Scott Loveless wrote:
I've been thinking lately about the cost of doing photography and
finishing photographs for web publication. A recent, erm, thread got me
steamed up enough to post this. Basically, how much can you accomplish
without spending any more money than it cost you to obtain
http://pug.komkon.org/03jul/bigbarn.html
Scanned from a slide with minimal processing. I frankly can't remember what
I used back then.
But I have been using Elements for a long time, version 1-5, so that would
let most of my photos out. Even if I did no twiddling, I would resize and/or
Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 4:10 AM
Subject: Cheapskate Challenge
I've been thinking lately about the cost of doing photography and
finishing photographs for web publication. A recent, erm
Obviously you don't care about web quality images you posted a size that
I don't have to scroll !
When will you guys ever learn? VBG
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cheapskate Challenge
http://www.primelensphoto.com
]
Subject: Re: Cheapskate Challenge
http://www.primelensphoto.com/peacock.jpg
Captured in RAW, edited in iPhoto saved to jpg.
K10D, Pentax-A 400mm f5.6, ISO800, f9.5, 1/60, Av
mode.
Decent shot of the peacock next door, but I'm
still
waiting for the shot. Trouble is, he
Although I find this rather strange exercise, but here is my attempt:
If you're interested in playing along, simply post a link to your
photo(s) in a reply to this message, or mark it as a Cheapskate
Challenge photo in a separate thread. Let us know what software you
used to process/edit
post a link to your
photo(s) in a reply to this message, or mark it as a Cheapskate
Challenge photo in a separate thread. Let us know what software you
used to process/edit the photo. Compare it to the software you would
normally use. If you're not interested, I won't be offended. If you
On Apr 3, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
... If you're interested in playing along, simply post a link to your
photo(s) in a reply to this message, or mark it as a Cheapskate
Challenge photo in a separate thread. Let us know what software you
used to process/edit the photo
Been there, done that.
The cheapest one I've done was a straight from my camera to the printer file
of a historic building in Moose Jaw.
No computers, no external software, just well composed and properly exposed
jpeg. The picture is hanging on the wall of the business that owns the
property
for the odd quick dirty.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Loveless
Sent: 03 April 2007 19:10
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Cheapskate Challenge
I've been thinking lately about the cost of doing photography
Scott Loveless wrote:
snip
I accept your challenge!
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_potsdock.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax 20-35mm f4.0
Raw conversion Pentax Photo Lab 3.02.
Final editing and sharpening in Irfanview 3.99.
Web presentation, (HTML code such as
#5035527265195980162
If you're interested in playing along, simply post a
link to your
photo(s) in a reply to this message, or mark it as a
Cheapskate
Challenge photo in a separate thread. Let us know
what software you
used to process/edit the photo. Compare it to the
software you would
:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5035527265195980162
If you're interested in playing along, simply post a link to your
photo(s) in a reply to this message, or mark it as a Cheapskate
Challenge photo in a separate thread. Let us know what software you
used to process
/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5035527265195980162
If you're interested in playing along, simply post a link to your
photo(s) in a reply to this message, or mark it as a Cheapskate
Challenge photo in a separate thread. Let us know what software
you
used to process/edit the photo. Compare
Couldn't resist a challenge!
http://tinyurl.com/3dyzyg
Technical data on the page
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 4:10 AM
Subject: Cheapskate Challenge
Ok, here's 3 that went straight to the web from photographic media with
little or no manipulation, mostly because I didn't know what the heck I was
doing.
This was shot on Kodachome film, scanned with an HP Photosmart S10 scanner,
sized and saved as a jpeg using Adobe PhotoDeluxe, which came
Good exposures shouldn't require a lot of manipulation. The point is
can you do good work without a lot of expensive software. It appears
that the answer is yes.
William Robb wrote:
Ok, here's 3 that went straight to the web from photographic media with
little or no manipulation, mostly
17 matches
Mail list logo
