Re: OT - totally OT - help identifying?

That's a high bar, Mark's pretty bizarre. On October 15, 2016 1:32:49 PM PDT, Steve Cottrell wrote: >On 14/10/16, Eric Featherstone, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Damn autoincorrect; for adnpanman read anpanman > >Most bizarre MARK ever !! -- Sent from my Android phone

Re: OT - totally OT - help identifying?

On 14/10/16, Eric Featherstone, discombobulated, unleashed: >Damn autoincorrect; for adnpanman read anpanman Most bizarre MARK ever !! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- _ -- PDML

Re: OT - totally OT - help identifying?

Wow! Just, wow! I don't stop being impressed with the collective wisdom of PDML and the broad individual knowledge of PDMLers. Thanks a lot, Eric! Igor Eric Featherstone Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:49:12 -0700 wrote: On 14 October 2016 at 21:52, Igor PDML-StR wrote: I know

Re: OT - totally OT - help identifying?

On 14 October 2016 at 22:47, Eric Featherstone wrote: > kokinchan - an adnpanman character from planet baikin (baikin = > bacteria in Japanese) > > http://www.awgosh.com/anpanmanchara.html Damn autoincorrect; for adnpanman read anpanman -- Eric -- PDML

Re: OT - totally OT - help identifying?

On 14 October 2016 at 21:52, Igor PDML-StR wrote: > I know that PDMLers are good at identifying various species. > I wonder if someone is knowledgeable about these Japanese creatures: > http://42graphy.org/misc/IMG_20150814_223740_957_resized.jpg > > I am trying to find out

OT - totally OT - help identifying?

I know that PDMLers are good at identifying various species. I wonder if someone is knowledgeable about these Japanese creatures: http://42graphy.org/misc/IMG_20150814_223740_957_resized.jpg I am trying to find out what's the name. I tried to do a reverse image search, and that didn't help

Re: Totally OT - important lesson about refrigerators

On 2015-06-05 20:12 , Igor PDML-StR wrote: The solution is simple: cleaning the coils. learned that lesson about 10 years ago, but would have been better to have learned it a couple of decades sooner -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Totally OT - important lesson about refrigerators

It's news to me! Thanks for sharing. I suppose it is one more indication of how our education system just doesn't cover the things we really need to know in life. :) On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Igor PDML-StR pdml...@komkon.org wrote: It is something that I've never thought about before...

Totally OT - important lesson about refrigerators

It is something that I've never thought about before... .. and I suspect that at least some people here might not have either... Our fridge at home seemingly died earlier this week: it stopped cooling/freezing and started warming up. We were figuring out if a repair was an option or we should

Re: totally OT - for word afficionados and Scrabble guru(s)

You can use your X to make XI as well. I've annoyed enormous numbers of people with QI and XI one after the other. Easy ways to make 'cheese'. PS - no points for 'afficionados' On 28 Feb 2015, at 04:58, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote: well not MANY years because every time they

Re: totally OT - for word afficionados and Scrabble guru(s)

Bob, HAR! I was hoping to sneak in an extra F unnoticed... Yes, it's only 4 points, but every little bit helps, doesn't it? ;-) ... but some aTTentive oFFicers caught it. As for those weird words, - I actually wonder if anybody outside Scribble actually uses them. While I like

Re: totally OT - for word afficionados and Scrabble guru(s)

On 2015-02-27 21:37 , Igor PDML-StR wrote: ... and Ann may actually have known this for many years.. But I just came across this weird set of words: 48 words to make in SCRABBLE with Q and no U. well known among those who need them; if you google q w… it will auto-complete to q without u and

totally OT - for word afficionados and Scrabble guru(s)

... and Ann may actually have known this for many years.. But I just came across this weird set of words: 48 words to make in SCRABBLE with Q and no U. Of those I have guessed the meaning of about 10 or so (including the plural form and variations), but none of those I would had thought to be

Re: totally OT - for word afficionados and Scrabble guru(s)

well not MANY years because every time they updated the official dictionary a few more drifted in. QAT was in before QI, for instance. all a blur to me now - that is, when what got into what edition of the OSPD ann On 2/27/2015 23:37, Igor PDML-StR wrote: ... and Ann may actually have

Re: Totally OT -- for you, cat haters and cat lovers

On 11/26/2014 1:01 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote: (Not mine): http://goo.gl/AYr5ZC Enjoy! Igor Yep. It definitely looks like a cat. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Totally OT -- for you, cat haters and cat lovers

(Not mine): http://goo.gl/AYr5ZC Enjoy! Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Totally OT -- for you, cat haters and cat lovers

Meow. Alan C -Original Message- From: Igor PDML-StR Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:01 AM To: PDML@pdml.net Subject: Totally OT -- for you, cat haters and cat lovers (Not mine): http://goo.gl/AYr5ZC Enjoy! Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net

totally OT help wanted

Guys - Do you do Crossword puzzles and/or acrostics? can you write code ? for windoze Xp platform ? write me off list please :-) Then I'll explain thanks, ann annsan.smugmug.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: totally OT but fun …

iRobot... On 2/7/2013 4:07 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: This arrived in the mail today: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/25268645/Robot_Star_II-0242.jpg https://dl.dropbox.com/u/25268645/Robot_Star_II-0243.jpg 1938-40-ish Robot Star II with Zeiss Jena Biotar 40mm f/2 lens. Everything works, although

Re: totally OT but fun ...

On 2/7/2013 6:29 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 7/2/13, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/25268645/Robot_Star_II-0243.jpg That's a HUGE knob there. But does it follow the three laws of Phototics? -- Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a

totally OT but fun …

This arrived in the mail today: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/25268645/Robot_Star_II-0242.jpg https://dl.dropbox.com/u/25268645/Robot_Star_II-0243.jpg 1938-40-ish Robot Star II with Zeiss Jena Biotar 40mm f/2 lens. Everything works, although the shutter needs a thorough cleaning and adjustment. A

Re: totally OT but fun ...

On 7/2/13, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/25268645/Robot_Star_II-0243.jpg That's a HUGE knob there. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Producion --www.seeingeye.tv _

Re: totally OT but fun ...

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 7/2/13, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/25268645/Robot_Star_II-0243.jpg That's a HUGE knob there. You're in a twisty maze of film spools, all different. -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

On Dec 27, 2012, at 10:34 , William Robb wrote: snip It's far easier to control information in private emails or on a little list like this where everyone is nice and courteous. Tom C. Screw you and your pompous little tirade you overblown buffalo. So much for nice and courteous. :)

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

Wasn't he originally the programmer the stalking tool designers hired before he screwed them over? From: P. J. Alling Perhaps it's because Zuckerberg designed it as a stalking tool from the start. On 12/27/2012 11:52 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote: ... or as they call it in software industry

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

Don't know, don't care really, if something's on Facebook, and I can't access it any other way, it doesn't impinge on my life anyway. Lots of people don't understand that but that's their problem. I'd be really pissed if the government made Facebook the only way to file my taxes, but otherwise

Totally OT - eat your own dog food

... or as they call it in software industry dogfooding (If you are not familiar with the term: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_your_own_dog_food ) FB's First Sister was bitten by its own dog, err... Facebook. ;-)

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

Perhaps it's because Zuckerberg designed it as a stalking tool from the start. On 12/27/2012 11:52 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote: ... or as they call it in software industry dogfooding (If you are not familiar with the term: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_your_own_dog_food ) FB's First Sister

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

I despise FB. I'm only on there because there are some people who don't communicate any other way nowadays and I want to stay in touch with them. :-\ G On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:32 AM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps it's because Zuckerberg designed it as a stalking tool

RE: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi I despise FB. I'm only on there because there are some people who don't communicate any other way nowadays and I want to stay in touch with them. :-\ does that mean that in Facebook you can only communicate with other

RE: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tom C Sent: 27 December 2012 18:09 From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org PS. There is something that I don't like about FB from the beginning, and I still cannot single out what that is. I still don't have my presence on FB...[*]

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

On 12/27/2012 1:23 PM, Bob W wrote: From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tom C Sent: 27 December 2012 18:09 From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org PS. There is something that I don't like about FB from the beginning, and I still cannot single out what that is. I still don't have

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

On 27/12/2012 12:08 PM, Tom C wrote: From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org PS. There is something that I don't like about FB from the beginning, and I still cannot single out what that is. I still don't have my presence on FB...[*] But maybe it means I am an e-dinosaur. It starts out from the

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

On 27/12/2012 12:31 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: Speech may be free, but there's really no such thing as free beer. It helps to be cute and have large bassooms. -- William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

On Dec 27, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: does that mean that in Facebook you can only communicate with other people in Facebook? That sounds like a dumb thing to get locked into - are you sure

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

Ditto, reconnect people I had lost touch with. I share some personal stuff now and then, but I figure of my limited number of friends, only about six really bother to read what I post. Unless you're a celebrity most people really don't pay that much attention to you. In real life and

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

On Dec 27, 2012, at 10:35 AM, William Robb wrote: On 27/12/2012 12:31 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: Speech may be free, but there's really no such thing as free beer. It helps to be cute and have large bassooms. Bill, you ain't cute, it must be your large bassooms. -- Larry Colen

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

On Dec 27, 2012, at 8:52 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote: Igor PS. There is something that I don't like about FB from the beginning, and I still cannot single out what that is. I still don't have my presence on FB...[*] But maybe it means I am an e-dinosaur. Facebook sucks, but it has it's

Re: Totally OT - eat your own dog food

From: William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com On 27/12/2012 12:08 PM, Tom C wrote: From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org PS. There is something that I don't like about FB from the beginning, and I still cannot single out what that is. I still don't have my presence on FB...[*] But maybe it

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural, engineering question)

From: John Francis On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:04:29AM +1100, Peter McIntosh wrote: FWIW, My father (god bless him) used to describe a hammer as an American screwdriver... :-) Ciao, Pete Mac in Melbourne - back to practicing my (poor) manual focus skills... The comparable UK expression I

RE: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural, engineeringquestion)

From: J.C. O'Connell force it, if it breaks, it needed replacing anyways... Bubba sez It'll fit ... at least ONCET! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural, engineeringquestion)

On Oct 25, 2012, at 1:15 PM, John Sessoms wrote: From: J.C. O'Connell force it, if it breaks, it needed replacing anyways... Bubba sez It'll fit ... at least ONCET! Measure twice, cut once. Pound to fit, paint to match. stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

I'm a chemist; use glue. On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: They say that flowers and duct tape fix everything. :-) Tue Oct 23 16:17:13 EDT 2012 Mark Roberts wrote: My solution is always duct tape and safety wire. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

Sounds like something Larry would say... On 10/24/2012 12:15 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote: They say that flowers and duct tape fix everything. :-) Tue Oct 23 16:17:13 EDT 2012 Mark Roberts wrote: My solution is always duct tape and safety wire. -- Don't lose heart, they might want to cut

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:04:29AM +1100, Peter McIntosh wrote: FWIW, My father (god bless him) used to describe a hammer as an American screwdriver... :-) Ciao, Pete Mac in Melbourne - back to practicing my (poor) manual focus skills... The comparable UK expression I grew up with is

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

British Leyland fine adjustment tool BFH-042. John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:04:29AM +1100, Peter McIntosh wrote: FWIW, My father (god bless him) used to describe a hammer as an American screwdriver... :-) Ciao, Pete Mac in Melbourne - back to practicing

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

You mean percussion adjustment tool... On 10/24/2012 1:41 PM, l...@red4est.com wrote: British Leyland fine adjustment tool BFH-042. John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:04:29AM +1100, Peter McIntosh wrote: FWIW, My father (god bless him) used to describe a hammer

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

If it doesn't fit, get a bigger hammer... On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:23 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: You mean percussion adjustment tool... On 10/24/2012 1:41 PM, l...@red4est.com wrote: British Leyland fine adjustment tool BFH-042. John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

If it breaks it needed to be replaced anyway. On 10/24/2012 4:28 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: If it doesn't fit, get a bigger hammer... On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:23 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: You mean percussion adjustment tool... On 10/24/2012 1:41 PM, l...@red4est.com

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

On 2012-10-24 16:28, Bob Sullivan wrote: If it doesn't fit, get a bigger hammer... If it doesn't fit, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing, anyway. -- Doug Lefty Franklin NutDriver Racing http://NutDriver.org Facebook NutDriver Racing Sponsored by Murphy -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

On Oct 24, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: On 2012-10-24 16:28, Bob Sullivan wrote: If it doesn't fit, get a bigger hammer... If it doesn't fit, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing, anyway. Doug doesn't need a torque wrench, he just tightens it until it strips, then backs

RE: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineeringquestion)

: Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineeringquestion) If it doesn't fit, get a bigger hammer... On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:23 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: You mean percussion adjustment tool... On 10/24/2012 1:41 PM, l...@red4est.com wrote

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

On 2012-10-24 16:49, Larry Colen wrote: On Oct 24, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: On 2012-10-24 16:28, Bob Sullivan wrote: If it doesn't fit, get a bigger hammer... If it doesn't fit, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing, anyway. Doug doesn't need a torque wrench, he just

RE: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineeringquestion)

safety wire? Hell, chicken wire! - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Doug Franklin Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:31 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Totally OT

Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:30 AM, William Robb wrote: then use nails for the mechanical fasteners (nails are stronger than screws) What is stronger: a nail screwed with a screwdriver or a screw hammered with a hammer? Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural, engineering question)

The threads on a screw are only intended for removal. pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 3 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:09:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Roshchins...@komkon.org To:PDML@pdml.net Subject: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question) Message

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineeringquestion)

- Original Message - From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org What is stronger: a nail screwed with a screwdriver or a screw hammered with a hammer? Applied that way, it sounds like something gets screwed in its hammeroids. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

Totally depends on the end use. How is the structure loaded? Would you put the fastener in shear or tension? Makes all the difference in the world, mechanically. In any case, a screw hammered in with a hammer is stupid. Works less efficiently then a nail would, and is pitiful in tension (pulling

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural, engineering question)

On 23/10/2012 10:19 AM, Don Guthrie wrote: The threads on a screw are only intended for removal. Remind me not to ask you to build anything for me -- William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

On 24 October 2012 02:09, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:30 AM, William Robb wrote: then use nails for the mechanical fasteners (nails are stronger than screws) What is stronger: a nail screwed with a screwdriver or a screw hammered with a hammer? Well,

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

My solution is always duct tape and safety wire. -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the

Re: Totally OT - philosophical question (Was: Structural engineering question)

They say that flowers and duct tape fix everything. :-) Tue Oct 23 16:17:13 EDT 2012 Mark Roberts wrote: My solution is always duct tape and safety wire. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Totally OT - iFhone 5 and Hologram comeback

http://www.buzzpatrol.com/steve-jobs-comes-back-as-a-hologram-to-promote-the-ifhone-5/ Larry and Boris, - it references the Galaxy ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly

Re: totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

There's nothing statistical about this at all really. The answer is in the raw data chart, actual distribution of values where a three digit number from 1 to 999 has all three place digits added together. The chart is handy but we're using it for something it's not designed for. The simple

Re: totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

Ann You never did tell us the reason you needed to know this. On Apr 28, 2012, at 11:53 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: There's nothing statistical about this at all really. The answer is in the raw data chart, actual distribution of values where a three digit number from 1 to 999 has all three

Re: totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

YOu can bet I didn't :-) no more hints ann On 4/28/2012 15:35, Larry Colen wrote: Ann You never did tell us the reason you needed to know this. On Apr 28, 2012, at 11:53 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: There's nothing statistical about this at all really. The answer is in the raw data chart,

totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

if you sum the three numbers across in all three digit numbers from 001 to 999, what sum would come up the most often? 2nd most? etc obviously 1 and 27 would be the two least. I'll tell the reason I'm asking after someone gives me the scoop - off list responses are fine ann -- PDML

Re: totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

On Apr 26, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: if you sum the three numbers across in all three digit numbers from 001 to 999, what sum would come up the most often? 2nd most? etc obviously 1 and 27 would be the two least. I'll tell the reason I'm asking after someone gives me the

Re: totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

on 2012-04-26 17:54 Larry Colen wrote On Apr 26, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: if you sum the three numbers across in all three digit numbers from 001 to 999, what sum would come up the most often? 2nd most? etc obviously 1 and 27 would be the two least. er, not obviously — 27 is

Re: totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

On 4/26/2012 20:40, steve harley wrote: on 2012-04-26 17:54 Larry Colen wrote On Apr 26, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: if you sum the three numbers across in all three digit numbers from 001 to 999, what sum would come up the most often? 2nd most? etc obviously 1 and 27 would be

Re: totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:57 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: On 4/26/2012 20:40, steve harley wrote: on 2012-04-26 17:54 Larry Colen wrote On Apr 26, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: if you sum the three numbers across in all three digit numbers from 001 to 999, what sum would come up the

Re: totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

Oops, my apology, that chart already does 0-9 not 1-10, so 13 or 14 would tie as the most common sum. On Apr 26, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:57 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: On 4/26/2012 20:40, steve harley wrote: on 2012-04-26 17:54 Larry Colen wrote On

Re: totally OT - for you math oriented (disoriented?) guys ...

Thanks, Larry! ann On 4/26/2012 21:04, Larry Colen wrote: Oops, my apology, that chart already does 0-9 not 1-10, so 13 or 14 would tie as the most common sum. On Apr 26, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:57 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: On 4/26/2012 20:40, steve

totally OT - The Ames Brothers

Thrift score of the day... 2 Lp album, in mint condition - The Ames Brothers greatest hits. for 99 cents! stuff from my high school days - and that of some of you as well. ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the

Re: totally OT - The Ames Brothers

Seventeen, Seventeen, Cutest gal I've ever seen... -p On 11/11/2011 3:12 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Thrift score of the day... 2 Lp album, in mint condition - The Ames Brothers greatest hits. for 99 cents! stuff from my high school days - and that of some of you as well. ann -- Being old

Totally OT - 2-cents solution

It has nothing to do with PDML, - but I thought some PDMLers, who frequently share their 2 cents, would appreciate that 2 cents can play a significant role. I recently purchased a valve to replace one in my toilet (so-called Fluidmaster 400LS Leak Sentry Pro Fill Valve). The main idea is that

Re: Totally OT - 2-cents solution

Seems that as opposed to mine, your two cents are actually good for something =) 2011/7/24 Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org: It has nothing to do with PDML, - but I thought some PDMLers, who frequently share their 2 cents, would appreciate that 2 cents can play a significant role. I recently

RE: Totally OT - 2-cents solution

From: Igor Roshchin It has nothing to do with PDML, - but I thought some PDMLers, who frequently share their 2 cents, would appreciate that 2 cents can play a significant role. I recently purchased a valve to replace one in my toilet (so-called Fluidmaster 400LS Leak Sentry Pro Fill Valve). The

RE: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

So, we found out last night that she didn't win. :( We are dying to know who took her crown, and will find out like the rest of Australia - by watching the Today Show tomorrow morning. In retrospect, it is probably a good thing anyways, as there are ethical reasons (have a read about

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Y har! - Original Message - From: Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 3:57 AM Subject: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!! So hey everyone! I know I haven't been around of late much, been crazy

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Three votes cast! Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:57 +1000, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote: So hey everyone! I know I haven't been around of late much, been crazy

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Got my vote. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

I voted. What's a Milky Bar? On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Keith Mosier jarheadpho...@yahoo.com wrote: Got my vote. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Steven Desjardins wrote: I voted. What's a Milky Bar? Haven't you seen A Clockwork Orange? -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Yeah, but I had a lot more brain cells back then. I did google it. I'm amazed to find that something fattening is not (commonly) sold in America. On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Steven Desjardins wrote: I voted.  What's a Milky Bar? Haven't you seen

RE: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

votes guys! Voting has now closed, so fingers crossed it did the trick! Tan.x. -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steven Desjardins Sent: Friday, 1 July 2011 11:28 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud

RE: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Subject: Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!! Steven Desjardins wrote: I voted. What's a Milky Bar? Haven't you seen A Clockwork Orange? -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Subject: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!! So hey everyone! I know I haven't been around of late much, been crazy busy, will fill you all in soon, however... I just realised that I haven't posted this to the list and I am such a bad mummy for not doing so! Some of you have seen

RE: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Steven Desjardins wrote: I voted. What's a Milky Bar? Haven't you seen A Clockwork Orange? ? That was the Korova Milk Bar, not a Milky Bar http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI-mDTdeKR8 Milky Bars did, however, seem to be equally good at preparing you for life:

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 07:12:02PM +0100, Bob W wrote: Steven Desjardins wrote: I voted. What's a Milky Bar? Haven't you seen A Clockwork Orange? ? That was the Korova Milk Bar, not a Milky Bar http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI-mDTdeKR8 Milky Bars did, however, seem to

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

I see my PPG account has finally been put back in order. Haven't tried voting today. Jack --- On Fri, 7/1/11, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote: From: Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com Subject: Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!! To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

, Christine - Original Message - From: Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 8:57 PM Subject: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!! So hey everyone!  I know I haven't been around of late much, been crazy busy

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

By the way, whatever happened to Jeep Girl? Dan On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote: So hey everyone!  I know I haven't been around of late much, been crazy busy, will fill you all in soon, however... I just realised that I haven't posted this to the list

TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

So hey everyone! I know I haven't been around of late much, been crazy busy, will fill you all in soon, however... I just realised that I haven't posted this to the list and I am such a bad mummy for not doing so! Some of you have seen this on Facebook, but, here goes: My daughter is in the top

RE: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Lol, precisely! t.x. -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Anthony Farr Sent: Friday, 1 July 2011 12:31 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!! Glad to send my vote Molly-Rose's way

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Glad to send my vote Molly-Rose's way. After all, what good is croneyism if you don't use and abuse it at every opportunity ;-) regards, Anthony    Of what use is lens and light     to those who lack in mind and sight                                                (Anon) On 1 July 2011

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

She got my vote. jm -Original Message- From: Tanya Love Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:57 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!! So hey everyone! I know I haven't been around of late much, been crazy busy, will fill you all in soon

RE: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

She got mine too! John Coyle Brisbane, Australia -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tanya Love Sent: Friday, 1 July 2011 11:58 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!! So hey

Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

Done and done. -Original Message- From: Tanya Love Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 11:27 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!! So hey everyone! I know I haven't been around of late much, been crazy busy, will fill you all in soon, however

Re: Totally OT: Bluetooth headset for smart phone

actually tempting. She might really like this. --Original Message-- From: David Mann Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Totally OT: Bluetooth headset for smart phone Sent: Jun 28, 2011 3:46 AM On Jun 28, 2011

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >