On 14/11/08, PN Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't know for certain what caused the front halo. But I have an
idea, and I'll tell you what I think after those who want to respond
have had a chance.
It precedes the air intake and also follows the rear roof...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
On 14/11/08, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
Looks to me like you were panning during the shot, and your panning
wasn't quite perfectly in sync ... 99 + 44/100% perfect, but not
absolutely PERFECT perfect.
Then why is it perfectly sharp with the livery? The writing on the side
is
Boredom pays off: a photo with no reason and it found itself in PPG...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/3030792833/
I was not thinking of Autumn, we don't have that season here in the Philippines.
Bong
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 14/11/08, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.letusdirect.com/letus-ultimate.html
Might not have been exactly that one, but yes, something very similar.
There are other makes with varying quality and prices. The Letus is
probably the best know, and amongst the most
On 14/11/08, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
It airs on BBC America, but I don't think they're the current series;
several of the most recently-shown programs appear to be from 2007.
Here's an excerpt from YouTube - the final bit where they speed test on
the salt flats:
Don't let that 620 core get away, you'll never get it back.
Respool the exposed film back to a 120 core if you have to send it out for
processing. DO NOT try to backwind it straight off the 620 core to a 120
core because the film and paper might buckle as you approach the attachment
tape. Take
Cotty wrote:
On 14/11/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
However, I'm leery of the FaceBook terms of use and the rights it
grants for User Content. See
http://www.facebook.com/terms.php?ref=pf
particularly this portion of the above:
...By posting User Content to any part
Some you can, some you can't. All were designed for 620 film but some
of the earlier ones will accept the slightly larger 120 rolls and while
the key that advances the film is a bit slopy in the 120 slot, it will
advance. Newer cameras were less tolerant. You can always adapt them
or
Getting shuttles up, seems a bit less Worrisome then getting them down
these days...
Walter Hamler wrote:
Less than an hour ago Endeavor went up successfully.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/gallery/4592986_mrB5J#417112348_xNWeL-L-LB
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
2008/11/15 Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Boredom pays off: a photo with no reason and it found itself in PPG...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/3030792833/
I was not thinking of Autumn, we don't have that season here in the
Philippines.
Very nice.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML
I liked the original, but this is great.
Drew.
PN Stenquist wrote:
Here's a version with the halo cloned out.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8227424size=lg
On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
PN Stenquist wrote:
Two PESOs from a global warming rally this afternoon in Hyde Park
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08/08_11/08_11_bear/01.htm
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08/08_11/08_11_globe/01.htm
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
What about depency of eyesight quality?
People with reduced eyesight will always enjoy deeper depth of field? :-)
Maybe we just have to accept that there is only one subject to lens
distance sharp and we are lucky we can choose that point ourselfs (or
leave it to the camera)
Greetz, Jos
hi,
came across this thread at dpreview which talks of a way of doing more
natural looking HDRs in-camera using multi-expose mode and manual EV
compensation:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=29327970
some images taken by the OP using the technique:
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14/11/08, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
Looks to me like you were panning during the shot, and your panning
wasn't quite perfectly in sync ... 99 + 44/100% perfect, but not
absolutely PERFECT perfect.
Then why is it perfectly sharp with the
Bong,
I enjoyed your picture. The multiple leaves give a sense of
movement(?), if that is possible. And the background pattern is
interesting, geometric, and off center which makes an excellent
composition. You may not have the Autumn season, but you have
captured the spirit.
Regards, Bob S.
2008/11/15 P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hum, this explains why they build them in Taiwan...
Spoilsport.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
A more 'reserved' presentation: :(
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=346
K20D, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1/500, ISO 200
Comments welcome.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
No flash here.
Paul
On Nov 15, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 17:27 , PN Stenquist wrote:
I don't know for certain what caused the front halo. But I have an
idea, and I'll tell you what I think after those who want to
respond have had a chance.
Paul
I
Nice light and patterns
Dave
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boredom pays off: a photo with no reason and it found itself in PPG...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/3030792833/
I was not thinking of Autumn, we don't have that season here in the
4 8 9 14 and 15 are the ones i like
Dave
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Here's a gallery of concert pictures of Ana Popovic band, shot by me a few
months ago:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/anae.htm
Is there any picture you like? Which ones
I like this one.
What type of shutter speeds and F stops do you find you need for these Franl
Dave
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:35 PM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't my best subway shot ever, probably not even my best subway
shot this week, but it's why I love shooting
Here's the original:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8231624size=lg
I didn't attempt to shoot any pans at the race track. Couldn't. The
guard rail was too high to shoot with a lens long enough to make a
smooth pan work. More importantly, the car made only four or five
passes, and
Well seen
Dave
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something about what this sign said, and how it said it:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=2094276id=744116392
If any of you can't peek at Facebook from work let me know.. I could put it
somewhere
Star date 1744.9
I think i left the stove on.
Good shot Walt
Dave
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Less than an hour ago Endeavor went up successfully.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/gallery/4592986_mrB5J#417112348_xNWeL-L-LB
Walt
--
PDML
Thats a good shot Paul.
Dave
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:53 PM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot this car for Dodge PR and Mopar Action magazine about a month ago.
The embargo has been lifted now, so I can show a pic. Another frame from the
shoot is going on the cover, so I'll hold
Nice shot. Good job on the exposure.
Paul
On Nov 15, 2008, at 9:11 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Star date 1744.9
I think i left the stove on.
Good shot Walt
Dave
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Walter Hamler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Less than an hour ago Endeavor went up successfully.
Very nice.
Dave
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A more 'reserved' presentation: :(
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=346
K20D, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1/500, ISO 200
Comments welcome.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Next you'll be telling me, wrestling is fake.:-)
The posted shot is quite a bit different i';d say.
Good job.
Dave
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:56 AM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the original:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8231624size=lg
I didn't attempt to
Bob W wrote:
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
endy is, I presume, Wendy Beard - long time Pentaxlistian...
(aside to other list members - What you thought she only
took pictures
of dogs? :))
ann
whose life eclipsed the synchronicity - maybe next year
For some
Lovely.
Dave
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:52 PM, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's my pic.
I actually re-submitted the photo about a minute after I'd sent the
first with a lengthy (for me) explanation about the timing of the
shot. I actually thought I'd put in more info the first
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Jos from Holland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Scott, for the work done!
All are nice, but the four that work best for me are:
-- The little bird by David Brooks
Thanks.
Dave
Greetz Jos
Scott Loveless wrote:
PUG's up. http://pug.komkon.org/
On 15/11/08, PN Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
No flash here.
Flash git ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 15/11/08, PN Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's the original:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8231624size=lg
I didn't attempt to shoot any pans at the race track. Couldn't. The
guard rail was too high to shoot with a lens long enough to make a
smooth pan work. More
Appreciated, David.
Jack
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Tired Mailbox (color)
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 6:15 AM
Very nice.
Dave
On Sat, Nov
Now, Paul, don't you feel more free?
Pretty involved Photoshopping.
Jack
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Paul comes clean: the Challenger pic
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, November 15,
Christine Aguila wrote:
I got off about 20 frames, but, you know, folks blinked, and I missed
focus, and the cat attacked me, since I was using the long DA* lens,
the little guy charged me during my best shot of his mom, dad made me
delete the shots of the water spurting from the kitchen
On Nov 15, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Now, Paul, don't you feel more free?
No. I feel the same:-)
Pretty involved Photoshopping.
All in a day's work, and lots of fun.
Paul
Jack
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PN Stenquist escribió:
I don't know for certain what caused the front halo. But I have an idea,
and I'll tell you what I think after those who want to respond have had
a chance.
Paul
On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:22 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Was the SR on? The manuals in Pentax cameras advise against
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:14 AM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 15, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Now, Paul, don't you feel more free?
No. I feel the same:-)
Pretty involved Photoshopping.
All in a day's work, and lots of fun.
Paul
My panning days are over.:-)
No problem, we shot similar things.:-)
I'm always looking for mailboxes to shoot. Its a Fair catagory.
Dave
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Appreciated, David.
Jack
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks
..and, I'm sure, very satisfying.
Jack
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Paul comes clean: the Challenger pic
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 7:14 AM
On Nov 15, 2008,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:41 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem, we shot similar things.:-)
I mean shoot.:-(
Dave
I'm always looking for mailboxes to shoot. Its a Fair catagory.
Dave
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Appreciated,
Enjiy your day.
I hope your 40th goes better than mine did.
Dave
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Gianfranco Irlanda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'll try to put apart my lurking status for a while...
It looks like I'm growing older every year (most of us do...)
Among the good
Bong Manayon wrote:
Boredom pays off: a photo with no reason and it found itself in PPG...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/3030792833/
I was not thinking of Autumn, we don't have that season here in the Philippines.
That's a /very/ nice photograph, Bong. It almost looks like a
Well, I'll be . . . pretty clever, Paul. Well done! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 7:56 AM
Subject: Paul comes clean: the Challenger pic
Here's the original:
PN Stenquist wrote:
Many of the pans you see in magazines that aren't part of race coverage
are shot this way. Fun with PhotoShop.
You're *far* more adept at Photoshop than I am. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 17:29 , Doug Franklin wrote:
At 50 I'm going to start counting down.
Doesn't do any good.
15 years later you'll still be 65 and start feeling it enough that you
won't fool yourself any longer.
:-)
You need to remember that I'm completely
Gianfranco,
Congratulation on the new exhibition. I'll be 39 in January and on the
verge of starting a new career. And your photos are spectacular as always.
Evan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Thanks for posting Subash. Just might try this this weekend. Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message -
From: Subash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 5:55 AM
Subject: In-camera 'HDR' images from the K10/k20D
hi,
came
Looks good, Derby. Love the second shot. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 5:29 AM
Subject: OT PESOs: Global Warming
Two PESOs from a global warming rally this
That's lovely, Bong! Autumn Drop Zone :-) Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 2:10 AM
Subject: PESO: a PPG surprise...
Boredom pays off: a photo with no reason and
I'm trying to build a site that might lead to some sales of VR home
tour panos. David Savage has already helped me immensely. Now I have a
few rooms online, and a general plan. However, when my panos load they
begin as pixelate BW then sharpen up and become color. Am I the victim
of a slow
I am just curious - were they rallying For or Against global warming?
stan
On Nov 15, 2008, at 5:29 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Two PESOs from a global warming rally this afternoon in Hyde Park
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08/08_11/08_11_bear/01.htm
PN Stenquist wrote:
However, when my panos load they begin
as pixelate BW then sharpen up and become color. Am I the victim of a
slow server, or is it possible that I'm doing something wrong here? (I'm
sure I'm doing more than one thing wrong, but help with this would be
great:-).
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:24 AM, PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to build a site that might lead to some sales of VR home tour
panos. ...
Have you looked at the panos tools at http://www.gigapan.org
Might be things there you could use
--
Sandy Harris,
Quanzhou, Fujian,
It precedes the air intake and also follows the rear roof...
I know - it was approaching the speed of sound and what is shown is
compressed moisture in the air - talk about fast!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Getting shuttles up, seems a bit less Worrisome then getting them down
these days...
No way, they always come down.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Last Night Shuttle Launch
Getting
Very nice.
I might crop it a little tighter on the LH side if it were mine.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: a PPG surprise...
Boredom pays off: a photo with no reason and it found itself in PPG...
Pau: FYI: I clicked the link, and I, too, got the pixilated BW. The pano
sharpened to color after a complete round-about the pano. When I clicked on
the stairway to go upstairs, I got pixilated BW, then sharpened color
version after a complete 360. Same with the kitchen. My 1st thought
Works better for me than the B+W image.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Tired Mailbox (color)
A more 'reserved' presentation: :(
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=346
Thanks Christine.
I've also noticed that some of the type is displayed differently by
the various browsers. On Safari, the subhead virtual home tours is
centered under picture this. On Firefox, it's off to the left.
ARRRGGH!!
This web stuff might make me crazy. Oh. Wait. I'm already
Me too, Ken. I think the rust color adds..for me.
Jack
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tired Mailbox (color)
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 8:48 AM
Works better for me
A common Blue Angels phenomenon. 8-O
Jack
--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dodge Challenger Race Package
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 8:39 AM
It precedes the air
Hi all,
I have a number of boxes of various old paper (for photocopying). They are
really old - some 15 years, but also very, very old, like 40-50 years old
that I got after my amateur photographer uncle died.
I guess they are useless for any photocopying.
However I hestitate to throw them
The QTVR loading from BW to colour is normal.
Your samples loaded quick enough on my dodgey internet connection
Cheers,
Dave
2008/11/16 PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying to build a site that might lead to some sales of VR home tour
panos. David Savage has already helped me
That said, I'd recommend sacrificing some resolution for smaller file sizes.
At the size your posting you should be able to get file size below 1MB.
This one of mine is only 760kb:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/0052_002.mov
Cheers,
Dave
2008/11/16 David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The
Good. Thanks.
It's nice to be normal!
Paul
On Nov 15, 2008, at 12:13 PM, David Savage wrote:
The QTVR loading from BW to colour is normal.
Your samples loaded quick enough on my dodgey internet connection
Cheers,
Dave
2008/11/16 PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying to build a site
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Hi folks,
Here's a gallery of concert pictures of Ana Popovic band, shot by me a
few months ago:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/anae.htm
Is there any picture you like? Which ones would you pick? Thanks.
Dario
A nice collection Dario. I prefer #12
MaritimTim
--
PDML
Thanks good info. Your file looks great. Most real estate sites run
them far smaller than what I'm showing, so I should be able to shrink
them substantially.
Paul
On Nov 15, 2008, at 12:18 PM, David Savage wrote:
That said, I'd recommend sacrificing some resolution for smaller
file sizes.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:16:29AM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
PN Stenquist wrote:
Many of the pans you see in magazines that aren't part of race coverage
are shot this way. Fun with PhotoShop.
You're *far* more adept at Photoshop than I am. :-)
I'm sure you've had enough practice at the
On my home connection (Comcast cable modem, around 10meg) I get
the initial BW low-res image, but by the time we get past the
clock I've got the full-res colour data.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 02:13:44AM +0900, David Savage wrote:
The QTVR loading from BW to colour is normal.
Your samples
John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:16:29AM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
PN Stenquist wrote:
Many of the pans you see in magazines that aren't part of race coverage
are shot this way. Fun with PhotoShop.
You're *far* more adept at Photoshop than I am. :-)
I'm sure you've had
I shoot 99.9% of my pans in camera, and it is easier under most
circumstances. And at the race track, it's really the only way. But as
you said, the photographer and subject have to be in the right place
at the right time. Another variable is the constant acceleration of a
drag car.
Happy birthday.
I am just 2 years behind you, having turned 37 in mid-september ;-).
Boris
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'll try to put apart my lurking status for a while...
It looks like I'm growing older every year (most of us do...)
Among the good news, yesterday was the
Hi!
So here is the list of some lenses that I thought about recently and the
considerations that may prevent me from buying them.
1. SMCP DA* 16-50/2.8 - serious distortions at wide end, quality control
issues still there
2. SMCP DA 17-70/4 SDM - some say it is a sibling of SMCP DA 10-17
Sigma 17-70. Excellent optics, very close focusing, fast (f2.8-4.5)
for a variable-aperture zoom. Yeah, it's a Sigma and not even an EX,
but I was VERY pleased with mine when I was using it on the K10D.
-Adam
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
So here
Having owned both, I have to say that the DA 16-45 shows considerably
more distortion at the wide end than the DA* 16-50, although both are
good in this regard. From what I've seen both are far better in terms
of wide end distortion than the DA 17-70, although they are a bit
wider. Also
David J Brooks wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:41 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem, we shot similar things.:-)
I mean shoot.:-(
Funny some people use shoot instead of sh*t...
Dave
I'm always looking for mailboxes to shoot. Its a Fair catagory.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Wide zoom (and not zoom) lenses redux
I noticed the very excellent DA14/2.8 is not on your list.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Obviously for, if it were cooler they couldn't dress that way...
Stan Halpin wrote:
I am just curious - were they rallying For or Against global warming?
stan
On Nov 15, 2008, at 5:29 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Two PESOs from a global warming rally this afternoon in Hyde Park
If they want to stop global warming they shouldn't allow women to be that
hot.
Bob
Two PESOs from a global warming rally this afternoon in Hyde Park
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08/08_11/08_11_bear/01.htm
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08/08_11/08_11_globe/01.htm
D
I think it's a combination of quicktime and your internet connection
speed. I got the same general thing, except the full color image image
loaded a lot faster than a full circuit of the image, maybe a quarter of
it. The BW image wasn't particularly pixilated, it seemed fairly
smooth in
PN Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Christine.
I've also noticed that some of the type is displayed differently by
the various browsers. On Safari, the subhead virtual home tours is
centered under picture this. On Firefox, it's off to the left.
ARRRGGH!!
Welcome to the world wide web.
This web
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: OT PESOs: Global Warming
If they want to stop global warming they shouldn't allow women to be that
hot.
Women that hot are often cold as ice.
It evens out.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You're a bitter man, Bill Robb!
If they want to stop global warming they shouldn't allow women to be
that
hot.
Women that hot are often cold as ice.
It evens out.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
He's been hanging out with my wife again.
On 11/15/08, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're a bitter man, Bill Robb!
If they want to stop global warming they shouldn't allow women to be
that
hot.
Women that hot are often cold as ice.
It evens out.
William Robb
Nor is the very excellent DA 12-24/4
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:59 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Wide zoom (and not zoom) lenses redux
I noticed the very excellent DA14/2.8 is not on your list.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
and yet Canon is know for having fairly poor W/A offerings, and the
major knock against Nikon is that they haven't redesigned their prime
lineup since the late `1960's. Let's just face it wide and ultra wide
solutions on miniature formats are difficult.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
So here is
Yeah, I effected a compromise. So while the type doesn't look great on
either browser, it's acceptable on both. I suppose the way around it
would be to do the type in PhotoShop and make it a picture.
Paul
On Nov 15, 2008, at 2:08 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
PN Stenquist wrote:
Thanks
The irony, at least in Nikon's case is that there are exactly 2 Nikon
primes that old (the 50/1.4 and 24/2.8) and one (the 50) has a
replacement due to ship in the next couple of weeks. The 20/2.8 is a
early 80's design, the 50/1.8 a late 70's, the 28/2.8 a mid-90's, the
35/2 a late 80's, the
The problem is most likely that we are talking
extreme retrofocus designs because the focal
lengths are very short yet the old 45.5mm
registration distance left over from FF still
remains on these APS Pentax DSLRs. I bet the
wides are better on 4/3 or micro 4/3 formats
because they have much
On Nov 15, 2008, at 09:16 , Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Hi all,
I have a number of boxes of various old paper (for photocopying).
They are really old - some 15 years, but also very, very old, like
40-50 years old that I got after my amateur photographer uncle died.
I guess they are useless
The page link takes me to a page of K mount lenses, the 20-35 isn't on
that page, the item number entered in the search box give a no results
found. I guess they're not that interested in selling it...
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 18:04, P. J. Alling wrote:
They don't seem to
Boris Liberman escribió:
5. Sigma 18-50/2.8 - well, I just don't quite like Sigma, and certain
people call Sigma really nasty names
There are two versions of that lens. I have the newest, Sigma DC EX
18-50 2.8 macro. This one has a 72 mm. filter ring, instead of 67 mm. in
the oldest
On 15/11/08, Carlos Royo, discombobulated, unleashed:
Was the SR on? The manuals in Pentax cameras advise against using SR in
panning shots, as it can malfunction and cause strange effects.
What? Pentax SR does not have *2 modes* like 'all-your-eggs-in-one-
basket' Canon IS lenses do?!?!?
--
On 15/11/08, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
A nice collection Dario. I prefer #12
Tim, you're a red-blooded male. Nice to confirm ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 15/11/08, Lasse Karlsson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any suggestions on any particular use that you can make of them?
HTH
http://www.pjlighthouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/origami-cool-
animal-02.jpg
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 15/11/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Women that hot are often cold as ice.
Take my wife.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Nov 15, 2008, at 11:37 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
and yet Canon is know for having fairly poor W/A offerings, and the
major knock against Nikon is that they haven't redesigned their
prime lineup since the late `1960's. Let's just face it wide and
ultra wide solutions on miniature formats
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
