For RAM intensive apps like Photoshop, the more RAM the better. LR is a bit
less RAM intensive—through memory usage modeling, I've never seen it consume
more than 2.5G RAM in any operations by itself—but is much more critical on
disk space utilization and read/write performance once you have
system says Mid 2010
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:21 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> thanks for those RAM site tips. I'm running 4gig at the moment with
> 166Gig free HD space. I bought my 21.5" iMac late 2011 i'm pretty
> shure, and have checked with adobe site and it looks like i
thanks for those RAM site tips. I'm running 4gig at the moment with
166Gig free HD space. I bought my 21.5" iMac late 2011 i'm pretty
shure, and have checked with adobe site and it looks like i can expand
up to 16gig. It had 4 slots 2 with 2 gig and 2 free or so the pop up
window says on my "
I have made it a standard policy when buying systems for the past decade or so
to max out RAM at purchase time (if not upgradeable) or immediately afterwards
(for upgradeable systems). I cannot see the point of running a system with a
less than optimal configuration for most of its life and
For RAM intensive apps like Photoshop, the more RAM the better. LR is a bit
less RAM intensive—through memory usage modeling, I've never seen it consume
more than 2.5G RAM in any operations by itself—but is much more critical on
disk space utilization and read/write performance once you have
Geez, I think it’s about time I jump on this RAM bus! Cheers, Christine
> On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> Dave, I can recommend these guys: OWC https://www.macsales.com/
>
> USA based, but fast shipping. They have tutorials with model-specific
>
I will also echo the OWC recommendation. I have bought much RAM and hard drives
etc. from them over the years. Never a problem, good information on the web
site to help you buy the right things.
And there are videos out there showing the relatively simple process of adding
the new RAM once you
On 30/12/16, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Dave, I can recommend these guys: OWC https://www.macsales.com/
>
>USA based, but fast shipping. They have tutorials with model-specific
>instructions on what to buy. And they accept trade-ins of RAM you pull
>out to replace. (Or they did
I can second the OWC recommendation. I buy most of my computer hardware from
them and have purchased memory numerous times. When I bought my current iMac I
purchased it with the minimum 8 gigs of memory and added another 24 gigs from
OWC. That saved me several hundred dollars.
Paul
> On Dec
Dave, I can recommend these guys: OWC https://www.macsales.com/
USA based, but fast shipping. They have tutorials with model-specific
instructions on what to buy. And they accept trade-ins of RAM you pull
out to replace. (Or they did anyway; check that.)
I maxed-out a 2007 iMac with 6GB RAM and
they recommend 8gb if using photoshop as well. double that is a good place
to start indeed.
On Dec 30, 2016 10:57 AM, "P. J. Alling" wrote:
> LIghtroom is not lightweight. You really need more ram. I don't know
> how much ram Adobe claims is the minimum to run
LIghtroom is not lightweight. You really need more ram. I don't know
how much ram Adobe claims is the minimum to run Lightroom 6.0 or CC but
take whatever they say and double it.
Besides being perpetually broke these days that's one of the reasons I
use a lot of old software. Once you
Re started the computer after is froze and tried again. Slow to load
but initial test photo seemed to go well. I jhave 4 Gig ram and i
think my iMac will take more ram. Its from 2011 i think i bought it
just prior to Xmas that year and in the About this mac screen under
memory it shows two 2 gig
Just restart the computer and see if it happens again. You might look inside
the catalog folder and see if there are any residual "journal" files (they
should be obvious). If there are, delete them before running LR again.
If it does happen again, call Adobe support (or start a support chat
That's the Adobe "wait until you're not looking then kick you in the slats"
subroutine. Works every timie.
> On 29 December 2016 at 21:11 David J Brooks wrote:
>
>
> bought and installed the upgrade to LR 6. Seems to be ok at first
> glance then tried to exit program and
bought and installed the upgrade to LR 6. Seems to be ok at first
glance then tried to exit program and it froze the computer.
Oh Oh.
Dave
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 12/27/2016 8:01 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>>
>> I have 4.4 and am looking at
On 12/27/2016 8:01 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I have 4.4 and am looking at getting 6.0, not the CC but the stand
alone. My version 4.4 does fine for what i want, but am looking at
upgrading my Nikon's to a D7200 or D500 so version 8 would be good for
those NEF files as well as my RAF Fuji files.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:29:05 -0800, you wrote:
>
>> If you're going to update at all, there's really no point to not updating to
>> the latest.
>
> Will they even give you the option of upgrading to an older
Adobe provides a page with downloadable, perpetual license versions of LR. You
could, theoretically, upgrade to an older version by obtaining a license code
and using a matching major revision download. I know various people who have
done that for rather odd reasons.
But in general, you're
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:29:05 -0800, you wrote:
> If you're going to update at all, there's really no point to not updating to
> the latest.
Will they even give you the option of upgrading to an older version? I
sort of doubt it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thnaks
Did not know about the pushy salesman thing, i'll watch out for that i
don't want CC i don't use it enough or PS to warrant the monthly cost
Dave
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
wrote:
> I've always upgraded my software incrementally as it came
I've always upgraded my software incrementally as it came out.
Standalone LR 6.8 runs beautifully on macOS v10.11/v10.12 in 4G RAM (presuming
you have enough free disk space on the home drive), but runs better and better
with 8, 16, and 32G … particularly if you are using it in conjunction
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 09:01:22 -0500, you wrote:
>I have 4.4 and am looking at getting 6.0, not the CC but the stand
>alone. My version 4.4 does fine for what i want, but am looking at
>upgrading my Nikon's to a D7200 or D500 so version 8 would be good for
>those NEF files as well as my RAF Fuji
Hi Dave:
I have the stand alone Lightroom 6 on my 2011 iMac desktop (21.5 inch) which
has 4 gigs of RAM. Lightroom 6 is workable with 4 gigs of RAM, but not
optimized; I do get pizza wheels sometimes, so I do recommend more RAM.
I have Lightroom, Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator, and a few
I have upgraded every versions since version 2. LR6/CC is extremely
heavy on RAM consumption. On an 8gb machine it is swapping constantly.
Especially with photoshop open as well. It is using like 2-3GB at all
times. At least on windows. I would suggest upgrading your RAM if you
only have 8gb as
I have 4.4 and am looking at getting 6.0, not the CC but the stand
alone. My version 4.4 does fine for what i want, but am looking at
upgrading my Nikon's to a D7200 or D500 so version 8 would be good for
those NEF files as well as my RAF Fuji files. Would save me a step by
converting to DNG and
26 matches
Mail list logo