Re: PESO, GESO New Zealand pics

We have just come back from 11 days in Tassie, nice spot, a bit like a smaller version of NZ with less snow LOL I'm still editing from December, at one point I shot 10 shows in as many days, about 20k images all up. Cheers, On 13 February 2018 at 08:35, Gonz wrote: > No

Re: PESO: T-Time

I mainly have Levis. -Original Message- >From: ann sanfedele >Subject: Re: PESO: T-Time > >Now I feel silly - I also should have KNOWN Bob was kidding.. >I do have a British gene in my DNA > >ann > >On 2/14/2018 6:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: >> Steve Cottrell wrote: >>

Re: PESO: T-Time

I wasn't kidding. > On 15 Feb 2018, at 00:13, ann sanfedele wrote: > > Now I feel silly - I also should have KNOWN Bob was kidding.. > I do have a British gene in my DNA > > ann > >> On 2/14/2018 6:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: >> Steve Cottrell wrote: >> >>> On 12/2/18, ann

Re: PESO: T-Time

> On 14 Feb 2018, at 23:56, Mark Roberts wrote: > > Steve Cottrell wrote: > >> On 12/2/18, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>> Distracting? - it's essential to the photo - ordinary without it >>> I hope you were kidding >> >> Don't worry Ann, it's

Re: PESO: T-Time

Now I feel silly - I also should have KNOWN Bob was kidding.. I do have a British gene in my DNA ann On 2/14/2018 6:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Steve Cottrell wrote: On 12/2/18, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: Distracting?  - it's essential to the photo  - ordinary without it I

Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018

Well, there you go, that's a problem... On 12/31/2017 7:49 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: Well I wouldnt say that since I don't drink at all ann On 12/31/2017 6:56 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: Some would say that the PDML is a drinking list with a photography problem... -- America wasn't

Re: PESO: T-Time

Steve Cottrell wrote: >On 12/2/18, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Distracting?  - it's essential to the photo  - ordinary without it >>I hope you were kidding > >Don't worry Ann, it's British humour. Bob has it shipped in twice a month from China. >Besides, what T ? I should

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

I expect that Pentax will do something unexpected,  so the next Top model will be named the M-1 because history... On 2/14/2018 11:53 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote: Aha! For the last few years, I've been thinking that something was really odd with the Pentax top-lines' model numbers. (While the

OT - Blues and Jazz

This link came over another list I'm on and I think that several of the folks on here would appreciate it as well. It's a blues and jazz station that simulcasts over the net. Original Message From: Scott Bonacker via Mgs Sent: February 12, 2018 2:59:45

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Fortunately, and somewhat unusually for me, I will not find it hard to resist temptation. With respect to low-light performance, I am already blown away. When we get back from a trip I typically do a quick pass through the downloaded images, everything that looks interesting and salvageable

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

It’s the typical minor upgrade we get between model launches. Not surprising. Paul > On Feb 14, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Gonz wrote: > > So not even the new sensor from Sony? Wow. > > >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote: >> The leaked

Re: PESO: T-Time

Lol On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote: > On 12/2/18, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Distracting? - it's essential to the photo - ordinary without it >>I hope you were kidding > > Don't worry Ann, it's British humour. > > Besides, what T

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

So not even the new sensor from Sony? Wow. On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote: > The leaked specs at pentaxrumors.com look somewhat genuine to me. > And if true it is not a major upgrade: > > - 2 stops higher ISO up to 819200 (same as KP I guess) > -

Re: PESO: T-Time

On 12/2/18, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: >Distracting?  - it's essential to the photo  - ordinary without it >I hope you were kidding Don't worry Ann, it's British humour. Besides, what T ? -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and || (O) |Live Broadcast News

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Aha! For the last few years, I've been thinking that something was really odd with the Pentax top-lines' model numbers. (While the lower model lines' numbers were missing sharpness.) Igor On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Bill wrote: On 2/14/2018 9:58 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote: Following the naming

Re: PESOs -- Monarch of the Daisies.

The white flowers were a little blown out in the second image, so I used a bit of trickery as well as a bit of negative exposure compensation to give them some texture.   Boosting the shadows ruined the effect of my other corrections so I decided to post as is. On 2/14/2018 10:38 AM, Igor

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Following the naming trend, the next one should be K 0.1 ... or, maybe K (-1). Ooh, wait... the formal name is already "K-1". So, it will be K-0.1. ;-) Igor Paul Stenquist Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:36:29 -0800 wrote: Yep. I don’t do the incremental upgrades. I’ll wait for the K2. Paul -- PDML

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Jan van Wijk wrote: >The leaked specs at pentaxrumors.com look somewhat genuine to me. >And if true it is not a major upgrade: > > - 2 stops higher ISO up to 819200 (same as KP I guess) > - improved high-ISO noise handling > - Improved pixel-shift > >No reason to upgrade my 3 months old K1 :)

Re: PESOs -- Monarch of the Daisies.

Very nice! At first I didn't even noticed the butterfly not having the sharpest focus. But given the focus being on the daisies, you can call it "Daisies' Monarchy". :-) I like the composition of the first one much more than that of the 2nd one. Besides, the shadow potions of second one

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Yep. I don’t do the incremental upgrades. I’ll wait for the K2. Paul > On Feb 14, 2018, at 10:31 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote: > > > > Larry, I know that you want it! > And let me tell you, you need it. ;-) > As a favor to you, I can send you a postage-paid label so that you

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Larry, I know that you want it! And let me tell you, you need it. ;-) As a favor to you, I can send you a postage-paid label so that you can carefully pack your existing K-1 into a box and get rid of it easily and painlessly. ;-) Cheers, Igor Larry Colen Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:10:43 -0800

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Jan van Wijk wrote: The leaked specs at pentaxrumors.com look somewhat genuine to me. And if true it is not a major upgrade: - 2 stops higher ISO up to 819200 (same as KP I guess) - improved high-ISO noise handling - Improved pixel-shift Here's the link:

Re: Sac Ntl Refuge

I'm solidly among the praisers, Erik! It's equipped with convenient and useful features and the machiening Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 14, 2018, at 6:17 AM, Eric Weir wrote: > > > >> On Feb 10, 2018, at 5:15 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >> >> Thanks,

Re: PESO: T-Time

Rick Womer wrote: >I like it, and think the T is a good inclusion for scale and a sense of place. > >Was the range of brightness really such that you had to use HDR? Probably helpful but not strictly necessary. But then my reasons for using HDR never have anything to do with getting increased

Re: Sac Ntl Refuge

> On Feb 10, 2018, at 5:15 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > Thanks, Erik! > > Equipment for most all reasonably > recent nature images: > Pentax K3/D FA 150-450. I see that that lens gets rave reviews. Certainly you got good results with it.

K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

The leaked specs at pentaxrumors.com look somewhat genuine to me. And if true it is not a major upgrade: - 2 stops higher ISO up to 819200 (same as KP I guess) - improved high-ISO noise handling - Improved pixel-shift No reason to upgrade my 3 months old K1 :) Regards, JvW