Yeah! I found it. It had fallen into a dresser drawer.
And it's still in its little plastic case. Heh.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.
**Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make
Most photographs deserve to be lost, so that's progress.
Agreed.
The issue is making sure that the best aren't.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: storage media
Bill Owens wrote:
> While surfing
I have to agree. I did a gymnastics meet of 22 teams about 1 week
ago. I am finding that shooting raw on the K20D that I get about 50
images per gigabyte. The action is moving so fast that there is
precious little time to change cards. I have 5 2gb cards and 2 4gb
cards. But before this event
David Savage wrote:
I used to have them attached to my camera strap but the bloody things
always get hocked up on something.
I have a neoprene "wallet" that holds eight or ten at a time. In the
field, a card is either in the camera on in that "wallet". When I get
home is when I'm more like
David Savage wrote:
Do you store your data on your computer spread over many small HD's?
No, I spread it across numerous big hard drives, CDs, DVDs, etc. And I
don't take them into the field with me, either.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://p
I found a couple of soft neoprene pouches somewhere.
They thread onto my cameras straps.
It's simple to carry a couple extra cards on each camera strap.
Now I worry about battery juice!
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> In a message dated 3/22/2009 1:57:
Marnie,
Look at the FRY's ads.
You can find 8gig, high speed (class 6) for a similar price.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:55 PM, wrote:
> In a message dated 3/21/2009 8:42:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> jehosep...@mindspring.com writes:
> A full 4 GB card is three or four hundr
2009/3/22 Paul Stenquist :
>
>> In a message dated 3/22/2009 1:57:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>> ozsav...@gmail.com writes:
>> Ditto.
>>
>> But I just use those zippered neoprene dodads that come with Sandisk
>> cards.
>
> I have a Sandisk pouch on my keychain. Since I always have my car key
In a message dated 3/22/2009 1:57:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ozsav...@gmail.com writes:
Ditto.
But I just use those zippered neoprene dodads that come with
Sandisk cards.
I have a Sandisk pouch on my keychain. Since I always have my car key
and take pains not to lose it, I always h
In a message dated 3/22/2009 1:57:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ozsav...@gmail.com writes:
Ditto.
But I just use those zippered neoprene dodads that come with Sandisk cards.
DS
=
I had a routine for never losing a SD card, and a case for it as well.
Frankly, I can't understand whe
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph McAllister"
Subject: Re: storage media
I'd be suspicious of any 16 GB SDHC cards that were priced that low.
Cheapest I've ever seen for a 16GB Class 6 SDHC is $41 at Amazon right
now. Your $32 card is probably not as fast as cl
I always keep an 8 gig card in my camera. If I take it out to download
files, I stick it back in the camera immediately thereafter. I keep a
second 8 gig card in the card storage slot of the K20D battery grip. I
keep a third 8 gig card in the card storage pouch that's attached to
my keyring
2009/3/22 Adam Maas :
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:49 AM, David Savage wrote:
>> 2009/3/22 Doug Franklin :
>>> Bill Owens wrote:
While surfing for another battery and charger for my Optio MX, I saw
listed a 16Gb sdhc card for 32.xx USD. Remarkable when only a few
years ago RAM s
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> For SD card storage I use these tamrac camera straps:
> http://www.tamrac.com/g_camerastraps.htm
>
> The left pocket is for empty SD cards, the right one is for full ones.
>
I do the same. Oh wait, or do i do it back wards.
'
Ohh Ohh.:-)
I hav
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:49 AM, David Savage wrote:
> 2009/3/22 Doug Franklin :
>> Bill Owens wrote:
>>>
>>> While surfing for another battery and charger for my Optio MX, I saw
>>> listed a 16Gb sdhc card for 32.xx USD. Remarkable when only a few
>>> years ago RAM sa selling for $50.00 or more f
I've got a cardwallet I use whenever I'm carrying more than 1 card.
It's a largish Sandisk wallet (size of a pack of smokes) and holds
4CF+4SD quite securely. Which nicely covers the 4CF and 3 SD cards I
own.
-Adam
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> For SD card storage I use t
2009/3/22 Bob W :
>
>>
>> When I've ever filled a card of felt it was getting too close
>> to full,
>> it goes into my "Filled Cards" micro-Halliburton aluminum
>> case, and a
>> fresh card pulled from my "Fresh Cards" micro-Halliburton aluminum
>> case. Both cases reside in my camera bag.
>>
>
> I
>
> When I've ever filled a card of felt it was getting too close
> to full,
> it goes into my "Filled Cards" micro-Halliburton aluminum
> case, and a
> fresh card pulled from my "Fresh Cards" micro-Halliburton aluminum
> case. Both cases reside in my camera bag.
>
I have a waterproof,
2009/3/22 Doug Franklin :
> Bill Owens wrote:
>>
>> While surfing for another battery and charger for my Optio MX, I saw
>> listed a 16Gb sdhc card for 32.xx USD. Remarkable when only a few
>> years ago RAM sa selling for $50.00 or more fore a mere MB. I may
>> pickup a 4 or 6 Gig card for recordi
> Bill Owens wrote:
> > While surfing for another battery and charger for my Optio MX, I saw
> > listed a 16Gb sdhc card for 32.xx USD. Remarkable when only a few
> > years ago RAM sa selling for $50.00 or more fore a mere MB. I may
> > pickup a 4 or 6 Gig card for recording high school band conce
For SD card storage I use these tamrac camera straps:
http://www.tamrac.com/g_camerastraps.htm
The left pocket is for empty SD cards, the right one is for full ones.
I've been using 128-133x 2G cards from Fry's fro $10 each. I can't
keep track of how SDHC ratings compare, but IIRC the fastest SDH
Joseph McAllister wrote:
My SDHC cards never leave the camera until I'm home transferring them to
my Mac's HD (and another HD). And they go back in the camera and get
formatted as soon as they are done committing their content to HDs.
Yeah, well, that's not really possible when you're filling
I'd be suspicious of any 16 GB SDHC cards that were priced that low.
Cheapest I've ever seen for a 16GB Class 6 SDHC is $41 at Amazon right
now. Your $32 card is probably not as fast as class 6, which may not
be a problem for you.
On Mar 21, 2009, at 20:16 , Bill Owens wrote:
While surfin
My SDHC cards never leave the camera until I'm home transferring them
to my Mac's HD (and another HD). And they go back in the camera and
get formatted as soon as they are done committing their content to HDs.
When I've ever filled a card of felt it was getting too close to full,
it goes in
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Yes. I just lost my 4 gig HD SD. I am royally poed. However, I'd already
copied the pictures to HD, so nothing was lost but the card.
I'm in the same boat. The silly thing is /somewhere/ in the house.
However, I've lived alone for twenty-five years, twelve in this
In a message dated 3/21/2009 8:42:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jehosep...@mindspring.com writes:
A full 4 GB card is three or four hundred PEFs, and a truly ungodly
number of JPGs, all ready to be lost at the same time in one tiny little
package. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
==
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin"
Subject: Re: storage media
Bill Owens wrote:
While surfing for another battery and charger for my Optio MX, I saw
listed a 16Gb sdhc card for 32.xx USD. Remarkable when only a few
years ago RAM sa selling for $50.00 or more fore
Bill Owens wrote:
While surfing for another battery and charger for my Optio MX, I saw
listed a 16Gb sdhc card for 32.xx USD. Remarkable when only a few
years ago RAM sa selling for $50.00 or more fore a mere MB. I may
pickup a 4 or 6 Gig card for recording high school band concerts.
A full 4
While surfing for another battery and charger for my Optio MX, I saw
listed a 16Gb sdhc card for 32.xx USD. Remarkable when only a few
years ago RAM sa selling for $50.00 or more fore a mere MB. I may
pickup a 4 or 6 Gig card for recording high school band concerts.
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
Wat would you want to know, Mark?
Ihave one of those CF->IDE adapter so please ask your questions, I
will do my best to help you.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
Ryan Brooks wrote:
>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> > On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Matt Kelch wrote:
>> >
>> >> Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large
>> >> part of why its still around.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure about CF using or being a modified IDE.
>> It is. In fact, t
On Sep 12, 2006, at 8:55 AM, ryan brooks wrote:
>> Interesting. Is it not also true that the CF to PC card adapters are
>> basically passive adaption? The PCMCIA specification is very
>> adaptable.
>>
>
> Yes, it is not true. PCMCIA is more like ISA, so an adapter would
> have
> electronics.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> Interesting. Is it not also true that the CF to PC card adapters are
> basically passive adaption? The PCMCIA specification is very adaptable.
>
Yes, it is not true. PCMCIA is more like ISA, so an adapter would have
electronics.
--
PDML Pentax
indeed.I have a CF -> IDE adapter which is passive.
2006/9/12, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:58 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
> Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large
> part of why its still around.
>
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure ab
On 12/09/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Similar or the same device is available from www.mittoni.com and
> www.psism.com as well.
>
> The device seems to have a maximum throughput rate equal to that of a
> 32x card.
Likely, mine is the Mittoni one.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
On 12/09/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't recall anyone saying that CF cards were no longer viable storage
> devices, only that SD cards were replacing them in many cameras and were
> becoming the more common - dare I say, standard - card. Were I to be
> desirous of using a
On Sep 12, 2006, at 6:07 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 12/09/06, Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Wasn't there a thread sometime ago about a device that enables a
>> SD card to be used in a device designed for CF? If so, could
>> someone post a
>> link to where one may be availa
I don't recall anyone saying that CF cards were no longer viable storage
devices, only that SD cards were replacing them in many cameras and were
becoming the more common - dare I say, standard - card. Were I to be
desirous of using a larger camera - like a 645 or a huge Nikon or Canon, CF
would b
On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:58 PM, John Francis wrote:
Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large
part of why its still around.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about CF using or being a modified IDE.
>> It is. In fact, there are even passive adapters for CF->IDE
>> (being th
still viable storage media
On 12/09/06, Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wasn't there a thread sometime ago about a device that enables a
> SD card to be used in a device designed for CF? If so, could someone post
a
> link to where one may be available.
Yes there are but t
On 12/09/06, Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wasn't there a thread sometime ago about a device that enables a
> SD card to be used in a device designed for CF? If so, could someone post a
> link to where one may be available.
Yes there are but they slow down the fastest SD cards considera
On 12/09/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what? You said you wouldn't use 8GB card because of risk of losing
> too many photos at once, and this capacity is already available in SD
> form ;-)
Oh no that wasn't me, I gave up my 4GB microdrive because I don't
trust drives, sol
trzyk
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 8:35 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT Why CF is still viable storage media
On 12.09.2006, at 14:16 , Digital Image Studio wrote:
> Sure but the point is whatever the current density of chips the CF
> card will physically hold about 4x more
On 12.09.2006, at 14:16 , Digital Image Studio wrote:
> Sure but the point is whatever the current density of chips the CF
> card will physically hold about 4x more than SD.
So what? You said you wouldn't use 8GB card because of risk of losing
too many photos at once, and this capacity is alread
and is ok to go up to 137GB ...
2006/9/12, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 12/09/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And apart from some pictures, what has that to do with the viability of
> > CF? These devices will work just fine in SD cards too.
>
> Sure but the point i
On 12/09/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And apart from some pictures, what has that to do with the viability of
> CF? These devices will work just fine in SD cards too.
Sure but the point is whatever the current density of chips the CF
card will physically hold about 4x more than SD.
> I did boot my PC with a CF card.
> The thing is NOT to let it swap on the CF otherwise, it will quickly
> go away. Otherwise it is VERY fast. I booted a small Linuw distro on a
> 32MB CF. The same OS on an IDE drive was quite a bit smaller.
I meant "The same OS on an IDE drive was quite a bit FA
I did boot my PC with a CF card.
The thing is NOT to let it swap on the CF otherwise, it will quickly
go away. Otherwise it is VERY fast. I booted a small Linuw distro on a
32MB CF. The same OS on an IDE drive was quite a bit smaller.
2006/9/12, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Sep 11,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:02:23PM -0500, Ryan Brooks wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> > On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Matt Kelch wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large
> >> part of
> >> why its still around.
> >>
> >
> > I'm not sure about CF
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Matt Kelch wrote:
>
>
>> Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large
>> part of
>> why its still around.
>>
>
> I'm not sure about CF using or being a modified IDE.
It is. In fact, there are even passive adapters
Impressive.
I never heard anyone say that CF wasn't a viable storage medium. It's
just fallen back in use compared to SD and other, smaller card
formats in recent times. Most new developments in flash memory
devices start in CF form factor because it's large and easier to
design for.
Godf
On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Matt Kelch wrote:
> Doesn't CF use a modified IDE interface? That might be a large
> part of
> why its still around.
I'm not sure about CF using or being a modified IDE. It stands for
"Integrated Drive Electronics" and is a standard dreamt up to
integrate drive
David Savage wrote:
> At 10:18 AM 12/09/2006, Adam Maas wrote:
>
>> Digital Image Studio wrote:
>>
>> http://www.digitimes.com/Backgrounders/ArtReview.asp?datePublish=2006/09/11&pages=PR&seq=204&Cat=1
>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/puph6
>>>
>>> >From a dpreview post
>>>
>>>
>> And
At 10:18 AM 12/09/2006, Adam Maas wrote:
>Digital Image Studio wrote:
> >
> http://www.digitimes.com/Backgrounders/ArtReview.asp?datePublish=2006/09/11&pages=PR&seq=204&Cat=1
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/puph6
> >
> >>From a dpreview post
> >
>
>And apart from some pictures, what has that to do wit
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> http://www.digitimes.com/Backgrounders/ArtReview.asp?datePublish=2006/09/11&pages=PR&seq=204&Cat=1
>
> http://tinyurl.com/puph6
>
>>From a dpreview post
>
And apart from some pictures, what has that to do with the viability of
CF? These devices will work just fine
http://www.digitimes.com/Backgrounders/ArtReview.asp?datePublish=2006/09/11&pages=PR&seq=204&Cat=1
http://tinyurl.com/puph6
>From a dpreview post
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
P
56 matches
Mail list logo
