02-2016 kl. 19:21 skrev Jens Bladt:
Hello
Inspired by "Pentaxians" - a Facebook Group, I bought a Pentax-K 2.8
120mm lens. It's supposed to be excellent according to Pentaxforums.com
(rated 10).
But now I can't get i t to work properly.
I did set the "Pentax Function&quo
Exactly. I do that on my K7. Works fine if you are not rushed to get the
shot.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 8:44 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Other than A
Sorry for troubeling you guys.
I found out. In the K-3 menu it's
Hello
Inspired by "Pentaxians" - a Facebook Group, I bought a Pentax-K 2.8
120mm lens. It's supposed to be excellent according to Pentaxforums.com
(rated 10).
But now I can't get i t to work properly.
I did set the "Pentax Function" to "Other than A" - shut
120mm lens. It's supposed to be excellent according to Pentaxforums.com
(rated 10).
But now I can't get i t to work properly.
I did set the "Pentax Function" to "Other than A" - shutter will
release, disregarded the apeture is not set to A.
But the Aperture is only stopping down i
--Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 8:21 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Other than A
Hello
Inspired by "Pentaxians" - a Facebook Group, I bought a Pentax-K 2.8
120mm lens. It's supposed to be excellent according to Pentaxforums.com
(rated
Resending. Wouldn't go.
-Original Message-
From: Alan C
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 8:48 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Other than A
Exactly. I do that on my K7. Works fine if you are not rushed to get the
shot.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Jens
I will try to confirm that tomorrow.
2009/7/18 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
But does K7 support other than A - menaing I can still use my
old K-mount lenses
on a K7 body, please?
Absolutely. And it seems to me that the metering is somewhat less
erratic
Sorry if I mised post on this.
But does K7 support other than A - menaing I can still use my old K-mount
lenses
on a K7 body, please?
Regards
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
On 7/18/09, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
Sorry if I mised post on this.
But does K7 support other than A - menaing I can still use my old K-mount
lenses
on a K7 body, please?
The pre-production version I played with at GFM worked just fine with
my K100/4 macro. Worked the same way
It does. Just like it was before.
It is placed on the Custom menu, the last tab. Setting#37: Using
Aperture ring. It has two options, prohibited and permitted. The
latter allows other than A.
Jostein
2009/7/18 Jens p...@planfoto.dk:
Sorry if I mised post on this.
But does K7 support other than
Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
But does K7 support other than A - menaing I can still use my
old K-mount lenses
on a K7 body, please?
Absolutely. And it seems to me that the metering is somewhat less
erratic than with the K10/20D.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Thibouille
Sendt: 26. juni 2006 23:38
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Note that Metz did very recently come with a Metz 45 version allowing
ETTL etc. Of course no PTTL rom Metz which is is an insult to Pentax
IMO.
2006/6/26
] vegne af
Thibouille
Sendt: 26. juni 2006 23:38
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Note that Metz did very recently come with a Metz 45 version allowing
ETTL etc. Of course no PTTL rom Metz which is is an insult to Pentax
IMO.
2006/6/26, Jens Bladt
-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Indeed, it works quite well.
Just a 360FGZ (from someone from the list) and it seems to work a lot
better than my 40MZ2 (which is TTL only).
Wireless is cool also :) I'm just playing but overall it seems to work
pretty well.
2006/6/27
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Thibouille
Sendt: 27. juni 2006 13:27
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Indeed, it works quite well.
Just a 360FGZ (from someone from
63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bob
Sullivan
Sendt: 26. juni 2006 21:44
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Jens,
Nice photos, some
.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Lou
Billing
Sendt: 26. juni 2006 01:05
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Godfrey, I too have noticed the rather late
Aztecs who crossed the Atlantic in stone canoes.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Forbes
Sent: 26 June 2006 22:10
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
If your great-great
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/25 Sun PM 10:42:30 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Godfrey, I too have noticed the rather late actuation of the iris blades
That's the giveaway. It's not immediately
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/26 Mon AM 01:54:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
On Jun 25, 2006, at 5:20 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Also works on the DL2. I will have to reread the manual...
See, I
List
Emne: RE: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Godfrey, I too have noticed the rather late actuation of the iris blades
I'm afraid you are right, Godfrey. The camera seem to chose the same speed
regardless of the aperture setting - meaning it fires wide open :-(
However, in Manual mode
Compatibility (to some extend)
3) The great guys that participates in the PDML
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 26. juni 2006 18:04
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Woo-hoo
On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:04 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Now my only wish (concerning the DL) would be to make TTL flash
work right.
Do I really need a PTTL flash for this?
Yes. The DL/DL2 bodies ONLY support P-TTL mode for TTL flash
metering. TTL flash units will not work with it.
The DS/DS2
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 26. juni 2006 18:17
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: RE: DL and K-lenses - other than a
I just tried this with the M 2.8/35mm. Works great. I even find think that
the AE-L button is better positioned on the camera than the green button on
the D
/72157594178238744/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Sendt: 26. juni 2006 18:17
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: RE: DL and K-lenses - other than
2006 21:44
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Jens,
Nice photos, some variety of flowers, rose shots are the best, beautiful
garden!
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/26/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus inspired, I spent 10-15minutes doing this, using my
: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bob
Sullivan
Sendt: 26. juni 2006 21:44
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Jens,
Nice photos, some variety of flowers, rose shots are the best, beautiful
Sullivan
Sendt: 26. juni 2006 21:44
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Jens,
Nice photos, some variety of flowers, rose shots are the best, beautiful
garden!
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/26/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus inspired, I spent 10
It seems that I am able to photograph just fine in M, Av and Tv with a
K-lens on the DL!
This is relly true? It seems to work fine - after stoped down with the DOF
dial.
It does stop down while fireing. Amazing.
My D can't do this ;-)
This was shot in Av mode:
Be sure ...
According to the instruction manual and my experience with the DS,
using the DS/2 and DL/2 a K-mount or M-series lens will only stop
down to taking aperture at the time of exposure in Manual or B
exposure mode. The iris mechanism is operated the lens is actually
wide open at
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/25 Sun PM 07:53:17 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: DL and K-lenses - other than a
It seems that I am able to photograph just fine in M, Av and Tv with a
K-lens on the DL!
This is relly true? It seems to work fine
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/25 Sun PM 08:23:33 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Be sure ...
According to the instruction manual and my experience with the DS,
using the DS/2 and DL/2 a K-mount or M
22:24
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Be sure ...
According to the instruction manual and my experience with the DS,
using the DS/2 and DL/2 a K-mount or M-series lens will only stop
down to taking aperture at the time of exposure in Manual or B
exposure
I suspect you'll find that, like the D, it stops down AFTER firing.
John
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 20:53:17 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems that I am able to photograph just fine in M, Av and Tv with a
K-lens on the DL!
This is relly true? It seems to work fine - after
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jens Bladt
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 6:43 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Godfrey, I too have noticed the rather late actuation of the iris blades
meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Godfrey
DiGiorgi
Sendt: 25. juni 2006 22:24
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: DL and K-lenses - other than a
Be sure ...
According to the instruction manual and my experience with the DS,
using the DS/2 and DL/2 a K-mount
On Jun 25, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I'm afraid you are right, Godfrey. The camera seem to chose the
same speed
regardless of the aperture setting - meaning it fires wide open
Yes, I thought so.
However, in Manual mode this is not the case. The aperture works in
time.
But
On Jun 25, 2006, at 5:20 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Also works on the DL2. I will have to reread the manual...
See, I thought it worked when I first got the DS2, but then I realized
it really wasn't -- exposure had just worked out okay, but I was
shooting wide open. Try it at f22 and at f2.8
On 25/06/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No need. The AE-Lock button replaces the green button on DS/DL series
bodies. Set the custom function to allow use of the aperture ring,
set the camera to Manual exposure. Set the aperture you want on the
lens. Frame what you want to meter
On 26/12/05, Vic MacBournie, discombobulated, unleashed:
As much as I like to see my name in print, could we please change the
subject line to something other than my name. Thanks alot.
The real Vic MacBournie
Like this?
;-)
Happy Holidays Vic !!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O
Perfect...
Thanks Cotty
On 26-Dec-05, at 8:46 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 26/12/05, Vic MacBournie, discombobulated, unleashed:
As much as I like to see my name in print, could we please change the
subject line to something other than my name. Thanks alot.
The real Vic MacBournie
Like
Okay. So the camera is here and works
very well when attached to the PC with
no card inside. This is with a lens
attached only. To set F stop other than
A in the custom menu there has to be a
card in the camera. Too bad. I now have
to wait for the new card I won on eBay.
The local dealers
attached only. To set F stop other than
A in the custom menu there has to be a
card in the camera. Too bad. I now have
to wait for the new card I won on eBay.
The local dealers have them for
approximately 4 times the price I paid
($20) and that includes postage.
Don
--
Dr E D F Williams
On that note, I'd suggest you get a battery charger and rechargable
batteries, as well as a card reader (all three things are quite cheap).
You'll definitely need the charger kit, and the reader is faster and
safer than reading the cards directly from the camera (e.g. if the
batteries are low
I have a card reader all I need is a
card to put in it once in a while. But
the AC supply is an over-rated device.
For 12 Euro I can get a 6V lead acid
(gel) accumulator which is not subject
to blackouts, brownouts, surges and
other glitches. Last year a large birch
was blown onto the power
Just wipe it off. It's got a hardened acrylic cover on it. Mine gets
nose grease and fingerprints on it all the time. I've never covered
it, and it doesn't have a scratch on it. I wipe it off when it gets
dirty.
A protective cover blurs the LCD image.
Godfrey
On Oct 26, 2005, at 8:24
Don Williams wrote:
I wish I had some of that film to protect the LCD. Its already covered
with finger prints. Extraordinary care and attention is needed when
picking up the camera with the screen facing away from you.
On my LCD, I have an iPod screen protector. There isn't any adhesive
I agree 100% with Godfrey. I've been using digis with such screens for
several years, and just wiping the screen with a soft cloth every now and
then seems sufficient. Heck, I sometimes use a shirt tail, or a napkin or
table cloth when in restaurants.
John Celio had one of those protective
No protection and no scratches on my *istD LCD.
Dario
On 26/10/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just wipe it off. It's got a hardened acrylic cover on it. Mine gets
nose grease and fingerprints on it all the time. I've never covered
it, and it doesn't have a scratch on it. I wipe it off when it gets
dirty.
A protective cover
On 26/10/05, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
No protection and no scratches on my *istD LCD.
Dario
I agree.
Instead, try my patented acrylic nose-protectors. Ergonomically shaped
hard-wearing DuPont ® space-age finish ensures greasy epidermal deposits
remain in contact with nasal
On 26 Oct 2005 at 23:47, Dario Bonazza wrote:
No protection and no scratches on my *istD LCD.
None here either, and I'm pretty rough with mine at times.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 27/10/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
None here either, and I'm pretty rough with mine at times.
And the camera.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
When this menu selection (F stop other
than A) is on, I understand the shutter
will release with the lens set to any F
stop. Yes? But if there is no lens at
all will the shutter release? For
example a tube without *any* contacts at
all, but with a lens, or some other
thing on the end? I
It will.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. oktober 2005 12:27
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: *ist D -- F stop other than A
When this menu selection (F stop other
than
Yes.
Don Williams wrote:
When this menu selection (F stop other than A) is on, I understand the
shutter will release with the lens set to any F stop. Yes? But if
there is no lens at all will the shutter release? For example a tube
without *any* contacts at all, but with a lens, or some other
When this menu selection (F stop other
than A) is on, I understand the shutter
will release with the lens set to any F
stop.
Pardon my ignorance but isn't this true of
all cameras?
Gautam
-Original Message-
From: Don Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 23
Yes it probably is.
But the *ist D is different:
The manual says (Troubleshooting p. 153) the shutter won't fire if the
aperture is set to other than A (or a lens without A-setting is attatched).
After the first firmware update, a new setting was introduced: Aperture
other than A in the MENU
is.
But the *ist D is different:
The manual says (Troubleshooting p. 153) the shutter won't fire if the
aperture is set to other than A (or a lens without A-setting is attatched).
After the first firmware update, a new setting was introduced: Aperture
other than A in the MENU. Then the camera
Actually, that setting was there even on v1.00, the firmware update
added the green button fix, which allowed metering in M mode, prior to
that the only metering at a setting other than A or with non-A lenses
was wide open Aperture Priority in the Program Modes.
-Adam
Who did play some
: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D - Exposure issues - lenses other than A
- Original Message -
From: Chris Niesmertelny
Subject: *ist D - Exposure issues - lenses other than A
When pressing the green
- Original Message -
From: Chris Niesmertelny
Subject: Re: *ist D - Exposure issues - lenses other than A
I'm really disappointed that this issue could be the meter
sensitivity
running out. Am I the only person who has used a non-A lens on the
*ist D
and tried to take a long exposure
Thanks for the feedback, Rob. I used the cap on the viewfinder and still
have the same issue. I suspect you and W. Robb are on to something with
respect to the meter sensitivity.
Tis a pity and a PITA.
Thanks,
Chris Niesmertelny
I broke out some non-A lenses to play with on the *ist D
get inconsistant results/underesposed frames.
Regards
Jens
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Chris Niesmertelny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. december 2004 00:20
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: *ist D - Exposure issues - lenses other
I broke out some non-A lenses to play with on the *ist D today and ran them
thru some exposure tests. When pressing the green button in moderate to
good light, it seems to be giving accurate exposures when the lens is
stopped to f5 or larger. When stopped down further than this, it often
- Original Message -
From: Chris Niesmertelny
Subject: *ist D - Exposure issues - lenses other than A
When pressing the green button in moderate to
good light, it seems to be giving accurate exposures when the lens
is
stopped to f5 or larger. When stopped down further than
On 12 Dec 2004 at 18:19, Chris Niesmertelny wrote:
I broke out some non-A lenses to play with on the *ist D today and ran them
thru
some exposure tests. When pressing the green button in moderate to good
light,
it seems to be giving accurate exposures when the lens is stopped to f5 or
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Dave Weiss wrote:
Paul,
Aw shucks, I hope I am not the lone pdmler who owns a Mamiya TLR! Strangely
enough, I was using it about a week ago and got some real nifty portraits of
my kids with the 180 super lens. I had forgotten how good the pictures
could look with
-discuss
Subject: Re: What cameras OTHER than the LX rate at least a half wink?
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Dave Weiss wrote:
Paul,
Aw shucks, I hope I am not the lone pdmler who owns a Mamiya
TLR! Strangely
enough, I was using it about a week ago and got some real nifty
portraits of
my
On Sunday, December 23, 2001, at 05:14 PM, Dave Weiss wrote:
Aw shucks, I hope I am not the lone pdmler who owns a Mamiya TLR!
I sold my Mamiya C33 to finance my 67.
Sorry! :)
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
So I'm wondering, all you LX smirkers out there,
if you had to replace your LX with ONE, ONLY ONE, other
Pentax that existed prior, to, say, 1990, what would it
be?
An MX, undoubtedly!
Wendy.
---
Wendy Beard
Ottawa, Canada
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
This one is easy:
Black K2. It's got almost all the same features of the LX, and the
same great feel.
Bill
Lon Williamson wrote:
Cotty,
I love ya like a hen loves her chicks, but some of us
are, as we say on this side of the pond, poor as Afgan
rats after the hay rack got bombed.
On Sunday, December 23, 2001, at 12:16 AM, William Robb wrote:
Hey, format wasn't specified..
I am pretty fond of the ME Super too.
I swear, Bill, we have the same cameras.
I'd put my votes in for the 67 and the ME Super. I love the size,
weight and layout of the ME Super. It's
Interestingly enough, while 67 prices have been quite reasonable of
late, some other cameras have been bringing good dollar. To finance some
6x7 purchases, I sold my Mamiya TLR equipment. (I've had some of it for
25 years, and it broke my heart to sell it. But I can't afford to keep
everything.)
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 11:09:05 -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Why haven't the rest of you bought 67s yet?
As soon as you mail me a check, I'll do it :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
In a message dated 12/23/2001 9:55:25 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 11:09:05 -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Why haven't the rest of you bought 67s yet?
Give it time, man, give it time...
I have my eye on the 67II...(drool...)
Brendan
-
This
Cotty,
I love ya like a hen loves her chicks, but some of us
are, as we say on this side of the pond, poor as Afgan
rats after the hay rack got bombed.
So I'm wondering, all you LX smirkers out there,
if you had to replace your LX with ONE, ONLY ONE, other
Pentax that existed prior, to, say,
Lon,
My second choice was and is the Super Program (Super A).
It has lots of features including TTL flash and DOF preview.
And when you just need some snapshots (like for Tom C's cover photos),
you can use a full program mode.
Regards, Bob S.
Lon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) asked Cotty:
So I'm
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: What cameras OTHER than the LX rate at least a half
wink?
So I'm wondering, all you LX smirkers out there,
if you had to replace your LX with ONE, ONLY ONE, other
Pentax that existed prior, to, say, 1990, what would it
be?
6x7
So I'm wondering, all you LX smirkers out there,
if you had to replace your LX with ONE, ONLY ONE, other
Pentax that existed prior, to, say, 1990, what would it
be?
-Lon, who, every time he THINKS he is enabled, finds that he
is not. lol.
The screwmount SV, I think. But then I am a sad
William Robb wrote:
6x7.
Yes, but
Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
So I'm wondering, all you LX smirkers out there, if you had to
replace your LX with ONE, ONLY ONE, other Pentax that existed
prior, to, say, 1990, what would it be?
Without hesitation the Super A or Super Program.
;^} (that's a Super A wink - g)
Fred
-
This message is from the
So I'm wondering, all you LX smirkers out there,
if you had to replace your LX with ONE, ONLY ONE, other
Pentax that existed prior, to, say, 1990, what would it
be?
Super A/Super Program.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Chat with friends
645, i'm pretty sure it came out prior to 1990?
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 6:34 AM
Subject: What cameras OTHER than the LX rate at least a half wink?
Cotty,
I love ya like
A black body MX with winder...
Brendan
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
So I'm wondering, all you LX smirkers out there,
if you had to replace your LX with ONE, ONLY ONE, other
Pentax that existed prior, to, say, 1990, what would it
be?
Well, I suppose I'd have to find another LX. Well, really ;-)
Malcolm
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
86 matches
Mail list logo
