For Larry...found the source for the gel clips - direct from Buff.
Still cheap at 3 bucks a dozen.
http://paulcbuff.com/clips.php
-p
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Decided to try upgrading to LR6 today. Got the impression that currently it’s
only available with the Creative Cloud plan, with the only options being paid
monthly or prepaid.
Googling brought me this link which explains how to upgrade the standalone
version. It appears Adobe’s not eager for
I was a lot more prolific with my shooting than with my editing this
month, so this gallery is bigger than my past six combined (25 shots, on
the assumption I don't get any amazing photos today). Even so, I don't
think there are really any clunkers in the set.
I like 11493, the color and contrast is excellent.
jco
On 5/30/2015 4:42 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I was a lot more prolific with my shooting than with my editing this
month, so this gallery is bigger than my past six combined (25 shots,
on the assumption I don't get any amazing photos today).
A question for the macro mavens, Is there an noticeable difference in
depth of field of the subject, when using different focal length lenses?
For example, if I were to come in to the distance where I'm at 1:1
magnification with my 35, 50 and 90mm macros, and focus on the 10cm mark
on a
On May 30, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote:
Ummm… the link?
Sorry about that. I do it often. Here it is (I promise):
http://owenbillcliffe.co.uk/lightroom-6-standalone-upgrade/
The 16-45 is my most-used lens by far--I bought it shortly after
getting my istD 10
Thanks a bunch
Paul wrote:
For Larry...found the source for the gel clips - direct from Buff. Still
cheap at 3 bucks a dozen.
http://paulcbuff.com/clips.php
-p
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On May 16, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Thanks again to all who responded to my request for input regarding wide
angle zooms. FWIW,regarding them, I’m leaning toward the pentax 16-45/4 or
the new sigma 17-40/2.8. The latter is especially attractive, though more
Ummm… the link?
The 16-45 is my most-used lens by far--I bought it shortly after
getting my istD 10 years ago. I hope you enjoy it.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Decided to try upgrading to LR6 today. Got the
Bulent Celasun wrote:
I had asked a similar question recently at another forum.
The answer was
for the same magnification
DOF is practically the same.
So, there was nothing to be won by using either of the 100mm or 180 mm lenses
(my question involved these on a medium format body)
as long as
DOF is essentiially the same for same optical magnification, but not for
same magnification done via non optical pp tricks.
On 5/30/2015 4:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Bulent Celasun wrote:
I had asked a similar question recently at another forum.
The answer was
for the same magnification
DOF
Thanks, Chris.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Chris Mitchell
chris.mitch...@which.net wrote:
Super portraits Dan. Larry is a bit of a cheeky bugger isn't he?
Chris
On 24 May 2015 at 21:31, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
On 5/30/2015 2:05 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
A question for the macro mavens, Is there an noticeable difference in
depth of field of the subject, when using different focal length lenses?
For example, if I were to come in to the distance where I'm at 1:1
magnification with my 35, 50 and 90mm
Thanks, Don.
The company was the scruffy, inebriated, disruptive, slightly
malodorous sort Joy and I usually hang around with, because we blend
right in.
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote:
They were the kind
They were the kind of people who are prepared to hang out with Rick, so make of
that what you will.
B
On 30 May 2015, at 16:51, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Lovely collection, some universal some perfectly English. Don't know about
the company you were keeping.
We got back
What Bulent said - at the same magnification DOF is essentially the
same. I read that in a book yeas ago and at the time it seemed counter
intuitive, but I did the test you describe and found that the there was
no real difference in DOF.
On 5/30/2015 2:05 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
A question for
Good point Matthew. True.
Thanks for the kind words Rick. It's funny because that shot was the
last of a series in the same general location and almost an
afterthought. I didn't think it would really be worth it because the
sun was against me, throwing most of the tractor (from this
perspective)
I am finding myself a little out of touch regarding good printing papers.
I'm looking for matte surface, roll paper up to 17 is fine. I would
prefer to buy from a Canadian dealer.
Any advice will be appreciated.
thanks
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20---%20%20doublecompound.html
Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/vmc Vivitar 70-210mm f2.8~4.0 (Komine)
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality
I'm sure you'll be happy with your selection, Eric - it's an excellent lens.
Mark
On 5/30/2015 2:58 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On May 16, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Thanks again to all who responded to my request for input regarding wide angle
zooms. FWIW,regarding
Nice - like pearls on a string. The spider probably slept in till the
the dew dried up.
Mark
On 5/29/2015 2:38 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Taken in Seney National Wildlife Reserve, in the Upper Peninsula of
Michigan on an early, dewy August morning.
The spider took the day off for this image.
Quoting Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net:
You would have paid a steep price
for my copy of the DA16-45, Eric!
Good choice!
Yes - hard to find anything bad to say about it. My only regret is
that I don't use it as often since I got the 18-135. I've just become
more lazy as I get older...
I couldn't figure out how to work both bug and nipplewort into a
provocative title.
To my surprise, I got another keeper today.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/18284298582/in/album-72157653722828602/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
You would have paid a steep price
for my copy of the DA16-45, Eric!
Good choice!
J
Sent from my iPhone
On May 30, 2015, at 3:36 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
The 16-45 is an outstanding value. It shoots much better than it looks or
feels. You will like it.
Paul via
The 16-45 is an outstanding value. It shoots much better than it looks or
feels. You will like it.
Paul via phone
On May 30, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
I'm sure you'll be happy with your selection, Eric - it's an excellent lens.
Mark
On 5/30/2015 2:58 PM,
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/longhorn-beetle
Took a somewhat different approach with this one and it seems to have
worked out OK. Or maybe the subject is just very photogenic. Be sure to
check out the lager view for all the detail. Comments welcome!
Mark
---
This email
What a clever way to Coit us.
Nice triple icon shot
On May 28, 2015 6:39:24 PM PDT, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
wrote:
The City by the Bay:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18029316size=md
K-5 II S, DA 28-135 zoom
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
Lovely set Rick and it was good to see you both. Come again soon!
Chris
On 30 May 2015 at 03:03, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote:
We got back to Philly late yesterday afternoon. We had an excellent 9 days in
the UK (8 days out of 9 being comfortable and sunny is routine, right?).
A
Hi Barry,
On Fri, 29 May 2015 18:07:58 -0700 Barry Rice wrote:
Tomorrow I'm going to be doing a long term video shoot. I have an AC adapter
(D-AC50) for my K7. This supplies 8.3V, 2A. Meanwhile, my K3 requires the
same voltage, amperage. The plug is compatible with both. Is it safe to use
this
Good morning,
How does one switch times to a 24 hour clock in LR4? I can find nothing useful
on line or in Martin Evening's book.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
I've recently been experimenting with posting in Google+ communities.
One thing that I have noticed is that, in default viewing mode,
vertical compositions are shown larger (short dimension sized to fit
the column) and horizontal compositions are shown smaller (to fit the
long dimension within the
Excellent pic, Darren; I've been looking at it for about 10 minutes and keep
finding interesting details (such as the way the wind has blown the trees near
the church). It certainly merits Flickr's kudo!
Cheers,
Rick
On May 30, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
I've recently been
Very nice, Chris! I like the way the people in #3 give scale to the White
Horse. There is also really nothing like film-based BW photography...
Cheers,
Rick
On May 29, 2015, at 7:44 AM, Chris Mitchell wrote:
Six genuine Pentax film photos from our PDML meet with Rick and Joy at
the White
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that the majority of people rarely turn their
cameras to a vertical orientation, horizontal is the default and
probably widely outnumbers verticals in images produced
The default depends whether their camera
I like it, Ken. The grasses provide an interesting twist on the wet-spider-web
theme.
Rick
On May 29, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Taken in Seney National Wildlife Reserve, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan
on an early, dewy August morning.
The spider took the day off for this
Lovely. Spider inferred.
On 5/30/15 10:06 AM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 14:38:26 -0400
From: Ken Wallerkwal...@peoplepc.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - 'Hanging out'
Message-ID: E5A07C1C36054C3AA5A020EBD154F14F@kena60ebc3b689
Lovely collection, some universal some perfectly English. Don't know
about the company you were keeping.
On 5/30/15 10:06 AM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 22:03:31 -0400
From: Rick Womerrickpic...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject:
Thank you, Rick.
I appreciate your comment.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
38 matches
Mail list logo
