I know. If I had $250 I could waste I'd be grabbing one. I like the MX-1.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:00 AM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
Woot is a 24-hour deal site, so get 'em while they last:
http://www.woot.com/offers/pentax-mx-1-12mp-4x-opt-digital-camera
Kinda wish I
If it makes you feel any better my K-5 is sitting at CRIS with a dead
sensor and/or bad board. Hoping they fix it under warranty.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:20:44AM -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
I feel for ya. I had the bad
I'm kind of underwhelmed with the A7 to be honest. First of all, I
hate sony as a company and would only buy a camera from them if they
were the last company on earth. Secondly, its downright ugly, not that
I would care in the end, but dammit I want to look *good* with my
camera on my shoulder.
Who said Pentax wasn't cheaper? :)
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Nikon 58mm/1.4 portrait lens at BH: $1700
Pentax 55mm/1.4 portrait lens at BH: $800
Go Pentax!
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
BTW, thanks bruce for that link. There's been a lot of debate about
performance with wide angles on the A7. Its nice to see a concise
explanation on why the angle of incidence affects IQ.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Who said Pentax wasn't cheaper
IMO a good lens adapter shouldn't present any real problems with image
quality. All you should be adding is air. Yes, I realize that at say
F2 you might see sharpness issues at infinity when things aren't
perfectly aligned but honestly, who needs perfect corner to corner
sharpness or expects that
The comment about the 21mm and color shifts has nothing to do with
adapters though and everything to do with how RF lenses are designed
and their inherent incompatibility with digital sensors. Leica had to
pull off some serious engineering to get a full frame to mostly work
with RF glass. The Nex6
Awesome! Hope you like it! I can't wait for mine to get back from CRIS.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Just placed an order for a new K-5 with Beach Camera. A $100 reward card from
ATT for switching to U-verse arrived yesterday and I decided to dive
With the K-5 IIs moire is eliminated as soon as you pass into the
diffraction limit which is around f9. From what I can tell around f8
and smaller the benefits of removing the AA filter become negligible.
Yes I do realize you eek more resolution out of a filter less sensor
even at smaller
That's pretty good shadow recovery for mFT. 4 stops is good. I pulled
many k-5 shots up 3 stops and had awesome results. These new sensors
are starting to get pretty good in terms of shadow noise.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
I'm wondering the same thing myself. A lot of people are concerned
with shadow noise and banding. Its actually pretty normal for
companies to prevent people from saving images on preproduction
cameras, but I don't know why people aren't allowed to talk about IQ.
I'm just patiently waiting for
excuse me. i need to wipe up some drool.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
If I had the discretionary income I would discreetly purchase this bad baby:
Pentax-A* 300mm f2.8
What? No DOF preview??
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
No tiltable screen, flash sync not improved, no aperture simulator, GPS
isn't built in.
Pentax is doomed.
bill
The first line is unnecessary...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
No focus peaking?
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
Oh, and BTW - no mention of PRIME III...
There is, actually:
http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/dslr/K-3_#!product-highlights
in the section headed
=) YEEE HAW!
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Not mentioned in the specs, but a big question by many ANSWERED:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29329237@N07/10137365063/
Yee-HAW!
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:33 AM, P.J. Alling
http://www.pktether.com/
Full tethering with the K-7/K-5/etc is completely available though
pk_tether is at best beta quality software.
With the K-01/K-30 on they seemed to have changed the firmware enough
that this hack no longer works.
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Bruce Walker
I have now rethreaded 2 of the 3 stripped screwholes on my bayonet
ring. I will attempt to reform the last one again tonight. Eventually
it will take hold. The edges of the frame all seem to have equal
sharpness. There is some slight softness in the lower left corner at
wide apertures, but that
Well that certainly puts a price on it. LOL
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 10/4/2013 11:05, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Ann, do you really want to sell your body for a bit of glass?
G
the istd body - yes - for my body, I'd have to have a 77 and an
Looks legit. Lots of speculation over the bump and larger prism assembly.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/238387-another-new-image-k-3-a.html
No rounded canon look, ala K-50/K-500. In fact I think it looks
downright sexy. Time to start dreaming..
--
PDML
That element is bad, but not bad enough to destroy sharpness. I bet
there is certainly some loss in contrast on that lens. Also night
shots or anything with point light sources in the frame would be very
problematic IMO.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, fascinating to hear that the M*300 is so corrected. I expected 1
ED element, not 3.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
That element is bad, but not bad enough to destroy sharpness. I bet
there is certainly some loss in contrast on that lens. Also night
shared HAD indeed
seen one, to make some of the modifications he made (which appear to
be accurate). We should only be a week to 10 days away from the
official announcement. I wonder how much mystery will remain when that
time comes.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com
Migol, taken with the A*
300mm and a K10D. This image is the result of 3 hours of integrated
exposure time (stacked shots).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/smigol/10015256316/
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, fascinating to hear that the M*300 is so
A hump rumor
Originally posted by moray-eel-bite
Okay, so before the reality dampens the rampant speculation:
The hump is a wifi receiver and sending unit. This is needed, because
the LCD screen is removable and usable as a remote with full depth-of
field preview as well as focus peaking.
that if WiFi is involved that Ricoh would supply an
APP/application for a tablet device, (Phone, iPad/Pod, etc.), or PC/MAC
laptop or desktop for remote photography.
On 10/1/2013 3:02 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
A hump rumor
Originally posted by moray-eel-bite
Okay, so before the reality
, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:02:56PM -0400, Zos Xavius wrote:
A hump rumor
Originally posted by moray-eel-bite
Okay, so before the reality dampens the rampant speculation:
The hump is a wifi receiver and sending unit. This is needed, because
Can we get over this hump ;)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:43 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
A hump rumor
Should have saved it for tomorrow when its..
HUMP DAY !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Zos Xavius
So it turns out when I fell and bent my A35-105 the other day, I also
didn't notice that I damaged my mirror box. I realized it was out of
alignment and was hoping the ring was just deformed. Turns out two
screws are stripped and the whole box is warped. Damn. Just got this
K-7 too. I figure CRIS
.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
So it turns out when I fell and bent my A35-105 the other day, I also
didn't notice that I damaged my mirror box. I realized it was out of
alignment and was hoping the ring was just deformed. Turns out two
screws are stripped
Damn I figured it wouldn't last long. That's actually the 300mm I've
been wanting for some time. Ah well, more will come around when I have
some cash for a change.
Stan, Sorry you had to send the 400 back. I guess it was just too good
to be true. You did get an awesome reflection shot with it, so
This looks like it could be real
http://photorumors.com/2013/09/26/first-picture-of-the-new-pentax-k-3-dslr-camera/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
it.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:20 PM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks like it could be real
http://photorumors.com/2013/09/26/first-picture-of-the-new-pentax-k-3-dslr-camera/
I'm not going
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-nfWxVV3SLpI/UkRyhGCADuI/Sgc/0UuYK1ZkO8Y/d/PentaxK-3_02.jpgg
It looks real
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
quoting photorumors themselves:
I don't think so, digicame-info always posts real stuff, they have
oh please. growing from selling 20 cameras to 30 is hardly setting
precedent! and their profit margins are insane because they keep
ramping prices on their gear. the new noctilux is like $10,000. No
wonder they are profitable
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com
precedent I meantsent too fast there...I'm just pointing out that
their growth rate means nothing when canikon sells hundreds of cameras
every day
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
oh please. growing from selling 20 cameras to 30 is hardly setting
/2013 2:05 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
This looks like it could be real
http://photorumors.com/2013/09/26/first-picture-of-the-new-pentax-k-3-dslr-camera/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
From what I understand Leica has operated at a loss or near break even
for many years now. Part of their high costs are firstly their high
cost of manufacturing. Secondly economies of scale play a major
factor. For ever $2000 FF DSLR Canikon sells, they certainly profit
less, but then they sell
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
Many pre-digital SLR lenses do work very well indeed. Few to none work as
well as lenses which are optimized for digital sensors with respect to
measurable lens performance criteria. However, I often use older lenses
I personally think (and hope) they go for a mirrorless solution with a
super short flange distance that will adapt any other system's full
frame lenses. Since they need to create a bunch of new lenses for full
frame they might as well start from scratch like sony did with
e-mount. Being able to
jumped ship a long time ago. Now the market is
the people that *think* they need FF (and probably don't).
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally think (and hope) they go for a mirrorless solution with a
super short flange distance that will adapt any
, Zos Xavius wrote:
33% more resolution and no AA filter? That's a big step up from the
k-5 on paper. We shall have to see what noise and DR looks like.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2013/09/latest-k-3-technical-details-from-my.html
It sounds like an announcement is right around the corner. Photorumors
source says 20mp. Rice High's source says 24mp. I'm gonna take a wild
shot and bet on 24mp as 20mp is not competitive with the D7100.
On Sun, Sep
Look at some 100% samples from the X-5. I've owned some bridge cameras
and the panny ones were always the best IMO with support for RAW and
great lenses. The X-5 samples look pretty awful full size. Everything
looks like watercolors in a bad way. You could do a whole lot better
for the price. I
33% more resolution and no AA filter? That's a big step up from the
k-5 on paper. We shall have to see what noise and DR looks like.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
http
There is a rumor the sensor can move around and the camera can combine
the resulting shots into a higher MP image as well. How this works
with APS-C designed lenses with a tight circle I have no idea, but I
guess we shall see if this rumor is correct.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Zos Xavius
3030
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:57 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
2525
On 9/20/2013 7:09 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
What year?
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com
To: PDML@pdml.net PDML@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:12 AM
Count me in on the envious list... :P
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:14:31PM -0400, John wrote:
... to stay out of Music Stores and Camera Stores.
Decided to stop by one of my local independent camera shops on the way
home from
I predict that in keeping with the current fascination with retro gear
the K-3 will be a full frame LX digital with an EVF and a 36mp sensor.
Now *that* would be a camera to get excited over. Ok, maybe not. I
still predict that Pentax will try to introduce a mirrorless FF system
and that K-mount
Thanks! I wanted to try this and compare with silver efex!
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
DxO in combination with SONY is offering a free license for their
FilmPack 3 Essential software. You need to supply your email address
and they will email you an
I agree entirely Bipin. I don't think there is a single thing that is
different from the K-30 to the K-50 outside of the change in body
shape. That the buttons on the back are all in the same exact place
tells me that the K-50 is just a K-30 in sheep's clothing. I think its
great that Pentax at
So the lens marked ugly only had a scuff on the barrel? Really?!
Nothing wrong with the glass? Ugh. I almost considered going for it
considering Keh's generous return policy but then I had to go and
break my A35-105/3.5. I did get a very nice replacement a few days
later from a kind member of
Really nice composition and detail. I wouldn't do a thing differently. :)
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Took a tour of state capital this weekend. Thought I might share this 1st
photo I took. I will post some more soon. CC etc.
I must correct that actually. There are at least three. The current
Tamron 18-270 is in k-mount. You just have to pay the insane price
pentax charges to put their label on it.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Darren Addy
Is it the M28? I have the 3.5 and its probably my favoritest lens
ever. I've taken more pictures with that than any other and it always
delivered when stopped down slightly. My copy sadly has stuck aperture
blades. Its sitting in a pile of things to hopefully soon send to
eric.
On Tue, Sep 17,
Wow. Tamron only has 2 current lenses in k-mount? Really?
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems like a lot of them are still available on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Dapsfield-keywords=Tamron%20Pentax
On Tue, Sep
Meh. Flash writes fail every once in a blue moon. Sometimes its just a
bad connection to the card and a reseat is all they need. There's a
reason all these new cameras have dual slots because everyone has had
a card fail at least once or twice on them eventually.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM,
With the Q7, it seems like you would need a good 42mm viewfinder with
the prime. I don't know if they make them with 42mm framelines.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 16/9/13, Bipin Gupta, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hello Steve, you are in luck. No
Very good to know. 42 is my favorite focal length.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
Voigtländer makes a 40mm FoV optical finder.
Godfrey
On Sep 16, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
With the Q7, it seems like you would need
I took a look. Very nice. There are some very lovely pictures there indeed.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
I've published a Blurb book based on the workshop I participated in early
last month. Mostly photos I took during (and before and after)
I've never seen a dslr torn down to the sensor and pcb board before.
quite honestly, an ist conversion doesn't look that hard if you take
great pains to put everything back together in the same order. that
said, I don't think I will be trying this. I guess the ist didn't have
shake reduction, so
Here it is mounted on a Q. He posts shots composed with it. They look
fairly accurate it he is indicating he did not crop.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-q/222794-electronic-viewfinder-q.html#post2365239
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Bipin Gupta bip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I'd blame the card a lot sooner than the camera. I've had my k-5
indicate that file could not be written before. I forget the error.
Card write error perhaps? I popped the card out and popped it back
in. The file came up corrupt of course in lightroom. I usually take
2-3 shots anyways just in
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/photographic-equipment-sale/237124-sale-pentax-fa-250-600-5-6-a.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
+2
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Exactly
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:01 AM
Subject: OT: xkcd hits the nail on the head!
My friend that sold me the AF28T Flash that died three weeks later
felt bad and brought me down a Vivitar 272. It takes 2 9v batteries.
=)
It looks like trigger voltage is somewhere between 150v and 290v
according to various sources. Therefore it is certainly not safe for
the hotshoe. Reading
, Zos Xavius wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/photographic-equipment-sale/236840-sale-pentax-67-400mm-f4.html
Of courseno automation...larger...heavier...but faster at least. :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Franklin do...@nutdriver.org
wrote:
On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/photographic-equipment-sale/236840-sale-pentax-67-400mm-f4.html
Of courseno automation...larger...heavier...but faster at least. :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Franklin do...@nutdriver.org wrote:
On 2013-09-12 1:37, Zos Xavius wrote:
Oh, I
at 3:25 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
My friend that sold me the AF28T Flash that died three weeks later
felt bad and brought me down a Vivitar 272. It takes 2 9v batteries.
=)
It looks like trigger voltage is somewhere between 150v and 290v
according to various sources. Therefore
, at 11:30 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Was running to catch a bus. My tripod swung around and got caught in
between my legs. Down I went tumbling with the camera slamming into
the asphalt. I had my A35-105/3.5 mounted. Its now bent beyond
usability. Majorly bummed. The body
And just like that someone from pentaxforums messages me with a good
copy for a very good price. Waiting to see some pictures of it. :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
:30 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Was running to catch a bus. My tripod swung around and got caught in
between my legs. Down I went tumbling with the camera slamming into
the asphalt. I had my A35-105/3.5 mounted. Its now bent beyond
usability. Majorly bummed. The body on the camera is surprisingly
They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
condition or not.
http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
I keep considering the A 28-135, but then look at the reviews on PF
and decide against it. It looks pretty badass though.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
I considered the F 35-105s pretty hard. I decided that I didn't want
to give up the f3.5 constant
, Zos Xavius wrote:
They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
condition or not.
http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
, fungus and/or
haze which will affect picture quality.*
which will affect picture quality says it all for me. It's not might
affect picture quality, it's *WILL* affect picture quality.
If KEH says it's only worth $90, I'll take their word for it.
On 9/11/2013 3:37 PM, Zos Xavius wrote
Who knows. My guess is that its the same sensor with a new image
processing engine.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/9/2013 11:50 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Yuh. k-7 and k20D have the same sensor. A samsung sensor. Its true
there is no standard for aps
Was running to catch a bus. My tripod swung around and got caught in
between my legs. Down I went tumbling with the camera slamming into
the asphalt. I had my A35-105/3.5 mounted. Its now bent beyond
usability. Majorly bummed. The body on the camera is surprisingly
unharmed. I am now with no good
A35-105/3.5. I haven't taken it off my camera at all lately. Razor
sharp at even f3.5. Stop down and it gets so sharp it will cut you. I
like this lens so much I'm going to track down a minty copy soon. Mine
has some slop in the focusing, but I've been more than ok with
fighting the focus when I
I haven't used thunderbolt, but find USB3 to be very fast. I routinely
get 50mb/s with a slow 5400rpm external drive. A massive improvement
over USB2 indeed.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:12:06PM +1200, David Mann wrote:
On Sep 9,
was
released the sensor was reported to be the same as the K-20D. I could be
wrong in the particular. However there is no generally accepted standard
specification for the dimensions of APS-C sensors.
On 9/8/2013 8:31 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Hmmmaccording to dxomark:
K-7 - 23.4x15.6mm
K
Correct me if I am totally wrong, but isn't the k-7 sensor size the
same as sony sensors with a 1.5x crop? Canon is the only oddball I
know of with their slightly smaller 1.6x crop sensor. OkI just
googled it. The difference is .1mm horizontally between the k-7 and
k-5. Not enough to even
movies.
On 9/8/2013 7:11 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Correct me if I am totally wrong, but isn't the k-7 sensor size the
same as sony sensors with a 1.5x crop? Canon is the only oddball I
know of with their slightly smaller 1.6x crop sensor. OkI just
googled it. The difference is .1mm
, Zos Xavius wrote:
Correct me if I am totally wrong, but isn't the k-7 sensor size the
same as sony sensors with a 1.5x crop? Canon is the only oddball I
know of with their slightly smaller 1.6x crop sensor. OkI just
googled it. The difference is .1mm horizontally between the k-7 and
k-5
PS: *ist-d is 3008x2008 pixels...so 2:2.996.
You really noticed a difference of .03?
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmmaccording to dxomark:
K-7 - 23.4x15.6mm
K-5 - 23.7x15.7mm
If those numbers are right, the k-7 is exactly 3:2 while the k-5
It takes skill. Nice shot. :)
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 05:49:47PM -0700, Marco Alpert wrote:
Gorgeous.
Yeah, Mark's one of those annoying photographers that
can make a photo of a blank wall look good.
- Marco
On Sep
Really nice brian! I wish I had a good camera when I was there last.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Crater Lake Pano
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
A very beautiful vista and
Ugh! Why would anyone do that?! :(
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a genuine Tamron PK/A Adaptall 2 mount that I will sell for $75
plus shipping.
I also have a Super Takumar 1:2/35 that is in MINT condition except
for one aspect. The previous
You mean a 12-105 f/2.8? =)
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 8/29/2013 2:03 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Wed Aug 28 23:48:20 EDT 2013
Boris Liberman wrote:
On 8/28/2013 10:52 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
http://photorumors.com/2013/08/28/updated-pentax-k-mount
http://photorumors.com/2013/08/28/updated-pentax-k-mount-lens-roadmap-published/
Huzzah!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
, that is pretty much exactly the
range I need, but since I can't use a flash, I also need faster
glass. Unless, of course the replacement for the K-5 can shoot at
ISO 25,600 as cleanly as the K-5 does ISO 6400.
stan
On Aug 28, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
http://photorumors.com/2013
that Tokina 11-16mm.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoping the tokina 12-28 makes it over. I love my 12-24, but wish it
were as good as the 11-16.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:04:25PM -0400, Stan
Rob, are you getting unsharp pictures during long exposure with even a
RF trigger and tripod??
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 August 2013 13:37, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
Rob, does your camera take pictures and appear to work
+1 for MZ-S!
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:46 PM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
The Z1-p or, better, the MZ-S.
On 24/08/2013, John Celio neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
http://jacelio.com/special/Auto-110-03.png
John
(I might put the ZX-30 in there someday, between the 6x7
Don't worry about the noise. Its the nature of the design. I can
assure you that it doesn't cause vibration on the sensor in long
exposures from experience.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks guys, I suspected as much, it's a very poor system
I like it. A 645 would be cool.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
The Rising Sun motif looks rather like the war flag of the Imperial Japanese
Army, so it's a bit like putting a swastika in the background...
It would soften it up a bit if there were a kind of
Its the SR. Don't worry the slightest about it! Even with SR off it
still has to lock the sensor in place.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested if your camera makes
My k-5 has noticeably louder SR than the k-7. Who knows why.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Its the SR. Don't worry the slightest about it! Even with SR off it
still has to lock the sensor in place.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Matthew Hunt m
Does the tokina variations of these lenses have SDM like the 50-135?
If it were me I would just use the screw drive. SDM sucks anyways. I'd
be thankful pentax put in a screw drive for backwards compatibility, I
imagine they will get away from SDM entirely with new lenses.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at
I realize that, I meant in the canikon versions they produce. Is there
SDM there or is that a Pentax only deal?
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Zos, Tokina does not produce these lenses in Pentax K-mount.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Zos Xavius
efficiencies in manufacture, even if it complicates repair, and
conventional wisdom believes it's better, so that's what will happen.
On 8/22/2013 9:06 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Does the tokina variations of these lenses have SDM like the 50-135?
If it were me I would just use the screw drive. SDM sucks
701 - 800 of 1156 matches
Mail list logo
