I read some earlier - posted between 8:40 and 9:00 CDT
-p
On 10/28/2015 9:37 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
so I just answered comments made on my Geso and commented on a couple of
others but some of my posts didn't come into my
PDML folder -
h
ann
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that
so I just answered comments made on my Geso and commented on a couple of
others but some of my posts didn't come into my
PDML folder -
h
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
that sounds about right timing wise
one was with my GESO subject line and one was a "like" for Frank on his
Haile mural
a mystery
ann
On 10/28/2015 11:02 AM, Paul wrote:
I read some earlier - posted between 8:40 and 9:00 CDT
-p
On 10/28/2015 9:37 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
so I just
Well I see this one.
On 10/28/2015 10:37 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
so I just answered comments made on my Geso and commented on a couple
of others but some of my posts didn't come into my
PDML folder -
h
ann
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
Quoting steve harley p...@paper-ape.com:
on 2012-01-17 21:59 Brian Walters wrote
Quoting steve harley:
i suspect an intermediate server is delaying the emails; check the raw
headers ? there should be a time stamp at each server; do you
notice any big
gaps in the timestamps (on the messages
sounds more like slow mail
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 17/01/12 8:55 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012, at 12:55 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:17PM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for
Quoting Philip Northeast rnort...@bigpond.net.au:
sounds more like slow mail
According to Fastmail support I'm hitting their new daily bandwidth
limits. I'm not convinced so I'm still discussing it with them.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western
on 2012-01-17 16:02 Brian Walters wrote
According to Fastmail support I'm hitting their new daily bandwidth limits. I'm
not convinced so I'm still discussing it with them.
hmm, those limits are pretty high, and it's odd that they would cause a delay
in just one email source ...
i suspect an
Quoting steve harley p...@paper-ape.com:
on 2012-01-17 16:02 Brian Walters wrote
According to Fastmail support I'm hitting their new daily bandwidth
limits. I'm
not convinced so I'm still discussing it with them.
hmm, those limits are pretty high, and it's odd that they would
cause a
on 2012-01-17 21:59 Brian Walters wrote
Quoting steve harley:
i suspect an intermediate server is delaying the emails; check the raw
headers ? there should be a time stamp at each server; do you notice any big
gaps in the timestamps (on the messages that were delayed)?
I'm using Fastmail via
Previous message: Testing...Testing... (again)
Next message: GESO Now with more hatness
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/15/12 8:57 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped
to receive PDML.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
Doug Brewer doug at alphoto.com
Mon Jan 16 01:58:40 EST 2012
Previous message: Testing...Testing... (again)
Next message: GESO
From: Brian Walters
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and after about 8 hours I received all of
the day's mail in one hit.
It's a bit odd, especially as my fastmail
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:17PM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for kicks, I set up a second Fastmail account for PDML mail and,
hey presto, it received my reply to Doug. But the original Fastmail
account hasn't.
It's a mystery.
I'll
John Brian,
I've encountered some problems of a different sort with my pdml account.
The pdml email comes to my gmail account and I somehow turned on 'Rich
formatting.'
(I suspect the Virgin America Airlines promo email did it.)
I kept on sending photo comments but never getting any replies.
I
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012, at 12:55 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56:17PM +1100, Brian Walters wrote:
Hmmm
Well this is getting odder and odder.
Just for kicks, I set up a second Fastmail account for PDML mail and,
hey presto, it received my reply to Doug. But the
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and after about 8 hours I received all of
the day's mail in one hit.
It's a bit odd, especially as my fastmail account seems to be receiving
reply, reply, reply.
Have you checked your spam folder?
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and
We read you loud and clear! Cheers, Christine
On Jan 15, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and after
Thanks David and Christine.
The only reason I know you replied is because I saw your messages (and
my original post) in the archives. I haven't seen any of those posts in
my Fastmail account.
David, Fastmail (at the base level I use) doesn't have a spam folder so
I should get everything.
It's
On 1/15/12 8:57 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Sorry for the interruption to your scheduled program
My Fastmail account has stopped receiving PDML mail again. It did the
same thing about a week ago and after about 8 hours I received all of
the day's mail in one hit.
It's a bit odd, especially
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option
settings - let me know if you see it someone
thanks
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
I saw it.\
On 7/2/2011 10:50 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option
settings - let me know if you see it someone
thanks
ann
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
--Marvin the Martian.
--
Ann,
Your message to the pdml worked fine.
Bob S.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option settings
- let me know if you see it someone
thanks
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Ping.
--Original Message--
From: Ann Sanfedele
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Testing again can you read me now?
Sent: Jul 2, 2011 10:50 AM
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option
settings
I see this! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 9:50 AM
Subject: Testing again can you read me now?
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option
Got ya, girl! :-)
G
On Saturday, July 2, 2011, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
gt; This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my
option settings - let me know if you see it someone
gt;
gt; thanks
gt; ann
gt;
gt; --
gt; PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
gt; PDML@pdml.net
gt;
Woohoo! You're back! :-)
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 2 July 2011 10:50, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
This is supposed to go out in plain text... according to my option settings
I still am not getting my mail , or anyone elses , coming back to me
Going to call my server again shortly
bear with me kids, I miss you
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
tell your server you have a bear with you and many kids so it had bettter comply
2011/4/25 Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
I still am not getting my mail , or anyone elses , coming back to me
Going to call my server again shortly
bear with me kids, I miss you
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and write
a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided to compare it
against DA14/2.8 and DA16-50/2.8. Here you can see two comparisons -
ultimate corners and frame centers. I don't say
Forgot to say - all shots are made at maximum aperture, i.e. at f/2.8 or
f/4 depending the lens.
BR, Margus
Margus Männik wrote:
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and
write a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
Forgot to say - all shots are made at maximum aperture, i.e. at f/
2.8 or f/4 depending the lens.
Then I would expect the 15/4 to be the best of the bunch. It's usually
a big quality jump from f2.8 to f4.
BR, Margus
Margus Männik
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
Forgot to say - all shots are made at maximum aperture, i.e. at f/ 2.8 or
f/4 depending the lens.
Then I would expect the 15/4 to be the best
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and write
a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided to compare it
against DA14/2.8 and DA16-50/2.8. Here you can see two comparisons
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:27 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
Forgot to say - all shots are made at maximum aperture, i.e. at f/
2.8 or f/4 depending
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Margus Männik [mar...@eol.ee]
Sent: 09 April 2009 16:04
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and
write
...@eol.ee]
Sent: 09 April 2009 16:04
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and write
a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided to compare it
against DA14/2.8
Will,
most likely you will have that chance quite soon. If there's good
weather tomorrow, I'll take those lenses and go shooting. Head to head,
aperture to aperture.
BRM
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
That does surprise me.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Margus Männik
[mar...@eol.ee]
Sent: 09 April 2009 16:48
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
Sorry, it's not :)
John
Margus Männik wrote:
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and write
a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided to compare it
against DA14/2.8 and DA16-50/2.8. Here you can see two comparisons -
ultimate corners and frame
As a matter of fact, the results surprised me as well.
Actual lens orders (from left to right) are:
Corner shot: 15mm - 16-50mm - 14mm
Center shot: 16-50mm - 15mm - 14mm
I shot three doubles in random order and the results were the same every
time. Seems I do have a really good sample of
So the much maligned 16-50 is clearly the best, even at 2.8.
Unexpected but not totally surprising based on my own experience with
the lens.
Paul
On Apr 9, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Margus Männik wrote:
As a matter of fact, the results surprised me as well.
Actual lens orders (from left to right)
to my prime
kit.someday.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Margus Männik
[mar...@eol.ee]
Sent: 09 April 2009 19:50
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
As a matter of fact
Let's see now...
Lasse
dang reply-to function is tripping out
Hi,
On 25 Feb 2002 at 19:33, Peter Smekal wrote:
I have a copied manual.
It says a red LED will glow next to LT, B2 when there is no
sufficient light or when the camera has selected a long exposure time.
How does on know which of these two alternatives the actual one at the
moment?
Both
I'm testing the LX again. I have two questions for the experienced:
1. I took a shot out of a window on a rather snowy scenery. The picture
turned out to be somewhat underexposed. Could it have something to do with
the shot being taken through a window?
2. I have a copied manual. It says a red
: Peter Smekal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päivä: 25. helmikuuta 2002 19:35
Aihe: LX-testing again
I'm testing the LX again. I have two questions for the experienced:
1. I took a shot out of a window on a rather snowy scenery. The picture
turned out
49 matches
Mail list logo
