Sure you may ask. I, however, needn't answer.
:-)
(That's something my father
would have said. Remember that post about me becoming my parents? It's
happening again g)
I'm about 6000 messages behind :-(
But seriously, $60 Cdn for an 8x10 signed print alone.
That's a very, very low
Gianfranco,
Of course I knew you and Eleanor were kidding! Not about Leicas, but I
knew
you were in jest.
So was I. Until I started typing about Yuppies. I hate them because:
(a)
They have money, and (b) I don't. vbg
That makes two of us g (not having money, that is vbg)
ukasz
Tanya, after seeing your picture, um, maybe we should submit
photos
of ourselves when we were 27 :)
In a year and a half vbg
regards,
ukasz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
www.fotopolis.pl
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
Lukasz, are you saying that you are still only 25?!
Yeah, at least til the end of March 2004.
So you and Katrin are
both younger than me!
I have no idea how that happened. It wasn't me! Serious! ;-)
Woohoo, I'm not the baby!
But boy, do I fell old - must be that marragie...
;-D
To quote the Soup Nazi, from the infamous Seinfeld episode of the same
name:
Don't push your luck, little man!
Aw - the Soup Nazi... Mmmm - I love this episode :-)
ukasz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
www.fotopolis.pl
===
Hu.I have several prints on Canon paper and Ilford semi gloss and
pearl that are well
over 1
1/2 years old and now loss in quality with the S800.(My test strips)
I offer a 10 year quaranty with all my digital prints,no one has taken me
up yet.
Is it possible then that there's something
Hi there,
I have an opportunity to buy this lens in ex + condition for the equivalent
of $188. Is this a good price?
And another question - I love 50/55mm lenses. Really liked my M 50/1.7, was
very fond of the FA 50/1.4, and now I'm a proud (and happy) owner of one K
55/1.8 and one K 50/1.4.
The lens has a dampening switch on it so when you use it in manual focus
it
feels like a manual focus lens.
That's one of the most important things for me - it's good to know that I'll
have an opportunity to handle this lens before buing, though :-) I knew
about the dampening swich, but I've
I only used one for a couple of weeks, courtesy of Wendy, and I loved it.
Not only does it's size work nicely with the MX, but I liked the fact that
it focuses from about 17 inches out (someone correct me if I'm wrong).
You called, Frank? g
From Boz's site - it focuses down to 0,6 m - that's
I don't doubt your (or Boz') figures. I thought it was closer, but what
do
I know? g
No more mean comments from me today, so I'll pass :-)
My point, I guess, is that for street shooting, hyperfocusing from 2 feet
to
infinity gives one pretty good focus-free range, and that makes the
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've heard of the F80-210/3.5-4.5 Zoom
Are you sure such a lens ever existed? K85-210mm/3.5 did, though.
Ekh-um... Not really :-) There was a K 80-200/4.5 though.
regards,
ukasz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
I had a lot of problem seeing the exposure indications of the MX. Is this
normal?
That's odd. With LEDs you shouldn't have any problems with seeing them
in the dark, though they might be a little less useful in bright
sunshine (still, I've never had any problems
Hi all,
I've just uploaded a few photos, and they're ready to be seen by you on
the photo.net :-) Most were shot with Pentax cameras/lenses. Any
comments are welcome.
Here's a link to one folder:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=335549
and here's the second one:
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I've notice the same thing. I go with three lenses:
20-35
50 1.4
100 2.8 or 135 2.5 or Sigma 100-300 DL
I prefer the 100 or 135, but sometimes I need the reach of the zoom.
Either way,
I still seem to like the 3 lens approach: wide, normal and fast, long.
I've only got
testing
After 2 weeks of waiting, my MX was finally ready to be pick up this
afternoon. Consider they asked C$190 for labour C$35 for parts, they
must
did hell of a job to ask that much. I attached my FA24 and brought the
camera outside the service centre and see if it focused at infinity.
Shocking,
Well, the subject says it all. Any thoughts, suggestions, etc.? I want to
use this lens (if I buy it) on a MX.
I've searched the archives but want more :-)
TIA.
regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You just got married and your hanging around here.
Me? Nah... ;-)
Get ya but outta here! :)
I'm already gone (I've got around 2000 unread PDML messages now) - had no
time before the wedding, won't have time immediately after, but I'm lurking,
and obviously have the time to ask questions :-)))
Hi there,
I'm going to spend a week in Paris (it's my honeymoon - I got married
yesterday :-) Anyone knows any good used Pentax gear sources there?
TIA.
Regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Hi there,
I know this is very OT, but I've nowhere else to ask :-)
I've found some really nice last minute deal for hotels in Paris on a
Rates To Go website (www.ratestogo.com), and was wondering if they're
trustworthy. Anyone's ever used their services?
TIA.
Best regards,
ukasz
No, I don't get it. I guess I haven't been paying attention. How, if it
will
use manual and AF lenses, is it NOT backward compatible?
There are manual lenses and manual lenses - an A series lens is a manual
lens that should work on the *ist D, while plain K-mount lenses probably
won't.
Time to have a nice holiday in Japan and stock up every silver MZ-S you
can.
This baby is even less common than black Limited.
But it sure looks much worse than black ltds.
Regards,
ukasz
That's really the flaw of the regional offices. There are constant ads in
Japanese magazines.
Here in Poland, we have a very peculiar situation. On the one hand, there's
lots of Pentax advertising in photographic magazines (of the MZ-S, now the
Optios - and I mean BIG advertisements, like a
Or, if they don't, why
should we listen to liars anyway. grin not a big grin, because there is
a
little tinsey winsey bit of seriousness in what I said.
Why liars?
ukasz
A? Jokes are a little hard to explain. Especially so when you delete
the
first part.
You think? ;-) Sorry - rough day today.
Regards,
ukasz
Hi there,
I wondered if anyone knows what's happening with Mark Cassino. I tried to
contact him via email, but he didn't reply, and his latest post on the PDML
was sent a few days ago. Anyone knows if he's on vacation or something?
TIA
Regards,
ukasz
===
Hmmm Can any digital print be called a Photograph? Perhaps a
Digital
Image would be more appropriate!
Maybe. But for me, if it looks like a photograph and feels like a photograph
it is a photograph for me.
ukasz
But for me, if it looks like a photograph and feels like a photograph
it is a photograph for me.
Sorry for my convoluted syntax - that's what you get for not reading before
hitting the send button :-)
ukasz
Think I would choose 85 for slightly shorter working distance, especially
indoor.
If I had this lens, my choice would be the same, but, as I only have the
100/2.8... :-)
Regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the F 24-50mm f4.0 and the F 70-210mm f4.0-5.6 have caught my attention.
Paul - I don't know anything about the long lens, and not much more about
the short zoom, but I'll tell you anyway.
I've recently bought a SMC A 24-50/4 lens that's optically identical to the
F autofocus version. Haven't
Hi there,
My best friend is currently in Lyon. He comes home for Easter and asked me
if I wanted him to buy there something for me that's not easily available in
Poland (it's my birthday tomorrow :-) Do any of our French PDMLers know of
any interesting photo stores in Lyon?
TIA
ukasz
Merci beaucoup, CYril :-)
It depends if your friend looks for used Pentax gear, or new equipment.
And which stores are best for used and which for new equipment?
Here's a list
Bertorello's store is kind; they gave me a pentax poster during my last tr
ip
to Lyon last october...
Once again,
I think that finally I got a good deal on something :-)
SMC A 24-50/4 in exc++/mint- condition for $92.5 including shipping. I guess
this is quite a good price. The lens is really nice - it doesn't have that
plasticky feel that some A lenses have. It's solid and looks to be all
metal. I've heard
The subject says it all. I really need this info quick - I found only one
opinion on Stan's site.
TIA.
Regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
Also, does the price of $90 seem fair/bairgain or not that good (I don't
think so)?
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
- Original Message -
From: ukasz
Anything less then 28mm in a zoom is going to cost you the big
bucks.better buy it before I do...and if you don't email me the link
off
list ok?
Too late, Taz - couldn't stand the pressure and bought it :-)
The lens was listed on a Polish auction site with a BIN price of the
equivalent of
Hi there,
Is the latter brighter? I could use a brighter screen in my MX, and I could
get this one (the SC-21) fairly easy.
TIA.
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
Yes... The LX SC-21 screen is a little brighter than the standard MX SC-1
screen.
Is the difference significant?
I did have the meter adjusted on my MX to compensate for the slightly
brighter screen.
How big the difference is? Is it possible to compensate for it by adjusting
the ISO dial?
Hi Gang,
I really need this info quick, but don't know where to look. Any pointers?
I'm mostly interested in the number of digicams with the sensor bigger than
640 x 480.
TIA.
Regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave(not buying anything else this year)Brooks
g
C'mon Dave - it's march :-)
ukasz
--r-e-k-l-a-m-a-
Szukasz banku bez prowizji ?
mBank - za konto
http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank
Hi all,
I've just bought an AF Adapter 1.7X from a fellow PDMLer, and it seems
there's something wrong with it (the adapter, not the man :-) It seems the
adapter is focusing closer than it should (from 0.5 cm to a few cm - that's
1/5 of an inch, and then a few inches for those not so familiar
now. By July this camera may be uncompetitive. Price of the *ist D is
Huh??? Canon's EOS 10D just announced is not that different from *ist D.
But it's supposed to ship in March.
Regards,
ukasz
PS. I'm not dissing the *ist D, just clarifying things.
Anybody uses such a combination? How's the picture quality? Any other
coments?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
Hi all,
I'm looking for opinions on the FA 100/3.5 Macro lens. I'm planning to use
it as a portrait lens. How good/bad is the manual focus ring? What kind of
bokeh does this lens have? How sharp is it? And the last thing - how much is
it worth?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ukasz
PS. Anyone has
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 5:13 PM
Subject: RE: Opinions on FA 100/3.5 Macro
Hey there, I have one of these. If Pentax doesn't get the DSLR to
market pretty soon it'll belong to Bruce.
snip between, but
The subject pretty much says it all.
Thanks,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
--r-e-k-l-a-m-a-
Tanie bilety lotnicze!
Hmm.. that's odd. But here is the link to the image directly:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2003/gif/200309.gif
Many thanks, Lawrence. I still can not acess the picture from the first link
you gave me, but the second one worked.
Thanks again,
ukasz
Hi gang,
I think my MZ-S may have a focusing problem. Everytime I use autofocus the
object isn't criticaly sharp. I mean, when I switch to manual focus and turn
the focusing ring a bit (maybe a milimeter) to the right (i.e. set a bit
longer distance) it is noticeably sharper. It's a small yet
Just an idea, but...try setting the diopter while looking at a blank
subject, such as the sky or a plain wall and using the diopter setting to
get the AF and spot circle indicators sharp.
And that's the problem - they *are* sharp! The info in the viewfinder
(aperture, shutter, etc.) is also
Any thoughts on this lens? Anyone uses it? How good/bad optically is it?
Thanks in advance.
regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
Here:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2003/200309.html
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see any *pictures* there. Needless to say, I
don't speak Japanese, so I only clicked any link I could find there
(namely - one), but didn't find any.
Regards,
ukasz
Well, the subject pretty much says it all.
Thanks in advance,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
--r-e-k-l-a-m-a-
Tanie bilety lotnicze!
Don't get so excited guys :-) It's my article and it's entirely based on the
info from the list, the infamous manual, etc. There's nothing you didn't
know there.
Anyway, I'm glad those search engines work :-)
regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
Thanks Alan,
I guess I'll strick to Pentax, then.
Regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi there,
Anybody has this lens? How good/bad is it? I'm tempted by the 24 mm, but I'm
not sure about the quality. How is the manual focus?
I'm thinking about buying either this Sigma or a FA 28/2.8 AL. Is the Pentax
lens significantly better?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ukasz
Congrats, Glenn!
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January
I seem to be getting multiple emails from the PDML - from 2 to 4 of the same
one. Is it me (I mean - my PC :) or is the list having hickups?
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o
test
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
internetowy magazyn o fotografii
***r-e-k-l-a-m-a**
Chcesz oszczedzic na kosztach obslugi bankowej ?
mBIZNES - konto dla firm
How noisy is the Z-1p? I'm mostly interested in the shutter and mirror
noise, but if you know something interesting about it's film transport - let
me know too ;-)
What about vibrations caused by the mirror slap? Is it damped enough? How
does it compare to the MZ-S in this respect?
I'm
Hi there,
To raise funds for my-to-be Z-1p or MZ-S I need to sell some stuff. I'm
afraid that because of the shipment price my offer could only be
attractive
to our Polish members, but who knows.
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 f/3.5, the first version with the 67 mm filter
thread. A few dust
-Original Message-
From: Stephanie Stiavetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I'm actually very disappointed in the state of this list.
Me too, but it will pass. It always does.
tv
I, for one, am quite happy ;-)
You see - I haven't had much free time to read the list recently, so
Read Fred's follow-up post, or change slashes.
Regards,
Lukasz
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: VS1 35-85/2.8 Lens Images
Fred,
In all of these site
You sure about the price? That's about $225 and that would make it a steal.
Now, if only I had tese $225 in my pocket... sigh
Lukasz
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:27 PM
Subject: LX for sale in UK AP
] wrote:
Czesc! Wiesz cos na temat adapterow Tamrona KA?mOzna ich uzywac z nowymi
puszkami?
Alek
U¿ytkownik £ukasz Kacperczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa³:
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it
is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: Odp: vivitar 35-85mm 2.8 lens
Czesc! Wiesz cos na temat adapterow Tamrona KA?mOzna ich uzywac z nowymi
puszkami?
Alek
Uytkownik ukasz Kacperczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
1. flare- how do i control
1. flare- how do i control it-it flares worse than smc lens
Now, that's surprise ;-)
3. was that a good price 0- i think so the last two on ebay went for
around
180-200 us or 320-350 australian
You already got your answer.
Sorry, nothing constructive here :-)
Regards,
Lukasz
I've seen the pictures, and I'm not thrilled. Out of 24 photos I think only
about 5 are great and 4 more very good. IMHO, too many look like thousands
of pictures I've already seen.
Still, that doesn't change the fact that Bruce Weber is a great
photographer, and the 67 is a great great camera
-
From: Dario Bonazza 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: for 6x7 fans: 2003 Pirelli calendar shot with Pentax
£ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
I've seen the pictures,
Where? Any link?
I've found the press release
I use a metal rectangular made for a standard lens for Practicas - recently
I saw one sell on ebay for $30! They're very nice, well made hoods, but I
got mine for the equivalent of $0.75 :-)
You see, there's plenty of'em here and (need I add?) the ebay seller was
Polish :-) (not me)
Regards,
I received a call today from Russ Kominek and the lens now holds it's
focus throughout the zoom range. I'm extremely impressed by Kominek's
service!! Pulling off what Pentax Canada could not! Russ stated that
Pentax equipment is one of their specialties so I would hope that they
never
This probably isn't the answer you're looking for, but if it were me
(and I know it isn't g)
You sure about that? I saw you wearing a bunny outfit, you know... ;-)
Lukasz
Hi there,
due to a sudden failure of my computer I've been unable to receive and
answers emails (and not only that) from saturday morning until now, but now
I'm back. Are you as happy as me? ;)
Regards,
ukasz
temporarily shut down the PDML
until you overcame your technical difficulties ;-)
- Original Message -
From: ukasz Kacperczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:28 AM
Subject: [OT] I'm back :)
Hi there,
due to a sudden failure of my
Hi folks,
does any know of a web page where I could find mr. Maytani's signature?
Thanks,
ukasz
PS. Sorry for thew off-topicness
,
Try
http://zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/archives/1998/msg09209.html
James
- Original Message -
From: ukasz Kacperczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 3:18 PM
Subject: [OT] Maytani's signature
Hi folks,
does any know of a web page where I could
Run a search on ebay - the last time i checked there was plenty of fujica
stuff.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: Sid Barris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:05 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: I Need lenses to match my Fujica ST 901--
You see, the French claim she was... (surprise, surprise) French :)
Lukasz (a poll himself ;)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Favorite Poll
Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul,
would like to say that you've missed lotsa inneresting disscussions, but
that wouldn't be true. The bickering is still going strong :(
Anyway, welcome back.
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: Paul Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:19 AM
To: [EMAIL
I'd leave the zoom at home (too heavy, not so useful focal range, and
despite the fact that it's said to be very good lens, it's a zoom and you've
got all the focal lenghts you really need in the primes you list), and would
put the 50mm on one body and the 105mm on the other. Hope this sentence is
OK, Bob - now tell which part is sad?
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 5:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How many bodies? - a sad tale
Well, I can't seem to part with a Pentax.
I started with a new ME
Anyway, I will have to send it to the only licensed Pentax shop in Poland
and it may take some time - I hate waiting for my cameras! :(
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 5:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how many
Errr... tell me of course :)
ukasz
-Original Message-
From: ukasz Kacperczyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How many bodies? - a sad tale
OK, Bob - now tell which part is sad?
Lukasz
I for one have noticed, but unfortunatelly it's not available in Poland :(
-- By the time this camera comes out, digital will be in an even stronger
position
than it is now, digital sensors will all be full frame at 20 - 30 megs,
You mean this spring? Wow - that's quite a lot to happen during
I didn't say it's not worth my kidneys. What I meant was that sometimes when
I want to buy a new lens I'd actually like not to reduce the number of my
innner organs in order to able to afford it. I'm not complaining about the
price of * glass. Hell, I'm not complaining at all :) I'm just saying
Does anyone know if the lens shade can be used on, let's
say the 30mm/2.8..
What's the filter size?
It's not removable.
But what if you really tried? ;)
Lukasz
After all - it's not mine, or is it? :)
ukasz
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 7:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Shade for 31 limited?
-Original Message-
From: ukasz Kacperczyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Does
:12 PM
To: pentax
Subject: Re: how many bodies do you own
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-2] ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
I'm just curious how many 35mm slr (or maybe not necessarily slr) you own.
And what is the lowest number that makes you feel safe.
I only own one 35mm SLR, currently. I just sold
I have 13 SLRs
AAaaarrrgghh
Um, sorry for that... :)
ukasz
Nice :)
BTW - how come I got the reply to this post earlier than the original (which
hasn't arrived yet anyway)?
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Now that's advertising. . .
I didn't know that I was the cause of so much trouble :) Never received such
an attachment myself (despite those from Brad which I deleted immediately
for my anti-virus software is down temporarily and I don't want to take
risks).
Regards and sorry for the inconvenience :)
Lukasz
-Original
Personally, I like Pepin the Short.
I think he had a cool name.
C'mon, Frank - we're trying to be serious here! ;))
Lukasz
Anyone has any experience with this lens or at least heard something about
it?
Thanks,
ukasz
I could send some money in an envelope (no credit card here), but it would
take forever to reach you, and would probably never reach you anyway (the
money, not the envelope).
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:11
I thought the point was for Doug to actually *get* something ;))
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: List news (don't read this, Mr Brewer)
We could start a get Doug a
What a refreshing thread - no mention of a non-existant Pentax DSLR :-)
Good luck with the camera club - it should be nice to have some themes
imposed on you, so that you would shoot something you wouldn't otherwise.
Cheers,
Lukasz
, October 14, 2002 10:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Well, in an effort to bring around additional topics...
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, [windows-1250] ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
What a refreshing thread - no mention of a non-existant Pentax DSLR :-)
I tried.
Good luck with the camera club
Lens name: SMC M/A/Limited 1:2.8 75-150mm
Length:
Diameter:
Weight:
Filter Thread: 49mm-55mm
Other: focusing down to 0.7 m
Regards,
ukasz
I feel the same. You can't make good pictures being interested only in
photography - you can't make good portraits if you're not interested in
people, etc. Something has got to make you leave home (or enter the studio).
Well, OK - you could make nice pictures of your cameras, but that's really a
Well, if portability is an issue I'd opt for the 100mm and the 200mm. I wouldn't
bother with the 85 or 120, cause they're too close to the 100. I'd go for the zoom if
flexibility was most important (and in overt photojournalism - i.e. when you're not
bothered that your subject knows you're
what do you expect from a test message? a dslr question?
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
