Bob W wrote:
Hi Bob,
thanks. Do they have an option for cut sleeve on the 35mm
E6, or is it just mounted?
As Steve Jolly has already replied, that option is available.
Why do you use someone different for your c41?
Late 2001/early 2002 I was going through many rolls of film and decided
Hi Rob
Isn't this noise problem regarded one of the *ist draw backs compared to the
competition? High noise levels at high ISO values?
It would be nice to se a similar test done with Canon 10D and Nikon D100.
All the best
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL
At 10:20 PM 1/10/2004, Cory wrote:
Here are some shots I took last night (still awake but it *was* last night)
at work. I dare say, I DO have some interesting clients ;)
http://community.webshots.com/album/110437403puIOyr
Cory, can I ask what kind of work you do that's not as fun as this?
Pat in
see: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxistd/page13.asp
Regards, Jens
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:28:01 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Is such an accessory available?
Shel,
I've used the Refconverter A quite successfully. The Refconverter M
should also work.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
Pat White wrote:
I'd be
surprised if there are _any_ buildings in North America as old as 560 years
that were built by the Europeans and their descendants.
Bob W:
2004 - 560 = 1444, so it would certainly upset a few ideas.
graywolf:
Since that would have been 1444, so would I. Come to think of
they have found the buildings from at least one of them. that is, the post
holes and firepits, etc.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hultman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 3:12 AM
Subject: Re: Unusual subjects to photograph.
The
2 violates EXIF naming convention. i doubt they would ever do that. i think
the Kodak 14n does 1 already. a decent photo database does all three at once
when you copy the files from the camera, if you want it to.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
not to mention that that is how you create folders with new names for
directing your image files on the CF card.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: DSLR future wish-list
The
At 01:21 2004.01.11 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:53:42 +0200
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Collin, I wrote you a small message off-list. I only wanted to verify
that you received it. Since in the past I had some kind of similar
problem, I am using the forum.
Thanks.
Hello.
Didn't get it.
Well, I guess it'd make no harm if I said that in public then g.
Collin, I wonder whether you already sold that 50/2 lens. If not,
please let me know. I'd like to have it.
Thanks.
Surely the only people likely to post to the list with such subject
lines will be newcomers, who won't have read the email below?
S
Dr E D F Williams wrote:
'Hi', 'Hello' and 'Hi there' are salutations placed in the subject line by a
nasty breed of spammer. I would suggest that they not be
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Jan 2004 at 22:20, Jostein wrote:
Huh?
I wouldn't consider a 24x36 chip in a 645 camera damned cheap. I'd call it a
good start. :-)
I'd call it a desperate attempt to perpetuate the 645 format. Install a 10-14MP
FF sensor in a good high
That didn't occur to me. But members who have been away for a time might
also say Hi -- I suppose.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
See New Pages 'The Cement Company from HELL!'
Updated: August 15, 2003
Oh my God!
Hi!
I'd call it a desperate attempt to perpetuate the 645 format. Install
a 10-14MP
FF sensor in a good high performance 35mm sized body with a full
compatibility
K mount and 645 will be dead-in-the-water. My prediction (Mamiya 7
user :-)
I agree completely. (I'm a Pentax 645 user)
May I ask
Hi!
For those listers who might be teetering over the purchase of a *ist
D I've
just put up a page that illustrates the image noise generated by a
Pentax *ist
D at each available EI given a wide contrast scene. It's about 850kB.
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/Pentax_ist_D_noise/
Was noise reduction turned on?
As has been commented in various tests by websites and magazines, the ist-D
seems very usable at ISO 800.
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11,
Pat,
I enjoy old architecture and cityscapes enough to be a preservationist, but...
I don't believe in freezing all redevelopment and living with the old stuff
exclusively.
1) Old does not mean good. Some of the old is simply poor quality buildings.
2) People's needs and desires change. The
I bought mine yesterday :-) I'm an amateur, and found it difficult to
justify such a lot of money but my wife pointed out that, apart from the
photography (!), I'm quite cheap to keep. I do love her!
It's really lovely to hold, I have to say - although small, it has a good
solid feel to it,
Hi
What is Neat Image - PC software? Or what?
By dthe way. Do you know if lenses made for the *ist D - e.i FA-J 18-35 mm -
can be used on a 35mm body? (It's a nice range for 35 mm).
Sorry I'm asking silly questions - I'm quite new to digital SLR photography.
All teh best
Jens
-Oprindelig
Hi Andy
I think my film cameras would have
performed rather better, although it was a difficult day for photography
and
I haven't done a direct comparison.
are you taking in to consideration that the film latitude/deveoping process
would adjsut this using the MZ-5n?
Another feature I'd like is
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: SV: *ist D image noise examples
Hi
What is Neat Image - PC software? Or what?
Yup. Seems to work pretty good too.
By dthe way. Do you know if lenses made for the *ist D - e.i FA-J 18-35
mm -
can be used on a 35mm body? (It's a nice
I did a bunch the other day, but accidentally deleted the post before I
could send it. Then, I got busy doing other things. So, after a hiatus of
several days, are a few more comments on this month's entries:
Reuniion by Jacke Dowell:
A very neat idea; an annual document of The Group. This
An interesting comparison chart . . . but there is one problem:
The ist D doesn't do ISO 3200 and yet they are reporting values for it.
Shouldn't they be reporting 3200 as N/A? A quick scan of the text
doesn't indicate why.
IL Bill
P.S. I'm not trying to argue that the ist D has lest noise
645 lenses can be mounted on K-mount.
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/adapters/645.jpg
But, why would you want to unless you owned 645 lenses and wanted to save
money? The K-mount lenses, with their smaller image circle requirement,
should be sharper.
Now, it's technically possible make a
Either PDML will help Rebekeh, or just confuse the hell out of her! vbg
BTW, hi, and welcome to the list, Rebekeh. Can't help at all with your
'chrome question. Haven't shot slide film in at least 20 years or more...
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.
It does go to 3200. It's custom function page 1, line 4.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Mr. William M Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D image noise examples
An interesting comparison chart . . . but there is one
On Friday, Jan 9, 2004, at 10:51 America/New_York, Ryan Lee wrote:
I understand it was probably meant as friendly concern, but given the
way it
was slipped in, I thought you made it sound like it was a problem
specific
to Singapore when it's not, really.
Ryan, it was never meant to sound like a
Cotty wrote:
In a word, no. Stanstead is a 2 hour drive for me and way
over in a different TV region. The whole Stanstead thing will
be VERY contentious over the coming years. It's a nest of vipers.
Yep. This one is set to run and run...
Problem is, air travel is increasing and there
What's TLA?
-frank, the internet illiterate
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Nick Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry I thought it was standard TLA. It's Ever Ready Case. Used to come
with all SLrs but
the sensor should be about 6 stops in dynamic range, about the same as a
very fogiving slide film like Astia. if you shoot in RAW mode, you might get
a half stop more.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Cycad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 9:35 AM
Hi!
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:25:25 -0800
Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
645 lenses can be mounted on K-mount.
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/adapters/645.jpg
But, why would you want to unless you owned 645 lenses and wanted to
save
money? The K-mount lenses, with their smaller image
Nearly all of the increase in air miles is by internal flights. Well, the
road and rail network has gone to hell on a handcart and will cost
billions
to sort. Airport expansion is the quick cheap fix - a *bit* of land around
the airports and journey times are kept low. The numbers travelling
I think that modern cameras wouldn't work well with ERC's. Their bodies
are have irregular shapes. Not like slab-sided Spotties and the like.
Besides, with all the control surfaces sticking out from every surface of
the bodies these days, designing a workable one that would not destroy the
NeatImage is software or a Photoshop plugin designed for batch noise
reduction in images. it is PC-only software, but it works in emulators on
Linux or Mac.
http://www.neatimage.com/
the FAJ series of lenses will work properly only on bodies that make
aperture adjustments from the camera body
Hey, Tom,
Steve forgot one:
G for Graywolf. You would have to put it in front of all of your posts,
so we don't have to listen to your curmudgeonly ways if we don't want to.
vbg
But, to be fair, if you agree with that, I'll agree with:
B for Bunny Ears. So the list won't have to put up
yes, it does. you have to set a Custom Function to allow it.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Mr. William M Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D image noise examples
An interesting comparison chart . . . but there
Well, at least your Leicas are screwmount, eh Paul? vbg
Still, it's kind of a passing of an era. I'm guessing m42 was your entry
into Pentax.
Wish I could afford some of that nice glass (the 85mm sounds so yummy - I've
been yearning for a portrait lens), but alas, whenever I have money to
Frank,
This morning I removed the ERC from my LX to see if it needed a CLA, but because it's
had TLC only the VF was of concern. Still don't know
what a TLA is ... Typical [...] Acronym?
frank theriault wrote:
What's TLA?
-frank, the internet illiterate
The optimist thinks this is the
Shel,
IIRC, and AFAIK, a CLA for an LX is PIA.
TTFN,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is there an
I haven't had much chance to look at PDML over the last few days, so this
one sat unopened in my in box.
I got a nice surprise when I opened it. Thanks, Shel. Lovely shot. I love
the expression on her face. Who knows what reality is, but she seems to
have a look of wisdom about her. I
Great shots, Cory!
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Some more photos from work
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:20:25
At 8:57 PM -0500 1/9/04, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I agree with your assessment of the K35/2.0. On the other hand, the
M35/2.0 is a very nice lens and is quite compact. It's one of my
most frequently used lenses.
Is the M35/2 a pretty fast focusing lens?
Just wondering how it would be for a street
Three Letter Acronym!
Suggested google search: internet acronym.
Time to find: less than to write post defining ignorance.
Mode: curmudgeonly.
:)
--
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Frank,
This morning I removed the ERC from my LX to see if it needed a CLA, but because it's
had TLC only the VF was of
Yes!
Just like the law requiring toy guns to be orange. A month later some criminal
mastermind shoots a cop with a real gun he had painted orange. The pass a law
types forget that the bad guys, by definition, do not obey those laws.
--
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
I think we should preserve S for
Welcome. What is the old Pentax? Spotmatic, MX, etc.?
We old guys like to reminisce . . . g
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops. Please ignore my other post. My chart tells me the P30t dates to
1990. So much for that Spotmatic crack . . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/10/04
Seems to me that DSLR's are making a serious inroad to the 645/66
area. A significant portion of the users of those systems shoot
weddings and portraits. Digital works quite well there. Those who
are shooting landscape/scenics might opt for a bigger format - either
67, 69 or 4X5.
I wouldn't be
Yeah, I agree. I tried a M50 1.7 on the *istD (which acts like a 75)
and it's a very small lens. That makes a very small walk around
package without the grip. A slow 60 just isn't much use.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540)
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is not just a Pentax issue. I predict that 67 and larger will do
better than 645/66 in the film arena. The 645 that survives will be
digital with better resolution than full frame 35mm.
That seems to be what Hasselblad
Have the SFXn with ERC, and the back accomodates the data back on the
camera. With the front cover removed, this setup makes a very comfortable
handfull.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 11:39 AM
Subject: Re:
Hi,
Is the M35/2 a pretty fast focusing lens?
Just wondering how it would be for a street lens where you want to
focus quickly. Some lens seem to snap into focus more quickly than
others. Although I'm sure it's pretty subjective.
yes. It's a good lens for it.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Probably, although an ERC came with my first SLR, a Ricoh XR1, and as most people
seemed to be using one on those days I assumed they came with all. They're great for
when you want to go out with just the camera and one lens, and provide protection
against the elements and knocks.
I have one
Amita Guha wrote:
Government won't pay. People will argue about the funding and never
agree on a suitable re-location.
What about an organization like the National Trust stepping in?
The National Trust is a charitable organisation who rely on property being
'given' to them, generally of
Bill Owens wrote:
Here in the USA, airport parking lots are an airport's
largest source of income.
Here in the UK, particularly airports like Gatwick, Heathrow and Stanstead
have astonishingly good bus, coach and rail links (and Underground to
central London in the case of Heathrow) and
Cool, that sure is a lot of different kinds.
So, are these just what you will buy according to what's on hand, or do you
have a specific purpose for each of these, for instance, fuji for landscape
photos because of its blue and green saturation, stuff like that?
Rebekah
a day without sunshine is
No! No digital songs! I don't think digital compares with film, yet anyways.
Of course, for Kodachrome, there's always Ebay.
Rebekah
a day without sunshine is like, you know, night.
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11,
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: Hi there
Rebekah Gonzalez asked: ...maybe you guys could give me your opinion on
Kodak's
Elite Chrome, does it compare to Koda Chrome?
Israel is rainy? Somehow I kinda got the idea it was dry - is the rain a
seasonal thing? What part of Israel are in? Thanks for the welcome.
Rebekah
a day without sunshine is like, you know, night.
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rebekah Gonzalez [EMAIL
If you are looking for A1 prime lenses, suggest starting with 50mm f1:1.2 M
or A. Price was always a deterent for me, bought an LX outfit on eBay, and
was surprised to see the lens in the bag when the kit arrived(a bonus). It
certainly is worth the price.
- Original Message -
From: Shel
Dude, cheer up. :o)
Rebekah
A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: Unsubscribe
Yeah, insulting everyone is always a good way to start off.
- Original Message -
From: Hal Sandra Davis
Subject: Re: Is there an analog only Pentax list?
If you are looking for A1 prime lenses, suggest starting with 50mm f1:1.2
M
or A. Price was always a deterent for me, bought an LX outfit on eBay, and
was surprised to see the lens in the
- Original Message -
From: Rebekah Gonzalez
Subject: Re: Unsubscribe
No! No digital songs! I don't think digital compares with film, yet
anyways.
Of course, for Kodachrome, there's always Ebay.
Until they discontinue it anyway.
Expect that to happen within the next couple of years.
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Smith
Subject: RE: OT Stanstead, was: Unusual subjects to photograph.
I would like to see parking areas reduced, thus
destroying less land, but for the point you make above, it's never going
to
happen.
We have a lot of excess land here that
- Original Message -
From: Rebekah Gonzalez
Subject: Re: Unsubscribe
Dude, cheer up. :o)
Ya Doug, stop being such a sour puss. I mean just because it's your list and
all,
WW
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Rebekah Gonzalez
No! No digital songs! I don't think digital compares with film, yet
anyways.
Of course, for Kodachrome, there's always Ebay.
Until they discontinue it anyway.
Expect that to happen within the next couple of years.
Two years?
The National Trust is a charitable organisation who rely on
property being 'given' to them, generally of outstanding
national historic interest, most of which come with a
substantial amount of land, which they can open to visitors
to help offset the maintenance costs. I can't think of any
Bob W pointed out:
I'd be
surprised if there are _any_ buildings in North America as old as 560 years
that were built by the Europeans and their descendants.
2004 - 560 = 1444, so it would certainly upset a few ideas.
Bah. Not awake enough to do math properly. When I wrote my own
reply,
One of the cameras recently given to me by a friend is a Konica FT-1,
in which I've never seen the viewfinder LEDs act as described in the
manual, so I figured I'd better shoot a test roll to see whether the
auto exposure (shutter priority) is actually doing anything halfway
sane despite the odd
Pat White wrote:
Classic buildings, though, shouldn't be as disposable as that. Destroying
old buildings is like destroying local history.
I agree in general, but not as a hard-and-fast rule. It's a shame
to see history destroyed. At the same time, I don't think we need
to preserve every
Check first - for BW cloudy could mean yellow - makes clouds stand out in BW.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These are fairly specific films for different purposes.
Fuji Reala 100 represents the most general purpose film. Very low
grain, good saturation and not too high of contrast.
Agfa Ultra 100 - High contrast, high saturation - for when the light
is low contrast and you still want strong colors.
William Robb wrote:
We have a lot of excess land here that can be used as parking
lots that you
in the UK just don't have.
True.
Not that we should be turning excess land into parking lots, mind you.
Well said.
Malcolm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. That brings up another point -- not all buildings that
ought to have been preserved are lost to progress.
Especially in the US, an awful lot of historical buildings
were made of wood, less durable than stone. It's still
tragic to lose history, even when
Hi Jens,
Here is a comparison of the noise levels on my 10d.
http://www.nrg666.com/10d/noise/
I put one up filtered with Neat Image, the results are a bit rough
though and could be refined more.
Regards,
Paul
Jens Bladt wrote:
Hi Rob
Isn't this noise problem regarded one of the *ist draw
Which would mean that TLA is actually a TLA. How ironic! g
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Nick Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Three Letter Acronym!
What?
And filter out The Voice of Reason? Perish the thought!!
:-)
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just filter me out, Frank. Where FROM: includes 'knarf',
Dear Curmudgeon,
Of course I could have googled it. I know that!
But it's ever so much more fun asking on-list, don't you think? g
BTW (and this isn't directed at you, Tom, just at TLA's in general), ERC,
TLA, BTW and all those other alleged TLA's aren't acronyms. They're
initialisms. A
frank theriault:
Three Letter Acronym!
Which would mean that TLA is actually a TLA. How ironic! g
However, ETLA (extended three letter acronym) is not a TLA :-)
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
Hi Paul
This is very impressive. I will try to get this plugin (for Photoshop,
right) as soon as possible.
Thanks a lot.
Jens
Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. januar 2004 21:51
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: *ist D image noise examples
Hi Jens,
frank theriault:
ERC, TLA, BTW and all those other alleged TLA's aren't acronyms.
They're initialisms. A true acronym spells another (usually
unrelated) word. So PUG, for instance, is an acronym.
Ok, so TLA isn't really a three letter acronym, then.
But it is a three letter abbreviation.
So,
Oooo, good one, Anders! vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Anders Hultman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, so TLA isn't really a three letter acronym, then.
But it is a three letter abbreviation.
So,
Hi Paul
I have downloaded the software at: http://www.neatimage.com/download.html
It seems it's not a plugin but a seperate program.
Looking forward to using it.
Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. januar 2004 21:51
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11 Jan 2004 at 9:19, Christian Skofteland wrote:
Was noise reduction turned on?
Yes I have NR turned-on however it's of little consequence in this particular
test as it is designed to eliminate sensor noise errors that appear during long
exposures. It isn't designed to filter regular
On 11 Jan 2004 at 10:20, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised to see 67 have a stronger presence than 645 a
few years down the road.
This is not just a Pentax issue. I predict that 67 and larger will do
better than 645/66 in the film arena. The 645 that survives will be
digital
Pat,
I understand about the Three Horseshoes pub, but 560 years is still older
than anything we have here in North America. I live in the so called 'midwest'
near Chicago, 1000 miles from the cities on the Atlantic coast (and 2000
miles from the Pacific coast). Isn't it 1000 miles from
People discovered BMW Boxer m/bikes that handled well and didn't leak oil.
C R K
My R80/7 had a most wonderful speed wobble.
I thought they had that fixed by the /7's. I remember the first time I hit
95 mph on my R60/5 I started wobbling fairly violently side to side. I
slowed down
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:22:55 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, it's not an abbreviation. An abbreviation is when a word is
used with one or more letters missing from it, such as bkfst for
breakfast.
Not according to AH3:
abúbreúviúaútion P Pronunciation Key (-brv-shn)
n.
1. The act
That's excellent Mark... congrats! I specifically like the term fellow
snowflake artists :-)
Regards,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:27 AM
Subject: Woo-hoo-DOH!
I finally got my 15 minutes and
A pub I frequent is the King and Tinker in Enfield which dates from around 1050 and is
still in use. Quite picturesque - I'll try to post a picture sometime.
Nick.
Hi,
Folks here were clearing land for
subsistence farming. Construction was primitive. There is very little worth
saving.
I would think that's exactly the kind of thing that *is* worth saving.
That kind of primitive construction is exactly the equivalent of the
post holes and similar
Thanks for the information. We are new to the list and trying to learn more
about our favorite Pentax stuff. Have several hundred bodies, lenses,
flashes, and accessories collected over past 40 years, and just 2-3 years of
looking back.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Ewins [EMAIL
How many telegraph operators have you met in the computer room? Yes they used
alphabet soup, but it was a different mix. 73
Jostein wrote:
Why we hang on to the acronyms.
Laziness I suppose...:-)
Interesting thoughts about Unix. :-)
I thought the alphabet soup had it's origin from morse and ham
Bob,
Gotta be practical here. How many of the original buildings, pre-roman era
of wooden construction are standing in London? ...Or anywhere in Britain? We
don't have the original log cabins that were built in out cities either.
Abraham Lincoln's family's homestead is still preserved in
Actually, I think the term alphabet soup originated in the Great
Depression in America, when a lot of government programs were initiated to
help people out . Since almost all of them went by an acronym, the common
people started calling the government alphabet soup. At least that's what I
heard;
On 11 Jan 2004 at 18:26, John Francis wrote:
Where? Actually in the image pixels? If not, then what happens if
you import the image into some editor that drops this information?
If actually in the pixels, do you move it to the correct edge when
the camera is used in portrait mode? Not to
Earlier this afternoon I was out looking for photos when
I drove past the Berkeley Senior Center. They had this
plywood cutout in the yard, and the moment I saw it I
knew that this was worth a QuikSnap.
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/senior.html
225K JPEG
Comments welcome ...
On 11 Jan 2004 at 17:06, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Earlier this afternoon I was out looking for photos when
I drove past the Berkeley Senior Center. They had this
plywood cutout in the yard, and the moment I saw it I
knew that this was worth a QuikSnap.
the warm film has that type of effect, but whether it is more or less than
what the filter does is up to you.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: Cloudy filter
OK, thanks ... so
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
