Christine Aguila wrote:
>Just saw this in the NYT. I didnt know Fredrick Douglas had written 4
>lectures on photography! I thought the list might enjoy this editorial in
>this mornings NYT.
>
>Cheers, Christine
>
Thanks, Christine!
A concise take on why we will always need good photographs.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
Hi PDMLers!
Just saw this in the NYT. I didn’t know Fredrick Douglas had written 4
lectures on photography! I thought the list might enjoy this editorial in this
morning’s NYT.
Cheers, Christine
And a misuse of the term "circle of confusion".
It is, to be certain, an archaic use of the term confusion and today we
might better say convergence.
They use it to describe the out-of-focus area when it's actually the
in-focus area, the point where the light from the lens converges.
--
PDML
Or
http://www.reynardcorp.com/products/optical-components/variable-filters/bullseye-radial-apodizing-filters/160-bullseye-apodizing-nd-filters-clear-center.html
On 4 May 2016 at 13:37, Toine wrote:
> from http://vapour-trail.blogspot.nl/2010_05_01_archive.html
>
> "Existing
from http://vapour-trail.blogspot.nl/2010_05_01_archive.html
"Existing imitation techniques
On Minolta Dynax 7 film cameras, the STF’s smooth bokeh can be
mimicked by taking seven exposures on one frame, each exposure with a
smaller aperture size. This results in circle of confusions with
bright
Toine wrote:
"STF lenses include an apodization element in their optical formulas
which creates the STF effect."
Apodization?? That's new for me. This page explains it:
http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/Apodization-Filter.html
Replacing the aperture with a gradiant aperture. Another DIY
"STF lenses include an apodization element in their optical formulas
which creates the STF effect."
Apodization?? That's new for me. This page explains it:
http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/Apodization-Filter.html
Replacing the aperture with a gradiant aperture. Another DIY project
on my bucket
Jostein should check this out
http://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/photo-articles/smooth-trans-focus-sony-135mm-f28-guide.html?src=eml
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse any swypos.
http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 19/2/16, Jaume Lahuerta, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://www.dpreview.com/opinion/4721880615/the-long-difficult-road-to-
>pentax-full-frame
Interesting headlines from you and I ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
http://www.dpreview.com/opinion/4721880615/the-long-difficult-road-to-pentax-full-frame
Regards,
Jaume
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
probably nothing new to some of you but I learned quite a bit from this:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/how-focus-works?BI=4906
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Quoting Tom Reese tomreesep...@gmail.com:
probably nothing new to some of you but I learned quite a bit from this:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/how-focus-works?BI=4906
Thanks for the link. I never really thought about this much until I
bought an
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2014-01-06 14:17 Bruce Walker wrote
Your spam predates my net access too. I was on email (UNIX v6 PWB) in
'79, then my company (AES Data) got limited net access in 1982 or so,
via
on 2014-01-06 14:17 Bruce Walker wrote
Your spam predates my net access too. I was on email (UNIX v6 PWB) in
'79, then my company (AES Data) got limited net access in 1982 or so,
via UUCP. For some years I was aesat!bmw (anyone else here remember
bang-paths?).
I always prided myself as being
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:32:32PM -0500, CollinB wrote:
on 2014-01-06 14:17 Bruce Walker wrote
Your spam predates my net access too. I was on email (UNIX v6 PWB) in
'79, then my company (AES Data) got limited net access in 1982 or so,
via UUCP. For some years I was aesat!bmw (anyone else
on 2014-01-04 13:52 Bruce Walker wrote
In 1984 when the 645 was released the Internet was a very
small network and didn't yet include AOL. Not even the first spam had
been mailed by then.
just a little reality check - this slightly predates my introduction to the
'net:
Earliest documented
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:29 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2014-01-04 13:52 Bruce Walker wrote
In 1984 when the 645 was released the Internet was a very
small network and didn't yet include AOL. Not even the first spam had
been mailed by then.
just a little reality check -
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:17:44PM -0500, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:29 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2014-01-04 13:52 Bruce Walker wrote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)#History_of_Internet_spam
Yeah, I do remember reading that now. I
on 2014-01-06 14:17 Bruce Walker wrote
Your spam predates my net access too. I was on email (UNIX v6 PWB) in
'79, then my company (AES Data) got limited net access in 1982 or so,
via UUCP. For some years I was aesat!bmw (anyone else here remember
bang-paths?).
i do, but i can't recall my
steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2014-01-06 14:17 Bruce Walker wrote
Your spam predates my net access too. I was on email (UNIX v6 PWB) in
'79, then my company (AES Data) got limited net access in 1982 or so,
via UUCP. For some years I was aesat!bmw (anyone else here remember
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014, P.J. Alling wrote:
The film era's not over yet. I still have film loaded in several
camera bodies. Someday I'll even shoot some.
That reminds me of this line: I like cooking with wine. Some of it goes
into the food.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
And you may also be able to get it processed!
-Original Message-
From: Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: Interesting article on LL 'The Full-Frame Myth'
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014, P.J. Alling wrote:
The film era's not over yet. I still have film loaded in several
camera bodies
Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/full_frame_myth.shtml
Interesting read.
Thanks Cotty.
Many of us on this list have been making and blogging this very same point for
years (though some of you guys continue to yearn for a FF Pentax).
As for
Cotty's just looking for reassurance that his hat might stay on his head rather
than landing on his plate.
On Jan 4, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Miserere wrote:
Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/full_frame_myth.shtml
Interesting read.
Thanks Cotty.
On 1/4/2014 3:02 AM, Miserere wrote:
Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/full_frame_myth.shtml
Interesting read.
Thanks Cotty.
Many of us on this list have been making and blogging this very same
point for years (though some of you guys continue
John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 1/4/2014 3:02 AM, Miserere wrote:
Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/full_frame_myth.shtml
Interesting read.
Thanks Cotty.
Many of us on this list have been making and blogging this very same
point for
John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 1/4/2014 3:02 AM, Miserere wrote:
Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/full_frame_myth.shtml
Interesting read.
Thanks Cotty.
Many of us on this list have been making and blogging this very same
point for
Interesting read indeed, Cotty. And a litmus test too...
Speaking of litmus, we have now a proper photography store in Tel Aviv.
Paid it a visit few days ago and got to handle Canon 6D with
24-70/2.8L... The camera is fab, the lens is out of my desire zone...
Boris
On 1/4/2014 12:00 AM,
John wrote:
I think some are still under the mistaken impression that what you
NEED permits you to tell me what I'm allowed to *want*.
What's interesting to me is that this nontroversy is new to digital.
Back in the days of film I don't recall anyone who expressed interest
in buying a Pentax 67
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
John wrote:
I think some are still under the mistaken impression that what you
NEED permits you to tell me what I'm allowed to *want*.
What's interesting to me is that this nontroversy is new to digital.
Back in
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
wrote:
John wrote:
I think some are still under the mistaken impression that what you
NEED permits you to tell me what I'm allowed to *want*.
What's interesting to me is that this nontroversy is new
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
wrote:
John wrote:
I think some are still under the mistaken impression that what you
NEED permits you to tell me what I'm
Paul via phone
On Jan 4, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
wrote:
John wrote:
I think some are still under the mistaken impression that what you
NEED permits
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
wrote:
John wrote:
I think some are still under the mistaken impression that what you
NEED permits
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Paul via phone
On Jan 4, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
wrote:
John wrote:
I think some are still under the mistaken impression that
On 4/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
some of you guys continue to yearn for a FF Pentax)
Because I can ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML
On 4/1/14, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Speaking of litmus, we have now a proper photography store in Tel Aviv.
Ah but is it kosher??
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
On 4/1/14, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
Surely you can buy whatever vehicle you feel you want to, but I
reserve the right to think you're daft if you decide that a road
grader is appropriate transportation for daily commuting.
That's just ridiculous!!
You'd never need anything more
Paul via phone
On Jan 4, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Paul via phone
On Jan 4, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell
On 4/1/14, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Speaking of litmus, we have now a proper photography store
in Tel Aviv.
Ah but is it kosher??
of course not - photo shops are subject to canon law.
B
--
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
Subject: RE: Interesting article on LL 'The Full-Frame Myth'
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell
On 4/1/14, Boris Liberman
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
John wrote:
I think some are still under the mistaken impression that what you
NEED permits you to tell me what I'm allowed to *want*.
What's interesting to me is that this nontroversy is new to digital.
Back in
On 1/4/2014 4:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
John wrote:
I think some are still under the
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/full_frame_myth.shtml
Interesting read.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I don't have to read the article. I can tell just by looking at those
597 pixel wide images at web resolution (and the captions) that all of
today's sensor sizes all produce the same exact high quality imagery.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
APS-C camera users, at least those whose cameras are of DSLR design,
don't get much of a break. The cameras aren't that much smaller and
lighter than Full Frame, and most people use full frame capable
lenses, because to buy APS-C specific lenses locks you out of an
eventual full-frame upgrade,
You do realize that he couldn't publish an article without including a
few images for illustration purposes, right? Reichmann doesn't expect
you to be convinced by comparing the images to each other.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have to read
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/articles/why-i-went-full-frame-and-why-you-d
ont-need-to
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Page Not Found
- Original Message -
From: JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Monday, March 5, 2012 9:04 AM
Subject: interesting article comparing full frame vs APS dslrs
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/articles/why-i-went-full-frame
Jack,
Odds are your mail program got messed up because the full link wraps
onto the 2nd line.
If you copy and past the whole thing into your browser's address field
(instead of just clicking)
you'll get the page. (It works fine in Gmail)
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Interesting opinion piece and the comments are valuable, as well.
In my opinion, the lost capability that is most serious on an APS-C
camera is the wide angle shift lens for doing architecture, etc.
The focal length multiplier kills you on that score. The Canon TSE
lenses are to die for.
Darren
Feb 25 (news and commentary)--Dealers on Friday got some new pricing
from Nikon, specifically on the D700. The new suggested price is soon
going to be US$2199 (currently US$2699). But here's an interesting
kicker: there apparently won't be a minimum advertised price (MAP)
associated with that,
On 3/5/2012 1:57 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Feb 25 (news and commentary)--Dealers on Friday got some new pricing
from Nikon, specifically on the D700. The new suggested price is soon
going to be US$2199 (currently US$2699). But here's an interesting
kicker: there apparently won't be a minimum
lens.
Or buy the lenses now before the price goes up.
It was an interesting article, and I'm curious to see what he has to say about
the D700 vs the K-5. For the most part, the difference between full frame and
APS seems to be about two years, and twice the cost. For me, the big appeal
Reminded me of all the KODAK How to be a better photographer books I
bought when I was first starting out. The bit at the end reminds us the
photographer matters more than the equipment.
From: Bob Sullivan
So Bill,
Do you think this is CNN trying train the public to take better pictures?
Ran across this while scanning CNN online. Thought maybe some folks
here might be interested.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/IREPORT/09/02/capture.photo.bootcamp.irpt/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
So Bill,
Do you think this is CNN trying train the public to take better pictures?
Trying to have 100,000,000 reporters out there with iphones.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Bill Owens wmbow...@gmail.com wrote:
Ran across this while scanning CNN online. Thought maybe some
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Bill Owens
Ran across this while scanning CNN online. Thought maybe some folks
here might be interested.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/IREPORT/09/02/capture.photo.bootcamp.irpt/index
.html?hpt=hp_t2
they're not really
Do you think this is CNN trying train the public to take better
pictures? Trying to have 100,000,000 reporters out there with
iphones?
No that funny, but still a Mark.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
So Bill,
Do you think this is CNN trying train
On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:06 AM, cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
I'd like to see the centerfold--is it of naked chemists such?Cheers
Christine from Chicago
I don't need the centrefold, I get to see a real naked chemist every day :)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
: Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com
To: Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Interesting article on the early history of photographic chemistry
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:06:16 +0100
I'm interested :)
2010/11/1 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
The most recent edition of Chemical Heritage (you should see
No centerfolds though. You must need a subscription to get the good stuff.
Chris S
--- Original Message Follows ---
From: Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com
To: Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Interesting article on the early history of photographic
chemistry
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:06:16 +0100
The most recent edition of Chemical Heritage (you should see the
centerfolds) has an article on the early history of photographic
chemistry. Esoteric, but I know that some of you are nerdy enough to
be interested. I'll sent a PDF copy to anyone that's interested.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML
...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Nov 1, 4:02 PM -0400
Subject: Interesting article on the early history of photographic chemistry
The most recent edition of Chemical Heritage (you should see the
centerfolds) has an article on the early history of photographic
chemistry. Esoteric, but I know that some of you
--
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net,Steven Desjardins
drd1...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Nov 1, 4:02 PM -0400
Subject: Interesting article on the early history of photographic chemistry
The most recent edition of Chemical Heritage (you should
: Interesting article on the early history of photographic chemistry
The most recent edition of Chemical Heritage (you should see the
centerfolds) has an article on the early history of photographic
chemistry. Esoteric, but I know that some of you are nerdy enough to
be interested. I'll sent a PDF
I'm interested :)
2010/11/1 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
The most recent edition of Chemical Heritage (you should see the
centerfolds) has an article on the early history of photographic
chemistry. Esoteric, but I know that some of you are nerdy enough to
be interested. I'll sent a
Just to note, it comes as three 2 pages files. I don't' have a copy
of Acrobat at home to combine them.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested :)
2010/11/1 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
The most recent edition of Chemical Heritage (you
For those interested:
Article:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/review/1496578/apps-exploit-graphics-cards
Adobe's KB: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad:
For those interested:
Article:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/review/1496578/apps-exploit-graphics-cards
Adobe's KB: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html
Thanks for posting this. Although I'd already known about that feature, I
didn't know that Use for Image Display was slowing
Can something similar be done in the latest LR?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Thibouillepentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
For those interested:
Article:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/review/1496578/apps-exploit-graphics-cards
Adobe's KB: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html
--
From the FAQ in the Knowledge Base article referenced below:
Q. Is Photoshop Lightroom GPU accelerated?
A. No.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:20:27PM -0700, Boris Liberman wrote:
Can something similar be done in the latest LR?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:50 AM,
Thanks!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:34 PM, John Francisjo...@panix.com wrote:
From the FAQ in the Knowledge Base article referenced below:
Q. Is Photoshop Lightroom GPU accelerated?
A. No.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:20:27PM -0700, Boris Liberman wrote:
Can something similar be done
There is an interesting article on focus shift, by Lloyd Chambers, in
the May/June issue of Photo Techniques magazine. Chambers discusses
the problem in quite a bit of detail. Assuming he knows what he's
writing about, I have a much better appreciation for the problem.
I never seemed
Note that's the Lloyd Chambers of diglloyd.com, his stuff is excellent
(I've got a paid subscription to his DAP site and also to his Zeiss ZF
reviews, worth every penny I payed).
-Adam
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:23 PM, George Sinos gsi...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an interesting article on focus
Hope it's not yet posted yet :)
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2009/03/interview-with-hoya-senior-official-on.html
Cheers,
.t
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Timbah! tim...@clancode.hu wrote:
Hope it's not yet posted yet :)
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2009/03/interview-with-hoya-senior-official-on.html
They would put more concerns on detailed characteristics (style?)
and mobility of their new DSLRs so as to
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: An interesting article about Pentax Future...
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Timbah! tim...@clancode.hu wrote:
Hope it's not yet posted yet :)
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2009/03/interview-with-hoya-senior-official-on.html
http://www.jmg-galleries.com/blog/2008/07/07/how-every-flickr-photo-ended-up-on-sale-this-weekend/
6 months ago I realized that two applications leveraging Flickr’s API
were ignoring photo licensing settings that every user configures in the
“Privacy Permissions” section of their “Your
In other Flickr news ...
Getty Images Begins Licensing Flickr Photos
Getty Images, one of the world’s largest media licensing companies, has
partnered with Flickr to add a broader selection of pictures to its
online catalog. Getty will hand-pick a number of Flickr members to
participate in
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.jmg-galleries.com/blog/2008/07/07/how-every-flickr-photo-ended-up-on-sale-this-weekend/
6 months ago I realized that two applications leveraging Flickr’s API
were ignoring photo licensing settings that every user configures in the
“Privacy Permissions”
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:22 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's only so low one will stoop...
F 32.??
Dave
AlunFoto wrote:
Peter, I think you should change your sig:
Vote for Ken Rockwell. Why settle for a lesser evil...
:-)
Jostein
2008/4/23 P. J.
Cool blog
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/2008-04-22-strobist-blog_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Indeed.
But how long do you think he can hold on to his readers?
Seems like a big risk to leave a paid job for a hobby project like that...
Jostein
2008/4/23 Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cool blog
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/2008-04-22-strobist-blog_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip
--
PDML
If, as the article says, he's making 6 figures from his blog in
advertising, that'd be a hell of a lot more than a staff photographers
salary.
But I agree, maintaining it for the long term will be difficult.
Cheers,
Dave
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:20 AM, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its hard to say, its certainly a topic of much interest among advanced
amateur photographers. And the advertisers certainly will go where
the crowds are. At the level of money he is making, he should be
putting a lot of it away for a rainy day.
On 4/23/08, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note he's also doing some paid work on the side (Teaching lighting
seminars), but he's become the defacto guru of lighting. Strobist is
to flash work what Thom Hogan is to Nikon or Ken Rockwell is to
clueless newbies. And if Rockwell can make a living at it, Hobby
should have no problem. Heck,
OH NO not Ken Rockwell IIEE.
Adam Maas wrote:
Note he's also doing some paid work on the side (Teaching lighting
seminars), but he's become the defacto guru of lighting. Strobist is
to flash work what Thom Hogan is to Nikon or Ken Rockwell is to
clueless newbies. And if
Peter, I think you should change your sig:
Vote for Ken Rockwell. Why settle for a lesser evil...
:-)
Jostein
2008/4/23 P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OH NO not Ken Rockwell IIEE.
Adam Maas wrote:
Note he's also doing some paid work on the side (Teaching lighting
Come now, Adam! :-)
The poor fellow doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence
as Ken Rockwell!
(Who does, btw...)
But you do have a very valid point. :-)
Jostein
2008/4/23 Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Note he's also doing some paid work on the side (Teaching lighting
seminars), but
There's only so low one will stoop...
AlunFoto wrote:
Peter, I think you should change your sig:
Vote for Ken Rockwell. Why settle for a lesser evil...
:-)
Jostein
2008/4/23 P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OH NO not Ken Rockwell IIEE.
Adam Maas wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 10:22 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, i'm here for an argument..
No your not.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Shouldn't that be you're.
David Savage wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 10:22 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, i'm here for an argument..
No your not.
Cheers,
Dave
--
I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati.
A union with the Bavarian
Yes, i'm here for an argument..
Can't help but feel he's trying to convince himself, he's correct.:-)
Dave
On Dec 10, 2007 9:31 PM, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Crovella wrote:
At least now we know the answer to What if they gave a war and nobody
came but that guy?
No.
We're talking about Dave B. and his desire for an argument.
I have no such desire.
Cheers,
Dave :-)
On Dec 11, 2007 10:48 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't that be you're.
David Savage wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 10:22 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
No.
We're talking about Dave B. and his desire for an argument.
I have no such desire.
yes you do
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
BULLSHIT!
-- Original message --
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Savage wrote:
No.
We're talking about Dave B. and his desire for an argument.
I have no such desire.
yes you do
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Aside from this guy's occasional rants, he seems to explain the issue of
DOF on APS-C digital cameras and makes a good case for FF sensors, for
reasons entirely apart from noise and pixel densities. Well I found it
interesting at least.
At least now we know the answer to What if they gave a war and nobody
came but that guy?
P. J. Alling wrote:
Aside from this guy's occasional rants, he seems to explain the issue of
DOF on APS-C digital cameras and makes a good case for FF sensors, for
reasons entirely apart from noise and
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo