Ann -
Have you used the free Open Office software suite? It's the free
alternative to some of Microsoft's office products. Among other
things the latest version included their take on Word.
What will make it helpful for your needs it can output your document
directly to PDF format.
You can
with Photoshop (elements
hopefully)
Ann -
Have you used the free Open Office software suite? It's the free
alternative to some of Microsoft's office products. Among other
things the latest version included their take on Word.
What will make it helpful for your needs it can output your document
Ann,
PHotoshop and Photoshop Elements will render out an image to a PDF
file, but if you are looking to put together publication quality,
multipage PDF documents, buy a copy of the full Adobe Acrobat
application.
Godfrey
On Oct 21, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
ultimately
ultimately related to photo files -
will some one write me off list about making PDF
files for
book pages?
I have photoshop elements 2.0
and acrobat reader -
IF i send stuff up to cafe press for a book (we
are thinking, in effect,
son of Sign Language) they do the book pages in
real black
http://tinyurl.com/88qa2
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0509/05092701photoshop_el4.asp
Shel
At 10:05 AM 9/27/2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/88qa2
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0509/05092701photoshop_el4.asp
Shel
Wow, Elements 4. I was just thinking of getting Elements 3.
Hmmm... This version has Face Recognition abilities? It sounds like a
special Homeland
H, might be a short life
See:
http://www.gluckman.com/MongoTrvl.html
and search for goat.
Cheers
Brian
+
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm emigrating to Ulan Bator to live as a goat.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/15 Fri AM 05:28:28 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - how to reverse the colors in photoshop elements ?
On 14/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Even in mono you'll not get the result of changing
Cotty wrote:
On 14/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Even in mono you'll not get the result of changing or adjusting a specific
tone. You'll get a negative.
I'm emigrating to Ulan Bator to live as a goat.
Cheers,
Cotty
Just curious ~ do old goats get rejuvenated in
Oh, the lines I pass up...
Cotty wrote:
On 14/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Even in mono you'll not get the result of changing or adjusting a specific
tone. You'll get a negative.
I'm emigrating to Ulan Bator to live as a goat.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
No, they become lunch apparently...
keithw wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 14/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Even in mono you'll not get the result of changing or adjusting a
specific
tone. You'll get a negative.
I'm emigrating to Ulan Bator to live as a goat.
Cheers,
http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/elements/replace_color.html
Shel
On 14/7/05, Anand DHUPKAR
I need help.
Can someone tell me how to reverse colors in photoshop
elements ?
I have some pictures of glassware - with black
background. I want to reverse the colors so
background
. For that the color to be changed has to
somehow be selected, which is done any of a number of different ways.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
From Elements 3.0 for DOS:
Filter | Adjustments | Invert
Or just press CTRL+i.
On 7/14/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
From Elements 3.0 for DOS:
Filter | Adjustments | Invert
Or just press CTRL+i.
On 7/14/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/7/05, Anand DHUPKAR, discombobulated, unleashed:
I need help.
Can someone tell me how to reverse
. For that the color to be changed has to
somehow be selected, which is done any of a number of different ways.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
From Elements 3.0 for DOS:
Filter | Adjustments | Invert
Or just press CTRL+i.
On 7/14/05, Cotty [EMAIL
[Original Message]
From: Scott Loveless
From Elements 3.0 for DOS:
Filter | Adjustments | Invert
Or just press CTRL+i.
On 7/14/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/7/05, Anand DHUPKAR, discombobulated, unleashed:
I need help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good example Shel. I find Replace Color to be a very valuable
and frequently used tool. I shot an engine the other day with
a tan distributor cap only to learn later that the original
cap was black. An easy fix with Replace Color. A big job
doing it any other
On 14/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
That won't do it unless the result is to invert all the colors in an image.
The question asked was how to change one color to another - at least that's
how I interpret the question. For that the color to be changed has to
somehow be
Even in mono you'll not get the result of changing or adjusting a specific
tone. You'll get a negative.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Cotty
On 14/7/05, Shel Belinkoff said
That won't do it unless the result is to invert all the colors in an
image.
The question asked was how to change
On 14/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Even in mono you'll not get the result of changing or adjusting a specific
tone. You'll get a negative.
I'm emigrating to Ulan Bator to live as a goat.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
is built, and I like her speed.
But there is one downer. I'm not able to load the RAW files in Elements 3. I
have been to the Adobe site. There I realize, Elements does not support Ds,
just the D. (By the way, the D is twice as expensive here in Norway, as the
Ds, don't ask me why).
So now I do
On 4/6/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
First. Just bought myself a second hand Ds. The kit lens is in the bin
(relax, not literally speaking). I've bought myself a Tamron 28-75/2,8.
I'm convinced this is the perfect toy for me. I love her, and I believe she
loves me back. If it ain't
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: RAW files from DS in Elements 3
On 4/6/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
First. Just bought myself a second hand Ds. The kit lens is in the bin
(relax, not literally speaking). I've bought myself a Tamron 28-75/2,8.
I'm convinced this is the perfect toy for me
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 02:37:05PM +0200, Tim ?sleby wrote:
But there is one downer. I'm not able to load the RAW files in Elements 3. I
have been to the Adobe site. There I realize, Elements does not support Ds,
Download the 2.4 or 3.x ACR update. While the DS isn't on the list of
cameras
Tim Øsleby wrote:
[ dirty talk cut :) ]
I'm not able to load the RAW files in Elements 3.
You may convert your RAW files to .dng format; PSE should then open
dng.
If you do not have the DNG converter already, it should be found
somewhere around http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/main.html
At 04.06.06 Cotty briefly stated:
ROTFL!
Ahem
???
Cotty. To this simple (but flaming) Norwegian this just looks like a bad
opening in Scrabble. What are you saying?
Tim
The Flaming Norwegian.
The bit where you wrote
She responds to every move I
make. And when I touch her button, she
PROTECTED]
Sent: 4. juni 2005 19:09
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: RAW files from DS in Elements 3
Tim Øsleby wrote:
[ dirty talk cut :) ]
I'm not able to load the RAW files in Elements 3.
You may convert your RAW files to .dng format; PSE should then open
dng.
If you do not have the DNG
Tim Øsleby wrote:
This converter doesn't seem to support the Ds.
Tim,
I am 100% sure it does support the DS. Give it a try :)
Adobe's website indeed does not mention the DS as supported camera,
but I have a dng file, converted from my very DS .pef, open right now
in Photoshop.
Keep it
-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: RAW files from DS in Elements 3
Tim Øsleby wrote:
This converter doesn't seem to support the Ds.
Tim,
I am 100% sure it does support the DS. Give it a try :)
Adobe's website indeed does not mention the DS as supported camera,
but I have a dng file, converted from my
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 21:55, Christian wrote:
FJW
FJW - Original Message -
FJW From: Peter Smekal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FJW To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
FJW Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:45 PM
FJW Subject: RAW files and Photoshop Elements 2.0
FJW
FJW
FJW Hi everyone,
FJW
and Photoshop Elements 2.0
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 21:55, Christian wrote:
FJW
FJW - Original Message -
FJW From: Peter Smekal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FJW To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
FJW Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:45 PM
FJW Subject: RAW files and Photoshop Elements 2.0
FJW
FJW
FJW Hi
Elements 2.0
FJW
FJW
FJW Hi everyone,
FJW is there any way to open *istD RAW files with Photoshop Elements
2.0?
FJW Peter
FJW
FJW No. You have to use PSE 3.0 to get Adobe Camera Raw support.
FJW
FJW Christian
FJW
FJW
FJW
How about the Pentax plugin? Would that work
From: Peter Smekal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FJW To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
FJW Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:45 PM
FJW Subject: RAW files and Photoshop Elements 2.0
FJW
FJW
FJW Hi everyone,
FJW is there any way to open *istD RAW files with Photoshop Elements
2.0?
FJW Peter
FJW
FJW No. You have
Use the Pentax RAW plug-in. This works fine with the earlier versions of
Photoshop and with Elements. Its conversion is not quite as good as ACR, but
it's certainly usable.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Peter Smekal[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27/04/05 20:45:54
To: pentax
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: RAW files and Photoshop Elements 2.0
Yes the Pentax Plugin does work in E2.0. It's really quite forgiving of
versions, I was using
and Photoshop Elements 2.0
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 21:55, Christian wrote:
FJW
FJW - Original Message -
FJW From: Peter Smekal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FJW To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
FJW Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:45 PM
FJW Subject: RAW files and Photoshop Elements 2.0
FJW
FJW
FJW Hi
I tried, but it doesn't work in Mac OS 9.2. It seems that it needs OS X.
Peter
Use the Pentax RAW plug-in. This works fine with the earlier versions of
Photoshop and with Elements. Its conversion is not quite as good as ACR,
but it's certainly usable.
Nick
-Original Message-
From
Yes. Assuming you have hardware which is up to the task, I would highly
recommend moving to Mac OS X and upgrading your image processing
application to Photoshop Elements 3.0. Is there some specific reason
why you are still running under Mac OS 9?
Godfrey
On Apr 28, 2005, at 10:49 AM, Peter
Hi everyone,
is there any way to open *istD RAW files with Photoshop Elements 2.0?
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Peter Smekal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:45 PM
Subject: RAW files and Photoshop Elements 2.0
Hi everyone,
is there any way to open *istD RAW files with Photoshop Elements 2.0?
Peter
No. You have to use
Andre Langevin mused:
Acetone is the best glass cleaner you can find.
Not quite - there's a couple of things I'd try if
there were things acetone couldn't remove (MEK,
Methyl Ethyl Ketone, would probably be the first).
But acetone should get off just about any kind of
oily residue, which is
Can gunk (for lack of a better term) be cleaned off lens elements
without harming the coatings?
Joe
Yes. The SMC coatings (maybe others also) are harder than the glass
underneath!
Andre
--- Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can gunk (for lack of a better term) be cleaned off lens elements
without harming the coatings?
Yes. The SMC coatings (maybe others also) are harder than the glass
underneath!
Try acetone if you can make sure it stays away from any plastic
Try acetone if you can make sure it stays away from any plastic
surfaces (including plastic elements). Best agent I have ever used.
Alan Chan
Acetone is the best glass cleaner you can find. To clean cemented
elements (a doublet for example), it is recommended to dilute the
acetone with water
--- Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Acetone is the best glass cleaner you can find. To clean cemented
elements (a doublet for example), it is recommended to dilute the
acetone with water 1:1. This recomendation may be true only for the
old lenses that used Canada balsam
it around mothcake. The smell is strong. This is not a good idea for
lenses, cameras, or electronics. Mothcake gives off a gas and can leave
residues. I don't know if that is what I am looking at, but it is some kind of
stuff on one or more elements.
I haven't tested it yet for optical performance
is strong. This is not
a good idea for lenses, cameras, or electronics. Mothcake gives off a
gas and can leave residues. I don't know if that is what I am looking
at, but it is some kind of stuff on one or more elements.
I haven't tested it yet for optical performance. I had to come in to
work
Earlier today I discombobulated:
Today I received my second F* 300 f4.5 from an eBay auction. It is a
gorgeous lens. Cosmetically and mechanically it is close to pristine.
KEH would grade it no lower than LN-, and perhaps even LN. Then I looked
through the lens toward a strong light and saw
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:44:23 -0600, Joseph Tainter wrote:
the stuff gives off gas that deposits as a residue.
I'm sure you know this Joe, but for everyone else:
If you can smell it, it's outgassing, and it might very well be leaving
a residue behind.
Even if you can't smell it, it might be
Does anyone know if PS Elements 3 has the perspective control tool found in
it's bigger brother?
Butch
Hi Gang.
Looks like El 3 is now getting available in my area for around $100 Canadian or
so. Any
one have any
Raw experience with it, either with PEF's(istD) or NEF's(D2h or D1).
If i can save $750 or so by getting E3 instead of CS i'd be game
by getting E3 instead of CS i'd be game for that.
I've been using Elements 3 since early November, and one reason I upgraded
from version 2 was the RAW support. I have an *istD.
So, yes, I have the experience. I've been steadily learning how to use RAW
since then, too. I think I'm almost competent now
Elements 3 was available on Amazon for 69.95USD - when I bought it, it
included a form for a 20USD rebate - don't know if that's still included.
The 2.4 beta version of the raw converter is available for free download on
Adobe's web site and is said to work with E3 as well as CS. While they're
I use Photoshop CS but both PE3 and PSCS use the same Adobe
Camera Raw converter plug-in. I'm currently using the v2.4 beta
version as it supports the *istDS PEF files. Works like a charm,
and Photoshop's basic editing/tool model works very well for me
whether it's Elements or the full application
I've been using Elements 3 since early November, and one reason I upgraded
from version 2 was the RAW support. I have an *istD.
So, yes, I have the experience. I've been steadily learning how to use RAW
since then, too. I think I'm almost competent
Hi all,
I don't have Photosop yet. I have been working with
PS Elements and Microsoft Digital Image Pro v7.0.
Does anyone have any suggestions for the best way to
convert istD images into BW? Maybe Pentax's software
is better?
TIA for any ideas, I really appreciate
Does Elements use layers and the Hue Saturation or Channel Mixer
adjustments? If so, try these choices:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/color2bw.html
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Steve Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't have Photosop yet. I have been working with
PS Elements
I have not found these adjustments in either program.
Can anyone confirm this? Tried to search in the help
menu, but could not find anything.
Thanks for the link. I would love to try it out
someday.
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Elements use layers and the Hue
Steve Pearson wrote:
Hi all,
I don't have Photosop yet. I have been working with
PS Elements and Microsoft Digital Image Pro v7.0.
Does anyone have any suggestions for the best way to
convert istD images into BW? Maybe Pentax's software
is better?
TIA for any ideas, I really appreciate
] wrote:
Does Elements use layers and the Hue Saturation or
Channel Mixer
adjustments? If so, try these choices:
Elements has layers and also has Hue/Saturation. Does not have Channel Mixer
(to my knowledge).
Hope this helps.
ERNR
$64.00 with a special offer:
http://tinyurl.com/5zc5e
Shel
On 15/11/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Elements 3 for Windows has a large additional feature (Organizer) not
available on the Mac version. Seems to imply that indeed, with this
software,
they are different.
Not that I can get Organizer to *work*, but ...
Thanks E
Now with RAW support. 'Photoshop for the rest of us' apparently
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/adobeelements3/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Cotty wrote on 11/15/2004, 11:09 AM:
Now with RAW support. 'Photoshop for the rest of us' apparently
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/adobeelements3/
It's very good actually. I bought it the other day and then 2 days
later got PS CS as a gift. Anyone want an opened-box almost new
On 15/11/04, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's very good actually. I bought it the other day and then 2 days
later got PS CS as a gift. Anyone want an opened-box almost new PSE 3
(windows version) cheap?
Are you sure it's Windows only? a lot of those Elements CDs are hybrid
Mac
, unleashed:
It's very good actually. I bought it the other day and then 2 days
later got PS CS as a gift. Anyone want an opened-box almost new PSE 3
(windows version) cheap?
Are you sure it's Windows only? a lot of those Elements CDs are hybrid
Mac and PC versions...
Cheers,
Cotty
of those Elements CDs are hybrid
Mac and PC versions...
Elements 3 for Windows has a large additional feature (Organizer) not
available on the Mac version. Seems to imply that indeed, with this software,
they are different.
Not that I can get Organizer to *work*, but ...
ERN
http://graphicssoft.about.com/b/a/112499.htm
Sounds like some improvements here,although i have not looked into it that far,just
what
Sue is saying
on her pages.
Healing brush and Histogram carry overs from CS and camera raw support
menu. to solve that, I opened the file in photo
deluxe after having scanned it into
elements and added the border. Saved that file as
jpg and tif and it is still there as pdd
(2) Is there no text window?
(3) I used the neat file info tool - that was easy
to do, but it appears one has to
put
I've answered two of my questions ---
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
(1) can't find the tool for adding a boarder. In
photo deluxe it was under the effects
menu.
answer (just to share with others --
use the marquee tool then use, of all things, STROKE
in the edit menu,
now why in the world couldn't
Paul wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 copies of Photoshop Elements 2.0 to give away, they both came
free with some gear i bought and i dont need them.
If any one needs and wants a copy then just email me off list, first in
best dressed.
One rule, you have to actualy need the copy :)
Regards,
Paul
Sorry. It's early, I was a little quick on the reply there.
-Matt
On Thursday, October 9, 2003, at 01:13 AM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 copies of Photoshop Elements 2.0 to give away, they both came
free with some gear i bought and i dont need them.
If any one needs and wants a copy then just
Hi,
I have 2 copies of Photoshop Elements 2.0 to give away, they both came
free with some gear i bought and i dont need them.
If any one needs and wants a copy then just email me off list, first in
best dressed.
One rule, you have to actualy need the copy :)
Regards,
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: OT Elements Q
I don't know either. I've somehow aquired two sRGB profiles,
one from Kodak and one from HP.
Herb Chong wrote:
all sRGBs are supposed to be the same. this is an ISO standard color
Probably the best 2 sentence description I ever read concerning
sRGB and AdobeRGB. I don't use AdobeRGB any more, as my prime
reason for using Photoshop is printing on cheapo inkjets.
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Also, sRGB should be close to what you can get on a print. AdobeRGB loses a
lot of oomph
My film scanner (Prime Film 1800 AFL) can scan in 8 bit or 14 bit color
depth. I've been scanning in 8 bit mode because when I scan in 14 bit, I
get a message that says something like the image is in an unsupported color
mode and will be converted
Does PS really not support higher than 8 bit
this is one of the differences between Photoshop Elements and Photoshop. go
to www.picto.com and download the free PDF manual on inCameraPro. it
documents their software but it has a large section on general color
management and color profiles.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
PS supports 8 and 16 color depth. With 14 bit images, PS will pad it out to 16
bits. The color space I would try would be Kodak sRGB, since sRGB is pretty
much standard for all but special, high end work and works well with just about
all printing devices.
BR
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My
Elements can't do 16 bit.
I, too, got Elements with my PIE 3600 Primefilm scanner.
The answer is to use Photoshop or some other 16-bit capable
app. Don't pitch Elements, though. It has a few features that
photoshop does not have. Photomerge Stitching and the quick'n'dirty
Redeye reduction brush
Gee, Corry, I had more to respond to.
Part Deaux:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does PS really not support higher than 8 bit color or is there a setting I
need to change? Should I care about this?
Some say doing initial color correction in 16 bits minimizes chances
of posterization. I will admit
06, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: OT Elements Q
PIE recommended using Kodak sRGB for my 3600. There was a readme file,
not
the user documentation, that pointed this out. Your milage may vary.
I've recently been looking at some of the (to me) competitive digital
cameras. I want a small one, and will either use it in conjunction
with my much larger older one, or if it's good enough, it will be a
replacement for it.
However...
When looking at the CCD tech info, I find the following data,
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 08:33
Subject: Digital sensor elements
When looking at the CCD tech info, I find the following data, on the
three cameras Im considering:
type sizecolor depth
OptioS
On 10 Mar 2003 at 5:33, Keith Whaley wrote:
I suspect color depth and bit depth are somehow different, but I
don't know how.
Colour depth generally refers to the cumulative number of bits that represent
the individual colour components ie 24bit (red, green and blue) colour but the
same
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 05:33:52 -0800, Keith Whaley wrote:
typesize color depth
OptioS1/2.5 inline CCD 3.34 Mpixels 10 bit x 3 colors
Pentax 4501/1.8 4.13 Mpixels 10 bit x 3 colors
Pentax 5501/1.8
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:16:41 -0800, Keith Whaley wrote:
10 bit x 3 = 30 bit = 1b colors
24 bit = 8 bit x 3 = 16 m colors
Okay, how do you get 1 billion colors from a 30 bit color depth?
I mean, 8 x 3 = 24 is easy to understand, but how do you get to 16 million?
What's the operator here?
The qualifier is KEY:
simple, if two lenses are equally corrected, the one with less
elements will be better. ala aspherical designs vs spherical
only or zooms vs. primes, etc.
Well, this makes no sense to me. Why would a designer add another element
but to make the lens better corrected
simple, if two lenses are equally corrected, the one with less
elements will be better.
I absolutely believe that statement...
Well it seems bizarre to me. How can one be better if they're equally
corrected?!? Either they're equally corrected, or one is better. Both things
can't be true
Mike Johnston wrote:
The qualifier is KEY:
simple, if two lenses are equally corrected, the one with less
elements will be better. ala aspherical designs vs spherical
only or zooms vs. primes, etc.
Well, this makes no sense to me. Why would a designer add another element
to increase functionality? Like closer focusing??
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lens Elements, WAS: Vivitar 35-85 better than Pentax 24-90?
The qualifier is KEY
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
to increase functionality? Like closer focusing??
That too! g
keith
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lens Elements, WAS: Vivitar 35-85 better
simple, if two lenses are equally corrected, the one with less
elements will be better.
I absolutely believe that statement...
Well it seems bizarre to me. How can one be better if they're equally
corrected?!? Either they're equally corrected, or one is better.
Both things
Aha! You mean ...fewer elements. Yes, I now understand...
Mike Johnston wrote:
Somebody said:
simple, if two lenses are equally corrected, the one with less
elements will be better.
To which I replied:
I absolutely believe that statement...
So, Mike countered:
Well it seems bizarre
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
simple, if two lenses are equally corrected, the one with less
elements will be better.
I absolutely believe that statement...
Well it seems bizarre to me. How can one be better if they're equally
corrected?!? Either they're equally corrected
Hi!
I am not talking to myself, really I don't :).
I've been thinking recently (how unusual) and found a way to modify
somewhat the sharpening procedure I posted.
You can obtain quite unusual results by the following:
1. Instead of mild High Pass Filter apply it really strongly, say with
, January 13, 2003 2:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Elements
Ok, I have started to play with this tool. The very first simple
thing seems clumsier than using Picture Window. All I want to do is
crop the image to a paper size ratio. In Picture Window all I do is
select crop and pick
to the question at hand...is there a simple way to crop to ratios
in Elements or is it as lame on that front as it seems?
Bruce
Monday, January 13, 2003, 12:19:43 AM, you wrote:
JCOC you crop your images to match the paper ratio?
JCOC I crop (if needed ) to get the composition just right and print
I personally find letterboxed things to look half baked unless
expensive custom matting is involved. Much of my stuff goes in albums
for clients or personal albums - the pages sleeves are sized to
standard paper sizes. I think that letterboxing looks rather tacky in
that scenario.
First
starting
BD values for the unsharp mask for amount, radius and threshold?
BD Bruce
BD Monday, January 13, 2003, 5:57:51 AM, you wrote:
In Elements it seems even clumsier. Tell me how to quickly and easily
crop to a given ratio.
MJ Bruce,
MJ Just click on the crop tool, and you'll notice
, radius and threshold?
BD Bruce
BD Monday, January 13, 2003, 5:57:51 AM, you wrote:
In Elements it seems even clumsier. Tell me how to quickly and easily
crop to a given ratio.
MJ Bruce,
MJ Just click on the crop tool, and you'll notice width and height boxes at
MJ the top of the frame
201 - 300 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
