A few new photos up on flickr.com ... Zone plate/pinhole stuff, experimenting
with more new ideas. Someone on another forum said I was channeling Man Ray
which I think is a neat way of putting it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/8554066698/lightbox
Anyone here use the 16-45?
How would you evaluate the results you get?
I'm looking for a carry-around for people shooting (dance studio).
And this is half the price of the 16-15/2.8.
Hopefully it produces a high quality image.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I have had the 16-45 for a number of years, 6 maybe, i bought it when
i had the istd. I found it a bit soft on the D but worked very nicely
on my KL-10D and now my K-5. Gives pleasing results imo. its the lens
that just stays on my K-5.
Dave
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Collin Brendemuehl
On 13 March 2013 22:04, Collin Brendemuehl coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
Anyone here use the 16-45?
How would you evaluate the results you get?
I'm looking for a carry-around for people shooting (dance studio).
And this is half the price of the 16-15/2.8.
Hopefully it produces a high quality
On Mar 12, 2013, at 11:29 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Forwarded Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: Doing Things the Hard Way
That's a nice image, Paul.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:56 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
focal length?
I started out wide (50mm) until I picked up the exact location of the
comet. If I wanted the moon and comet in the same image, I couldn't go
much over 150mm. I pulled back wider to bring the ground in on some
I use one when I need a standard zoom, usually when traveling. The 24mm
wider end is very nice. It is sharp but not outstanding and is a bit
prone to CA. The reverse zooming action (lens is longest at the wide
setting) means that you sometimes can't use the internal flash when
shooting wide
I've been looking at the same lenses because I too need a standard zoom. The
photozone numbers for the borders look a lot better on the 16-45 wide open. At
f8 they are neck and neck. The 18-55 wr is also sharper @ 55 than the
16-45 is at 45. Something to consider. To be honest, I
Hi, Collin. I've had a DA 16~45 for for since they first became available. I've
thought a few times i might swap in for a DA*16-50 but in reviewing images,
couldn't really justify making the change.
For exasmple, I have a framed 16~20 print that's been hanging in my home since
2010. It
On Mar 12, 2013, at 22:34 , Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Picked up the thin crescent moon at 8:00 CDT, but didn't see the comet
captured until 8:17. Photographed until approx 8:50. Here are a couple
of images, simply processed on the iPad with SnapSeed. Could not see
it visually.
Very nice.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Picked up the thin crescent moon at 8:00 CDT, but didn't see the comet
captured until 8:17. Photographed until approx 8:50. Here are a couple
of
I really like the self portrait; the grain, the cropping and the
vintage feel combine for an appealing image.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
A few new photos up on flickr.com ... Zone
The guy on the right appears to be protecting his lady from that photog.
Gave me a grin.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:58 AM
Subject: Photography on the Beach
Been there, done that with the distracting shadows.
Some thoughts on work arounds:
- don't use flash, or
- bounce flash, and/or
- detach flash from camera, handhold it high overhead, dial in -1 or -2 on
the flash, or
- as above, with flip-up flash dialed in to -1 or so
Oops - just
Really nice cyclist portrait. Not sure it works as a Messenger photo though. 1)
His hand is on the brake lever. Messengers don't ever slow down do they? 2) He
doesn't look intense, he's not in a hurry to get someplace. Don't use this to
advertise your service!
stan
On Mar 11, 2013, at 11:07
Thanks for the comments. Larger image:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/8555015868/in/photostream/lightbox/
2.5 sec @ f/8, ISO 800
Here is one taken by another fellow in our area. A nice shot, but
guessing he's a Canon shooter by the looks of the noise:
http://goo.gl/2IslH
: )
On Wed,
Thanks Rick, Glad you liked the farm. The 2nd one was certainly all
about the composition.
Now I've got to find something to post for this week.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rick Womerrwomer1...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Stan, I am convinced you are a natural-born travel photographer. But you
Dan M. are killing me with these tropical wonderlands.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:23:25 -0400
From: Stan Halpins...@stans-photography.info
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail ListPDML@pdml.net
Only retired guys have the freedom to post a picture like that.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 7 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:48:57 +1100 From: Brian Walters
apathy...@lyons-ryan.org To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO -- The Three Amigos Message-ID:
Man Ray fro sure. Which is a good thing IMHO.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:56:10 -0700
From: Godfrey DiGiorgiramar...@mac.com
To: PAW Picture-A-Week projectp...@micapeak.com,SeePhoto Talk
seeph...@micapeak.com, BAPhotoShooters BAPA
Cool! No I mean really wasn't it cold taking that picture. What part of
the sky is that, maybe I could take something from my patio window.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:34:53 -0500
From: Darren Addypixelsmi...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
A lot going on here and I appreciate the joke in the title. Still I
think I'd send you back to the showers. :)
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:58:07 -0400
From: Daniel J. Matyoladanmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject:
LOL.
It was about 35 degrees, but a pretty good breeze blowing made it feel
a lot colder. Fortunately, I strategized: I went up on Yanney Tower
(seen here from the north:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/8002062029/in/set-72157631571806897/lightbox/
) and was protected from the north wind
I didn't notice the 280T either, I assumed Peter was using the K20's
popup flash. Since the 280T both tilts and swivels, I'd recommend
either:
- bounce from ceiling, tilted up 45 degrees;
- bounce from adjacent (corner) wall, rotated 45 degrees;
- tape a white card to top of flash so it sticks
March 1963 was when Kodak released the first Instamatic camera.
http://blog.eastmanhouse.org/2013/03/12/50th-anniversary-of-the-instamatic-1963/
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/?p=1188
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I actually remember that!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
March 1963 was when Kodak released the first Instamatic camera.
Thanks, Jack and Don, for looking and commenting.
Everyone in the scene, except the gent coming out of the water, is
there to watch the sun set (as was I). The photographer with the
tripod was setting up for a standard sunset shot when he noticed some
iron and cement from and old pier that had
From: Stan Halpin
Been there, done that with the distracting shadows.
Some thoughts on work arounds:
- don't use flash, or
- bounce flash, and/or
- detach flash from camera, handhold it high overhead, dial in -1 or -2 on
the flash, or
- as above, with flip-up flash dialed in to -1 or so
That's an amazing sequence story, Dan. A miracle of nature.
You showed great patience.
Alan C
--
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:07 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT:
On 12/3/13, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm not sure if the lady specified that she didn't want to look at the
camera, but neither she nor her children are looking at the camera. The
pic was for a newspaper column she wrote. Maybe they just thought they
should look at the flash.
Took a drive in the Sutter Butte area this AM. Discovered this scene on,
unusual in that this area is normally stingy with anything colorful.What with
the ground cover and some PSE10 help, is offered as, at least, a sign of the
approach of Spring.
Grabbed from the car along West Butte Rd.
Beautiful pics and an awesome story! Makes me want to get a feeder going.
Chris
Chris Brogden, Manager
Don's Photo St. Vital
31 - 845 Dakota St.
(Right across the street from St. Vital Centre)
Winnipeg, MB R2M 5M3
Ph: (204) 254-9075
Fax: (204) 253-7173
We make it easy to order greeting
Enjoyed this, Dan!
Jack
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:07 AM
Subject: OT: Hummingbird Nest
This series of photos from several years ago documents the birth of
Thanks Don! And Dan, Rob, Frank and others who have looked and commented. I do
enjoy travel! I would rather have spent the time in the Nagev Desert or in
Venice or Rome or Paris or London or Machu Pichu, but this cruise was what
seemed feasible at the time. And I think it was time well spent,
Yes, the natural bridge is now a natural pile of rocks. Slow erosion, with high
waves from a hurricane dealing the final blow. The Baby Bridge is still there a
few miles down the coast.
Not sure if they have working mines; we did pass by signs for Gold Mine Ruins.
And ostrich farms.
Curaçao is
From: Mark Roberts
March 1963 was when Kodak released the first Instamatic camera.
http://blog.eastmanhouse.org/2013/03/12/50th-anniversary-of-the-instamatic-1963/
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/?p=1188
I had one of those. And I had another one later when they came out with
the 110
Chimping no less...
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Photography on the Beach
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17037892
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J.
Matyola
I hear that the famous natural bridge
collapsed after I photographed it
sounds like you need a quieter shutter
B
Sent: 13 March 2013 17:49
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO: Caribbean Chapter 4 (Aruba)
Nice blog post. I've got a Retina that looks just like the one on your
blog post page. Need to put some film in it and have some fun.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Another slooow overnight transit from Aruba to neighboring Curaçao which has a
similar history of colonial development. Except that Curaçao has been, for the
last 90-100 years, a major spot for refining Venezuelan oil. A much more varied
population and economy. Our day in Willemstad was spent
Nice subject that just cries out for better light - less harsh.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
Subject: PESO: Wesr Butte Spring
Took a drive in the Sutter Butte area this AM. Discovered this
- Forwarded Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:40 PM
Subject: PESO: Wesr Butte Spring
Took a drive in the Sutter Butte area this AM. Discovered this scene on,
unusual in that this area is
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Stan Halpin
Another slooow overnight transit from Aruba to neighboring Curaçao
which has a similar history of colonial development. Except that
Curaçao has been, for the last 90-100 years, a major spot for refining
Venezuelan oil. A
A motion sensor in the camera and a tiny speaker that says No card in
the camera, dumbass! the moment you pick it up.
Don't ask me why this idea came to me.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Great shots, Stan. I just got back from a trip to Curacao, and it's hard to
come back to blizzards once you've spent a couple weeks in tropical
paradise. Gotta love the Floating Market as a photo op!
Chris
Chris Brogden, Manager
Don's Photo St. Vital
31 - 845 Dakota St.
(Right across the
For those on the list that don't think much of iphone photography, and for
those that would like to see some iphone images, I've included 2 links to
sites with images taken by my son which were all captured with his iphone
and run thru some iphone apps. I agree that the shutter pusher is more
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013, Darren Addy wrote:
A motion sensor in the camera and a tiny speaker that says No card in
the camera, dumbass! the moment you pick it up.
Why did this idea come to you?
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
I don't think so. I think he is using live view or the equivalent
on his camera to compose and focus the shot.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:32 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Chimping no less...
Kenneth Waller
Is anyone finding that their k-5 leans towards over exposure? I often have to
use -.7 to -1 ev compensation. I find this consistent across old glass. With
the kit lens and thr 12-24 it seems to do a bit better, but still overexposes
at times. I generally use matrix metering. Even in well
I've got an old Vivitar 24mm prime that over-exposes on my K5 - I
usually set compensation to -1 stop when I use this. Which is rarely
because the CA with this lens is awful...
Haven't had it with any of my other lenses - 18-135 zoom, A 28mm
f/2.8, A 50mm f/2.0, Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 HSM.
Ciao,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013, Darren Addy wrote:
A motion sensor in the camera and a tiny speaker that says No card in
the camera, dumbass! the moment you pick it up.
Why did this idea come to you?
Don't ask.
--
PDML
If I was a Microsoft engineer tasked with designing this idea, I'd
implement it as an SD card.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
A motion sensor in the camera and a tiny speaker that says No card in
the camera, dumbass! the moment you pick it up.
Don't
Pretty nice stuff, Ken.
He must have a good phone!
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:02 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
For those on the list that don't think much of iphone photography, and for
those that would like to see some iphone images, I've included 2 links to
sites with images taken by my
On Mar 13, 2013, at 16:30 , Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone finding that their k-5 leans towards over exposure? I often have
to use -.7 to -1 ev compensation. I find this consistent across old glass.
With the kit lens and thr 12-24 it seems to do a bit better, but still
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone finding that their k-5 leans towards over exposure? I often have
to use -.7 to -1 ev compensation. I find this consistent across old glass.
My K10D tends toward underexposure on modern (AF) lenses, but
It could very well be the glass that I am using. I just tested daylight, well
cloudy and it seemed fine and was consistent with live view. I'll have to test
more. Never did get a feel for these Pentax meters' though using center
weighted and metering on the subject always worked well. Never
Older wide angles are generally not corrected well for digital. Heck even the
12-24 is a CA prone lens, though it is easily correctable. WA is tough on
digital due to the angles. My tamron 28mm had bad aberations on the borders. On
full frame it would likely be a disaster.
Peter McIntosh
On Mar 13, 2013, at 17:33 , Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
It could very well be the glass that I am using. I just tested daylight, well
cloudy and it seemed fine and was consistent with live view. I'll have to
test more. Never did get a feel for these Pentax meters' though using
Noted. This behavior is with A glassFA glass too. At least its consistent
depending upon lighting. With m/k glass I'm pretty OK with center. They usually
require some compensation anyways and stop down metering just gives you a
reference, tho it is fairly accurate used properly.
Charles
I have a smc pentax k 28mm F3.5 that is razor sharp with no CA from corner
to corner on aps-c digital so its not the wide, its the lens.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Zos
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 12/3/13, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm not sure if the lady specified that she didn't want to look at the
camera, but neither she nor her children are looking at the camera. The
pic was for a newspaper
On Mar 13, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Bob W wrote:
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Stan Halpin
Another slooow overnight transit from Aruba to neighboring Curaçao
which has a similar history of colonial development. Except that
Curaçao has been, for the last 90-100 years, a
Ah geez! I'm pretty sure that's what my uncle gave me to shoot when we
toured Expo 67 in Montreal. I was 11 and I think that was the turn-on
point for photography for me.
Did these produce tiny slides? I seem to recall getting slides back
and using a viewer to see the shots.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013
I hurried this image in order to get it posted a couple places. I was advised
by Ken that he wasn't a fan of the lighting.
I found his impression to be mine also.
Am posting a complete re-do. Please forget the initial posts and would very
much appreciate comments.
Thanks!
Jack
Bruce Walker wrote:
Ah geez! I'm pretty sure that's what my uncle gave me to shoot when we
toured Expo 67 in Montreal. I was 11 and I think that was the turn-on
point for photography for me.
Did these produce tiny slides? I seem to recall getting slides back
and using a viewer to see the shots.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Correction:
But there *were* some fairly advanced cameras made for 126 film for a
But there *were* some fairly advanced cameras made for *126* film
while. The late, great Galen Rowell got his start shooting Kodachrome
in a 126 camera. The slides were square and slightly
From Wiki:
In 1963, Kodak introduced a new film, encased in a plastic cartridge, for
which they re-introduced the 126 designation. (The number was originally
used for the unrelated 126 roll film format from 1906 to 1949). The term
126 was intended to show that images were 26mm square, using
not so, they were actually slightly larger than the 24mm dimension of 35mm
film
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:08 PM
To:
It's a really good lens. I've used it for a high percentage of shots in recent
trips (Egypt and
Italy) and the quality is very good to excellent. It's light and not too long
or awkward to carry,
so I have no hesitation in recommending it as a walk-around lens. You're only
problem may be that
I really like the composition and subject in this, Jack. Very nice.
But, is it just me or is there some slightly odd thing happening with
what looks like clipped blueness showing up scattered around the
mountainside left of the tree and peeking through the branches at the
horizon level, right?
On 14 March 2013 00:37, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been looking at the same lenses because I too need a standard zoom. The
photozone numbers for the borders look a lot better on the 16-45 wide open.
At f8 they are neck and neck. The 18-55 wr is also sharper @ 55 than
But there *were* some fairly advanced cameras made for *126* film
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Rolleiflex_SL26
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
On 14 March 2013 09:52, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Noted. This behavior is with A glassFA glass too. At least its consistent
depending upon lighting. With m/k glass I'm pretty OK with center. They
usually require some compensation anyways and stop down metering just gives
you
http://vimeo.com/61083440
Cheers,
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Actually, two images.
Having heard the groans from snow-and-ice afflicted PDMLers as they viewed
tropical beach and jungle shots, I offer this is to illustrate that I share
your pain; I came home to an ice-filled river.
http://photos.stanhalpin.com/p155717848/e5811daa8
But then we had a few
Very nice shot, Paul, and extra points for doing it the hard way. I'm
surprised you did not get Newton rings with the film on the scanner, but
the results speak for themselves.
On 3/12/2013 7:51 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Way back in 1975 a teacher at the Chicago high school where I taught
These ladies were in deep shadows with a brightly lit wall behind them. No
time for exposure comp. The moment would have been gone. Shot at f 2.8, 1/50th,
ISO 12,800 with the DA* 50-135 at 135 mm. Pushed it 1.25 stops in conversion,
so it's the equivalent of about ISO 30,000. Noisy, but I like
Very nice! The blond will probably shoot you if she ever sees it though.
Imagine what it would have looked like it you had shot it on Tri-X pushed to
1600. In that context, I think the noise level is quite acceptable.
stan
On Mar 13, 2013, at 9:27 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
These ladies were
Enjoyed that blog post a great deal, Mark!
My mom bought an Instamatic the first year they were out. I thought it was the
coolest thing! My dad's old Yashica A tlr seemed a relic to me.
And my Kodak Brownie just wasn't cool at all. Spools of film (127 roll film)
were so ancient!
My Brownie is
I can only comment on the mono printing. I have an Epson 3800 which used
the K3 inks but lacks the vivid magenta. I've been very satisfied with
the BW printing results.
It's not my preferred way of working, but if I don't expect to need to
print the image in the future I just use the advanced
Paul,
Good work, captures the moment!
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
These ladies were in deep shadows with a brightly lit wall behind them. No
time for exposure comp. The moment would have been gone. Shot at f 2.8,
1/50th,
On Mar 13, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Very nice! The blond will probably shoot you if she ever sees it though.
Imagine what it would have looked like it you had shot it on Tri-X pushed to
1600. In that context, I think the noise level is quite
Thanks Mark. You're right. Previous attempts with film on glass have produced
Newton rings. Have to try it again with this scanner. I have some other 4 x 5s
I'd like to scan.
On Mar 13, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
Very nice shot, Paul, and extra points for doing it
On 14 March 2013 12:45, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
My Brownie is still around. Same with the Yashica. Lord knows where the
Instamatic might be...
I can't find my Instamatic either, it was my first camera, a later 56x
model with the Magicube flash
Cheers,
--
Rob
I did some reading in my Galen Rowell books. He says his 126 camera
had an f/2.8 Schneider lens. Some digging on the web indicates that it
was probably a Kodak. They made some fairly serious 126 cameras for
a while - even an SLR at one point! Even more amazing to me is that
they actually used the
There used to be a web site where you could purchase 126 film
recently, but I think they are totally out now. I got three cartridges
before they did, and bought a couple of decent 126 cameras to use with
them. A Yashica EZ-Matic, with a 37mm f2.8 Yashinon lens
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
I did some reading in my Galen Rowell books. He says his 126 camera
had an f/2.8 Schneider lens. Some digging on the web indicates that it
was probably a Kodak.
Yes, my Instamatic 500 (made in Germany) has a
Rollei made a 126 SLR.
On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
I did some reading in my Galen Rowell books. He says his 126 camera
had an f/2.8 Schneider lens. Some digging on the
http://collectiblend.com/Cameras/Rollei/Rolleiflex-SL-26.html
On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:25 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Rollei made a 126 SLR.
On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Mark Roberts
From: kwaller
For those on the list that don't think much of iphone photography, and for
those that would like to see some iphone images, I've included 2 links to
sites with images taken by my son which were all captured with his iphone
and run thru some iphone apps. I agree that the shutter
Do you still have the 4 x 5 holder for the Epson 3800? By chance I have
my film holders for the 3800 and V500 sitting in the same drawer. Both
look like they hold the film the same distance above the scanner's
flatbed (no micrometer handy to actually measure that.) I put the 3800
holder on the
Good idea, Mark. I do have the old film holder. I'll give it a try.
On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:30 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
Do you still have the 4 x 5 holder for the Epson 3800? By chance I have my
film holders for the 3800 and V500 sitting in the same drawer. Both look like
they
Some excellent photos, Ken. He has a good eye.
Paul
On Mar 13, 2013, at 5:02 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
For those on the list that don't think much of iphone photography, and for
those that would like to see some iphone images, I've included 2 links to
sites with images taken by my son
I haven't had any exposure problems with the K-5. I use matrix metering. Of
course it can't nail every situation. One has add some exposure comp when
working with really dark or really bright backgrounds. But in general, the K-5
metering is very accurate.
Paul
On Mar 13, 2013, at 5:30 PM, Zos
Found this page that shows comparative sizes. Looks like 126 slides were
just about the same size as 35mm slides but more square 1.08x0.98 vs
1.3x0.85
http://howtoscan.ca/film-format-types.html
Later 110 film produced teeny-tiny slides, but that wouldn't have been
available yet in 1967.
From: Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com
http://vimeo.com/61083440
Thanks for sharing that Rob. It was wonderful.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Don, and thanks to all who looked and commented. It was a cool
morning but not that cold: maybe -10C which off the top of my head
might be 15F.
Yeah, but today was 25C here
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
The wood duck is a nice catch. Ice covered river leaves me cold. ;-)
Jack
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 5:58 PM
Subject: PESO: Change of pace
Actually, two images.
He must have a good phone!
Yep! And its professional - its black.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT - iphonography
Pretty nice stuff, Ken.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:02
Absolutely great capture - the mouths have it!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: PESO - Free Feed at the Old Pool Hall
These ladies were in deep shadows with a brightly lit wall
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
