basement somewhere.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: A few questions on a Zeiss Ikon, an old film and a studio
lightingpeace
Date: Fri Aug 4, 2006 11:20 am
Size: 1K
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
That is about what they go for today (old stock), so you would just
break even at that rate grin. I understand they still make 5's in
China, but no one seems to be importing them. They make the big ones in
Ireland and some folks import those, but they are more like $10 each.
--
graywolf
Wait a second Jack, am I reading you right? There's a good reason to use
Velvia?
My contention has always been that Velvia is frequently appealing because it
*brings the image up* in the viewers mind to the level where one doesn't
think the picture doesn't do it justice.
Tom C.
I will not
Buy *istDL today, or wait a little to get K100D in my country? Prices
will most probably be about the same but what's new in K100D, that I
desperately need? Very little... so, I'm perplexed, which one to buy.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED], /bin/zsh. C|NK
--
On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Tom C wrote:
My contention has always been that Velvia is frequently appealing
because it
*brings the image up* in the viewers mind to the level where one
doesn't
think the picture doesn't do it justice.
This is like saying that NPZ brings the image down.
Hi, Tom. Thought you'd be up pretty soon. :)
Of course there are those looking for brought up images and if it's
your intent to satisfy these folks, (sales, kudos, etc) knock yourself
out. I do marvel at Velvia's resolution.
Will you accept a radio collar? How about being labeled a famous
This is all about a cute accident.
At Bryce Canyon, UT, several years back, my wife was 'playing' with a
chipmunk by placing bits of Ritz crackers on a pine root. (Probably a
Chipmunk nutritional NO NO).
It would dart out and promptly vaporize. I took a few shots and, when
processed, was surprised
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:12:15AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
When Velvia was introduced, there was nothing like it on the market. The
reason it did so well was because if you put a normal Ektachrome or
Fujichrome beside it on a light table, the colours really popped out by
comparison.
If your choice is between the *ist-DL and the K100D then your choice is
obvious, wait for the K100. The major specifications are all the same,
except you for the addition of shake reduction, which should be a big
plus. If you were contemplating the K110D, then I'd say get the DL
now. For all
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:12:46AM -0400, Bob Shell wrote:
On Aug 3, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
1) Regarding the Zeiss Ikon Nettar front piece: You can see this red
little thingy set at F.
Now what does this red thing do there? What does F and M mean?
This is the flash
Aaron,
Yes that's exactly like what I'm saying. And I contend it to be true. Any
mechanical/chemical/digital
construct that captures an image which is subsequently displayed is a
rendering of a scene. Just as people see and remember scenes differently,
film and printing, and digital will
Hi Jack,
It's not my intent to satisfy those folks. I do however think Velvia has
the ability to more accurately render some scenes than others. It may
indeed be garish when photo after photo displayed side by side has the look.
The other thing is, when looking at a digital representation
SR, better AF, improved exposure...I would wait.
--- Vid Strpic [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Buy *istDL today, or wait a little to get K100D in
my country? Prices
will most probably be about the same but what's
new in K100D, that I
desperately need? Very little... so, I'm perplexed,
P. J. Alling wrote:
If your choice is between the *ist-DL and the K100D then your choice is
obvious, wait for the K100. The major specifications are all the same,
except you for the addition of shake reduction, which should be a big
plus. If you were contemplating the K110D, then I'd say
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Sorry if this has been already mentioned.
Concerning Sigma EF-500 DG Super and EF-500 DG ST
It says that Sigma offers a free upgrade on the
flashes.
That's the main reason I shy away from Sigma products. I have seen their
compatibility problems before, and not
A lot of people seem to be confusing the K10D, (if that's what it will
be called), the K100D and the K110D. I just wanted to be clear. The
K100D is already available everywhere on line and in stock at BH photo,
by the way, it should be a short wait.
Vid Strpic wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
For sale:
SMC Pentax-A 15 mm. 3.5, , an excellent ultra wide lens, compatible in
all exposure modes with Pentax DSLRs, LN- 550 euros.
SMC Pentax-A 50 mm. 1.2, the fastest lens Pentax has ever made, in A
version (compatible with all exposure modes with Pentax DSLRs)
LN- 250 euros.
Tokina 28-70
It's starting to show up in stores now, not widely available. I'd expect
another couple of weeks before wide availability.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
A lot of people seem to be confusing the K10D, (if that's what it will
be called), the K100D and the K110D. I just wanted to be clear. The
On Aug 4, 2006, at 9:52 AM, mike wilson wrote:
On Aug 3, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
1) Regarding the Zeiss Ikon Nettar front piece: You can see
this red
little thingy set at F.
Now what does this red thing do there? What does F and M mean?
This is the flash synch setting.
Adam Maas wrote:
It's starting to show up in stores now, not widely available. I'd expect
another couple of weeks before wide availability.
That's the problem, I could buy it in USA, but shipping and taxes.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED], /bin/zsh. C|NK
--
I suppose we could throw this back and forth from now on. Not that
these sorts of discussions are not interesting, it's that I'm sure with
both clearly see the other's point. Right?
That last comment was a clever response to your I will not be...
parting comments.
Re-read it now and you'll
Oh yeah! Now I get it. :-)
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Some images...
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006
Wait. The K100D is a next generation camera, and it has image stabilization.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Vid Strpic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buy *istDL today, or wait a little to get K100D in my country? Prices
will most probably be about the same but what's
Thanks Godders. Yeah, I have to remember to fix that. Been busy:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 30, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This one is ISO 400, f16
@ 1/30th with a much longer lens. The DA
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
I am just curious how the shake reduction function in the
new Pentax cameras would behave in this type of shots.
Of course, one can switch it off, but what would happen if it is left
on? Would it all be motion-blurred?
I really have to
On Jul 30, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This one is ISO 400, f16
@ 1/30th with a much longer lens. The DA 50-200 at 180 mm.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4746245
Very nice! You caught the motion beautifully.
Just clone out those dust spots that Ralf saw. :-)
I advertised this earlier, but combination and price now changed. Am
keeping one grip and cord. Selling the extra:
Both absolutely as new:
4P sync cord 5 pin. Straight 16' with TTL/sync dbl attachment for the
LX. FTR, cost $45.
Accompanying TTL/slow sync grip (w/tripod adapted base) #37126.
Well, I've only actually seen photos of the latest build of it, courtesy of my
Pentax rep, but at least I've got a little more information for you to chew
on. The photos were taken this week, so this is about as current as it gets.
First off, the magic press-release date is September 13th.
For sale: Minolta Scan Dual III 35mm film scanner.
It handles both slides and negs, and is in fine working and cosmetic
condition. It's a wonderful little scanner, I just don't shoot film very often
these days!
$150.00 US obo. PayPal only, please.
I'm not sure how much shipping will be for
Damn, it looks to me as if Pentax has decided to add as many features
to the mix as possible, without asking if these are necessary to the
likely target audience. More like, what can we implement cheaply to
set us apart, and get the bullet point count up. Oh, well. At least we
can hope the
I like the on-screen DOFP. Often hard to get a good feeling in low light
through the viewfinder.
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss
My earlier Chipmunk Flare upload didn't incite a lot of activity, but I
stubbornly press on. Here's another kind of unusual critter pic.
Shot a Sacramento's Land Park Zoo, a few hot summers back.
I watched him/her dive into the pool and come up spinning off the
water. Finally decided I'd try to
I hope you're wrong about the preset shooting modes. Or if it does have them, I
hope it has a switch for continuous autofocus as well, along with
individualwheels for shutter speed and ap. In other words, I hope it's at least
as professional in its operating modes as the *ist D. The price is
I'm being told, this page is not available on your server. Any
practical help appreciated.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I've only actually seen photos of the latest build of it,
courtesy of my
Pentax rep, but at least I've got a little more information for you
to chew
on. The
Any practical help appreciated.
Jack
In the event of an actual nuclear missle attack, Tuck head between legs,
count to 10, kiss your *ss goodbye.
Take two aspirin, go to bed, and call me in the morning.
A stitch in time saves nine.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Not a clue, it opens for me.
Jack Davis wrote:
I'm being told, this page is not available on your server. Any
practical help appreciated.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I've only actually seen photos of the latest build of it,
courtesy of my
Pentax rep, but at least I've got a
Unfortunately the rear screen DOFP is the same as taking a photograph
you can't save. Not to mention the fact that the resolution on the rear
screen isn't really high enough to make a good determination of DOF
anyway. I personally think that it's a useless feature. I know some
will
Ann wrote:
getting off our posteriors to put things up.
and I'd just like to point it out to Mark...
--
Cheers,
Bob
John -
skimming the lists mail today I didn't find the reply to the
above I thought I had written.
Glad you liked my shot - it was one that immediately jumped
into my
Is there going to be a 645D??? ??? :-)
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
Date: Fri, 04 Aug
You could have cropped a little tighter on the chipmunk but other than
that it's a great little capture. Looks like it should be on the cover
of Chipmunk Times. (Yes, I know I'm asking for it).
Jack Davis wrote:
This is all about a cute accident.
At Bryce Canyon, UT, several years back, my
Sorry, missed that one originally, I started reading about Flashbulbs
with Digital Cameras and somehow got side tracked into corroding
carabiners...
I like the first one. I'm not too sure about this one. It's very
surreal, maybe, not over sharpened, but too sharp for the subject
matter? I
Low price has me a tiny bit concerned, as it does you.
Am wondering if continuous frame count info is a part of the unshared
information?
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope you're wrong about the preset shooting modes. Or if it does
have them, I hope it has a switch for continuous
Not making a major issue of it, but the screen is a good 5 times the size of
the viewfinder, plus one can zoom in on the part of the image they wish to
inspect... I can see it being useful (though I would easily have traded 2
more megapixels for the feature).
Tom C.
I will not be pushed,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I've only actually seen photos of the latest build of it, courtesy of
my
Pentax rep, but at least I've got a little more information for you to chew
on. The photos were taken this week, so this is about as current as it gets.
First off, the magic
From my experience, I've taken shots that I was sure I'd missed the
focus on, and reviewed them on the rear screen of my *ist-Ds, not as big
as the new K series but close, and breathed a sigh of relief thinking
they were salvageable. They weren't. Everything looks sharp at that
resolution,
One could use M with electronic flash as long as one uses a shutter
speed of 1/30 second or less. At slow speeds the shutter is open long
enough that 20ms makes no difference.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
On Aug 4, 2006, at 1:07 PM, mike wilson wrote:
DOF-preview now functions in a very interesting manner (apparently
it does this
on the K100D, but I didn't know that). Straight out of the box,
when you use
the DOF-preview function, it actually takes a photo and displays
it on the
On the DS, if you go to about 4x-5x magnification, you're seeing the
pixels at approximately 1:1 and can evaluate sharpness easily.
I agree that you can't see sharpness well enough at standard review
size without magnification.
G
On Aug 4, 2006, at 1:33 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
From my
Really? I set my first zoom step to 4x on the DS2 and find the image at that
size to be a perfectly good size for judging focus -- and I do it a lot,
shooting wide-open with a 400mm 2.8, which gives the tiniest sliver of in-focus
image.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling
I also will not use this feature -- but since a simple change to a preference
setting will cause the switch to behave as a regular DOF preview, just like on
the old bodies,
I see no reason to complain about it.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj:
Thanks John.
$900, huh? Sounds a little low for the D200 type build-quality, but
heck if it works as well as I hope it does it will be a great price.
I like the RAW/JPEG switch button ... that is a more common switch
for me than white balance.
Can't wait to see one.
Godfrey
On Aug 4,
So your experience is different. I don't have a problem seeing the
effect of the DOF lever in the viewfinder, I don't see a difference in
focus on the rear viewer unless the focus is way off. I know a couple
of people who can't separate the darkening of the image from the
apparent change in
I'm not complaining, just pointing out that it just adds to the feature
list. The length of the manual explaining all the features in the
*ist-Ds sent Ann running back to a Canon ZLR when she rightfully belongs
in the Pentax fold. I wonder how many other people are more
intimidated than
Tom C wrote:
Not making a major issue of it, but the screen is a good 5 times the size of
the viewfinder, plus one can zoom in on the part of the image they wish to
inspect... I can see it being useful (though I would easily have traded 2
more megapixels for the feature).
Tom C.
I
IMO it is better than not having it. For most people (I mean newbies
and all normal people;) it will easier to understand and use.
I have to say that checking DOF at f/16-32 is a pain. So it may be
useful to some of us, who knows?.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
Jack Davis wrote:
My earlier Chipmunk Flare upload didn't incite a lot of activity, but I
stubbornly press on.
I really liked that stop-action shot of the Chipmunk!
Those guys are masters of the ultra quick reaction...
You can almost see the smoke of the braking action and push off! g
Here's
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 4, 2006, at 1:07 PM, mike wilson wrote:
DOF-preview now functions in a very interesting manner (apparently
it does this
on the K100D, but I didn't know that). Straight out of the box,
when you use
the DOF-preview function, it actually takes a photo and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Body + 18-55 lens should be $899.
:(
I was hoping for a higher-spec'd camera (around 1200-1500 body only).
Hope they haven't cheaped out.
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
P. J. Alling wrote:
I'm not complaining, just pointing out that it just adds to the feature
list. The length of the manual explaining all the features in the
*ist-Ds sent Ann running back to a Canon ZLR when she rightfully belongs
in the Pentax fold. I wonder how many other people are
Because Sigma doesnt buy license and do only reverse-engineer other's stuff.
Maybe Tamron/Tokina do buy a license ?
2006/8/4, Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Sorry if this has been already mentioned.
Concerning Sigma EF-500 DG Super and EF-500 DG ST
It says that
I hope you're wrong about the preset shooting modes. Or if it does have them,
I hope it has a switch for continuous autofocus as well, along with
individualwheels for shutter speed and ap. In other words, I hope it's at
least as professional in its operating modes as the *ist D. The price is
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:13:27PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Body + 18-55 lens should be $899.
:(
I was hoping for a higher-spec'd camera (around 1200-1500 body only).
Hope they haven't cheaped out.
Me too. Obviously the less the camera costs the more money
Thanks, P.J.,
I didn't have my 1.4L T/C at the time and would only have been of
moderate help at that.
Would have loved to have been able to pull up this critter, but as I
said in my conveying email, this frame is VERY heavily cropped. If I
had included less of the surrounding area, the Chipmunk
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:13:27PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Body + 18-55 lens should be $899.
:(
I was hoping for a higher-spec'd camera (around 1200-1500 body only).
Hope they haven't cheaped
things we were led to expect -- heh, make sure to direct your unhappiness at
the folks on the internet fuelling the rumormill and not at Pentax, who have
gone out of their way not to tell us anything.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: K10D -
I reda this somewhere about the K100D:
The digital preview is not very usefal as it cannot be enlarged and
the histogram cannot be shown.
It sounds incredible, and hopefully is.
Bertil
4 aug 2006 kl. 23:04 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not making a major issue of it, but the screen is a good 5
Many thanks to all of you for all your nice comments!
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
