Yeah but those aren't Auto 110 specific items.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Owens
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The smallest survey
Anybody think of anything I either
Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody think of anything I either don't have or forgot to mention?
Kent Gittings
kodachrome 64 in 110?
kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions
It's a decent lens that is rated only a little less than the more expensive
17-35/2.8-4.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Coyle
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:31 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Expensive BW
to indistinguishable from
much better lenses if you don't blow them up bigger or look at them with a
good loupe on a light table.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paris, Leonard
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:15 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED
like
within the zoom range and change the perspective relative to the background
by zooming as you change distances and locations relative to the subject.
Unfortunately most first time users with a zoom never consider or develop
that.
Kent Gittings.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I looked at one of the 20-35/2.8s and found that the sharpness wasn't as
good as the 20-35/3.5-4.5 I already had. Tests seem to bear this out
although in most cases it might not show up on film as much. Made me decide
to keep my slower version till I could afford a Sigma 17-35/2.8-4 instead.
Kent
as I have a Spotmatic F MD in my collection also).
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lon Williamson
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Favorite Body Roll Call (Yes, I am
use
them anymore.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Only using my prime lenses - I promise
Well, all this prime v zoom stuff is useless
Who says you have to stay in one position to use a zoom? If you treat the
zoom as a bag full of primes you can learn additional skills.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:10 PM
on a tripod in front of my Super
A MD pointing at my front bird feeder.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Max McRae
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tamron SP 300mm f2.8
Guys,
I saw a used
(I
have one). Works good if you like using a 300/2.8 lens without a monopod at
least.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Chan
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tamron SP 300mm f2.8
Anybody think of anything I either don't have or forgot to mention?
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Ewins
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The smallest survey
Forgive the pun
I think it is built from multiple smaller ones.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Collin Brendemuehl
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Digital backs
Here's something to look at:
Fuji
be on the print. He
was a little perturbed because he wasn't sure he liked 100% after that.
Go figure.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Walkden
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 1:17 PM
To: lbparis
Subject: Re[2]: Pentax AF viewfinders
to be
standing under the ozone hole in Antarctica.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Harris
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 6:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Photos of Aurora Borealis and Aurora Australis
From
on camera gear or more on
astronomy equipment.
By the way as a kid I lived in Maine for a few years. South of Machias in a
town called Bucks Harbor.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Sharpe
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001
as
normal and it could be built on a body not much larger than the film
versions of the respective cameras.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of john.vanderaalst
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 9:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Maybe ugly but you notice Nikon made the shutter angle and location exactly
the same as the F100/F5. Smart move I'd say. This is the kind of things a
good design team should pay attention to. But it's looks might take some
getting used to. And the limited lens range.
Kent Gittings
-Original
of a wave
of sodium light.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peifer, William
[OCDUS]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:42 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: 'analogical' lenses coating and CCD, not fully compatible
Actually Brendan I have an old Umax SCSI scanner I'm not using now either. I
think it is a 600S model. I replaced it with a USB Epson with an add on film
scanner module. I was using the Vuescan software with it in fact. Let me
know if you have an interest.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message
Known variously as irregular surface baffling or random surface baffling. Or
Quaker Oats baffling if your brand conscience.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL
an
entire company just to get the rights to their code because they couldn't do
it for the same money or less on their own.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of lbparis
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
than Pentax's.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax digital info
From what little more I've been able to dig up I'm pretty sure
stopped and
then pull it away to start the exposure.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Spiro
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: K2 shutter vibration question
Various tests have found
or positive
image and see if it holds as you get larger blowups compared to using an
enlarger on the original negative. Anybody want to do a report on this?
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Farr
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1
think are made by using multiple smaller arrays.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pentax digital info
I considered that but my sources tell me
line simply because the potential buyer list is much larger.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chaso DeChaso
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax Digital NEWS! Part one
Wasn't there a time
. In
fact a 3 MP with interpolation to 6MP would be good, like the Fuji, while
saving a significant cost over a full 6 MP camera.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of aimcompute
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL
some ,like the Nikon D1 series, comes in bodies with 2 different arrays with
different sizes and therefore different multiplication ratios. Most fall in
the 1.2-1.5 range.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matamoros, Cesar
Just look at their feedback. If they have few and some are bad avoid them.
If they have lots and a few are bad usually they are Ebay marketers and you
can't please everybody. Meaning there are just as many if not more rotten
buyers as sellers.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From
hardware is in the design and
manufacture of a new version of the same chip array with some new
performance like increased sensitivity to various light levels and reduced
noise. Like going from the regular to the Kodak E CCD chips.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Also the focus ability of the lens depends on the registration distance to
the film plane. All the lenses would no longer focus at the normal ranges.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mick Maguire
Sent: Tuesday, October 23
Simpler more archaic solution to film advance. I'd compare a high end AF
camera to a manual one as the difference between a revolver and an assault
rifle or sub-machine gun.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
causing factors.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
This is correct. Pentax models that have aperture priority have been
stepless since the days of the first ES camera.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of PAUL STENQUIST
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 7:58 AM
To: Pentax List
to
not include the function built in on the MZ-S because of the improved low
light performance of the new system. Doesn't mean it won't benefit in some
situations from having a spotbeam available.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karasch
Kiev 60 ( 5 lenses)
Minolta Maxxum 9 (all my pro lenses are for this)
Minolta Maxxum 700si (2) (backups or alternate films)
Minolta RD-175 (digital 35mm body) (have to practice till a newer
Pentax/Minolta body comes out)
Fuji MX-1200 (pocket digital)
Kent Gittings
-Original Message
MZ-S
excepted but I have no knowledge of it's specs in that area).
One reason people use those cameras is because they know they will still
function under adverse conditions a normal camera will not.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Also remember in photography the important thing is the shot itself not what
equipment you have to use to get it.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Pentax, Minolta, and Nikon all still make manual gear in 35mm.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:16 AM
To: Pentax List
Subject: Manual Focus Bodies Lenses
Does Pentax now
glass formulations to save
a buck or two in later generation of the same lens. Especially if you can't
tell much difference shooting.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:32 AM
700si
Maxxum 9
Other:
Yashica Electro-35
Kiev 60
I could always use a few more of the right type.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Owens
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gear ratio
I've never liked the narrow focus ring on the F but the lens performance has
always been top notch. I also have A50/1.4 and older SMC-T 50/1.4s both of
which are great.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brendan
Sent: Friday
was zero maintenance
and less losses.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MZ-S; Built to last
Bad analogy ... Timing belts are used because
each
frame.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MZ-S; Built to last
My Ricoh XR-X uses an optical sprocket system to advance the film.
Less moving
also for a small added charge
(optional second Battery Grip Fg available). Was my wife's camera and she
has something else now.
Kent Gittings
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely
The joke goes:
There are 2 kinds of people. Those that divide people into 2 groups and
those in the other group.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clive Williams
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Pentax Discuss
or an AF lens in manual mode.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brendan
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The 5n could be the best if ...
Actually axe the mz-30, move the mz-7 into it's
201 - 248 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
