Hi all
Anyone tried Firefox 3 with Linux yet?
I just installed it - installs fine on Ubuntu 6.10 and works well but
the font rendering seems to be back to the bad old days of Linux. In
short - bloody awful!
I've gone back to Firefox 2 for the time being.
Cheers
Brian
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/19 Thu AM 03:25:13 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PUG reminder
Mark Roberts wrote:
David Savage wrote:
At 06:01 AM 19/06/2008, P. J. Alling wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 18/6/08, Godfrey
Op Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:24:29 +0200 schreef Ken Waller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You may find jogging more efficient than cycling.
As far as loosing weight you're absolutely right!
Do this for several years you might be eligible for a couple of new
knees!
Yes. Run on unhardened roads, if you
I have used the K10D and 77 Ltd, but for portrait shots.
I'll look around, i know i have something.:-)
Dave
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We will know is not a Pentax, cuz you are shooting sports.
On a serious note, did you try the K10D and the 77LTD for
Thanks
Laidlaw BBQ this morning. I'll try it out after that
Dave
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Christine Aguila
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave: I hope all goes well with the K10D. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax
We've had a lot of discussions about photographer's rights. I was on
the local Zoo's website today because we're taking our herd there later
on. Then I noticed this little tidbit tucked away on the bottom of the
page:
*Photography Videography*
Visitor agrees not to commercially use any
that can't be legal
rg2
On 6/19/08, Cory Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had a lot of discussions about photographer's rights. I was on
the local Zoo's website today because we're taking our herd there later
on. Then I noticed this little tidbit tucked away on the bottom of the
Brian Walters wrote:
Hi all
Anyone tried Firefox 3 with Linux yet?
I just installed it - installs fine on Ubuntu 6.10 and works well but
the font rendering seems to be back to the bad old days of Linux. In
short - bloody awful!
You might need to go into about:config and set or modify
Cory Waters wrote:
*Photography Videography*
Visitor agrees not to commercially use any photography or reproduction
in any form taken during any visits to Zoo Atlanta, and visitor grants
permission to the Zoo Atlanta and its agent to utilize Visitor's image,
likeness and/or sound
Well that's certainly a one way agreement they're assuming. I wonder if
they think that simply posting it is enough.
Cory Waters wrote:
We've had a lot of discussions about photographer's rights. I was on
the local Zoo's website today because we're taking our herd there later
on. Then I
I think the first part violates fare use doctrine as well.
Rebekah wrote:
that can't be legal
rg2
On 6/19/08, Cory Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had a lot of discussions about photographer's rights. I was on
the local Zoo's website today because we're taking our herd there
Op Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:50:25 +0200 schreef Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Heck, if Pentax made a 10MP camera the size of the ist-D or DS I'd be
quite interested.
Is the K-200D that much larger?
--
Ciao, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about cropping it a little further on both sides?
I decided to leave it full frame because to me the grass surrounding
him is part of the story that I saw. In fact, had I shot a wider
view, I'd have been happy.
Op Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:55:22 +0200 schreef AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think with all Pentax AF SLRS, the mirror is semi-translucent, and
with a second mirror behind it to divert light to AF sensors located
in the mirror house floor.
I may have misunderstood this completely, though... :-)
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
?
I guess if the photo moved you enough to tell us you don't get it (or
ask what it means, or whatever the question marks mean) that's better
than no comment at all!
:-)
Seriously, thanks for looking and commenting.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:07 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a story there, a sand pathetic story, but a story none
the less.
Yeah, there is a rather sad story, but I don't think it needs
retelling right now.
Thanks for looking and commenting.
cheers,
frank
--
That's just a cover their ass statement. If you happen to end up in a
photo or recording that the zoo produces for publicity or educational
purposes, you can't demand payment. They have to do it. Too many
people out there who will hit them up for money at the click of a
shutter.
Paul
On
Of course it's legal. No one is forcing him to go to the zoo.
Paul
On Jun 19, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Rebekah wrote:
that can't be legal
rg2
On 6/19/08, Cory Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had a lot of discussions about photographer's rights. I was on
the local Zoo's website today
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, I like this one, the only thing that could make it better for
me is if the dog was facing/staring at the camera, but you can't
control them with your mind (yet)
I wish the dog would have looked at me, but in the only I
It's enough for their purposes. They're not going to feature an
unaware visitor in an ad or depict him in a bad way. It's just
covering their butt in case he ends up in the background of a photo.
Paul
On Jun 19, 2008, at 8:33 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Well that's certainly a one way agreement
I would agree, but it also says you can't sell pictures that you take there
rg2
On 6/19/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's enough for their purposes. They're not going to feature an
unaware visitor in an ad or depict him in a bad way. It's just
covering their butt in case he
No. They are certainly allowed to restrict commercial use of photos.
Most zoos will offer a phodo-use license at a fairly reasonable rate.
And consider that most zoos are bleeding money. In order to keep the
doors open, they have to try to maintain their property rights.
Paul
On Jun 19,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Christine Aguila
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank: I'd tighten the crop on the left just a tad on the right, though
I'd probably keep the paper in the grass. You caught a great facial
expression. Interesting shot. Cheers, Christine
Thanks, Christina.
For
I agree, Frank. The isolation, suggested by space around them, adds to the mood.
Jack
--- On Thu, 6/19/08, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - A Dog and his Boy Eating Supper
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date:
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 1:14:29 PM, you wrote:
PS Nicely done. I look forward to seeing the tight shot.
PS Paul
PS On Jun 18, 2008, at 5:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm putting the other version of the same photo:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=21949full=1
Each of
The specifications say so. It's larger than the K100D which was larger
than the *ist-D, (When I tried one out it was comfortable to hold though).
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:50:25 +0200 schreef Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Heck, if Pentax made a 10MP camera the
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 1:14:29 PM, you wrote:
PS Nicely done. I look forward to seeing the tight shot.
PS Paul
PS On Jun 18, 2008, at 5:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm putting the other version of the same
In the over broad interpretation of commerciality that I've seen
promulgated by some msiumes lately, if I were publishing a newspaper I
doubt I'd print any news item about the zoo if it included photos, and
that said if it didn't bleed I would publish that. Using the story
and photo as
Of course not. Photography licensing is a source of much needed
income for zoos. If you want to use a pic taken at a zoo for
commercial purposes, they're entitled to payment. As I mentioned in
another message, they will provide license for photography. You can
take pictures for your own
that should be ...if it didn't bleed I wouldn't publish that.
P. J. Alling wrote:
In the over broad interpretation of commerciality that I've seen
promulgated by some msiumes lately, if I were publishing a newspaper I
doubt I'd print any news item about the zoo if it included photos, and
I don't know if this has already been posted here. The Boston Globe's
website now has a blog of large photos, 990x605, of current events.
The shots of the Iowa flood are heartbreaking.
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/
Amita
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
That is pretty neat. It may be a bit much for most people's basement,
but it could easily lead to a grassroots industry.
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/18/2008 8:03 PM
If plans and a material list are made available, (something that
Popular
Mechanics used to do many moons ago), I can see
Well you'd be all alone then. Major dailies always run zoo stories,
complete with photos. Zoos are generally not evil, just careful. As
they should be.
Paul
On Jun 19, 2008, at 9:20 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
In the over broad interpretation of commerciality that I've seen
promulgated by some
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that can't be legal
Well...
Here's the thing: The zoo is private property (even if it's a
publicly owned zoo, it's still private property). If one doesn't like
that term in the contract one needn't buy a ticket and enter
Dao: I agree with Frank. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: PESO: The planet of two bugs
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:01 AM, [EMAIL
The biggest problem I see is spools and backing paper, the spools, at
least the old metal ones, can probably be recycled indefinitely, but
backing paper might be a problem for 120 and other more esoteric film
sizes.
Steve Desjardins wrote:
That is pretty neat. It may be a bit much for most
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:47:28 +1000
Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone tried Firefox 3 with Linux yet?
have been using it here on Ubuntu 8.04 since RC 1. Beta 5 was the
default but i reverted to V. 2.
I am waiting for the release version to make it through to the
repositories.
Bran
On 19/6/08, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
visitor grants
permission to the Zoo Atlanta and its agent to utilize Visitor's image,
likeness and/or sound recordings for the purpose whatsoever in perpetuity.
Er, they have to acquire you images first ;)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/90-kitsch.jpg
Window Kitsch - Mountain View 2008
Panasonic L1 + Olympus ZD 11-22mm f/2.8-3.5
ISO 320 @ f/5 @ 1/20 sec, 11mm fl
Comments and critique always appreciated.
I love kitsch!
P. J. Alling wrote:
The biggest problem I see is spools and backing paper, the spools, at
least the old metal ones, can probably be recycled indefinitely, but
backing paper might be a problem for 120 and other more esoteric film
sizes.
The original spools were wood with metal ends. They
The paper specification predates the ISO requirements by many years.
I'm sure a manufacturer could be found to produce the stuff, but would
it be affordable. Flexible film stock would also be a problem thought
polyester films are made for other uses and could probably be
re-purposed within
Scott Loveless wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
The biggest problem I see is spools and backing paper, the spools, at
least the old metal ones, can probably be recycled indefinitely, but
backing paper might be a problem for 120 and other more esoteric film
sizes.
The original
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/PentaxK20D/
C'mon... K20D is out since a while now and all we get is a preview? :D
.t
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Don't you remember, they were waiting for a fix to the wandering hot
pixel problem before testing...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/PentaxK20D/
C'mon... K20D is out since a while now and all we get is a preview? :D
.t
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a
Amita,
It is heartbreaking. I live in Illinois and have come to think of
Iowa as that big, flat state across the Mississippi River. My wife's
hometown of Davenport is on the Mississippi and flooded regularly. To
see the other areas west of there in trouble is astounding. You folks
back east
Again, well done. Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 1:14:29 PM, you wrote:
PS Nicely done. I look forward to seeing the tight shot.
PS Paul
PS On Jun 18, 2008, at 5:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/90-kitsch.jpg
Window Kitsch - Mountain View 2008
You know, Window Kitsch would be a great name for a band...
Come to think of it, that photo would be a great album cover!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course it's legal. No one is forcing him to go to the zoo.
Sounds like his kids are.:-)
Dave
Paul
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML
Reading through the preview I just found out that the default jpeg
mode is set to Bright if any language other than Japanese is
selected; I guess to cater different markets (or target specific
reviewers, cough Askley cough). That's so funny.
On 6/19/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I've tried shooting dogsports with a K10D and been sorely
disappointed with the results.
It's not that I don't know how to. I've had plenty of experience. It's
just that a 1Dmk2/3 can do it better :-)
Wendy
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You read
Better I agree ;-)
Which lens did you use?
On 6/19/08, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I've tried shooting dogsports with a K10D and been sorely
disappointed with the results.
It's not that I don't know how to. I've had plenty of experience. It's
just that a 1Dmk2/3 can do it better
Op Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:09:11 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The specifications say so. It's larger than the K100D which was larger
than the *ist-D, (When I tried one out it was comfortable to hold
though).
O.k. I *really* liked the small Olympus (E-420?) from the pictures,
Op Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:12:28 +0200 schreef Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do you believe everything you read on the internet? ]'-)
Certainly.
On Jun 18, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Fernando wrote:
I read in dpreview that Pentax can't do sports :oP
On 6/18/08, Scott Loveless [EMAIL
The other thing that I like from the *ist D is the mirror slap noise,
compared to the one of the *ist DS (and I'm assuming that the same
applies to the KxxD series) the latter is much louder, more intrusive
for candid photography (for what I use the *ist D, low light candid
photos with fast
Another in this series:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/91-chairs.jpg
Chairs And Table - This Cafe Life 2008
Olympus E-1 + Summilux-D 25mm f/1.4 ASPH + EC14
ISO 400 @ f/2 @ 1/200 sec, fl=35mm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Fernando wrote:
BTW Somebody knows how loud is the Oly E-420 mirror slap?
Was just at the camera shop this morning and looked at the E-420.
It's too small for my hands, I'd feel cramped using it; the *ist DS
for a similar sized camera was better suited to my
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another in this series:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/91-chairs.jpg
Chairs And Table - This Cafe Life 2008
Olympus E-1 + Summilux-D 25mm f/1.4 ASPH + EC14
ISO 400 @ f/2 @ 1/200 sec, fl=35mm
Comments and
Thnxs
On 6/19/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Fernando wrote:
BTW Somebody knows how loud is the Oly E-420 mirror slap?
Was just at the camera shop this morning and looked at the E-420.
It's too small for my hands, I'd feel cramped using it; the
http://www.zeiss.com/photo
Carl Zeiss announced launching lense line for Sony Alfa
Tele lens f-stop Focus AOV*Weight
Planar T* 1,4/85 ZA
http://www.zeiss.com/C12567A8003B58B9/ContentsWWWIntern/CD0BD4CD57133031C1257282004B1B14#1
1.4 - 160.85 m – ∞ 39° 640
I was missing these posts
On 6/19/08, Roman Melihhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.zeiss.com/photo
Carl Zeiss announced launching lense line for Sony Alfa
Tele lens f-stop Focus AOV*Weight
Planar T* 1,4/85 ZA
To my ear it's quiet. However you may think differently. I don't find
the Ds to be louder than the D just different. The sound is higher
pitched so it carries more.
Fernando wrote:
The other thing that I like from the *ist D is the mirror slap noise,
compared to the one of the *ist DS (and
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
CW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
On 19/6/08, Amita Guha, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't know if this has already been posted here. The Boston Globe's
website now has a blog of large photos, 990x605, of current events.
The shots of the Iowa flood are heartbreaking.
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/
I looked at each and
On 19/6/08, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
Baaa.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Perhaps there should be a special mailing list...
Fernando wrote:
I was missing these posts
On 6/19/08, Roman Melihhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.zeiss.com/photo
Carl Zeiss announced launching lense line for Sony Alfa
Tele lens f-stop Focus AOV*Weight
Planar T*
It's free, apparently...
Cory Waters wrote:
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
CW
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
-- Dr. Jerry Pournelle
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
You managed to make a nice composition out of what could have been a mess:-).
Very nice. Precision pays off.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another in this series:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/91-chairs.jpg
Cory Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
In my case, because the day I decided to set up a photo-sharing
account, I was in a hurry and Flickr was the one I could most
quickly
The communities in the form of groups with individual photo topics,
which includes forums and, if the group is about a location (e.g. the
Toronto group) actual social gatherings, is what generates the
customer base loyalty. And it has a somewhat limited free account
option.
On 6/19/08, Cory
Cotty wrote:
On 19/6/08, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
Baaa.
So Cotty... they have sheep?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
You pay with pain.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's free, apparently...
Cory Waters wrote:
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
CW
Only if you have the adult option enabled.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cory Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
On 19/6/08, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are kinda
ugly.
Cory Waters wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 19/6/08, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
Baaa.
So Cotty... they have sheep?
There's a joke about WW's wife in there somewhere...
(and given time he'll make it)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You pay with pain.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's free, apparently...
Cory Waters wrote:
I don't
Cory Waters wrote:
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
???
Flickr sucks.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
I think this link was the first time I heard about flickr:
http://www.prime-junta.net/pont/Pontification/ab_Why_Flickr_Is_Better/_Why_Flickr_Is_Better.html
On 6/19/08, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The communities in the form of groups with individual photo topics,
which includes forums
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: Re: PUG reminder
No, I've tried shooting dogsports with a K10D and been sorely
disappointed with the results.
It's not that I don't know how to. I've had plenty of experience. It's
just that a 1Dmk2/3 can do it better :-)
HAR!!
I
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Just a preview?
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/PentaxK20D/
C'mon... K20D is out since a while now and all we get is a preview? :D
I think they do it to spite the idiots on PentaxForum who have a habit of
getting themselves
banned from
On 19/6/08, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
So Cotty... they have sheep?
Specially trained sheep.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Welcome to two years ago (aside from the 24-70, launched in January this year).
-Adam
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Roman Melihhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.zeiss.com/photo
Carl Zeiss announced launching lense line for Sony Alfa
Tele lens f-stop Focus AOV*Weight
The community and how good the search is. Interestingness is also
pretty cool as are tag-based searches.
Site design ranges from mediocre to atrocious, but there isn't much
better out there.
-Adam
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Cory Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't get what's so good
Pages may be ugly, but Flickr is all about pictures which can be viewed
in all sizes. It is fast; there are no adds like in photo.net; there is
unlimited upload in file size and number of pics for a cost lower than
of a domain/webhost (or free for 200 pics) - so you can use it as
online
Perhaps because Obama has a Flickr page?
Henk
Cory Waters schreef:
Everybody seems to use it though... why?
CW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Initially I didn't get it but wanted to let you know I viewed it. Your
response about cropping explained it to me.
BTW, IMHO you don't have to justify an image to anyone but yourself. It's
enough that you like it. I assumed you liked it since you posted it.
Kenneth Waller
Most of the criticisms of PhotoSig expressed there are
eerily similar to the complaints about the Pentax Gallery
that have been voiced here.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 04:54:37PM -0400, Fernando wrote:
I think this link was the first time I heard about flickr:
Yes but he has a ghost photographer populate it, (well I don't really
know that but I suspect it).
Henk Terhell wrote:
Perhaps because Obama has a Flickr page?
Henk
Cory Waters schreef:
Everybody seems to use it though... why?
CW
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a
I've visited both, I won't contribute to either, with the Pentax Photo
Gallery I don't need the rejection, on PhotoSig, I don;'t need the pain.
John Francis wrote:
Most of the criticisms of PhotoSig expressed there are
eerily similar to the complaints about the Pentax Gallery
that have been
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've
seen are kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
Baaa.
So Cotty... they have sheep?
No, but (wait for it...)
...the pictures (patient!...)
take up (it's coming...)
...an awful
Wow, reminds me of the 93 flood.
Evan
On Jun 19, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Amita Guha wrote:
I don't know if this has already been posted here. The Boston Globe's
website now has a blog of large photos, 990x605, of current events.
The shots of the Iowa flood are heartbreaking.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:23:54 -0400, Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Brian Walters wrote:
Hi all
Anyone tried Firefox 3 with Linux yet?
I just installed it - installs fine on Ubuntu 6.10 and works well but
the font rendering seems to be back to the bad old days of Linux. In
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: OT: What's so good about Flickr?
So Cotty... they have sheep?
No, but (wait for it...)
...the pictures (patient!...)
take up (it's coming...)
...an awful lot of ram!
Ba-da-boom!
Ewe think that was funny?
--
PDML
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:44 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've visited both, I won't contribute to either, with the Pentax Photo
Gallery I don't need the rejection, on PhotoSig, I don;'t need the pain.
I live for both
Dave
John Francis wrote:
Most of the criticisms of PhotoSig
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:32 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: OT: What's so good about Flickr?
So Cotty... they have sheep?
No, but (wait for it...)
...the pictures (patient!...)
take up (it's coming...)
...an awful
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: OT: What's so good about Flickr?
So Cotty... they have sheep?
No, but (wait for it...)
...the pictures (patient!...)
take up (it's coming...)
...an awful lot of ram!
Ba-da-boom!
Ewe think that was funny?
Time to
On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Cory Waters wrote:
I don't get what's so good about flickr. The pages I've seen are
kinda
ugly. Everybody seems to use it though... why?
Irrational responses to the contrary, the reason to become involved
at flickr.com have a lot to do with having a broad
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:00 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: Re: PUG reminder
No, I've tried shooting dogsports with a K10D and been sorely
disappointed with the results.
It's not that I don't know how to. I've had plenty
For me, i like the larger photo, showing more of the flower/weed
Dave
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 1:14:29 PM, you wrote:
PS Nicely done. I look forward to seeing the tight shot.
PS Paul
PS On Jun 18, 2008, at 5:39 AM,
Hey Dave, there's a cartoon about you in the New Yorker:
http://www.cartoonbank.com/product_details.asp?mscssid=EPFKD9RC5PW78JQ
UNDRMTTA6EPBJFFMEsitetype=1did=4sid=125292pid=advanced=1keyword=
undefinedartist=section=printscaption=artID=topic=pubDateFrom=06
Brian Walters wrote:
I checkedlayout.css.dpi. Currently it's set to -1, which means
(apparently) that Firefox uses the host system’s logical resolution or
96, whichever is greater - whatever that means..
Yeah, Windows does a particularly poor job of managing the
transformations between
G'day Cory.
There are better photo sharing sites.
I've been a Flickr pro user for about 9 months.
I still don't like the site layout ( I know many users who feel the same way)
For I long time I just didn't get flickr either. However, my reason
for joining using it is because there is a very
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
