John,
The requirements seem a bit peculiar at first, but not really very complicated.
Size:
Max heigth is 600 pixels. It is a good idea to use 600 pixels to get
the most out of the presentation interface.
Due to limitations in the same interface (which is Flash-based), they
don't want panoramic
I'll restrict my reply to the DSLRL related issues of this survey (there
are so many bikes in my country so these are literally only a commmodity
item):
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
2
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
1
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle once.
what gear where you in?
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
I do believe it is out of line.
I had one of this style body back in the early 50's and the lens was
designed to be pulled out to this position from being hard against the mount
- you kept pulling and then rotated it to engage a breech type lock on the
end of the barrel which engaged in a socket
On 19.11.2007, at 16:44 , Thibouille wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=25674627
Quite accurate ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Purpose? To help inform my suspicions...
Let's go then
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
1
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
1
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
2
4/ What's the longest length of time you've owned a single DSLR
camera?
2
Excellent composition but I much prefer your Cutter images. This one seems a
bit flat.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A Seattle ferry at sunset.
Hi Rick
I like both but there seems to be more to hold interest in the second. The
reflections on the water and the blue lights on the tower add impact.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/20 Tue AM 08:30:22 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle
And and excellent photo it is too.
Congratulations, Boris.
(nice to be able to put a face to Tim's name as well).
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think Pentax had a wonderful idea, but by refusing to put the ongoing
resources required into the gallery, they have diluted the concept.
May be it is not too late to fix it if they decide so...
Sadly, the USA is rapidly going broke. I expect
Okay...
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
1
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
none
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
over 2 years
4/ What's the longest length of time you've owned a single DSLR camera?
over 2 years
5/ When you purchased
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
1
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
0
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
3
4/ What's the longest length of time you've owned a single DSLR camera?
3 years
5/ When you purchased your first DSLR, did it
Good timing, Cotty.
It's just about exactly 4 years since the *istD hit the marketplace.
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
Two.
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
None other.
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
Four.
4/ What's the longest length of
I suspect it is not fully extended and/or locked. But it does look deformed as
it is pictured. Poor thing. I'll give it a good home.
From: Rod Connan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/20 Tue AM 09:29:51 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: OT: And you though
Very nicely done. I like the composition with the long walkway leading to the
building and the lighting seems just about perfect.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting cbwaters [EMAIL
I just realized that I didn't interpreted correctly the question number 2/ (and
I don't want to ruin such an important survey with a false response)
So it should be:
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
0
- Mensaje original
De: Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:28:18 +, Cotty wrote
Must be about time for one.
Actually I was reading something on a different list about expectations
and fulfilments with regard to DSLR cameras. No need to be precise about
brands here, it can be any DSLR, but please limit to this sort of
Vern nice. I remember the pic, an excellent portrait.
Paul
On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:20 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Tim requested permission to take one of my photos from our most recent
trip to Norway for his use. Permission was naturally granted. Here is
what came out of this:
Cool Boris! And a very nice portrait as well. Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 19, 2007 11:20 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Tim requested permission to take one of my photos from our most recent
trip to Norway for his use. Permission was naturally granted. Here is
what came out of
Opps. I reread the question and i suppose my answer need to change to
6 years.(D1)
Dave
On 11/19/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4/ What's the longest length of time you've owned a single DSLR camera?
One year
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
LOL... I'm sure there are other things missing ... ;)
On Nov 20, 2007 10:19 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19.11.2007, at 16:44 , Thibouille wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=25674627
Quite accurate ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/2007 6:28 PM
Must be about time for one.
Actually I was reading something on a different list about
expectations
and
Hi Cotty list,
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
2
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
Just these two.
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
Waited for Pentax to launch *ist D and bought one then - 4 years ago?
4/ What's the longest length of
Not that much, but I think continuos drive mode in K20D is really
worth consideration ;-)
Pozdrowienia
Sylwek
On 20.11.2007, at 12:35 , Thibouille wrote:
LOL... I'm sure there are other things missing ... ;)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/900x600-_IGP0442-EQ.jpg
^^^ Low hanging sun creates typical for this time of the year
red-to-purple cast. That's I like about this time of the year in
northern Europe. Do you?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Great Boris, congratulations.
(BTW, I see that the website is Spanish. I bet that a lot of people confuses
Tim with the film director (and Oscar winner) Fernando Trueba
http://es.geocities.com/lorovaz/DIRECTORES/T/Truebaf.htm, they look similar at
first sight, and Fernando has been also very
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle once.
what gear where you in?
Bob
Full leathers, natch.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Nov 20, 2007 10:28 PM, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle once.
what gear where you in?
Bob
Full leathers, natch.
Is
On Nov 19, 2007 6:28 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must be about time for one.
Actually I was reading something on a different list about expectations
and fulfilments with regard to DSLR cameras. No need to be precise about
brands here, it can be any DSLR, but please limit to this sort
I prefer the view of the second one too, but I like the exposure of
the first more so.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 20, 2007 10:23 AM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the Seattle series, another view of the Coast
Guard cutter in the harbor:
On Nov 20, 2007 2:01 AM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks pretty good to me - would be slightly nicer with more of the
trailing tentacles showing rather than cut off, but the rest of the
presentation is excellent.
G'day Bruce,
excuse me I'm having a Monty Python skit flash
...I'm
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle once.
what gear where you in?
Eh? I'd have thought he'd have taken his gear off for that...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Nov 20, 2007 7:10 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#5134676760981182386
This is the the other church i have always wanted to get a shot of.
And a lovely shot it is too. I like the muted colours.
On Longlac IR Number 58, its all
On Nov 20, 2007 1:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2007 3:49:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP2602.jpg
It's a very nice jelly. I took shots of jellies in Monterey in 2006.
On Nov 20, 2007 6:25 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing special - God, you're picky!
Sometimes yes, sometimes not enough :-)
If it was mine I'd be pretty happy
Thanks Brian.
The only thing is I find the intensity of the blue background a bit
distracting.
Hmmm...It's
Thanks Dave.
It's the jelly fish/background colour combination that drew me to this
shot when I was browsing my archives
(Looking for a PUG submission to help keep Scott with his evil JD
threats of our backs).
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 20, 2007 3:20 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice
Thanks Paul.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice. Well framed and beautiful color.
Paul
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP2602.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Excellent shot mate. The composition colours work really well.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 20, 2007 3:49 AM, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/gallery/3314121#223236908-A-LB
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
William Robb wrote:
I think Pentax had a wonderful idea, but by refusing to put the ongoing
resources required into the gallery, they have diluted the concept.
I strongly suspect it isn't so much a matter of refusing as not
having the money. This ain't Canikon we're dealing with.
--
PDML
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/20 Tue PM 02:30:14 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: RE: DIGITAL SURVEY
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had
On Nov 20, 2007 11:30 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle once.
what gear where you in?
Eh? I'd have thought he'd have taken his
On Nov 20, 2007, at 7:57, Roman Melihhov wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/900x600-_IGP0442-EQ.jpg
^^^ Low hanging sun creates typical for this time of the year
red-to-purple cast. That's I like about this time of the year in
northern Europe. Do you?
The colors are nice... but the
On Nov 20, 2007 11:37 PM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
into someone's skit/pants or whatever?
Ahh...that should be skirt, not skit.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Thanks, Brian. Me too, but this image has (or is
intended to have) a completely different mood.
Rick
--- Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent composition but I much prefer your
Cutter images. This one seems a bit flat.
Cheers
Brian
On 11/20/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007 7:10 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/General/photo#5134676760981182386
This is the the other church i have always wanted to get a shot of.
And a lovely shot it is too. I
Hi!
In particular what do you think of www.alamy.com and
www.imagekind.com... I am thinking to start posting my work for a bit
of profit if such a thing is really possible these days.
Thanks in advance.
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Haaa better Fps, nice addition indeed :)
Better tracking AF IMO wouldn't be bad too but I'm not holding my
breath on that one ...
On Nov 20, 2007 1:56 PM, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that much, but I think continuos drive mode in K20D is really
worth consideration ;-)
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle once.
what gear where you in?
Eh? I'd have thought he'd have taken his
I can see what attracted you to this scene. Very nice lighting.
I do want to level the camera, however.
Not knowing what I might see if I were to get somewhat higher, I'd have
to take a look with that idea in mind. I'd, also, want to eliminate the
immediate foreground (murky and soft) and limit it
In a message dated 11/19/2007 9:20:57 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
Tim requested permission to take one of my photos from our most recent
trip to Norway for his use. Permission was naturally granted. Here is
what came out of this:
Yes, the SMC Takumars are better than the Super Taks in that they are more
flare resistant. One would have to take the same flare-prone shot with both
lenses to illustrate the difference. But my experience with both says it's
substantial. Some lens lines were upgraded optically in the switch
Thanks for looking. I agree. She was better in the first shoot, although she
was good here with Grace. The choices are fewer, among the bathing suit pics.
I think she was more self conscious. But we have at least two that will work
right now (8.1 and 7.5), and I have at least fifty more to
Is there any real, visible differenc between the multi coated
SMC-Takumars and the normal (older) Takumar? Could anyone show the
difference between non coated, single coated and multicoated lens?
Thanks,
.t
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Faster AF in low light, please.
I think that AF in general is the main failed subject of Pentax DSLRs
(I would say of Pentax SLRs in general but I haven't tested the MZ-S one, that
is supposed to be a good one).
- Mensaje original
De: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss
On 11/20/07, .timbercode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any real, visible differenc between the multi coated
SMC-Takumars and the normal (older) Takumar? Could anyone show the
difference between non coated, single coated and multicoated lens?
Actually, there's a little bit more of a
On 20/11/07, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
So we will learn if our responses satisfied your curiosity? :-)
Percentages and observations next week!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I don't like this as much as the other shots of her that you have
posted. She doesn't look quite as attractive here.
On Nov 18, 2007 8:05 PM, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sweater/hoodie seems oui of place.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
On 11/19/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
1
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
I've only ever owned the one.
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
1 year ago. I'm behind the curve.
4/ What's the longest length
I have not submitted anything except from the very beginning of the gallery.
Today i submitted several photos i'm quite fond of, and i'll see hwo they go.
I did go into the site and looked at photos to vote on.
The few pages i saw, i doubt mine will go to far.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On 20/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's not an expectation ... that's a desire. You knew the size and
viewfinder before you bought it.
Expectations should be things that you expected the camera to do, in
features or performance, based on what you knew of it from
On 20/11/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ahh...that should be skirt, not skit.
I think skit is more 'Australian'. Sort of a cross between a skid and a
skirt...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 11/20/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle once.
what gear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/gallery/3314121#223236908-A-LB
Very nice colors and tones, a little darker in the foliage (details
tend to mush together) than I'd prefer.
The cropping is a little too tall/oblong to my eye. Trimming a little
off the bottom and about
That is the first sign of wisdom, grasshopper.
==
Well, I took the survey to mean expectations, not desires. My
expectations
re cameras (film or digital) are usually much lower than my desires.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now
On Nov 20, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Cotty wrote:
I have to disagree bro. In my book, an expectation can be a desire.
It's
all very well to read up on specs and things before a purchase, but
(in
my case) I have to feel it with my heart. It's not something that I
can
easily put words to. I'm
In a message dated 11/20/2007 9:37:19 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, just because something doesn't meet my expectations, doesn't mean I
don't like it. If i didn't like it, I'd get rid of it. In fact, I
haven't picked up the 1DmarkII in ages. I love the L1/A20
One word: Chaps, baby, chaps.
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2007 9:30 AM
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle once.
what gear where you in?
Eh? I'd have thought he'd have
On 20/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, I took the survey to mean expectations, not desires
My interpretation of 'expectations' and 'desires' has nothing to do with
the survey Marn. I will collate the data and show percentages, and in
addition I will offer some of my
Is there any real, visible differenc between the multi coated
SMC-Takumars and the normal (older) Takumar? Could anyone show the
difference between non coated, single coated and multicoated lens?
My only point of direct comparison between Takumar and SMC Takumar
has been with the smc-Pentax
On Nov 19, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
A Seattle ferry at sunset.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6650355
K10D, FA 70-200, ISO 800, f/5.6 @ 1/45, RAW via LR.
I like the idea.
- Horizon is slightly tilted (always drives me batty with pictures
like this).
- The tones are
On Nov 19, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 19/11/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
What DSLR did you recently buy that fails to meet your
expectation?
Panasonic L1. It's a neat camera, and I do like it. But my
expectations
were of something smaller with a better
You're forgetting the most infamous one of all. The Takumar 135 F2.5.
We used to have regular arguments on the list about whether or not it
was worth spending even $25 on one. I had one but gave it away. ;-)
.timbercode [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2007 11:31 AM
Is there any real, visible
For me it would be enough if Pentax DSLR would have AF from MZ-S ;-)
On 2007-11-20, at 17:22, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Faster AF in low light, please.
I think that AF in general is the main failed subject of Pentax DSLRs
(I would say of Pentax SLRs in general but I haven't tested the MZ-
S
Steve Desjardins wrote:
You're forgetting the most infamous one of all. The Takumar 135 F2.5.
We used to have regular arguments on the list about whether or not it
was worth spending even $25 on one. I had one but gave it away. ;-)
Best $20 lens I ever bought (Takumar Bayonet 135/2.5).
On 20/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
What I'm disagreeing with you about is that I feel a desire is not
the same thing as an expectation.
EG: In 1975, I wanted a Lamborghini 350GT and I had many expectations
of it regards performance, etc. Once I bought one, I found
There's a very big difference. SMC coated lenses deliver higher contrast, more
saturated colours and are far more flare resistant.
Personally, I like my Super-Taks for portraiture, but prefer SMC lenses for
most other uses.
-Adam
.timbercode wrote:
Is there any real, visible differenc
That's one of the newer 'Takumar(Bayonet)' lenses. IMHO it's quite sharp but
flares easily. Had my mitts on one for a couple weeks (loaner from a friend
with GAS) and was favourably impressed. Will probably look for an M42 Super or
SMC Tak version instead though.
-Adam
Steve Desjardins
Sex in (or with) chaps means something rather different
on Cotty's side of the Atlantic, though ...
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:49:59PM -0500, Steve Desjardins wrote:
One word: Chaps, baby, chaps.
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2007 9:30 AM
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had
In a message dated 11/20/2007 10:21:57 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
6.the degree of probability that something will occur: There is little
expectation that he will come.
==
Heh. Probability. The probability that they would make a camera (any brand)
that
On Nov 20, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Cotty wrote:
If I have a desire for something, and I try and fulfil that desire,
then
I also have an expectation.
And in that statement, you articulate exactly what I mean: they are
two things, linked for sure, but two separate things. ;-)
G
--
PDML
Below...
Regards,
Bob...
-
Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message,
but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
2,
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
Two
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
Two
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
Whenever the *ist DF came out
4/ What's the longest length of time you've owned a single DSLR camera?
Whenever the *ist D cameout
5/
Yes.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: To those who submit to the Pentax Photo Gallery
Just curious;
Do you care to cast votes when you don't have any of your own images
in for review?
Thanks,
Jostein
I remeber that shot.
Good for you Boris,.
Dave
On 11/20/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Tim requested permission to take one of my photos from our most recent
trip to Norway for his use. Permission was naturally granted. Here is
what came out of this:
Kind of good for me too. Thank you for giving me this mysterious look. It
suits the context very well, I think.
Tim Typo
The Radio Photographer.
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 8:50
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/MargaretsGarden.jpg
I love the way the sun drives out enough water vapor to create a mist
that allows the sun's rays to be seen.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
I like this, it works very well.
Rick Womer wrote:
Another Seattle shot, self-explanatory.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6650358
K10D, DA 16-45, ISO 800, f/8 @ 1/350, RAW via
Lightroom.
Comments cordially invited.
Rick
On 20/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
And in that statement, you articulate exactly what I mean: they are
two things, linked for sure, but two separate things. ;-)
I don't give in *that* easily. I am British!
I need 24 hours to gather my thoughts.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Just two:
1) Pentax *ist D and
2) Pentax K10D.
Both nice cameras :-)
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Cotty
Sendt: 20. november 2007 00:28
Til: pentax
Cotty wrote:
I need 24 hours to gather my thoughts.
Knowing you I wonder if that will be sufficient ;-)
Here's a hint: At the time of purchase, expectations and desires are
very close if not exactly equivalent: I seldom buy a piece of gear
unless I *expect* it's going to do what I *desire*.
I just got a Sigma EX 10-20mm 1:4-5.6 DC.
Rectiliniar.
Not too bad at all and a pleasure to use too:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157603252126527/
I sold couplle of old lenses, which just about paid for the Sigma zoom :-)
Regards
Jens
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43
Thanks, Peter.
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this, it works very well.
Rick Womer wrote:
Another Seattle shot, self-explanatory.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6650358
K10D, DA 16-45, ISO 800, f/8 @ 1/350, RAW via
Lightroom.
Comments cordially
Cotty wrote:
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
one
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
none
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
1.5
4/ What's the longest length of time you've owned a single DSLR camera?
1.5years
5/ When you purchased your
On 20/11/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a hint: At the time of purchase, expectations and desires are
very close if not exactly equivalent: I seldom buy a piece of gear
unless I *expect* it's going to do what I *desire*.
That's very good.
i've also had more to drink than
Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob W wrote:
11/ Have you ever had sex with a bicycle? (You don't have to
answer
this. In fact, better if you don't).
I had sex on a motorcycle once.
what gear where you in?
Eh? I'd have thought he'd have
On Nov 19, 2007 5:28 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ How many DSLRs do you currently own?
2 - both Pentax DL (but one I brought used to give to my sister shortly).
2/ How many have you owned in the past?
0
3/ How many years ago did you buy (not just use) your first DSLR?
1.5
4/
Cotty wrote:
On 20/11/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a hint: At the time of purchase, expectations and desires are
very close if not exactly equivalent: I seldom buy a piece of gear
unless I *expect* it's going to do what I *desire*.
That's very good.
i've also had more
Well, using the larger display option on photo.net,
the top of the light-colored band of water is 2.8 cm
from the bottom of the pic on the left and 2.8 cm from
the bottom on the right. Said light band of water is
thinner and brighter on the right, and I think gives
an illusion of
Godfrey,
There is the *expectation* that the ferry is going *up* river. This may
or may not be desired, depending on your destination.
John Graves
WA1JG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
A Seattle ferry at sunset.
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
