Sorry John, could not resist ;-)
2011/2/2 Collin Brendemuehl :
> Here is a basic comparison of the A35/2 v SuperMultiCoated Takumar 35/2.5
>
>
>
> The full image
>
> Tak: http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/pentax/Twhole.jpg
> PKA: http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/pentax/Awhole2.jpg
>
>
>
Stan Halpin wrote:
On Feb 2, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
JCO is correct
Mark!
My comment was going to be -- "Oh Gd, don't let him know" :-)
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to U
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
>
>> On Feb 2, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>>
>> JCO is correct
>
>
> Mark!
Beat me to it.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pen
> On Feb 2, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>
> JCO is correct
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Here is a basic comparison of the A35/2 v SuperMultiCoated Takumar 35/2.5
The full image
Tak: http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/pentax/Twhole.jpg
PKA: http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/pentax/Awhole2.jpg
The two centers
Tak: http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/pentax/Tcenter.jpg
PKA:
> Now I'm signing off for awhile, I'm shipping my HDTV to Bangladesh and
> selling my gear that contains an aperture simulator.
> Norm
What about your high end audio gear ?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Norm Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e temptation to
argue with JCO is great and sometimes the only way we can reduce our
frustration is to join in Anyway, you've done your penance and it's
time to move on.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
&g
Don't push it...
Norm
Tim Øsleby wrote:
> Norm. You left out a name in this appology ...
>
> Tim Øsleby
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Norm Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2
e have had fun and frustration arguing with JCO,
> this is truly uncalled for. I'd like to think you're a bigger and better
> person than this post seems to indicate.
>
> Shel
>
>
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: Norm Baugher
>> To: pentax-Disc
fuck you too Tim
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tim Øsleby
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 12:19 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: MSNBC Poll: Is JCO really an asshole?
Norm. You left out a name in this appology ...
Tim
Norm. You left out a name in this appology ...
Tim Øsleby
- Original Message -
From: "Norm Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: MSNBC Poll: Is JCO really an asshole?
> Shel, you
silliness on the list.
However, this post, especially the subject, is truly mean-spirited and
vulgar. While many here have had fun and frustration arguing with JCO,
this is truly uncalled for. I'd like to think you're a bigger and better
person than this post seems to indicate.
Shel
&
rm
>
> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> > Of course not, but we all know NORM BAUGHER
> > is an ASSHOLE for posting something of this
> > nature, especially without any provocation...
> >
> > jco
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL
That's Mr. Asshole to you sir! I was only relaying something I saw on
the news this morning.
Norm
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Of course not, but we all know NORM BAUGHER
> is an ASSHOLE for posting something of this
> nature, especially without any provocation...
>
> jco
Of course not, but we all know NORM BAUGHER
is an ASSHOLE for posting something of this
nature, especially without any provocation...
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Norm Baugher
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 12:19 PM
To: pentax
Now I'm signing off for awhile, I'm shipping my HDTV to Bangladesh and
selling my gear that contains an aperture simulator.
Norm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
On 4/5/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John. I have a question: Does this tactic work?
>
>
It works if your goal is to start and win arguments.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai
lf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: 6. april 2007 14:07
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
Well said and obviously true.
Paul
On Apr 6, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Bob W wrote:
> I really think you should go back to the beginning of the thread about
> resolution, and re
On 4/6/07, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If people hadn't started to snipe at him the thread would have petered
> out like any other. But this list has developed a nasty little habit
> of picking on John at every little opportunity. It's ugly and it's
> time it stopped.
That's one take on it.
In a message dated 4/6/2007 5:06:51 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If people hadn't started to snipe at him the thread would have petered
> out like any other. But this list has developed a nasty little habit
> of picking on John at every little opportunity. It's ugly
-
> Bob
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
>> Sent: 06 April 2007 01:43
>> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
>> Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
>>
&g
That's great! Thanks for being so understanding. I knew you'd finally get
it.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: J. C. O'Connell
> [...] I am going to start letting people continue
> to attack and insult me personally without provocation
> and give no response in reply...
>[...] that's goin
Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
>
> John. I have a question: Does this tactic work?
>
> I think the number of posts in the resolution threads
> suggests otherwise.
> The number of times you have been in similar unpleasant situat
On 4/5/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John. I have a question: Does this tactic work?
>
>
It works if your goal is to start and win arguments.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
yeah right, I am going to start letting people continue
to attack and insult me personally without provocation
and give no response in reply...
Like that's going to happen sometime soon...
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tim Ø
ubject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
If I dont
take aggressive countermeasures when attacked
agressively, this stuff would never end..
Hopefully these attackers will think twice
before they launch into the first stike
personal attacks if they know a potential
"wrath" in reply may oc
I wish I knew it as that myself, but thats
not my experience unfortunately..
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 6:59 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
I guess I view
e countermeasures when attacked
>agressively, this stuff would never end..
>Hopefully these attackers will think twice
>before they launch into the first stike
>personal attacks if they know a potential
>"wrath" in reply may occur...
>jco
--
PDML Pentax-Discu
Bbsss
frank theriault wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You're a BOOB.
>>
>
> What have you got against boobs?
>
> -frank
>
>
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon she
If I dont
take aggressive countermeasures when attacked
agressively, this stuff would never end..
Hopefully these attackers will think twice
before they launch into the first stike
personal attacks if they know a potential
"wrath" in reply may occur...
jco
-Original Message-
Fr
Could be that having nothing against boobs is his problem
WW
On 4/4/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're a BOOB.
>
> What have you got against boobs?
>
> -frank
>
> --
> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cart
o the PDML.
--Mark
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
>yes I do. the CAPS are for emphisis, and I dont
>use them all the time, only when needed. I dont
>take the stance there is never any need for CAPS
>and hence should never be used.
>jco
>
>-Original Message-
>F
On 4/4/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're a BOOB.
What have you got against boobs?
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
You're a BOOB.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> yes I do. the CAPS are for emphisis, and I dont
> use them all the time, only when needed. I dont
> take the stance there is never any need for CAPS
> and hence should never be used.
> jco
yes I do. the CAPS are for emphisis, and I dont
use them all the time, only when needed. I dont
take the stance there is never any need for CAPS
and hence should never be used.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Sent
gt;of the posts or the thoughts expressed.
>I dont think thats the most important
>thing to be concerned with..
>jco
>
>-Original Message-
>From: pdml-bounces at pdml.net [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net] On Behalf >Of
>Mark Erickson
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2
On 4/4/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > However, while I understand Doug's desire not to moderate, maybe he should
> > reconsider at least mild moderation. I wonder how many people have left
> > over
> > the last year because of one person.
> >
> Sorr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However, while I understand Doug's desire not to moderate, maybe he should
> reconsider at least mild moderation. I wonder how many people have left over
> the last year because of one person.
>
Sorry. I'll try to be nice.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
In a message dated 4/4/2007 8:02:45 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I barely remember the Who, that's why I haven't kill filed JCO yet, (and
I didn't have too much trouble with Brad Dobo so I guess in most cases
I've thick skinned).
===
Di
I barely remember the Who, that's why I haven't kill filed JCO yet, (and
I didn't have too much trouble with Brad Dobo so I guess in most cases
I've thick skinned).
Minelli Flavio wrote:
> Hey, wow. I missed all this...
>
> Does any of you remember "The Who&quo
erience since blocking JCO
> messages a month or two ago. Suggest you do the same. He seeks an
> audience.
> Regards, Bob S.
>
> On 4/3/07, Mark Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let me ask again:
> >
> > Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J. C. O'Connell
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:38 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO
screw you, I do
splaying these... My system
which is neither state of art, nor expensive
displays them fine...Reducing them in size is not
the answer in my opinion because the COST
in reduced image quality is too high..
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
I think your more concerned with CAPITOL
LETTERS than your are with the meaning
of the posts or the thoughts expressed.
I dont think thats the most important
thing to be concerned with..
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Mark Erickson wrote:
Talk about pissing into the wind ... I like JCO ... I agree with him
pretty frequently ... but I'm on the verge of putting him in the
killfile because his presentation is annoying.
John, please. Take a chill pill and come back when you're less
emotionally inve
Mark,
I've had a peaceful and happy pdml experience since blocking JCO
messages a month or two ago. Suggest you do the same. He seeks an
audience.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/3/07, Mark Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me ask again:
>
> Do you believe that your ALL CAPS
Cotty wrote:
> Ack I've just wet meself.
*Canned laughter*
S
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Witty? Hum...
Cotty wrote:
> On 3/4/07, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> I believe that most PDML list members look for messages that include
>> information, links to galleries, and the odd witty interchange involving
>> Cotty.
>>
>
> Ack I've just wet meself.
>
>
On 3/4/07, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I believe that most PDML list members look for messages that include
>information, links to galleries, and the odd witty interchange involving
>Cotty.
Ack I've just wet meself.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Plac
an $200 NEW.
>Thats really not making any sense
>whatsoever. Its a personal attack
>to attempt to win a losing argument,
>plain and simple...
>
>jco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
because
I use and recommend a much better
screen setup even AFTER I told
them it cost less than $200 NEW.
Thats really not making any sense
whatsoever. Its a personal attack
to attempt to win a losing argument,
plain and simple...
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
JC,
I believe that the PDML list consists of photo enthusiasts with a specific
interest in Pentax equipment.
I believe that the PDML list consists largely of intelligent, thoughtful
participants.
I believe that PDML list participants use the list to share information and
images with each o
most foul.
You'r a mean one Mr JCO, I would not touch you with a ten and a half
foot pole.
People like Stenquest, Godders, Cotty, Roberts have the utmost
admeration of myself and this list. As far as i'm concerned you Sir,
are the utter, in utmost.
incase thats beyond you, i'
t your trying
to say happened. Whatever...
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bob Sullivan
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:39 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PISS OFF JCO: Camera sold,but worries remain (yet another
eBayquestion)
You as well as him are both full of it and are
only trying to justify what cannot be justified
thru falsehoods. I never
used the word CLUELESS, as it was NOT used in caps
by me, that part is fiction.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hey you, get your facts straight first, I called him
clueless in a post but it wasnt in CAPS, so
I dont think you have a point, and it certainly
did not warrant the extremely pornographic profane reply
( any without any rebuttal to the point I might add)
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Paul and Dave,
You know that I missed the whole thing until you guys quoted him.
Dave - you need gmail? The spam filter works great on JCO.
Regards, Bob S.
On 1/19/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't leave, Dave. I shouldn't have responded to the post w
ct word ) on
>> something he was obviously "clueless" about. And if
>> you think thats OK, well then me telliing
>> you to FUCK OFF should be fine with you
>> too then. You are the ultimate hypocrite if
>> is isnt. And dont blame me for this outrageous profane
n
> something he was obviously "clueless" about. And if
> you think thats OK, well then me telliing
> you to FUCK OFF should be fine with you
> too then. You are the ultimate hypocrite if
> is isnt. And dont blame me for this outrageous profane
> list language, beca
"clueless" about. And if
you think thats OK, well then me telliing
you to FUCK OFF should be fine with you
too then. You are the ultimate hypocrite if
is isnt. And dont blame me for this outrageous profane
list language, because I am not the one initiating
it.
Have a nice day, :)
JCO
-
JCO
YOU EAT SHIT PAL.
I CANNOT SEEM TO GET MY EMAIL FILTERS TO WORK, ESPECIA;LLY TO GET RID
OF YOUR ASSHOLE RELATED, IDIOTIC POST.
PAUL STENQUEST POSTED A REPLY, YOU CHOSE TO FLY OFF THE HANDLE AGAIN.
SO PLEASE ,AND THIS IS THE ONLY MESSAGES THAT SEEM TO WORK,
WOULD YOU FUCK OFF
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
- Sir Winston Churchill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
At 04:49 AM 10/11/2006, Gonz wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 10/20/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>- Original Message -
> >>From: "David Savage"
> >>Subject: RE: The JCO survey
> >>
> &
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 10/20/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "David Savage"
>>Subject: RE: The JCO survey
>>
>>>Aren't you? You've said so many times that you have no
The post topic was about the age of the lenses
not pentaxnomics.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I should start lurking
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: The JCO survey - I should start lurking more often.
> The age of the lenses is irellavant, its
> whether they are compatible with the
> current mount and K/M lenses are fully
> compatible with th
The age of the lenses is irellavant, its
whether they are compatible with the
current mount and K/M lenses are fully
compatible with the latest mount, pentax
is just choosing to disable some of their
functions for no technical reason whatsoever.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:54:19 -, P. J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not even worthy of a response.
Nonetheless, it seems to have elicited one. :-)
John
>
> John Forbes wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:20:26 -, Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> A flagship
Not even worthy of a response.
John Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:20:26 -, Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> A flagship is a flagship, and if there's a K1D in the future, it should
>> be as
>> complete as the LX was in its day.
>>
>
> Quite right. As complete,
On 11/02/06 7:32 PM, "Perry Pellechia", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We all expect perfect messages from you now.
>
> On 11/2/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> MUCHO GRACIAS!
>> JCO
But now he is ALL CAPITAL!
Ken
--
PDML Pentax
We all expect perfect messages from you now.
On 11/2/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MUCHO GRACIAS!
> JCO
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Perry Pellechia
> Sent: Thursday, Novemb
MUCHO GRACIAS!
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Perry Pellechia
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 6:44 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
1) Turn off using Word as the email editor:
Tools
Many Thanks,
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Coyle
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Mail text formatting: was Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
John, you may find these tips
ot;
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 8:18 AM
Subject: RE: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
> Whatand where is the setting(s) I need to change then?
> I have looked all over in many, many, menus for
> These settings. I DO blame Bill Gates because these
> Are the default settings an
ff in the program settings, but to no avail.
Try harder. Everybody else gets it right.
> jco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Christian
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:23 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
MAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whatand where is the setting(s) I need to change then?
> I have looked all over in many, many, menus for
> These settings. I DO blame Bill Gates because these
> Are the default settings and they are not easy
> To find or shut off, even with the help inform
Christian
Sent: 2. november 2006 21:23
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
Cotty wrote:
> On 2/11/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>>I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
>>And put OTHER people's na
advance,
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 4:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Blame Bill Gates. My ms-outlook/word
ed and tried many times to turn
> This stuff off in the program settings, but to no avail.
> jco
You're (you are) the only one it would seem. Sure, push off
responsibility to someone else. Why not blame global warming, the
economy, our mothers, George W. Bush, sun spots or Cotty?
On 2/11/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Why not blame global warming, the
>economy, our mothers, George W. Bush, sun spots or Cotty?
You've gone too far this time Christian. What have our mothers done to you!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
to turn
This stuff off in the program settings, but to no avail.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
Cotty wrote
Cotty wrote:
> On 2/11/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>>I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
>>And put OTHER people's names on them, if it was
>>Your survey, which it was in this case, than call it yours.
>>jco
>
oooh
I thought JCO stood for "Just Counting Opinions"
ann ducks
Cotty wrote:
> On 2/11/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
> >And put OTHER people's names on them, if it was
> >
On 2/11/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
>And put OTHER people's names on them, if it was
>Your survey, which it was in this case, than call it yours.
>jco
That *must* be the last word.
D'oh!
--
C
manual shutter speed
Changes, I have to take my finger off the shutter
Release button to adjust he shutter dial, so its worse.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lon Williamson
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:42 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss
I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
And put OTHER people's names on them, if it was
Your survey, which it was in this case, than call it yours.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lon Williamson
Sent: Thursday, Novembe
On Nov 2, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Lon Williamson wrote:
> Thistles thrown at twenty paces?
> Pizza without sauce or cheese?
> Rocks in my socks?
> Being doomed to listen to JCO forever?
>
> Penitent, I am, I am...
I think being banned forever ought to suffice.
Bob
--
PDML P
Heck folks, I'm usually a lurker but I DID start "The JCO survey".
It was intended as a survey, but I'm now thinking it is one of the largest,
stupidest, and most bitter threads yet spawned here.
I think I deserve a prize.
Thistles thrown at twenty paces?
Pizza without sauce
I find this to be true on my M bodies. You can't just use your fore or mid
finger to twist the shutter dial easily. My KX bodies, however, don't
have as much friction that way. I think this depends on the body.
I have 3 MX bodies and 4 KX bodies, so I suspect I have a reassonable
sampling of the
It's the camera that replaced the K1000.
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Never heard of that one, either.
>
> Shel
>
>
>
>
>>[Original Message]
>>From: keith_w
>
>>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
>
>>>The ZX-M? Never heard of it.
>
>
>>Mfg. 1997. Same camera as the MZ-M in the U.S.
>
>
>
>
> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/10/31 Tue PM 10:59:05 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>
> Arghhh!
> It's back. It's Halloween, and the thread from hell is back!!
It _is_ the day when de
OK because the K/M lenses
> Are old. So is the current lens mount. There is nothing
> Technically that cause the need for removal of full
> KM support on these bodies because there is no new mount
> Or mount feature which necessitated dropping the KM full
> Support.
> jco
>
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: The JCO survey - I should start lurking more often.
> Because the lens mount is the same as it was 32 years ago!
> That's why. You cant say its OK because the K/M lenses
> Are old. So is the
Never heard of that one, either.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: keith_w Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > The ZX-M? Never heard of it.
> Mfg. 1997. Same camera as the MZ-M in the U.S.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> The ZX-M? Never heard of it. I'll have to check Boz's site. Anyway, I'm
> not in the market for a film camera right now. Got enough of them ;-))
>
> Shel
Mfg. 1997. Same camera as the MZ-M in the U.S.
Me too!
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
htt
ature which necessitated dropping the KM full
Support.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:55 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I should start lurking more often.
O
On 31/10/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>In other words, the LX provided only partial support for six year-old
>lenses. So why should the K1D provide full support for thirty two-year
>old lenses (assuming it makes its debut in 2007).
In the same vein, please do use petrol to st
used it, and purchased it.
> It has the bits you mentioned. It's actually kinda sweet.
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> >Yes, I understand that, but I wonder of JCO grasps the concept. I knew a
> >number of people in the automotive business many years back, and they'd
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:20:26 -, Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A flagship is a flagship, and if there's a K1D in the future, it should
> be as
> complete as the LX was in its day.
Quite right. As complete, not more. I don't recall that the LX mounted
screw-thread lenses with
:29 PM, Lon Williamson wrote:
>
> > Shel, consider the ZX-M. Not an exensive camera. I've used it, and
> > purchased it. It has the bits you mentioned. It's actually kinda sweet.
>
> > Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, I understand that, but I won
1 - 100 of 1561 matches
Mail list logo
