On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Thibouille wrote:
The lens data bug is caused by firmware 1.20 I've read on DpReview.
Can't say more 'cos I run 1.10 no problem at all so far.
I've got 4000 exposures made with all versions of the K10D firmware
and all lenses, dating back to the beginning of
Either the models are wrong or there aren't enough millions of years...
graywolf wrote:
Hard to accept that you are not somehow special, isn't it. Personally I
believe random chance over millions of years is the simplest answer.
--
All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs.
On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Thibouille wrote:
The lens data bug is caused by firmware 1.20 I've read on DpReview.
Can't say more 'cos I run 1.10 no problem at all so far.
I've got 4000 exposures made with all versions of the K10D
- Potassium metabisulfite to treat the chlorine/chloramine. Buying water
sucks.
I've found with my wine making that if I let tap water sit idle for a few
days the chlorine gasses out. Don't know about chloramine though.
Yeah, aerating and/or letting it sit and outgas for awhile
Go flip a quarter until it comes up heads 100 times in a row. Then get back
to me on that. ;-)
Tom C.
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Global warming was: The Nine-spotted
Date: Wed, 13
I do not think evolution explains that first one cell life form. It has to be
random chance, or intelligent design, or something we have never imagined.
After that evolution is all that is needed, either it survives to reproduce or
it doesn't. However random chance is the most likely
Golly, you two do make my point well. GRIN
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Bob W wrote:
The most recent book I have about Neandertals is dated 1999, so it's
too early for some of the
That's not a bug...
Cotty wrote:
On 13/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes, it's bug day on the PDML
Nice pic Paul.
Here's another one from 10 days ago at GFM ;-)
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
--
All dogs have four legs; my cat has
Even as simple a search as Wikopedia shows that all this is still very much in
dispute. The final argument seems to be that one side claims there was
interbreeding and the other side says that was impossible because of DNA
evidence, to which the other replies the samples were inadequate to
graywolf wrote:
Ah, so the problem is they are not getting what they think is their fair
share of the US Dollars? Always interesting to get some insight to what lays
under the propaganda and rabble rousing.
Not exactly. The US and Libya have disliked each other since the late
18th
Einstein very much believed in intelligent design. He also did not believe in
Quantum Theory, although he was the guy that came up with it, and it made
atomic energy possible, because it went against his personal beliefs.
Scientists are not demigods, they are humans and no more infallible than
Yep also called the Phony Phord. J. C. Whitney's used to sell the kits.
John Francis wrote:
Ever seen one of these?
http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW0722
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:09:33PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Ken. I bet it's a real hoot to drive, as long
Hoyle was also referring to the following...
quote by Hoyle:
The big problem in biology isn't so much the rather crude fact that a
protein consists of a chain of amino acids linked together in a certain way,
but that the explicit ordering of the amino acids endows the chain with
remarkable
How about I flip a quarter a hundred times and it comes up heads once? That is
all that is needed. You apparently do not understand random chance any better
than Hoyle.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
Hi Bruce,
Just to let you know, the lens arrived in fine fettle yesterday. Many thanks.
Best wishes,
Eric.
On 21/05/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My photographic needs have changed somewhat and this lens, much as I
love it, is not getting much use. I had previously offered this
In a message dated 6/13/2007 9:58:01 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm completely in awe of people who presume that someone will invent a
parachute after they've fallen off the cliff but before they hit the
ground..
William Robb
==
Mark!
Marnie aka Doe
On 14/06/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What say you, guys?
Benefits and disadvantages ?
I have no idea if the Gov't would be more interested in you but I did
it a for a couple of years some years back and it was just a PITA. I
don't believe that there was any real sales benefit
Exactly. When it comes down to origins, none of was around at the
beginning.
Some of us look at the evidence and believe there must have been a designer
or creator. Others look at the evidence and reject that conclusion. Some
start out with the belief that there was no designer and therefore
HAR!
Regards,
Bob Blakely
-
A mother takes twenty years to make a man of her boy,
and another woman makes a fool of him in twenty minutes.
- Robert Frost
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL
No that's not all that is needed. For everything to work at the biological
machine/cellular level numerous things have to all be lined up in advance
and occur virtually simultaneously. We're not talking about something as
simple as heads and tails (you know that).
We're talking about about a
Still it only has to happen once! And the odds of that chain happening are
exactly the same as they are for any other viable chain. The problem with the
intelligent design thing is that it multiplies the other; where in the hell did
that intelligence come from. All you do is push Hoyles odds
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 14/06/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What say you, guys?
Benefits and disadvantages ?
I have no idea if the Gov't would be more interested in you but I did
it a for a couple of years some years back and it was just a PITA. I
don't believe
The only problem with your theory, is that I have thought it through from both
positions. But in the end, if there is a god, he hates me. So F'im grin.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
A new bug. They were all the rage for about a week, weren't they? In
the end, common sense prevailed.
Paul
On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 13/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes, it's bug day on the PDML
Nice pic Paul.
Here's another one from 10 days ago
Yep, the beatle with the Ford nose. I remember seeing a couple over
the years. Quite a transformation, isn't it? Probably a lot more
trunk space to boot:-). Even though the trunk isn't in the boot.
Paul
On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:15 PM, John Francis wrote:
Ever seen one of these?
Ah, J.C. Whitney. They were at the intersection of Archer Avenue and
State Street in Chicago. When I was fifteen years old, I used to
wander their showroom for hours. They had a display engine: a 312
Ford with six deuces. I loved the look, but I was already smart
enough to know that it was
Nah, the shirt is the real deal. The enlargement is just their poor
typing
skills. Why they didn't just post a larger picture, I don't know.
the shirts can be ordered direct from Pentax Imaging:
https://pc-wweb.pentax.com/scripts/wgate/zw20_pc/!?
No such thing as not being old enough to drive. Old enough to be
legal maybe, but driving is feasible at just about any age...
stan (started with tractors at 12/yr, cars at 14/yr)
On Jun 13, 2007, at 8:39 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Ah, J.C. Whitney. They were at the intersection of Archer
OK, the other thread got me to browsing the net. From the following NASA
website it looks like new information is going to be abundant over the next few
decades.
http://origins.jpl.nasa.gov/index1.html
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof
Silly stuff. I don't wear advertising. :-)
I would never expect a utilitarian dude like yourself to wear anything of the
sort, Godfrey. Me, I'm just irrationally drawn to Pentax. When I get this way
over something, I tend to go all-out. It's rare that I do this, for which my
wallet is
On Jun 13, 2007, at 10:09 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
No such thing as not being old enough to drive.
How true. And how we embraced that way back when.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://www.matoe.org/gallery2/v/tomatoe/roadtrip2007/IMGP1539.jpg.html
This is the only one of my entries that really was truly happy with.
Slightly reworked on a better monitor than my laptop has. Just a bit
of levels and curves adjustment from the original that I submitted for
the contest.
http://www.matoe.org/gallery2/v/tomatoe/roadtrip2007/IMGP1460.jpg.html
Another one from Thursday night at GFM.
Cory's comment was that his wife would be scared out of her wits by
him being up on a rock like that. :-)
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Sounds to me like it might be meant to deter streakers.
jm
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax marketing
Stan Halpin wrote:
Speaking of marketing (I know, I know -
201 - 234 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
