http://www.web-options.com/_B296674.jpg
Thanks to everyone for replying to this - I've been very surprised by
the size of the response. I think generally others have the same view
of it that I have.
It's in a very funny spot, light-wise. It seems to be really difficult
to find a time when
thanks to those who commented.
Alastair
On Dec 8, 2007 4:07 PM, Alastair Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/90022150
Taken last weekend while fooling around looking for bird shots. This
is borage and a bumblebee both introduced from Europe. Borage is
Thanks. Yes, all with the E-1.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 09 December 2007 03:29
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Wet Ones
That's a very appealing set of photos, Bob.
All with
On 09/12/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a version with no people:
http://www.web-options.com/_B296673.jpg
I like that a lot more.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
On 09/12/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
The ME is much smaller than
the MX,
Poppycock.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 09/12/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks. Yes, all with the E-1.
You're giving him ideas...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks. Yes, all with the E-1.
You're giving him ideas...
it's a nice camera. I had no worries at all about walking around with
it in the pouring rain all day. They're practically giving them away
now as well.
--
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Forgot to answer the q about the lens in my previous reply. The lens
used was the Olympus 14-54, at 28mm. That's the equivalent of 56mm in
35mm terms. The converging verticals are probably the result of me
framing it so that the line of the pavement was in the right place -
it would leave the
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 09:33:39 +, Cotty wrote
On 09/12/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
The ME is much smaller than
the MX,
Poppycock.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Having owned both, the ME is slighly smaller 131 x 82.5 x 49.5 compared to
the MX 135.8 x 82.5 x 49.3. Most
P-FA 18-35mm f4-5.6 AL IF is film accessory lense series and supposed to
cover full-frame or film light circle. I wonder if anyone has this lense
and can tell me whether it really work with film body and whether it
covers fill frame image area. By spec it has FOV 100˚-63˚ but I don't
know
I'm trying, but just can't make it work for me without one. I'm only slightly
near sighted but making instintual focus adjustments just seems impossible, the
;microprism just doesn't do it for me, especially in low light. The thing is,
i can't find the damn things anywhere, nobody has them.
Hi Ben
Quoting Polyhead [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying, but just can't make it work for me without one. I'm
only slightly near sighted but making instintual focus adjustments
just seems impossible, the ;microprism just doesn't do it for me,
especially in low light. The thing is, i can't
Do you know what strength diopter you need? I have a few around.
Joe
On Dec 9, 2007, at 7:13 AM, Polyhead wrote:
I'm trying, but just can't make it work for me without one. I'm
only slightly near sighted but making instintual focus adjustments
just seems impossible, the ;microprism
Not a clue, I do know on the cameras with one built in its just a few clicks
from normal Its just enough that at night what should be a point of light is
more of a sphere of light. I do know i'm near sighted, i'm not sure how that
translates out to which diopter I need. I'm guessing by the
Roman, this lens is an FA lens and as such is of course compatible
iwht 35mm bodies.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=25952452
or
http://tinyurl.com/39x99n
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
GST and PST taxes are added to the price shown. Alberta is the only
province that only has GST and no PST. Oil money there.:-)
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 12:15 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VAT/GST.
It's the same thing.
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 1:36 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh and it is an FA-J so no aperture ring there.
On Dec 9, 2007 2:23 PM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roman, this lens is an FA lens and as such is of course compatible
iwht 35mm bodies.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and
Well, it is actually, Whitchurch-Stouffville, but i still made it up.:-)
Dave
On Dec 8, 2007 3:05 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Stouffville a real place, or just a figbox of everyone's
imagination?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Like this one Paul.
Great expression on the girl.
Dave
On Dec 8, 2007 6:40 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another coffee shop pic. K10D with the FA 50/1.4. Cropped to about
60% of frame, ISO 1000, f2.5 @ 1/100th.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6719465size=lg
--
PDML
:-) for the cameras.
Dave
On Dec 8, 2007 2:41 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At a local retail temple:
http://www.web-options.com/_C086725.jpg
--
Regards,
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Nice shot, to bad the bowlers we're not more in synch.
Dave
On Dec 8, 2007 10:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice, but I think it needs to be part of a story.
:-)
Godfrey
On Dec 8, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Cotty wrote:
Like this one a lot.
Good exposure on the lights and nice sky.
Dave
On Dec 8, 2007 6:55 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
K10D, FA 50/1.4, f3.2 @ 1/125th, ISO 640.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6719554
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The skating shot is intriging. I like the lights on the tree, the side
ways motion to them. The people look almost robotic.
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 4:51 AM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. Yes, all with the E-1.
You're giving him ideas...
it's a nice camera. I had no worries
They better keep supporting the K10D, or i;'ll be pretty ticked.
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 8:26 AM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=25952452
or
http://tinyurl.com/39x99n
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
I'm sure it will be no surprise, but I prefer the people-less version.
I've never needed a living being, of any sort, included in a photo to
give it life. Especially when there is not even an implied
connection.
This is a (nicely leveled) strong image that allows a pleasing
uninterrupted visual
Love those unicycle santas. With model release you'd have yourself a
good commercial image.
Paul
On Dec 9, 2007, at 8:39 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Well, it is actually, Whitchurch-Stouffville, but i still made it
up.:-)
Dave
On Dec 8, 2007 3:05 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is
Thanks Dave. I shot several frames. It was her expression that led me
to choose this one.
Paul
On Dec 9, 2007, at 8:36 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Like this one Paul.
Great expression on the girl.
Dave
On Dec 8, 2007 6:40 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another coffee shop
Thanks again. I've shot this theater before. But as I was leaving the
coffee shop yesterday evening, I noticed it's relationship to the
decorated tree. The sky still had some light in it, which was a plus.
Paul
On Dec 9, 2007, at 8:34 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Like this one a lot.
Good
What is the correct way to do when one takes pictures of people like the one
below? Do you approach them after taking it, show it to them and ask them for
permission to keep/publish it? How do photographers do in such situation? I've
taken photos of people in Mexico, sometimes without them
They will.
Oh and Raw files or 1.5x a K10D raw files although no information on
the format of the said file (PEF or DNG? compression?)
On Dec 9, 2007 2:49 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They better keep supporting the K10D, or i;'ll be pretty ticked.
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 8:26
You can publish any picture taken in a public place in an editorial
context or gallery. You can't use it to promote a product or service
without a model release. Sometimes I approach the subjects, tell them
I've taken a photo and ask if they'd like me to send them a copy.
This time I chose
It works on my MZ-6 (ZX-L) as a proper lens except that it has no
aperture ring and so it has to be controlled from the body.
On Dec 9, 2007 2:14 PM, Roman Melihhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P-FA 18-35mm f4-5.6 AL IF is film accessory lense series and supposed to
cover full-frame or film light
On Dec 9, 2007 10:53 PM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh and Raw files or 1.5x a K10D raw files although no information on
the format of the said file (PEF or DNG? compression?)
About right if it is 14 Mp versus 10 and same format.
I'd prefer to hear they were larger and used the extra
The 18-35 would cover the 24x36mm frame, but with poor corner
performance until stopped well down, especially when wider than about
24mm. As others have noted, it must be used on a body that can control
the lens, either via an automatic exposure mode or via control wheels
on the body.
On Dec 9,
that's a really good photo - you're getting somd stuff in there.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
Sent: 09 December 2007 14:23
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Coffee Shop Gamers
Thanks
On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Bob W wrote:
Thanks. Yes, all with the E-1.
You're giving him ideas...
it's a nice camera. I had no worries at all about walking around with
it in the pouring rain all day. They're practically giving them away
now as well.
Someone was talking about current
I like both of these photos, Bob. Sans people, it presents more of a
formal study. Quite different photos, really, and both good. Lots to
look at and enjoy.
Which do I like more? I don't think I can say without more context to
pose the question.
Godfrey
On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:14 AM, Bob W
I like the tighter composition, but I would rather have people in it
as well. And the two walkeers in the other version wouldn't fit in
this frame. I think what would be idea would be to have this version,
but have one person in each phone booth, talking on their respective
phones, each
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=25954582
K20D is also rumoured to output (as an option or standard I dunno) to
14bit RAW but of course those sizes might be 12bit output.
About right if it is 14 Mp versus 10 and same format.
I'd prefer to hear they were larger and
On Dec 9, 2007, at 3:14, Bob W wrote:
http://www.web-options.com/_B296674.jpg
The 2 men make the picture more successful than previous attempts.
With noone in the frame it is too flat and static for me. Other
versions have people walking parallel with the picture plane, and lack
life or
People would think I was an American tourist...
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stan Halpin
Sent: 09 December 2007 16:52
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Opinions please
I like the tighter composition, but I
I'll take this message as some twisted way of saying:
Congratulations on the advertorial in Popular Photography!
Thank you.
Godfrey
On Dec 8, 2007, at 9:00 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I just finished perusing the latest Popular Photography. It seems
that
Sony is putting on a full court
Thanks Bob. It's a good location with large windows and plenty of
light. And it's usually crowded, so I can be somewhat inconspicuous.
Paul
On Dec 9, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Bob W wrote:
that's a really good photo - you're getting somd stuff in there.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From:
Marnie wrote:
Hmmm, I have an nVida card. :-(
How do you run the Spyder startup routine manually, Jostein?
On your Start menu in Windows,
move the mouse to all programs, and then to startup. There you
will find an icon for the Spyder (possibly called OptiCal, depending
on your Spyder version).
The same diopter that works on the M series, (and all later), cameras
will work on the P30 IIRC. Which I guess means that you can use OM
diopter adapters as well, (since the viewfinder accessories were more or
less usable on the M cameras), there may be others.
Polyhead wrote:
I'm trying,
I'm still pretty happy with my *ist-Ds purchased in the spring of 2005.
Anyone here still using a(n) *ist-D?
--Mark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
In camera terms is certainly is. Look at a pair side by side sometime.
Lets see. The width of an MX (side to side) is 94% of the width of an
LX a camera that most everyone would admit is much bigger. (In fact the
LX is damn close to the same size as that old K dinosaur the K2). The
width
Mat Maessen wrote:
Turn off the nVidia utility at startup. Start-Run, type msconfig,
find it in the list and uncheck it.
Reboot to verify whether or not it fixed the problem.
Thanks Mat,
Never used that on Vista before, but it looks like it actually works.
Had to disable every entry with
Yes lots of us seem to be, thought I use my Ds more.
Mark Erickson wrote:
I'm still pretty happy with my *ist-Ds purchased in the spring of 2005.
Anyone here still using a(n) *ist-D?
--Mark
--
The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the
difference
William Robb wrote:
As best as I can tell, My card uses a Parhelia chipset. I've spent about a
half hour on this, and this is as close as I've gotten to an answer.
Have you gone into the color management ara of your display properties and
told the darned thing which color profile to use as the
YES vote.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
K10D, FA 50/1.4, f3.2 @ 1/125th, ISO 640.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6719554
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
I took this as it was getting dark, the sky was interesting. A more or
less straight print didn't do it justice so I manipulated the hell out
of it. More artwork than photograph at this point but hell it started
out as one.
On 12/9/07, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From your first post I assume you have recently made a switch from CRT
to LCD screen. I think you're right that the old OptiCal wasn't ideal
for calibrating LCD screens.
If you installed the OptiCal off of the the bundled CD that came w/
the
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:09:02AM -0800, Mark Erickson wrote:
I'm still pretty happy with my *ist-Ds purchased in the spring of 2005.
Anyone here still using a(n) *ist-D?
--Mark
Using? Sure. Using as my only DSLR? No. But if I'm going out of
the house and just carrying a single camera
Good DOF and a worthy effort. Lighted adjacent building adds greatly.
Teeny nit, breakwater starts awfully near center.
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took this as it was getting dark, the sky was interesting. A more
or
less straight print didn't do it justice so I
In a message dated 12/9/2007 10:14:46 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still pretty happy with my *ist-Ds purchased in the spring of 2005.
Anyone here still using a(n) *ist-D?
--Mark
Think I have you beat with the Canon 300D (Digital Rebel).
Heh.
In a message dated 12/9/2007 9:58:29 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One clue as to whether your machine is affected is to just right-click
the mouse on a vacant space of the desktop. if the item nVidia
Control Panel is not on the list, you're safe. In any case, you
I'm sure i could find out who there are.:-)
Would that be something the manufacturer or retailer might want.
The unicycle is starting to be a big thing for the kids here. One 16
or so yearold has done shows and what not for them.
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 9:26 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I bring my istD as a back up, and for IR, so yes, still using.
Also still using my D1, from 2001
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 1:09 PM, Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still pretty happy with my *ist-Ds purchased in the spring of 2005.
Anyone here still using a(n) *ist-D?
--Mark
--
On 09/12/07, John Whittingham, discombobulated, unleashed:
Having owned both, the ME is slighly smaller 131 x 82.5 x 49.5 compared to
the MX 135.8 x 82.5 x 49.3. Most noticeable when you're trying to fit an ME
ERC to the MX body, but we're only talking a few mm.
Exactly. The Allingator said:
On 09/12/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Lets see. The width of an MX (side to side) is 94% of the width of an
LX a camera that most everyone would admit is much bigger. (In fact the
LX is damn close to the same size as that old K dinosaur the K2). The
width of an ME is 96%
On 09/12/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
You can publish any picture taken in a public place
In the UK, this would not include the interior of a coffee shop. It
would, however, cover the pavement (sidewalk) outside the coffee shop,
shooting through the window.
--
Cheers,
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/WinterScenic/photo#5140879210128490882
Taken 180 degrees from the red barn shot.
Dull day, some freezing rain at the time.
I think the snow should be a bit brighter.?
K10D 16-45 LR Adjustments
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
My backup is an *ist D. Dave is using a Nikon that predates the D by
quite a bit.
Paul
On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Mark Erickson wrote:
I'm still pretty happy with my *ist-Ds purchased in the spring of
2005.
Anyone here still using a(n) *ist-D?
--Mark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
A nice scene that probably would benefit from a bit of lightening. The
mood of the shot, however, works as is.
I'd sure have been tempted to move to my left (away from the higher
grass) and place a group of cattails against the immediate snow field
and include what I could of the fences/gates.
I was thinking a humorous Christmas card. It might also be appealing
to stock agencies. It's a fun and unusual pic.
Paul
On Dec 9, 2007, at 2:05 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
I'm sure i could find out who there are.:-)
Would that be something the manufacturer or retailer might want.
The
Thanks, but it's a longshot for the gallery. I haven't seen anything
make it recently that wasn't a landscape. I've probably only
submitted a half dozen in the last two months. Most of what I'm
shooting now is either commercial or family snaps.
Paul
On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Jack Davis
A nice scene. I'd brighten it overall a bit and maybe up the contrast
some as well, using an RGB curve so as not to move the black point.
Paul
On Dec 9, 2007, at 2:31 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/WinterScenic/
photo#5140879210128490882
Taken 180 degrees
Well, the om's had an adjustable one built in i think.
The same diopter that works on the M series, (and all later), cameras
will work on the P30 IIRC. Which I guess means that you can use OM
diopter adapters as well, (since the viewfinder accessories were more or
less usable on the M
Thank you Wiliam, Boris and guys who'd spoken from their real-life
experience using this piece of glass. I wish all a wonderful
evening/afternoon and fantastic photographic week to come.
Yours,
Roman.
--
fashion, models and gadgets once and again... 4models.info
http://www.4models.info
--
Grace 'scapes' might be the exception. ;))
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but it's a longshot for the gallery. I haven't seen anything
make it recently that wasn't a landscape. I've probably only
submitted a half dozen in the last two months. Most of what I'm
The original D1 was introduced in 1999 and is the first modern DSLR.
So, yeah, Dave wins.
-Adam
On 12/9/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My backup is an *ist D. Dave is using a Nikon that predates the D by
quite a bit.
Paul
On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Mark Erickson wrote:
I'm
- Original Message -
From: Polyhead
Subject: Re: Diopters needed for P30T
Not a clue, I do know on the cameras with one built in its just a few
clicks from normal Its just enough that at night what should be a point
of light is more of a sphere of light. I do know i'm near
The extra size and magnification of the MX (.97x at 95% instead of
.95x at 92%) is enough to make the MX's too large to use comfortably.
I find the ME smallish as well, but since I'm not trying to use the
shutter dial it's a lot less annoying.
But other than the LX, I never clicked with any of my
Thats the title that some moron on dpReview put to this gem:
if they are gonna put a * on the damn thing and make it Dslr compatable
only they would atleast make the 60-250 a f2.8!
f4?! pff, you can buy an ebay junker thats F4 that will deliver the same
quality pictures.
I love how the
That's not all that bad. The Sony A700 is known to produce 12MB X-Fine
JPEG's (comparable to their compressed cRAW format).
-Adam
On 12/9/07, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=25952452
or
http://tinyurl.com/39x99n
--
Thibault
I used to sell both the OM1, OM2, and OM10 the original OM series bodies
didn't. If later models had built in diopter correction I wouldn't
know. However the OM viewfinder accessories fit Pentax M and later cameras.
Polyhead wrote:
Well, the om's had an adjustable one built in i think.
I'll take the lens on the left.:-)
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 4:40 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original D1 was introduced in 1999 and is the first modern DSLR.
So, yeah, Dave wins.
-Adam
On 12/9/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My backup is an *ist D. Dave is using a
Canon spy.
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 4:29 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats the title that some moron on dpReview put to this gem:
if they are gonna put a * on the damn thing and make it Dslr compatable
only they would atleast make the 60-250 a f2.8!
f4?! pff, you can buy an ebay
I remember when I was on a Dodge television shoot in 1999, a big dollar print
photographer was on hand to shoot some stills. He used a D! much like polaroids
were once used. He shot the pic on the D!, then sent it to the clients for
approval. After they gave it an okay, he shot it on film with
Good, that's the one we dropped.
David J Brooks wrote:
I'll take the lens on the left.:-)
Dave
On Dec 9, 2007 4:40 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original D1 was introduced in 1999 and is the first modern DSLR.
So, yeah, Dave wins.
-Adam
On 12/9/07, Paul Stenquist
Dave -
Just using the snow to set the white point in levels helps.
http://home.earthlink.net/~allaround6/quickpage/winter_field.jpg
I'll remove this in 24 hours...sooner if you'd like.
-p
David J Brooks wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/WinterScenic/photo#5140879210128490882
Francis wrote:
Good morning all!
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?image_id=470gallery_id=1s=pentaxdiscuss
Hungry after a long cold night, this energetic little fellow showed up
at my feeder with about twenty of his kin on the morning after our first
big snowfall
It's very
William Robb wrote:
Here is a sad survery.
How many Pentax film cameras do you have that you are rarely, if ever,
using?
List by model and number if you like.
Reply in confidence to
warobb at accesscomm.ca
I'll tally them up and post numbers, but not names when I have something.
Cotty wrote:
On 05/12/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thought it was time to reminisce again.
A: What cameras have you owned that you wish you had never gotten rid of?
B: And, just for fun, what cameras have you lusted for but never had?
A:
The only camera I have
frank theriault wrote:
Happy Birthday, buddy!
cheers,
frank
Frank, and all those on the list who responded,
Thanks!
It was rather a nondescript day. I had surgery on my right eye. All is
well. I spent the day with my parents.
Personally, things are in a bit of turmoil - thus my
David J Brooks wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/WinterScenic/photo#5140879210128490882
Taken 180 degrees from the red barn shot.
Dull day, some freezing rain at the time.
I think the snow should be a bit brighter.?
I do? :)
yeah - a tad more contrast overall - but ask Jack - he's
Hear it is, kids, the results you don't want to see from a survey you didn't
want to have..
I will keep score for a while longer, but the replies are slowing enough
that I thought I'd post what I have...
Fourty seven people decided to partake in this thing, and they have 302
Pentax 35mm
Mark Erickson wrote:
I'm still pretty happy with my *ist-Ds purchased in the spring of 2005.
Anyone here still using a(n) *ist-D?
I've kept mine as a backup, or for when I need two lenses mounted at the
same time.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Interesting. It suggests that we aren't likely to part with our Spotmatics, but
MZ-S and other recent models? Put 'em on ebay.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hear it is, kids, the results you don't want to see from a survey you
Thanks for all the replies.
I'm still trying to find a Photoshop softening technique for portraits that
I find acceptable, which is why I keep bouncing this stuff off the list.
The rendering of the nose seemed to be a cause for consternation with a few
people. Note, this is not a DOF issue, or a
Very nice capture Paul. Well DOne.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Holiday Films
K10D, FA 50/1.4, f3.2 @ 1/125th, ISO 640.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6719554
--
PDML
Or the MZ-S and other recent models are still finding use.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. It suggests that we aren't likely to part with our Spotmatics,
but MZ-S and other recent models? Put 'em on ebay.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb
The MZ-S is the only Pentax 35mm film body I've not owned that I'd be
actually tempted to get. Too bad the prices are still ridiculous (Good
body, but it's priced similar to far more capable bodies of similar
vintage. An EOS 1v or F5 it is not).
-Adam
On 12/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
At 7:19 PM -0500 12/9/07, Doug Franklin wrote:
Mark Erickson wrote:
I'm still pretty happy with my *ist-Ds purchased in the spring of 2005.
Anyone here still using a(n) *ist-D?
I've kept mine as a backup, or for when I need two lenses mounted at the
same time.
My ist D sees regular use,
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I'll take this message as some twisted way of saying:
Congratulations on the advertorial in Popular Photography!
Thank you.
Godfrey
Gee, twisted? I would have said amusing! ;-)
keith whaley
On Dec 8, 2007, at 9:00 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I just finished
So, the upshot of this little tempest in a pisspot seems to be that once
again, a photographer has caved in to the threat of legal action, even
knowing that he has done nothing wrong.
So far, I have not been able to find any citations, in either Canadian
criminal or civil law that seems to put
I like the layered look.
I think the snow should be a bit brighter.?
Me too. I opened this up in CS2 - the histogram showed quite a bit of room
on the RH side for whiter whites.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to all that offered options on this.
played with all the sugestions and ending up liking JAlblum the best.
now to get organised and get some shots worth putting up.
thanks to all
Bran
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
