I hope you have better luck with this seller than I did. He
misrepresented an LX winder that I bought from him, and getting him
to make good on it was an ordeal.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1221287672
Check in there, many good prices:
http://www.digipartner.com/mr3/luettelo.txt
All list in FIM...
Philippe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
David,
K1000 for $10...no I don't think you can lose on this one! Even if the lens
doesn't work!
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1221445625
I don't think I can lose with this purchase
David
-
This message is from the
Hi all,
I need to know which lenses have ghostless coating. Please only reply if
you are absolutely sure!
I think that it is better to send replies to the list so that I do not
receive many mails with the same information.
TIA,
Boz
--
_\\|//_ Imagination is more important than
Hi,
I have a problem with the diaphragm on a Pentax 100mm f/4 macro.
The diaphragm work ok, except at shortest focus, then it doesn't close.
So it is not a sticking diaphragm. If I move the diaphragm-lever
with my finger I here a click when I fully open the diaphragm, this click
prevents the
Hi all,
I need to know the exact name that appears on the barrel of the A* 200/2.8
Macro ED lens.
TIA,
Boz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Hi Paul,
really no insult intended. I am also careful to guard my equipment
whereever I go. It is just limited what you can do about it (theft,
accidental loss etc.), as I learned recently.
Most of the shoots I take a taken outside my house. Buying lenses to be
used in my house wouldn't make
I wrote:
A company that doesn't reply to e-mails is certainly suspect.
Well, they finally replied today after three weeks. So they don't seem that suspect
after all.
Pl
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Don't you guys need a license to steal at this rate?
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
David,
K1000 for $10...no I don't think you can lose on this one! Even if the lens
doesn't work!
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Outside of the Limited lenses, I wonder how we'd know? It doesn't say
anything about it on the lens, does it? Reason I ask is because I have a
few recent lenses that could have the coating but I don't see anyway to be
sure.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Bojidar Dimitrov
Nice work! Some grain in the sky in the first photo - the shen tree - but
it still looks good. Change it to LAB color and blur the A B channels,
then back to grayscale and you're set.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "tom" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "PDML" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1220636208
Damned if *I* know what it is... ;)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org
The guy in Japan who bought my K1000SE used BidPay. In just a
few days I received a Western Union money order in the mail (in
US dollars, of course). It was quick and painless.
Actually, I has my auction listed as being for U.S. bidders
only, but after what this guy bid for my camera I wasn't
Hey, can that project possibly be as entertaining as us? ;)
Make sure to drop us the occassional update, and good luck.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
He may have made a mistake in his "Buy it Now" price, as was said before. If
so, it should not come as a surprise when he doesn't want to close the deal
for $10. I don't think I'd make an issue of it if that was the case.
Mistakes, happen.
Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 12 Mar 2001, at 5:26, Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Hi all,
I need to know the exact name that appears on the barrel of the A* 200/2.8
Macro ED lens.
Hi Boz,
I'd love to have 200f2.8 macro but I've only got a:
SMC PENTAX-A* MACRO 1:4 200mm ED (passed sticker) [serial#]
Cheers,
Rob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can someone tell me if there's a trick to using the self-timer
on the Super Program?
I've followed the instructions in the manual but it seems to
trip the shutter immediately.
Pull/slide the self-timer to the right (while holding the
"Gary L. Murphy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:47:35 -0500 (EST), Harry Baughman wrote:
i like to shoot people.
I thought that was illegal in most places... :-)))
He must be one of those guys from Texas :-)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Best of luck with your endeavors, Mike.
Guess I won't have to buy a new hard drive now: You have been
responsible of a disproportionately large number of the messages
that I save in my personal permanent archive :-)
(Not to mention my much-loved Pentax K2!)
Mark
-
This message is from the
James Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those Kodak instant print cameras are really valuable. Remember them?
After Polaroid won their patent case, those Kodak gems really became
collectable. I've seen a few at thrift stores. No one wants them -yet!
Jim A.
My father was an engineer at Kodak
Todd Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1221287672
$99?!?!? ARRGHHH
Yeah, but what I *really* hate is when someone points out
something that I was too late for but wouldn't have known about
otherwise!
;-)
(Sorry, Todd--I just had to
"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
Outside of the Limited lenses, I wonder how we'd know? It doesn't say
anything about it on the lens, does it? Reason I ask is because I have a
few recent lenses that could have the coating but I don't see anyway to be
sure.
I've seen it in a few Pentax press
Hi Shel,
Seems to be the general opinion, as long as it`s done in subdued light.
I had a good time shooting with you yesterday.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 9:58
Look at
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2001/200110.html
Arnie
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Hi all,
I need to know the exact name that appears on the barrel of the A* 200/2.8
ED lens.
SMC PENTAX-A* 1:2.8 200mm ED
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Kelvin wrote:
KA I've read many good comments about this lens. Does it
KA perform well in the entire range of aperture settings,
KA particular wide open at f/1.4?
Kelvin, it's excellent starting with 2.8, when there's no more light
fall-off and the resolution easily allows for 30x40 cm
Leonard wrote:
PL Outside of the Limited lenses, I wonder how we'd know? It doesn't say
PL anything about it on the lens, does it? Reason I ask is because I have a
PL few recent lenses that could have the coating but I don't see anyway to be
PL sure.
It was mentioned on the FA 35/2 press
Looks like coax cable to me.
Doug
Quoting Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?
ViewItemitem20636208
Damned if *I* know what it is... ;)
Ashwood Lake Photography
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Hope nobody minds the post. Just thought that some may find this helpful
since it seems there are a few people on the list who are using inkjet
printers to make prints.
==
50 sheets of high-gloss inkjet photo paper for $12
Hi Boz ..
It reads: SMC PENTAX-A* 1:2.8 200mm ED
Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
I need to know the exact name that appears on the barrel of the A* 200/2.8
ED lens.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no rules for good photographs,
there are only good photographs.
-
This message
"Gary L. Murphy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:47:35 -0500 (EST), Harry Baughman wrote:
i like to shoot people.
I thought that was illegal in most places... :-)))
He must be one of those guys from Texas :-)
-
It's only legal in Texas MOST of the time.
I bought mine about a year ago for $565. It is the most exciting thing I
have done in 35mm photography. Imagine a 300mm lens that gives results like
shooting with a 50mm lens. I almost wept on seeing the first pictures I
took. I couldn't believe the sharpness. I will always have a Pentax
I own both and like both. When I bought a camera for my daughter I gave her
the 28-70 because my instincts (and photos) indicated that I had more
confidence in the 28-105. However, the28-105 is heavier, larger and I
have recently bought another 28-70. I like the 28-70 on my ZX5n w/o
X - A scroll of news from
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Read it? [yn] y
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1220636208
Damned if *I* know what it is... ;)
It is a bit short to connect a pneumatic tool to an air compressor.
ObPhoto: Check out
Those Kodak instant print cameras are really valuable. Remember
them?
After Polaroid won their patent case, those Kodak gems really became
collectable. I've seen a few at thrift stores. No one wants them
-yet!
Jim A.
Really? I was just looking at my wife's old Kodak. She lost out on the
Hi,
Recently Alin Flaider wrote:
It was mentioned on the FA 35/2 press release and possibly for the
FA 20-45/4 too. For sure ghostless coatings is associated with the new
24-90/3.5-4.5.
It was also mentioned in the press release of the 28-105/3,2-4,5. Can
anyone confirm for the
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. You mention that it displays a
softening effect around the _local edges_. Can you
explain what you mean by local edges? And, how does
local contrast differ from overall contrast? I'm quite
new to photography but I'm eager to learn more.
Thanks again,
Kelvin
--- Alin
A scroll of mail from Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 12
Mar 2001 12:25:08 +0100
Read it? y
I wrote:
A company that doesn't reply to e-mails is certainly suspect.
Well, they finally replied today after three weeks. So they don't seem that suspect
after all.
An online company that
A scroll of mail from Tom Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:57:55 -0500
Read it? y
I don't know how well it will sell, but what list members are
missing is this camera won't be competing with 3 mega-pixel
amateur cameras but with cameras that are now selling for about
Yes. Although the DOF, [the part of the picture available just in front of,
or just behind, the focused upon subject] is greatly limited as far as what
one can include in a close-up f1.4 shot.
But this is true with every fast, wide open lens...
And at least the FA 50/1.4 focuses sharp as a tack
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:59:37 +1300, David A. Mann wrote:
The digital SLR (MZ-D ?) will heve a 24x36 mm sensor, equal in size to
the 35mm system FILM camera's.
I am fully aware of that. I was aiming my post at the "other" brands who use
those puny little APS-size sensors (are we allowed to
Hi Boz,
I confirmed it with Pentax Lenses catalogue as of June 2000.
It says "Two aspherical lenses, glass mold and hybrid, are
adopted. Various technologies such as floating zoom and
GHOSTLESS COATING enable this lens to perform very well at
all focal length and perspective."
Sincerely,
Dan wrote:
I dropped a roll of print film off at a new lab for processing and
sleeving, and, instead of sleeving, they rolled the film and put it into
the canister the film cartridge was in. I've cut it into 5 frame strips,
but I'm having a heck of a time trying to uncurl the strips so
Yeh, I realize I'm probably wrong now (Head hung ashamed) and that Tom R.
was being funny. Where I came from an A was anything between 90 - 100. If
the teacher was particularly impressed by some ungradeable aspect of the
paper you got an A+. It's likely the original poster was not rating
The 2.8/180 mm is the original legendary Olympia Sonnar of 1936 designed for the
Contax II rangefinder.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-Alkuperinen viesti-
Lhettj: Sas Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL
People ... I love working with all sorts of people in many types of
environments. Kids are great, especially when I can capture the
relationship between kids and their parents. I love catching a hug
or a kiss, a touch or a glance, or some other indication of
closeness and the love and bond
Dan,
I heard that if you pee on it, it will straighten right out. Wouldn't hurt
to try. It supposed to cure athlete's foot and keep the pests of off roses.
:-)
Tom C.
Thanks Tom. I'll let the volunteer PUG critics handle that.
(FWIW, it's extremely efficacious on cats.G)
Dan Scott
[EMAIL
Some goodies I picked up today that'll go cheap here.
I'll pay US shipping on these items.
Collin
#1. Case $25
Metal construction and good foam inside.
http://www.integrityonline21.com/dpconsult/ebay/case.jpg
http://www.integrityonline21.com/dpconsult/ebay/caseb.jpg
#2 50mm
Nick Snowdon wrote:
I am looking for a zoom to replace my old 35-80 and I
am casting my eyes over the new Tamron 24-135 SP. Has
anyone seen any reviews of this lens? I am going to
use it on my PZ1p. I suspect it will be quite a bit
cheaper than the Pentax 24-90 and has a more range but
I have no
Hello
I hold last thursday a sample of the MZ-S!!!
It is very special event but its price gives a bad taste of it
See you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-
This message is
Many years ago I purchased a Tamron (I believe) 500 mirror for my M series bodies and
K-1000. There was noticable loss of sharpess but contrast really took the big hit.
It eventually was stolen from my car while
on a trip (along with a Vivitar 283 flash and SMC-M 135/3.5 lens). I replaced
Hello.
Today one of my friends offered to sell me a flash - it's Achiever
630AF (with added below "for Pentax Z10"). His friend is selling one
and he was asking if I'm interested. This flash has a GN of 30 and AF
beam.
Does anybody have any info about this flash?
Is $50 about right price
"Juan J. Buhler" wrote:
MWAH HA HA...
All your LX are belong to us!
*snicker* http://www.geocities.com/driseog/ayb.html
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Hi
In the following link there is reference to "color reversal film".
https://www.thecamerazone.com/productdetails2.cfm?Product_ID=RAP120
Could anybody tell what is "color reversal film"?
Is "reversal film" another name to "Slide film"?
Thanks
Ramesh
-
This
i wondered if someone would say something about that wording. i am sure
everyone knew what i was talking about.
"Gary L. Murphy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:47:35 -0500 (EST), Harry Baughman wrote:
i like to shoot people.
I thought that was illegal in most places...
Brent wrote:
The exact same situation occurs if the ISO is 100 and the shutter
is set to "B". It does not however occur at a "B" when the ISO is
50...but it does if the dial is set to the blank space between "B"and
1/1000 sec.
Hi Brent,
The combination of ASA 100 film speed setting and B
Nick wrote:
I am looking for a zoom to replace my old 35-80 and I am casting my eyes
over the new Tamron 24-135 SP. Has anyone seen any reviews of this lens? I
am going to use it on my PZ1p. I suspect it will be quite a bit cheaper than
the Pentax 24-90 and has a more range but I have no idea how
I have had one for about 3 years, using it on my PZ-70 and PZ-20. It has
functioned perfectly and I have no complaints. The tilting and rotating
head is really nice for bounce flash. I bought mine, NIB, on ebay for about
$85 and I consider it a good buy. I would expect it to be in excellent
*** My reply to Ralf:
Unfortunately, Tamron's SP series is not so good now as it used to be. I
wouldn't rate it "FA* so to say". Normal Tamron zooms are cheapish consumer
zooms, while the SP series has the pro lenses, but similar to other
third-party's pro lenses. I think the * Pentax lenses are
Unfortunately the focus direction is wrong way in Pentax and Nikon
mount. Ralf
I would say the Tamron's got the "right" way focus direction. All my old
lenses (the lenses which made SLR concept - Exakta lenses. Granddads of all
SLR lenses g) turn the way as Tamron (and opposite the way of F
Apparently the last Nikon rangefinders were the special batch of 2000 units of S3 in
black made for the Tokyo Olympics in 1964. Otherwise the Nikon RF production seems to
have ended in 1961.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
In a word...yes
Jerry in Houston
-Original Message-
From: Ramesh Kumar_C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:09 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: color reversal film?
Hi
In the following link there is reference to "color reversal film".
Yes!
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]P; vegne af Ramesh Kumar_C
Sendt: 12. marts 2001 22:09
Til: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Emne: color reversal film?
Hi
In the following link there is reference to "color reversal film".
When did they modifiy the feature, over the weekend.
First bid used to kill the option, you have buy it now upto when the reserve
has been met now apparently!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Hi,
reversal film is negative film, ie it is reversed.
Another name for slide film is transparency film.
Bob
Monday, March 12, 2001, 9:08:52 PM, you wrote:
Hi
In the following link there is reference to "color reversal film".
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, aimcompute wrote:
" El Rastro, December 2000 " by Juan Buhler
I love the expressions captured on the faces. This is not my type of
photography, but this shot strikes me as very well executed and outstanding.
Thanks very much.
Also, thanks to the other people who
My thanks to Gabor, Jens, and Evan for clarifying the mount arrangement in
CZJ lenses. Because of my aversion to dimmed viewfinders, I no longer
regret that I recently missed picking up a "K-mount" CZJ 20/2.8 for $200 by
a few hours.
But Gabor also wrote:
Some old teles (2.8/120, 2.8/180) are
Hi everybody,
This afternoon, while heading home, I've been attracted by a "bargain"
Spotmatic SP offered at a very nice price. The camera had some corrosion on
the top and around the mount. It worked fine, though (I couldn't test the
meter - dead battery) and had its original case (in very good
Shot wrote:
Hello.
Today one of my friends offered to sell me a flash - it's Achiever
630AF (with added below "for Pentax Z10"). His friend is selling one
and he was asking if I'm interested. This flash has a GN of 30 and AF
beam.
Does anybody have any info about this flash?
Is $50
On 13 Mar 2001, at 0:15, dave o'brien wrote:
If you look at the press release, they make a big play over the fact
that you can use 6x7 and 645 lenses on it. Not news to serious
pentaxians, but the kind of thing which might grab the attention of
someone used to a different system.
Hi Dave,
Will it be delivered? That is the question.
Otis Wright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
K1000 for $10...no I don't think you can lose on this one! Even
if the lens
doesn't work!
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1221445625
I don't
On 12 Mar 2001, at 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My thanks to Gabor, Jens, and Evan for clarifying the mount arrangement in
CZJ lenses. Because of my aversion to dimmed viewfinders, I no longer
regret that I recently missed picking up a "K-mount" CZJ 20/2.8 for $200 by a
few hours.
Hi
I 'spose since a reserve price not met constitutes a non-auction. How does it
work on a non-reserve auction (like most of mine)?
Steve S.
http://people.mn.mediaone.net/sscott2
Tiger Moses wrote:
When did they modifiy the feature, over the weekend.
First bid used to kill the option, you have
You might want to consider the old FA Power Zoom 28-105/f4-5.6. It's
heavy (with relatively useless power zoom that you can turn off), but is
also a sharp lens in its class and quite highly regarded. It was
designed for the 1p. This is the standard lens on my 1p. I don't know if
it's still being
WRONG!
-Original Message-
From: Bob Walkden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:56 PM
To: Ramesh Kumar_C
Subject: Re: color reversal film?
Hi,
reversal film is negative film, ie it is reversed.
Another name for slide film is transparency film.
Bob
Monday,
Except for the new commemorative edition that came out last year.
Raimo Korhonen wrote:
Apparently the last Nikon rangefinders were the special batch of 2000 units of S3 in
black made for the Tokyo Olympics in 1964. Otherwise the Nikon RF production seems to
have ended in 1961.
--
Shel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tiger Moses
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ebay - Buy it Now!
When did they modifiy the feature, over the weekend.
First bid used to kill the option, you
Hi there,
Thanks for the clarification. I believe I got what you
mean. Does it then make good portraits wide opened? I
guess the 50mm focal length is too short for
comfortable distance between the photographer and the
subject.
Kelvin
--- Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By local
Hello Skip,
What do you usually use a 50mm for? It seems too long
for a nice landscape and too short for a portrait. I
would love to get the lens (been rated too well to
ignore it) but I really don't know how useful it can
be. It would be nice if other readers could contribute
what they would
Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love the solitude, the focus, the hunt, the subjects, the gear, and the
photographs. I love tracking down the ID of my latest find and picking up
anything I can on its history or the origin of the name. I love sitting
over my photos, trying to figure out
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:39:10 -0800, Mark Roberts wrote:
He must be one of those guys from Texas :-)
Yup! It's legal here =all= the time! :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
No they have several. I think they have in K mount a non-macro, a macro,
and a macro with KA contacts. The last two are the ones to get.
Todd
At 09:55 AM 3/12/01 +0800, you wrote:
Yes, one of the lens is Sears 135mm but I don't know whether it has macro
feature because I have not got it.
Silver, yuck They need to start making the black models again.. Even
on the MZ/ZX series they look better
l8r,
Douglas E Harmon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://personal.mia.bellsouth.net/~genius91/
- Original Message -
From: Arne Lie (f) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I find that a 50mm lens is frequently a good choice to frame a
full-figure portrait, a small group of people or a street scene. (My
current PUG submission is a street scene that was shot with a 50.) The
50 works well for photographing some indoor activities. I've used it on
a couple of occasions
Baron Wolman just recently started using a Pentax 928 PS for some
of his everyday shooting. He LOVES the camera. To hear him talk,
he's more excited about it than his Nikon gear ... I kid you not.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
When it's described on EBay, of course:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1221346392
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: (703) 834-4648
Ha! That's nothing.
I saw a "50/1.7 Zoom Lens" yesterday. :-)
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the
Hi Gianfranco,
Congrats on the Spotmatic! I`m glad it cleaned up OK for you. I think
you will like it.
I can`t answer the question, yet. I picked up a Super Tak 50 1.4, but have
not
used it yet.
I did`nt know there were two versions of the 50mm 1.4 Super Tak. How do you
tell them apart? Peter
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:12:27 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
I saw a "50/1.7 Zoom Lens" yesterday. :-)
Man, you should have grabbed that sucker! Talk about RARE! :-))
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Hello all;
I have been in contact with a guy named Klaus
Garcia who has offered to fix my Me Super for
what I consider to be a small sum. My Me Super
does not advance the film at first, and then,
after retrying about 50 times, it will advance it
every third time, then every other time, then
Sorry guys, you're going to be inundated
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/balto_tower_10030001.html
FA 645 120/4 Macro, Pan F+, 25 filter
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Hi all,
Has anyone ever seen or own a 1.4X or 1.5X teleconvertor in screw mount?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Never under any circumstances take a sleeping pill and a laxative
on the same night.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
I did and I'm still trying to figure out how to make it zoom ;-)
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:12:27 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
I saw a "50/1.7 Zoom Lens" yesterday. :-)
Man, you should have grabbed that sucker! Talk about RARE! :-))
Later,
Gary
-
Ken Archer wrote:
I did and I'm still trying to figure out how to make it zoom ;-)
It employs the advanced and complicated bipedal zoom mechanism.
You may need to get a manual from Pentax.
tv
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:12:27 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
I
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:12:27 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
I saw a "50/1.7 Zoom Lens" yesterday. :-)
Man, you should have grabbed that sucker! Talk about RARE! :-))
Later,
Gary
I would've, but I'd just made a great deal on a slightly used bridge in
Brooklyn, and din't have any money left.
Dan
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:31:13 -0600, Ken Archer wrote:
I did and I'm still trying to figure out how to make it zoom ;-)
Use a reversing ring! :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:15:26 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
I would've, but I'd just made a great deal on a slightly used bridge in
Brooklyn, and din't have any money left.
ROTFLMAO!! :-)
Way to go, Dan!
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On Ebay they call them unused old stock. As far as I know there
is only one company in the world currently making flash bulbs.
There is/was supposed to be another one in China but I have
never found any information on them. Megaflash in Ireland does
not make FP rated bulbs as far as I know.
Over on rec.photo.? a gentle man has compared film v digital and
concluded that digital is better. He did this by scanning a 4x6
photo and printing it out as a 8x12 and printing an 8x12 taken
with his 3 megapixel camera. He says the digital picture was
definitely the better of the two.
???
I bookmarked his page earlier. I would sure be interested in how things turn
out for you. Now I know why there is protection in large groups.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
Hello all;
I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything good or
bad about him. If not, perhaps I will play
Darn! You mean I wasted all that paranoia?
Doug Brewer wrote:
Well, I'm not usually one to let a good conspiracy theory die on the vine, but in
this case it was Ken's ISP. They had cached a bunch of messages, and then instead of
forwarding, they reversed them back into the pdml server.
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo