Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread Frantisek
Thursday, January 27, 2005, 7:47:39 PM, Jens wrote: JB Thanks for the answers. To me it seems like there's an aperturering on the JB D70, shown in http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond70/page2.asp JB How far the backwards compatibility reaches, I don't know. I'll ask at the JB camera club next

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread Peter Loveday
Unfortunately, Nikon dropped the aperture simulator on its all non-pro bodies, including the cheaper DSLRs (D100,D70). So you can mount a lens on D100 or D70 with an aperture ring, but you won't get any metering. For that, you would have to buy the expensive pro DSLRs (D1 D2). Or hack the lens

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread Frantisek
PL Hmm interesting. Unfortunately this is impossible with pre-A pentax lenses PL due to the non-linear motion of the aperture lever. PL I assume, then, that Nikon lenses have always operated the same way as far PL as this goes (be it linear or non-linear? Well, sorry for the Nikon excursion,

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread Jamie Walling
Yes Nikon digital does not work with their MF lenses unless you add a chip to the lens (not factory supported by the way). It was actually that reason that sent me to get a 10D a year ago. It's amazing but the 10D actually has stop down metering with my old MF Nikon lenses (via adaptor), while

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread Jamie Walling
Actually what you are talking about is new features Nikon added over the years to get more functionality out of the same lens mount. Things like P mode with no digital contacts, etc. As far as manual focus goes Nikon only has ever had two mounts. F mount and pre-F mount (i am not sure exact

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread Graywolf
The Nikon compatibility thing is a myth. When they first went to internal meters they just added a coupling fork to the existing lenses, and you could have one added to your old lens. That started the compatibility myth. When they went to Auto-Indexed lenses for program exposure your old lenses

(diverging OT) Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
I can't be the only one who keeps reading this subject line as having to do with levies to pay for dragon-chow ... can I? -- Glenn

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread Pentxuser
I consider being able to use manual focus lenses with the istd (s) an outstanding benefit to owning Pentax and an excellent reason to buy a digital SLR. Being able to (almost) seamlessly use 20+ year old lenses on the latest technology puts Pentax, IMHO, way ahead of the rest... Vic

Re: (diverging OT) Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread mike wilson
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote: I can't be the only one who keeps reading this subject line as having to do with levies to pay for dragon-chow ... can I? Guilty. 8-)

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread Andre Langevin
I consider being able to use manual focus lenses with the istd (s) an outstanding benefit to owning Pentax and an excellent reason to buy a digital SLR. Being able to (almost) seamlessly use 20+ year old lenses on the latest technology puts Pentax, IMHO, way ahead of the rest... Vic Permanently

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-28 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Jamie Walling Subject: Re: Is Perntax the only one? As far as manual focus goes Nikon only has ever had two mounts. F mount and pre-F mount (i am not sure exact dates but we are talking early 70's here.. ). All F mount lenses will mount on all F mount cameras

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-27 Thread Peter J. Alling
It depends on what you would call abandoned. Canon, Minolta and Olympus have all changed their lens mounts and none of the new ones included an aperture ring. Nikon as usual is a mixed bag. Contax? Leica hasn't but they've introduced a digital back for their film SLR's... Jens Bladt wrote:

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-27 Thread Cotty
On 27/1/05, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed: So my question is: Have other brands abandoned the aperture simulator/use of an aperture ring as well - or is it just Pentax??? Not just Pentax. When Canon switched from FD to EOS, the ring vanished. Before I stopped using Pentax bodies, I

Re: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-27 Thread Mark Roberts
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have other brands abandoned the aperture simulator/use of an aperture ring as well - or is it just Pentax??? Canon and Minolta have abandoned it completely. Nikon partly (and to a greater extent than Pentax, I think). As they say, you don't need a weatherman

RE: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-27 Thread Jens Bladt
://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 27. januar 2005 15:38 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Is Perntax the only one? Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have other brands abandoned the aperture simulator/use of an aperture ring

RE: Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-27 Thread Daniel Papic
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Is Perntax the only one? Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:46:28 +0100 From time to time I get annoyed because Pentax ist-series doesn't support the apperture ring/aperture simulator (Grrr

Is Perntax the only one?

2005-01-26 Thread Jens Bladt
From time to time I get annoyed because Pentax ist-series doesn't support the apperture ring/aperture simulator (Grrr). (For me, the main reason for staying with Pentax was the option to use old lenses/backwards compatibility - it still is though it's a PITA shooting in manual mode). So my