On 13/10/2011 7:21 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
BW film might still rule if film didn't curl, and if the enlarger and/or
scanner were perfect. But in the real world, digital rules.
And digital is perfect?
Actually, in the real world, what rules is the media that the artist
feels most
In terms of DR film still rules over digital.
On 14/10/2011, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Well, I enjoy both PS and chemicals.
I might be tempted, though, by the new 36mp Nikon.
That is 200 pixels per mm, roughly the
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite happy with the K-5 as an
all-around camera
http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/2011/10/pentax-k5-dslr-review.html
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (from dos4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I'm a couple weeks behind on PDML and I just looked at a few dozen
PESOs and this was the first one that made me hit the reply key.
Beautiful shot. Exquisite backgrounds, which matters. -T
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a shot I took
Nice pic! Would like to see a color version. -T
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Just a little photo-play. Definitely, a Bears-sweatshirt-day--nippy. Tough
season to be a Bears fan this year. Cheers, Christine
I'd crank the contrast a bit, but that photo has a whole lot of life in it. -T
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:04 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I attended a march/protest in San Francisco on September 24th. It part of
a world-wide environmental event day sponsored by 350.org (Bill McKibben).
If
exquisite. -T
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Bulent Celasun
bulent.cela...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments and criticisms appreciated...
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14332853size=md
Bulent
-
Full of drama. Excellent. -T
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 2:54 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA*50-135mm@50, 1/80s, f/5.6, ISO100.
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Wednesday evening, on another mailing list I was pointed to a saddening
post on Tim Bray's blog. Last week, Dennis Ritchie passed away.
This news will almost certainly cause one of two reactions:
Who?
or
Dismay that we have lost someone who has arguably contributed more to
the world of
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Wednesday evening, on another mailing list I was pointed to a saddening post
on Tim Bray's blog. Last week, Dennis Ritchie passed away.
This news will almost certainly cause one of two reactions:
Who?
or
Dismay that we have lost someone
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:28 PM, Don Guthrie
shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a redo of a picture I posted in late Sept. Stan and several
other posters kindly (and strongly suggested) I missed the angle on the
subject.
I replaced the one there with new one I took last week. One
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:19 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
I am reviewing my Rome 2009 images, getting back into the Blurb book I
have planned. I came across an image that intrigues me; I am curious what
others will say WRT rendering and subject matter.
So, two
Wired is on it:
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2011/10/thedennisritchieeffect/
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Just a heads-up for anyone interested in trying night photography.
Here's a free introductory 24 page eBook (PDF) on the subject ...
http://availablelightimages.com/blog/night-photography/
The content looks pretty good. Author makes a couple of questionable
assertions, but stuff like his
BW film might still rule if film didn't curl, and if the enlarger and/or
scanner were perfect. But in the real world, digital rules.
There is a reason I do not do 135 film, but still do sheet film. It's nice to
be able to burn in low-contrast detail, something that cannot be done with
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:15:32 -0700
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Wednesday evening, on another mailing list I was pointed to a saddening
post on Tim Bray's blog. Last week, Dennis Ritchie passed away.
This news will almost certainly cause one of two reactions:
Who?
or
Dismay that we
On 14 October 2011 20:58, Collin Brendemuehl coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
That forthcoming N 36mp body, full frame. Sony sensor. That's 5k x 7k
pixels. 5K pixels over 24mm == roughly 200 pixels / mm. That begins to
match the resolving power of 100 line pairs / mm. And with reduced
Thanks
Dave
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a heads-up for anyone interested in trying night photography. Here's a
free introductory 24 page eBook (PDF) on the subject ...
http://availablelightimages.com/blog/night-photography/
The content
And digital is perfect?
Actually, in the real world, what rules is the media that the artist
feels most comfortable working with. This may be digital, it may equally
be oil paint or macrame.
William Robb
What 'digital' has done is put the entire range of the photographic
process (capture
The term Microsoft garbage is redundant.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Rulers rule!
Of course, it's BW film. Color world last time I looked. Digital
brought that kind of control to color photography for the typical
photographer and that is the biggest advance for me.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
And digital is perfect?
I emailed a few scientists and one has replied that this is
caterpillar of a moth of the family Limacodidae.
Can't confirm that, but it's kind of hard to prove that it isn't.
Wikipedia says:
They are mostly tropical, but occur worldwide, with about 1000
described species and probably many more as
Thank you very much, Tim!
That background is one of the reasons I rarely shoot with anything other
than my 50/1.4 these days. I'm utterly smitten by the bokeh it produces
when I luck up and get it right.
-- Walt
On 10/14/2011 2:56 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
I'm a couple weeks behind on PDML and
Thanks for the legwork! It was driving me batty!
-- Walt
On 10/14/2011 9:55 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
I emailed a few scientists and one has replied that this is
caterpillar of a moth of the family Limacodidae.
Can't confirm that, but it's kind of hard to prove that it isn't.
Wikipedia says:
On 10/14/2011 3:07 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 13/10/2011 7:21 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
BW film might still rule if film didn't curl, and if the enlarger
and/or scanner were perfect. But in the real world, digital rules.
And digital is perfect?
Actually, in the real world, what
That kind of depends on the film. I believe that slide film has a
narrower DR than even straight from camera Jpegs. But I don't have any
hard numbers on that.
On 10/14/2011 3:17 AM, David Savage wrote:
In terms of DR film still rules over digital.
On 14/10/2011, Paul
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:23:24PM +1300, David Mann wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Wednesday evening, on another mailing list I was pointed to a saddening
post on Tim Bray's blog. Last week, Dennis Ritchie passed away.
This news will almost certainly cause
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:03:06AM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
The term Microsoft garbage is redundant.
Darren Addy
Not in the terms of C/C++ programming it isn't.
The Visual C products have long been serious contenders for
the title of best C development and debugging environment.
--
PDML
Thanks. That is the best answer I could find.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I emailed a few scientists and one has replied that this is
caterpillar of a moth of the family Limacodidae.
BW no vehicle is the best, though the color version has it's charm.
The version with the speeding car is also good, but now you don't have a
clear subject, it could be either the figure at the bus stop or the car.
On 10/12/2011 11:19 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
I am reviewing my Rome 2009 images,
On 14/10/2011 1:47 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite happy with the K-5 as an
all-around camera
http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/2011/10/pentax-k5-dslr-review.html
The decade is still young.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 14/10/2011 7:56 AM, Tom C wrote:
And digital is perfect?
Actually, in the real world, what rules is the media that the artist
feels most comfortable working with. This may be digital, it may equally
be oil paint or macrame.
William Robb
What 'digital' has done is put the entire range of
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:39 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/10/2011 1:47 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite happy with the K-5 as an
all-around camera
http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/2011/10/pentax-k5-dslr-review.html
On Oct 14, 2011, at 5:46 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Just a heads-up for anyone interested in trying night photography. Here's a
free introductory 24 page eBook (PDF) on the subject ...
http://availablelightimages.com/blog/night-photography/
The content looks pretty good. Author makes a
On 14/10/2011 10:47 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
That kind of depends on the film. I believe that slide film has a
narrower DR than even straight from camera Jpegs. But I don't have any
hard numbers on that.
Last time I checked (which was something like 20 years ago), slide film
was 5-6 stops,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
On 14/10/2011 1:47 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite happy with the K-5 as an
all-around camera
http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/2011/10/pentax-k5-dslr-review.html
The decade is still
If you're doing street photography at night, it's always a matter of
blown highlights and no shadow detail. If the data is in the capture,
either digital or film, then there's a way to get it into a print. If
it's not, then you have to cheat.
On 10/14/2011 2:09 PM, William Robb wrote:
On
The convention is to count years from 1, there is no year zero. So,
it's was released last decade.
On 10/14/2011 2:27 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
On 14/10/2011 1:47 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't know the reviewer, but he seems quite
On 14/10/2011 12:31 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
If you're doing street photography at night, it's always a matter of
blown highlights and no shadow detail. If the data is in the capture,
either digital or film, then there's a way to get it into a print. If
it's not, then you have to cheat.
Note
On 14/10/2011 12:27 PM, John Francis wrote:
The decade is still young.
That rather depends on how you count - the K-5 was released in 2010.
Was that the last year of one decade, or the first year of the next?
I would think most competent reviewers would put the Nikon D700 ahead of
the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:33 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
The convention is to count years from 1, there is no year zero. So, it's
was released last decade.
That is the convention for centuries, but not typically for decades.
We speak of the 1990s, not the 200th decade
Just to follow up. The answer came from biologist Jan C. Meerman
Belize Environmental Consultancies Ltd.
Belmopan, Belize.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
And digital is perfect?
Actually, in the real world, what rules is the media that the artist
feels most comfortable working with. This may be digital, it may equally
be oil paint or macrame.
William Robb
What 'digital' has done is put the entire range of the photographic
process (capture
On 14/10/2011 1:00 PM, Tom C wrote:
A
But I must ask, despite your over emotional reaction, why do you have,
how many DSLR's is it? When's the last time you've spent a substantial
amount of time in a wet darkroom vs. frying your eyeballs out looking
at the computer monitor?
Too many DSLRs.
Nice shot... Good angle! Where's it from? -T
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:28 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I took a photography class recently.
It included two field trips to San Francisco. I shot tons of photos. Which
I why I took it, to get myself taking pictures again.
This was late in
Very nice, you can almost feel the texture -T
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been going through some of the shots I've taken over the past couple of
months and stumbled upon some that I had set aside for another day and let
them slip my
My eyes like it, but I'm not sure exactly why. Thanks -T
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bulent Celasun
bulent.cela...@gmail.com wrote:
Do not expect much!
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14378496size=lg
Old stock film (Fuji NPS PRO Color Negative, best before date: 2004).
Kiev 60
Wouldn't mind seeing color versions of those -T
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
Did a couple of Still Life images this morning using Paul's lovely old Leitz
Elmar 5.0cm f/3.5 lens, an uncoated lens from 1932-1934 era …
Ah... very atmospheric, made me smile. Could do with a little leveling? -T
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a redo of a picture I posted in late Sept. Stan and several other
posters kindly (and strongly suggested) I missed the angle on the
From: David J Brooks
Thanks
Dave
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a heads-up for anyone interested in trying night photography. Here's a
free introductory 24 page eBook (PDF) on the subject ...
On 10/14/2011 3:20 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
Very nice, you can almost feel the texture -T
Thanks again, Tim!
:-)
-- Walt
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been going through some of the shots I've taken over the past couple of
months and
On 11-10-14 4:33 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: David J Brooks
Thanks
Dave
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Bruce Walker
bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a heads-up for anyone interested in trying night photography.
Here's a
free introductory 24 page eBook (PDF) on the subject ...
I work for Google, so feel free to discount this as highly-biased raving.
Having said that, Google+ is really pretty nice for a photographer:
1. The presentation of the photos is pretty good compared to anything
else with social in the name
2. There are a lot of really good photographers already
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
It occurs to me that this will be a lot more difficult with K20D because
you can't turn off the long exposure noise reduction. How are you going to
get contiguous star trails?
Or has anyone come up with a hack that
On 11-10-14 5:04 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Bruce Walkerbruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
It occurs to me that this will be a lot more difficult with K20D because
you can't turn off the long exposure noise reduction. How are you going to
get contiguous star trails?
From: William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
On 14/10/2011 1:00 PM, Tom C wrote:
But I must ask, despite your over emotional reaction, why do you have,
how many DSLR's is it? When's the last time you've spent a substantial
amount of time in a wet darkroom vs. frying your eyeballs out
(aside to Tim Bray and his gushing over G+)
Working on new calendar - calling it 'Feathers finally found a cormy
snap of mine from earlier this year...
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Works-in-Print/New-2012-calendars/Feathers/19261415_nN7VmR/1/1528728093_VpgwnMK/Medium
sorry not to be more gabby
On Oct 14, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
It occurs to me that this will be a lot more difficult with K20D because
you can't turn off the long exposure noise reduction. How are you going to
get contiguous
on 2011-10-13 12:58 Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/6240687863/lightbox/
Or
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/6240687863/
simple moody, but with a kind of formal structure
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 14/10/2011 4:31 PM, Tom C wrote:
I was just trying get a rise out of you. You're just like my wife...
you react when I least expect it and ignore me when I expect
attention.
:-)
Naw, your wife is way nicer.
You do realize that you are really obvious when you are trying to get a
rise
I don't scan film often, but I have hundreds of thousands of frames I've never
printed, and I occasionally need to scan something. (I still have a darkroom,
but have little time for that and definitely don't want to fool around with
color printing.). Some reviews say the Epson 700 flatbed is at
on 2011-10-02 11:06 Christine Aguila wrote
Just a little photo-play. Definitely, a Bears-sweatshirt-day--nippy. Tough
season to be a Bears fan this year. Cheers, Christine
great environmental portrait
provoked thoughts:
* don't misplace that remote control!
* can only read a couple
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:49:22PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don't scan film often, but I have hundreds of thousands of frames I've
never printed, and I occasionally need to scan something. (I still have a
darkroom, but have little time for that and definitely don't want to fool
around
Get a used film scanner. No contest.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Get a used film scanner. No contest.
I have a lot of medium format film to scan as well and even some 4x5, so a film
scanner is pretty much out of the question. In any case, the Epson 700 with a
d-max of 4.0 and 4800 dpi native resolution
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
I am reviewing my Rome 2009 images, getting back into the Blurb book I have
planned. I came across an image that intrigues me; I am curious what others
will say WRT rendering and subject matter.
So, two images
Boris is a Japanese experimental-guitar-noise band that I really like;
I saw them Tuesday and took some pix of guitarist/singer/keyboardist,
Wata. If you're interested in reading about seriously challenging but
deeply beautiful fringe music, there's
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 1:38 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
After heading down to the Lake on Sunday morning, it was off to a
favourite coffee shop before I did a bit of city shooting:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2011/10/sunday-papers.html
She heard me
68 matches
Mail list logo
