Bob W wrote:
Just couldn't cope with it... email is my preferred method of
communicating when a phone call is not possible (which is my
FAVORITE type of communication)
so for those of you who are on it, please don't invite me
back - just don't want to do it
ann
Well said.
ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Again - from Roosevelt Island
Great. The light is really beautiful.
More! :-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web :
On 29/8/09, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most relaxing to watch. Did you have to close off the river while stunt
punting?
Har! No I was quite cunning..
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7673591.stm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
The only reason I am using Facebook is because I can reach it from my
phone. I was invited to the other 'social life' pages but I believe
social life is better if it's lived in a pub next to a beer (or orange
juice in my case) :)
.t
ann sanfedele wrote:
Just couldn't cope with it... email is
Adam wrote : Unfortunately while that's a nice theory it is not born
out in practice.edit, see full quote below.
No, I dont agree. Are you trying to say that a FF lens has to have
the same resolution across the board as an APS lens across the board
to match the APS overall system
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 6:30 AM, J.C. O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
Adam wrote : Unfortunately while that's a nice theory it is not born
out in practice.edit, see full quote below.
No, I don’t agree. Are you trying to say that a FF lens has to have
the same resolution across the board
Nice pic. Pretty light.
Is it a power generating facility?
Paul
On Aug 29, 2009, at 1:55 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Again - from Roosevelt Island
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-New-York/2564371_i3HHm/1/633193442_Aakk9/Large
http://tinyurl.com/lgpnnv
ann
I'm late on this :-)
I'm with Godfrey on this. One reason is that Adobe have moved some
essential tools around, the cropping tool is one example. They moved
it from the lower bar to one of the side bars.
In other words, you will force him to learn the same things twice.
--
MaritimTim
2009/8/18
Nice lighting and composition Ann
Dave
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:55 AM, ann sanfedeleann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Again - from Roosevelt Island
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-New-York/2564371_i3HHm/1/633193442_Aakk9/Large
http://tinyurl.com/lgpnnv
ann
I'm 60/40 for the colour version. The BW seems a bit more dramatic,
but the colour a bit more daring.
Dave
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Sasha Sobolsa...@asobol.com wrote:
I need your advice - color or bw?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/3864313344/in/set-72157622040375943/
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Derby Changder...@iinet.net.au wrote:
BW. I would have pulled back slightly. The pose is a little awkward, so a
bit less crop might have helped. Pretty set, though. The first shot is my
favourite.
If i was allowed to get that close to a pretty girl, i'm gona
Womderful series of photos.
This one i like a lot.
http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD#5374129055267831010
Dave
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Subashpdml.l...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
pictures from my first trek in the himalayas, which turned out to be
an amazing experience. this is
Ann, all i get when i click on the link is a gallery. Which one is it.??
Dave
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:43 PM, ann sanfedeleann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
at the place where you get on the tram from Roosevelt Island back to
Manhattan - hand held and no flash tweaked a little
in Elements to
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:57 PM, ann sanfedeleann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Actually, I really did call it TRAM as a bit of irony -- its more about the
bridge and the crazy tramway mechanics..
that being said ... I did make a file with Marnie's suggestion and I think
I like it... but I waffle...
I admit I'm more amenable to the APS-C forever, unless it is beaten out by
4/3. The point is that even though MF and LF existed, the smaller 35 mm
dominated because the IQ was good enough. I think that's where APS-C or 4/3 is
now. Of course, good enough doesn't make sense to many on this
I'm unsure of 4/3rds viability long-term. I suspect strongly that the
lower-end 4/3rds DSLR's will be killed off by Micro4/3rds and the
higher-end line will be on life support and exist mostly to fill in
the gaps for Micro-4/3rds users. 4/3rds simply hasn't been able to
capitalize on the promise
What Dave said!Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:08 AM, David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice lighting and composition Ann
Dave
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:55 AM, ann sanfedeleann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Again - from Roosevelt Island
In a message dated 8/29/2009 2:35:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
p...@web-options.com writes:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7673591.stm
What? I found the legal ruling that since God had no known address and
papers couldn't be served to him/her because of that, quite
In a message dated 8/28/2009 10:54:32 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
Again - from Roosevelt Island
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-New-York/2564371_i
3HHm/1/633193442_Aakk9/Large
http://tinyurl.com/lgpnnv
ann
http://annsan.smugmug.com
I don't think I have posted this one as a peso. Checked PPG today and
they accepted it :)
http://tinyurl.com/kkttav
Thanks for viewing (or watching),
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Nice, Toine!
Jack
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
From: Toine to...@repiuk.nl
Subject: PESO Watching you
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 8:10 AM
I don't think I have posted this one
as a peso. Checked PPG today and
they
I agree. I should have said micro-4/3 since that's what the G1 and E-P1 are.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Adam
Maas
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 10:23 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: Sony Releases A850 FF
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 6:12 AM, David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Derby Changder...@iinet.net.au wrote:
BW. I would have pulled back slightly. The pose is a little awkward, so a
bit less crop might have helped. Pretty set, though. The first shot is my
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Again - from Roosevelt Island
Great. The light is really beautiful.
More! :-)
Ralf
Glad you like it, Ralf - I was lucky to be there then - visiting a
friend who had just moved to the island - until then
I had
Yeah it's an LIPA (Long Island Power) plant... I had though it was Con-Ed
ann
paul stenquist wrote:
Nice pic. Pretty light.
Is it a power generating facility?
Paul
On Aug 29, 2009, at 1:55 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Again - from Roosevelt Island
ooops - maybe it is Con Ed... it is called the Ravenswood Power Plant
and there is some controversy going on about it being
sold to TransCanada... I'm not really up on the story
ann
paul stenquist wrote:
Nice pic. Pretty light.
Is it a power generating facility?
Paul
On Aug 29, 2009, at
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-New-York/2564371_i
3HHm/1/633193442_Aakk9/Large
http://tinyurl.com/lgpnnv
ann
http://annsan.smugmug.com
==
Heh. Nice shot. But to have it really be for Ralf, you gotta shoot it at
night.
Marnie
Nice, Toine -- classic subject from unusual angle...
I want to sing 'Let a smile be your _umbella_ ' remembering a tiny bit
of botanical terms.
ok I'll shut up now
Toine wrote:
I don't think I have posted this one as a peso. Checked PPG today and
they accepted it :)
Ehh.. I don't get it. Which song?
Toine
2009/8/29 ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
Nice, Toine -- classic subject from unusual angle...
I want to sing 'Let a smile be your _umbella_ ' remembering a tiny bit of
botanical terms.
ok I'll shut up now
Toine wrote:
I don't think I have
In a message dated 8/29/2009 8:10:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
to...@repiuk.nl writes:
I don't think I have posted this one as a peso. Checked PPG today and
they accepted it :)
http://tinyurl.com/kkttav
Thanks for viewing (or watching),
Toine
===
Don't get the title, but very
I don't follow your logic, the higher the overall sensor resolution
and sensor pixel densities get with time, the more the overall system
resolution depends
on the lens' absolute resolution AND FORMAT SIZE. If you use two lenses
with
same across the board resolution ( say 60 lp/mm), the larger FF
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tamoneki/3867754586/
pentax spotmatic sp II
super takumar 135 2.5
fuji 100
nikon ls-1000
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
I think maybe your overlooking the fact that APS SLRs are
really retrofits of FF slrs and use the same size lens mounts,
registration etc as FF cameras. The bottom line is that FF
DSLRs and lenses are hardly much bigger than the APS DSLRs/lenses
for these reasons. If APS had been designed from
There is an old song called Let a Smile be your UMBRELLA
and i was punning on that with the botanical term that describes
the flower you photographed from the family _umbelliferae_
has to do with the way the flowers branch out at the top of a stem, I
believe
anyway, nice flower
ann
Toine
Marnie -- look to the right... you'll get the title...
I didn't notice at first either.
ann
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/29/2009 8:10:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
to...@repiuk.nl writes:
I don't think I have posted this one as a peso. Checked PPG today and
they
Now I get it. Googled the title. Never heard the song. And I also
didn't know the botanical family name umbelliferae.
I learn a lot (including photography) on this list.
Toine
2009/8/29 ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
There is an old song called Let a Smile be your UMBRELLA
and i was punning
Or click on the image for full screen, larger is better
Toine
2009/8/29 ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
Marnie -- look to the right... you'll get the title...
I didn't notice at first either.
ann
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/29/2009 8:10:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
J.C. O'Connell wrote:
I think maybe your overlooking the fact that APS SLRs are
really retrofits of FF slrs and use the same size lens mounts,
registration etc as FF cameras. The bottom line is that FF
DSLRs and lenses are hardly much bigger than the APS DSLRs/lenses
for these reasons. If APS
Wrong equivalence. That should read:
So a 150/2 on 4/3 is required for getting 200/2.8 performance on APS-C
(which in turn can be comparable to 300/4 on FF). Or at least this is how I
see things.
The conclusion is the same.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:24:27PM -0400, J.C. O'Connell scripsit:
I think maybe your overlooking the fact that APS SLRs are
really retrofits of FF slrs and use the same size lens mounts,
registration etc as FF cameras.
[snip]
Which is a very good thing for in-body anti-shake systems.
Also a
Especially with my old eyes!
ann
Toine wrote:
Or click on the image for full screen, larger is better
Toine
2009/8/29 ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
Marnie -- look to the right... you'll get the title...
I didn't notice at first either.
ann
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a
Luka,
I like the repeated pattern between the girl's knee and the tree.
The picture has a woodsy feel to it.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Luka
Knezevic-Strikalukastr...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tamoneki/3867754586/
pentax spotmatic sp II
super
That's sorta my point,
A FF Pentax DSLR is not going to be that much bigger
than the current APS DSLR because APS is already using
the same size lens mount, registration etc
and those will not increase in size with a FF Pentax DSLR.
4/3 DSLRs are smaller than APS DSLRs are they not?
Arent the
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:13 PM, J.C. O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
I don't follow your logic, the higher the overall sensor resolution
and sensor pixel densities get with time, the more the overall system
resolution depends
on the lens' absolute resolution AND FORMAT SIZE. If you use two
Great composition!
2009/8/29 Luka Knezevic-Strika lukastr...@gmail.com:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tamoneki/3867754586/
pentax spotmatic sp II
super takumar 135 2.5
fuji 100
nikon ls-1000
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
higher image quality trump all for me not solely
because higher final image quality is always needed, but because
of other things you can do like crop more while
maintaining same final image quality. To me, cropping
ability is very powerful because it allows you to
capture much quicker and easier,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:56 PM, J.C. O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
That's sorta my point,
A FF Pentax DSLR is not going to be that much bigger
than the current APS DSLR because APS is already using
the same size lens mount, registration etc
and those will not increase in size with a FF
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM, J.C. O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
I think maybe your overlooking the fact that APS SLRs are
really retrofits of FF slrs and use the same size lens mounts,
registration etc as FF cameras. The bottom line is that FF
DSLRs and lenses are hardly much bigger
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:57:06 +0200
Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
2009/8/29 Luka Knezevic-Strika lukastr...@gmail.com:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tamoneki/3867754586/
pentax spotmatic sp II
super takumar 135 2.5
I love the way the model's curves and lines echo those of the trees
framing
In a message dated 8/29/2009 10:31:17 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
OH. Got it. Hehehehe.
Marnie Old eyes, to be sure.
==
Marnie -- look to the right... you'll get the title...
I didn't notice at first either.
ann
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In
Resolution. LPM. Register distance. Etc. Etc.
There are good technical arguments both for and against full-frame.
None of it makes any difference. Full-frame is about marketing,
consumer needs (desires, really) and fashion. And Pentax can no more
choose not to go full-frame than they could have
Nicely done. Good composition, exposure colors.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Toine to...@repiuk.nl
Subject: PESO Watching you
I don't think I have posted this one as a peso. Checked PPG today and
they accepted it :)
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:18:15PM +0200, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tamoneki/3867754586/
Very nice.
Was it a deliberate pun based on sitting bare in the woods?
pentax spotmatic sp II
super takumar 135 2.5
fuji 100
nikon ls-1000
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Aug 28, 2009, at 16:34 , Derby Chang wrote:
Decoder Ring, rightly lauded for their gorgeous Somersault
soundtrack, have gone back to an all-instrumental outfit. Not that
instrumental music quite accurately describes what they do. What
an an epic set. All three bands boundary-riding the
I would disagree that lens resolution usually isnt
the limiting factor with ** todays high density APS sensors **.
The small high density sensors used now generally
ruthlessly reveal all the shortcomings of what I would say
the majority, not the minority of lenses out there. This is probably
the
By the way, let Bridezilla know they can tour up here in the USA,
Seattle specific, anytime they wish. I'll not only buy tickets, but
photograph their performances for them in return for travel, room, and
board.
On Aug 28, 2009, at 16:34 , Derby Chang wrote:
Decoder Ring, rightly lauded
well I think the thing to consider is that the volume of a FF
Pentax DSLR would not be 1.5x1.5x1.5 = approx 3.375 times the volume
of their APS dslrs because not everything has to be scaled up, just
some things. I havent really done any studies on these, but I would have
a hunch that the body +
On 29/8/09, Joseph McAllister, discombobulated, unleashed:
By the way, let Bridezilla know they can tour up here in the USA,
Seattle specific, anytime they wish. I'll not only buy tickets, but
photograph their performances for them in return for travel, room, and
board.
Joseph is such a nice guy
in some cases IQ does trump all. I have some very nice
family photos I shot on 8x10 and Im glad I did. I had
35mm, MF, 4x5 at the time but I didn't skimp.
Now of course 8x10 is very inapprpriate for many things,
Im not saying it's the best, no way.
But for me, I would gladly trade up to a
I disagree on it not making any difference(s). The ultimate image
performance obtainable
out of the APS format is not going to be as great as the
ultimate performance obtainable out of the FF digital format.
Larger formats have the potential for higher IQ performance when
properly executed.
--
Mark Roberts wrote:
Resolution. LPM. Register distance. Etc. Etc.
There are good technical arguments both for and against full-frame.
None of it makes any difference. Full-frame is about marketing,
consumer needs (desires, really) and fashion. And Pentax can no more
choose not to go
FF should not only be able to achieve higher system resolution
at same or larger sensor resolutions, it should also be able
to achieve same low noise performance at higher ISO sensitivities
than APS sensor due to larger area sensor pixels. Just like APS
images better than tiny digital ps sensors
J.C. O'Connell wrote:
FF should not only be able to achieve higher system resolution
at same or larger sensor resolutions, it should also be able
to achieve same low noise performance at higher ISO sensitivities
than APS sensor due to larger area sensor pixels. Just like APS
images better than
Some refinements in my thoughts below:
J.C. O'Connell wrote:
FF should not only be able to achieve higher system resolution
at same or larger sensor resolutions, it should also be able
to achieve same low noise performance at higher ISO sensitivities
than APS sensor due to larger area sensor
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:42:15PM +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote:
3) An ever-increasing number of DSLR users want FF. When they will be the
majority, it will make No.2 irrelevant to 99% of DSLR users, thus
resurrecting No.1.
You're forgetting the most important point - a FF DSLR will always
John Francis wrote:
And whatever they may *say*
they want, 99% of DSLR purchasers will vote with their wallet and
buy the cheaper DSLR.
So no one on this list owns a K7 then? Or bought a K20 when it was
new? Or a Nikon D700? (Hi, Dave Savage!)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
On 29/8/09, Joseph McAllister, discombobulated, unleashed:
By the way, let Bridezilla know they can tour up here in the USA,
Seattle specific, anytime they wish. I'll not only buy tickets, but
photograph their performances for them in return for travel, room, and
board.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7673591.stm
What? I found the legal ruling that since God had no known
address and papers couldn't be served to him/her because of
that, quite sane and reasonable.
Maybe. On the other hand he/she/they/it is/are omnipresent, so
- Original Message -
From: John Francis jo...@panix.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Sony Releases A850 FF Camera for $2,000
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:42:15PM +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote:
3) An ever-increasing
It occurs to me that arguing what sort of lenses you need to get the
full performance out of a full frame camera is like arguing what sort
of tires you need to get the full performance out of a Ferrari. Most
of us can't afford it, and most of those who can afford it don't have
the skill to make
people don't just buy DSLR bodies, they buy DSLR systems (bodies and
lenses) .
Since FF system can match or outperform an APS system with lower
performance,
less costly lenses, a FF system could cost less, not more
for same level of peformance as an all APS system even if the body
alone costs more
In a message dated 8/29/2009 2:12:23 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
p...@web-options.com writes:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7673591.stm
What? I found the legal ruling that since God had no known
address and papers couldn't be served to him/her because of
ff bodies don't need as high a peformance lenses as APS
bodies do to achieve same level of system peformance.
That's the main appeal of FF bodies. No super tweeked,
super performance leneses are required, mortal lenses
can be applied to them for same results due to larger sensor format.
--
J.C.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:37:41PM -0400, J.C. O'Connell scripsit:
people don't just buy DSLR bodies, they buy DSLR systems (bodies and
lenses) .
Since FF system can match or outperform an APS system with lower
performance,
less costly lenses, a FF system could cost less, not more
for same
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:40 PM, J.C. O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
ff bodies don't need as high a peformance lenses as APS
bodies do to achieve same level of system peformance.
That's the main appeal of FF bodies. No super tweeked,
super performance leneses are required, mortal lenses
depends how many lenses you buy and how much
you save on each FF lens.
Of course Pentax cant do FF in near future,
last time I checked they had about 4 FF
lenses currently available. They are not
not ready to sell a FF system.
They would rather sell you poorly tested
very expensive DA lenss and
huh, pentax doesn't have a FF sensor. If they did
it would around $2K like Sony, no?
How many much cheaper non-DA lenses would it take to make
up the extra $800 or so for the FF Penatx body
vs the APS body?
Answer - not many at all. A few at most.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Sat Aug 29 16:38:27 CDT 2009
Eactivist wrote:
In a message dated 8/29/2009 2:12:23 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
pml at web-options.com writes:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7673591.stm
What? I found the legal ruling that since God had no known
address
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:40:42PM -0400, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
ff bodies don't need as high a peformance lenses as APS
bodies do to achieve same level of system peformance.
That's the main appeal of FF bodies. No super tweeked,
super performance leneses are required, mortal lenses
can be
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:00 PM, J.C. O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
huh, pentax doesn't have a FF sensor. If they did
it would around $2K like Sony, no?
How many much cheaper non-DA lenses would it take to make
up the extra $800 or so for the FF Penatx body
vs the APS body?
Answer -
Peter Zalabai wrote:
The only reason I am using Facebook is because I can reach it from my
phone. I was invited to the other 'social life' pages but I believe
social life is better if it's lived in a pub next to a beer (or orange
juice in my case) :)
.t
I believe it is better if its
Bit late on this thread (been away in Hong Kong for a week): my oldest
camera is a Rolleicord Vb from about 1955, which still works perfectly,
although it does seem to have been built for a left-handed person!
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:19:45PM -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:00 PM, J.C. O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
huh, pentax doesn't have a FF sensor. If they did
it would around $2K like Sony, no?
How many much cheaper non-DA lenses would it take to make
up the extra
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9712560
Comments welcome.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
rant on
I filled in the data form for a PPG account shortly after it opened a few years
ago.
Then, I read here and elsewhere about the ridiculous review system, which has
only gotten more ridiculous.
I tried to look at people's photos, and found the interface to be slower than
an Apple II in
Peter, I think this would work better in BW. Ed's ruddy complexion and a
color rendering don't collaborate very well.
One might also use the gradient tool in LR or PS to decrease the exposure on
the right.
I like the focus. Overall, it's a characterful portrait.
Cheers,
Rick
none exist? umm about 25 million PK mount FF lenses do exist.
They are called the SMC Pentax K,M,A,F, FA series lenses and that's
not even counting the many third party FF K mounts. Not all of them
would be suitable for FF digital of course for a number of reasons but I
bet
the number is NOT
if the FF body had same sensor pixel density as proposed by others
as their best APS sensors, cropping the FF image would give same
result as the APS, in that case the APS body doesn't have any
lower cost long teles advantage, you could do same with the
FF body if desired. Just crop the FF image
Layer effect caused by the mist, well seen. Effective composition.
Jack
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO: Dome in the Mist
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, August 29,
Nothing is perfect, Rick. The Pentax Photo Gallery is a wonderful
display of interesting images. It is well worth participating in.
I am often frustrated when they reject one of my favorite images, or
take a long time to review one, but I enjoy looking at the
collection and the other entries,
Thanks, Jack
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Jack Davisjdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Layer effect caused by the mist, well seen. Effective composition.
Jack
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO: Dome in
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:41:18PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
rant on
I filled in the data form for a PPG account shortly after it opened a few
years ago.
Then, I read here and elsewhere about the ridiculous review system, which has
only gotten more ridiculous.
I tried to look at
Yeah but the Michellin Pilot Sport Cup tires are the best.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: Re: OT: Sony Releases A850 FF Camera for $2,000
It occurs to me that arguing what sort of lenses you need to
That's a doozey, Ann. Great light interesting subject. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 12:55 AM
Subject: Peso - one for Ralf :-)
Again - from Roosevelt Island
Nice framing nice mist, Dan. I know it's a dome, but it also kind of
looks like a giant golf ball :-). Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 8:51 PM
Subject:
I was at Central Camera today on display in the window is a 300mm Takumar
screw mount lens, f4, I believe, for $349. IIRC there was a tripod mount
attached as well. Contact info can be found at the link below--if anyone is
interested. I'm sure if you call they'll tell you all about the
Me three! And I signed up before the gallery opened too!
Nice images, but a pain in the butt to view or join.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:18 PM, John Francisjo...@panix.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:41:18PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
rant on
I filled in the data form
98 matches
Mail list logo
