On 4/16/2014 6:13 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 22:54, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd watch?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd
On 16/04/2014 4:56 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd watch?
I am so in. We could call it
That's tweaking not twerking, right?
ann
On 4/16/2014 06:56, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd
I'm in!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode.
Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 4/16/2014 06:56, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality show that has Bill Robb tweaking a different
cult every episode. Who'd
Tweaking, twerking ... Whatever it takes. Bill uses whatever is at his
disposal.
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 16, 2014, at 6:24 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
That's tweaking not twerking, right?
ann
On 4/16/2014 06:56, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love
On 16/04/2014 9:08 AM, Bruce wrote:
Tweaking, twerking ... Whatever it takes. Bill uses whatever is at his
disposal.
You guys couldn't handle the twerk.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 9:08 AM, Bruce wrote:
Tweaking, twerking ... Whatever it takes. Bill uses whatever is at his
disposal.
You guys couldn't handle the twerk.
bill
I have just been violently reminded that covering one's
On 16/04/2014 9:31 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 9:08 AM, Bruce wrote:
Tweaking, twerking ... Whatever it takes. Bill uses whatever is at his
disposal.
You guys couldn't handle the twerk.
bill
I have just
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 16, 2014, at 8:34 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 9:31 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 9:08 AM, Bruce wrote:
Tweaking,
On 16/04/2014 10:06 AM, Bruce wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Alas, poor Yorick! I twerked him, Horatio.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
To Twerk or not to Twerk, that is the question.
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 16, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/04/2014 10:06 AM, Bruce wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Alas, poor Yorick! I twerked him, Horatio.
--
PDML
On Apr 16, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just been violently reminded that covering one's eyes does
nothing to prevent unwanted mental images.
MARK!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On 16/04/2014 10:46 AM, Bruce wrote:
To Twerk or not to Twerk, that is the question.
Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness
twerked upon them.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 16 Apr 2014, at 13:33, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak them from time to
time just to watch them jump.
I propose a TV reality
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 13:33, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bill wrote:
I love the cults. The mindsets are incredible. I tweak
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was possible, but this list has just reached new
heights (or is that lows?) of farce.
I'm not complaining, mind.
You guys are all effing mad. 'Twerk' is where a Yorkshireman goes every
morning.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 16 Apr 2014, at 19:43, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 13:33, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 22:54, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was possible, but this list has just reached
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was possible, but this list has just
Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org
wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Bruce bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I Twerk, therefore I Am.
Hi ho, hi ho, it's off twerk I go...
I didn't think it was possible, but
On 2014-04-16 18:20, Mark Roberts wrote:
And listening to electronic music by Kraftwerk.
Possibly my favorite Kraftwerk lyric:
Die Fahrbahn ist ein graues Band
Weisse Streifen, grüner Rand
It scans really well, and it agrees with my inner driver, though on
track we do have some Gelbe
Just an twerkish observation
Is that the language they speak in twerky?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org
Subject: Re: DNG converter
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
However, i think you might find that it can handle an xt-1 file, should such a
camera somehow come your way. I've my x100 for a while, certainly since lr4,
and it's been fine, so lr4 supported raf as a format.
Go to your pusher with a sd card, take some snaps with an xt-1, go home,
breathe
If it was able to convert it to dng, then it would recognise the format and be
able to use it, so you wouldn't have to convert it...
You will need a separate converter. You could upgrade to LR5, convert it to
Dng, then edit it in LR4 if you wanted.
B
On 15 Apr 2014, at 19:15, David J Brooks
Conversion to DNG is pretty trivial for raw files using Bayer filter
sensors. Once the order of the bit patterns is known they all work the
same way. However Foveon and what ever Fuji X-trans sensors are enough
different to require lots of special processing. I wouldn't be
surprised if the
well looking at blog.adobe, the 8.4 version of the converter will not
work on OSX 10.6. I really dont want to upgrade but may have to
Dave
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:36 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an older mac OSX 10.6.8 with LR version 4.1. I know this would
not have
On 15/4/14, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have an older mac OSX 10.6.8
Hey mate not that old! My MacBook Pro is 2010 running 10.6.8 and it does
everything I need and runs all my professional software :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web
has anyone upgraded from snow leopard 10.6.8 to maverick. What
glitches should i expect, programs that will not work. I have CS1
running with a second program, forget the name, so it will work, i
suppose that will not work now. My Epson 2400 printer and Epson 2450
scanner, problems, Vuescan
on 2014-04-15 8:48 David J Brooks wrote
has anyone upgraded from snow leopard 10.6.8 to maverick. What
glitches should i expect, programs that will not work. I have CS1
running with a second program, forget the name, so it will work, i
suppose that will not work now. My Epson 2400 printer and
On 15/04/2014 12:30 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Conversion to DNG is pretty trivial for raw files using Bayer filter
sensors. Once the order of the bit patterns is known they all work the
same way. However Foveon and what ever Fuji X-trans sensors are enough
different to require lots of special
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/04/2014 12:30 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Conversion to DNG is pretty trivial for raw files using Bayer filter
sensors. Once the order of the bit patterns is known they all work the
same way. However Foveon and what
In the Fuji community, there are certain people who are totally snotty
about the ACR/Lightroom processing of the X-trans raw files and would
only use one of these niche products. I look at their example shots
and can’t see the difference myself
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Bill
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
In the Fuji community, there are certain people who are totally snotty
about the ACR/Lightroom processing of the X-trans raw files and would
only use one of these niche products. I look at their example shots
and can’t see
Nope, I think you’re out of luck, you need Lr 5.4 or whatever version
of ACR corresponds to that to read the X-T1 RAW files.
Alternately, all the Fuji X-cam reviews say they make JPEGs that are
really excellent, to the extent that RAW might be superfluous. So
maybe no big deal.
On Tue, Apr 15,
on 2014-04-15 18:17 Tim Bray wrote
Alternately, all the Fuji X-cam reviews say they make JPEGs that are
really excellent, to the extent that RAW might be superfluous. So
maybe no big deal.
i often see this kind of statement (not just for Fuji), and i am puzzled — in
what world would an 8-bit
Well, they do look pleasing to the eye. In particular, the X-cams’
auto-white-balance is frighteningly good, I basically never go near
that control in Lr, and WB correction is one place where you can fix
things in RAW that you just can’t in JPEG. But yeah, I don’t find
the idea tempting either.
So you always accept the WB that the camera hands you? A so-called
accurate WB is not necessarily what a given scene calls for in the
final rendered shot. You would not be tempted ever to add warmth or
coolness for artistic reasons?
I do, all the time. I would never accept that I can only use
To the extent I have a photo ideology, it’s “make the picture look
like what I saw” and the Fuji does an amazingly good job of that out
of the box, whereas with my Pentaxes up through the K-5, I often have
had to tweak the WB to achieve it. Pretty well the only time I touch
it with the Fuji is
Replies from two senders interspersed.
On 15/04/2014 6:11 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
In the Fuji community, there are certain people who are totally snotty
about the ACR/Lightroom processing of the X-trans raw files and would
On 15/04/2014 7:38 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
So you always accept the WB that the camera hands you? A so-called
accurate WB is not necessarily what a given scene calls for in the
final rendered shot. You would not be tempted ever to add warmth or
coolness for artistic reasons?
Honestly, I
Dave,
IF you really don't want to upgrade your OSX, the alternative might be
to install one of the emulators (VM-Ware or Parallels) with Win-7
(or Win 8, Win8.1) on it and install DNG 8.4 on it.
This way you'd be able to convert the Fuji XT-1 RAW files to DNG in
Windows, and then do the rest
That sounds like what I want. I'll go take a look. Thanks Paul.
Gonz
On 1/17/08, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gonz -
I use DownloaderPro by Breeze Systems. Using the plug-ins provided with
the software here's what it will do...download the originals, whether
pef or jpg, and put
Gonz -
I use DownloaderPro by Breeze Systems. Using the plug-ins provided with
the software here's what it will do...download the originals, whether
pef or jpg, and put them in a primary directory, convert the pef's to
dng's and put them in whatever directory you specify (assuming you have
Lightroom will do all of this as part of the import process. And
apply keywords, metadata, and any Development presets you have in
mind as well.
Godfrey
On Jan 17, 2008, at 8:43 PM, Gonz wrote:
I want to automate my backup/conversion flow, and I dont know if you
guys have ever run across
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can someone
lead me
through this? For some reason, I cannot find the options to
do this.
(Or my brain
David Weiss wrote:
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can someone lead me
through this? For some reason, I cannot find the options to do this.
(Or my brain is just too fried anymore).
In the Photo Browser, right
David Weiss wrote:
Hello,
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can someone lead me
through this? For some reason, I cannot find the options to do this.
(Or my brain is just too fried anymore).
Thanks
Dave
Doug Franklin a écrit :
David Weiss wrote:
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can someone lead me
through this? For some reason, I cannot find the options to do this.
(Or my brain is just too fried anymore).
Adam,
Okay, got that, now how do I oper/edit the image with the pentax
software? It does not let me open the dng files.
Dave
Adam Maas wrote:
David Weiss wrote:
Hello,
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can
Indeed. it will work with next update I guess.
2006/9/23, David Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Adam,
Okay, got that, now how do I oper/edit the image with the pentax
software? It does not let me open the dng files.
Dave
Adam Maas wrote:
David Weiss wrote:
Hello,
Do I understand
Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
Doug Franklin a écrit :
David Weiss wrote:
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can someone lead me
through this? For some reason, I cannot find the options to do this.
(Or my
Not sure but I read it does... just that it is not officially supported.
2006/9/23, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
Doug Franklin a écrit :
David Weiss wrote:
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo
The Pentax software is write-only with DNG's. Which is a good thing, as
the only thing it's useful for is DNG conversion.
-Adam
David Weiss wrote:
Adam,
Okay, got that, now how do I oper/edit the image with the pentax
software? It does not let me open the dng files.
Dave
Adam
It doesn't without editing the PEF's to change the camera identifier.
-Adam
Thibouille wrote:
Not sure but I read it does... just that it is not officially supported.
2006/9/23, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
Doug Franklin a écrit :
David Weiss wrote:
On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Do I understand correctly that I can convert a pentax raw file to
dng using the pentax photo lab 3.02 software? Can someone
lead me
through this? For some reason, I cannot find the options to
do this.
(Or my brain is just too fried
DNG files are not Photoshop directly, they're handled by the Camera
Raw plugin. Camera Raw v2.4 is what you should be using with
Photoshop CS, it handles the DNG files correctly. It's also the last
version of the Camera Raw plugin compatible with CS.
You should be converting your files
DNG files are not Photoshop directly, they're handled by the Camera
Raw plugin. Camera Raw v2.4 is what you should be using with
Photoshop CS, it handles the DNG files correctly. It's also the last
version of the Camera Raw plugin compatible with CS.
You should be converting your files
solution 1: Sort the PEF files into a subfolder. Open DNG Converter,
set source to the subfolder and destination to the same folder as the
other DNG files.
solution 2: Let it do it's thing on all the files, than delete the
redundant files with a properly executed wildcard file parameter
From: Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I add PEF files to a folder which has DNG files in it and then run DNG
Converter it creates a second copy of the DNG files.
Any way to stop this annoying redundant behaviour?
Yes, it's quite simple. Grasp the power cord that connects your cpu to
I have only used the converter once, Powell, and when i went to save in the
same folder i
got a are
you sure you want to do that message. I think its best if you make seperate
sub folders.
Thats what i
ended up doing.
Dave
If I add PEF files to a
Keep the DNG files in a separate folder from the PEF files.
It's been suggested to DL the PEF's to one directory and have the converted
files placed in a second directory.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 5/10/2006 10:27:12
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:28:11AM -0700, Powell Hargrave wrote:
If I add PEF files to a folder which has DNG files in it and then run DNG
Converter it creates a second copy of the DNG files.
Any way to stop this annoying redundant behaviour?
Yes - don't put the DNG files in the same
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:28:11AM -0700, Powell Hargrave wrote:
If I add PEF files to a folder which has DNG files in it and then run DNG
Converter it creates a second copy of the DNG files.
Any way to stop this annoying redundant behaviour?
John Francis wrote:
Yes - don't put the DNG
Just a quick question about DNG.
I use CS, and I can't find any reference to the DNG format. Is this a CS2
feature only? Also, how much space is saved with using DNG?
Thanks.
69 matches
Mail list logo
