From: Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com
I should add, following the line of thought, that any/every camera is
capable in the hands of one who knows how to best use it.
That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light
photography (although it's considerably better than my
That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light
photography (although it's considerably better than my previous Canon
A710). Similarly, no camera is good if you hate to use it (you can argue
that it's capable, I suppose, but that smells of wrong question).
Really?
On Apr 13, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
Yes, it was pretty chilly, but lovely...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/8644993704/lightbox
Incognito - Ballaugh Beach 2013
Is that snow in the background? I thought it was supposed to be spring up
there.
On Apr 14, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Alan C c...@lantic.net wrote:
Very sad, Godfrey. The building has a lot of character, especially the roof
lines. You would think some creative architect could come up with a novel way
of preserving the basic structure.
I had similar thoughts, especially from
On Apr 14, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Chris Mitchell chris.mitch...@which.net wrote:
How do you deal with the lack of telephoto lenses?
--
I use my Pentax ones.
I thought get closer was the correct answer.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Is it me or are most of the images a little out of focus?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Derby Chang
Sent: Sunday, 14 April 2013 9:11 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT GESO - Olympus 17mm 1.8
I was
That certainly is a lot of camera for the Mr. Rich. But who would need
it? Certainly not me, an average enthusiast, happy with my Pentax
DSLR. Of interest to a specialist photographer perhaps, who can afford
an Assistant to carry that stuff with its equally costly Tripod. Or a
Collector of fine
Our cat on the kitchen table:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/251-plumeaux
shot with the Q 06 zoom. This lens is a real gem.
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
A beauty, Toine.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
Our cat on the kitchen table:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/251-plumeaux
shot with the Q 06 zoom. This lens is a real gem.
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 14, 2013, at 1:16 AM, Toine wrote:
Our cat on the kitchen table:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/251-plumeaux
shot with the Q 06 zoom. This lens is a real gem.
For a cat photo, that's pretty damn nice.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML
Well said. I'm in about the same place. I still shoot professionally but the
bulk of my shooting is for personal enjoyment. The K-5 and DA* lenses are
completely capable of providing top quality newspaper and magazine work, and
some of my primes, like the K85/1.8 and FA 35/2 are a lot of fun.
Most seem a bit soft, but it may be due to motion blur in some cases. Based on
this small web-size sample, I'm certainly not blown away by the lens, but I do
enjoy Derby's photography. What's not to like about pretty girls?
On Apr 14, 2013, at 3:12 AM, John Coyle jco...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Is
Very nice photo. Pleasing background and good detail.
Paul
On Apr 14, 2013, at 4:16 AM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
Our cat on the kitchen table:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/251-plumeaux
shot with the Q 06 zoom. This lens is a real gem.
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, Mark C wrote:
I am hoping that we see something out of Pentax - Ricoh that tells
us that they are serious about the K-AF mount and it's corresponding
glass. I really don't care if they lag the market regarding FF dslr,
but let's face it - the day is not far off when FF
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, Tom C wrote:
From: Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com
I should add, following the line of thought, that any/every camera is
capable in the hands of one who knows how to best use it.
That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light
photography (although
Thanks, Frank.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:43 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Something compelling about this one, Dan.
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Charming portrait!
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
A 1977 photo with the Mamiya C2 TLR and 80mm lens.
I think he was trying to tell me something:
Love the eyes!
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
Our cat on the kitchen table:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/251-plumeaux
shot with the Q 06 zoom. This lens is a real gem.
Toine
On 13/04/2013 8:42 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
I considered both and ended up with the X-E1 rather than X-Pro1. That
35mm is oh my goodness. The E1 is lighter and has the same sensor, and
saves you substantial bucks because its EVF is all E, which works
great for me. Lots of samples at
The X-E1
On 13/04/2013 10:30 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013, Tim Bray wrote:
I considered both and ended up with the X-E1 rather than X-Pro1. That
35mm is oh my goodness. The E1 is lighter and has the same sensor, and
saves you substantial bucks because its EVF is all E, which works
great
Quoting Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, Mark C wrote:
I am hoping that we see something out of Pentax - Ricoh that tells
us that they are serious about the K-AF mount and it's corresponding
glass. I really don't care if they lag the market regarding FF dslr,
but let's face
On 14/04/2013 12:14 AM, Tom C wrote:
That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light
photography (although it's considerably better than my previous Canon
A710). Similarly, no camera is good if you hate to use it (you can argue
that it's capable, I suppose, but that
On 14/04/2013 5:46 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, Mark C wrote:
I am hoping that we see something out of Pentax - Ricoh that tells
us that they are serious about the K-AF mount and it's corresponding
glass. I really don't care if they lag the market regarding FF dslr,
but let's
14. apr. 2013 kl. 01:20 skrev Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com:
On 13/04/2013 7:38 AM, George Sinos wrote:
I think I subscribed to PDML in 2000 or 2001. It seems like the last
couple of years, and especially the last few months the topic of other
brands supplementing Pentax gear or just
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, Mark C wrote:
I am hoping that we see something out of Pentax - Ricoh that tells
us that they are serious about the K-AF mount and it's corresponding
glass. I really don't care if they lag the
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, Bill wrote:
On 13/04/2013 10:30 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013, Tim Bray wrote:
I considered both and ended up with the X-E1 rather than X-Pro1. That
35mm is oh my goodness. The E1 is lighter and has the same sensor, and
saves you substantial bucks because its
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, DagT wrote:
In my view the Fuji system does compete with the Pentax DA Limited
lenses providing a good, compact, system and I am tempted to sell them
and get the X-Pro with 18mm f/2, 35mm f/1.4 and 60mm f/2.4. On the
other hand Pentax does compete in other areas such as
This post was too long to go through, so trimmed Cotty's quoted material.
I have a hard time recounting my personal history re cameras, because I
sort of forget it. I remember the names of the Canons I've had (mostly), but
not the Pentaxes (because I am with Canon now is probably the
Derby,
I have to agree with Paul and John.
Images are a bit soft, out of focus?
Not up to your usual standards.
Is it you or the lens?
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Most seem a bit soft, but it may be due to motion blur in some
Toine,
Nice of the cat to let you live with her!
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
Our cat on the kitchen table:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/251-plumeaux
shot with the Q 06 zoom. This lens is a real gem.
Toine
--
PDML
Case in point...
I have the K-01 with me all the time in the car
I'm still having trouble getting used to the 'NO VIEWFINDER.'
This makes me put it away faster/sooner and stop shooting.
Not really a good thing. I'm trying to adjust, but...
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Bill
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Case in point...
I have the K-01 with me all the time in the car
I'm still having trouble getting used to the 'NO VIEWFINDER.'
This makes me put it away faster/sooner and stop shooting.
Not really a good thing. I'm trying to adjust, but...
The
From: Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
On 14/04/2013 12:14 AM, Tom C wrote:
That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light
photography (although it's considerably better than my previous Canon
A710). Similarly, no camera is good if you hate to use it (you can argue
On Apr 13, 2013, at 18:47 , knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Beyond the technical aspect, this is a really nice moment: the bass player
being totally into the music, the guitarist and drummer watching him.
Well, they're both on guitars but I see your point. :-)
Terrific!
Thank you!
From: Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
On 14/04/2013 12:14 AM, Tom C wrote:
That's half-true, at best. My Nikon P7100 just isn't good for low-light
photography (although it's considerably better than my previous Canon
A710). Similarly, no camera is good if you hate to use it (you can argue
Might as well cut out the middle-man by just standing in a cold shower
tearing up hundred dollar bills
From: David Parsons
Because the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.
I know a guy that went from Pentax, to Canon, to Nikon, to Sony, to
Canon. In the space of a year.
Nothing to see here, but go look anyway...
This was about 2 minutes with the Fuji outside my enabler's store. I
found the out of camera images to be a little dark and a little flat,
but I had done absolutely nothing to the camera's adjustments either.
The top shot was at a middling aperture
I must have missed the bit where you told about butchering innocent
Pentax lenses to fit Canon. I don't see switching brands as a joyful thing.
It's just a pain in the nether regions, like getting a baseball bat enema!
But I've grown old waiting for Pentax's MZ-D, and I don't think I can
But, can you see the USA from your backyard? 8-D
From: knarftheriault
Actually, looking east across Lake Ontario means it was an American sunrise.
;-)
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: kwal...@peoplepc.com
Sent: April 13, 2013 4/13/13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
From: Aahz Maruch
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013, Tim Bray wrote:
I considered both and ended up with the X-E1 rather than X-Pro1. That
35mm is oh my goodness. The E1 is lighter and has the same sensor, and
saves you substantial bucks because its EVF is all E, which works
great for me. Lots of samples
http://www.ebay.com/itm/smc-PENTAX-FA-50mm-f-1-7-Exc-/221204147488?pt=Camera_Lenseshash=item3380cb6d20
This one is new for me. I have never seen a FA50/1.7 with lock screw. It isn't
even listed at http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/normal/index.html ,
but the user manual in the picture
Some cameras rise above their ergonomics. The Kodak Medalist, is a
beast, though not that much bigger and heavier than a K20D, and by
modern, (say post 1950), standards quirky to say the least, but what
limits my shooting with it is available film. The damned stuff is
getting expensive, (and
A strange lens indeed. Focus limiter? No macro? Hmmm. Might be rare,
though the box and packaging would indicate mass production. Maybe an
aftermarket mod? That would be my guess
SV Hovland pdml...@heime.org wrote:
Yes, she's very tolerant. If I buy a new chair every few years to
polish her nails I'm allowed to stay.
On 14 April 2013 16:25, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Toine,
Nice of the cat to let you live with her!
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Toine
On Apr 14, 2013, at 6:08 AM, DagT wrote:
14. apr. 2013 kl. 01:20 skrev Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com:
On 13/04/2013 7:38 AM, George Sinos wrote:
So, I want a camera with a fast standard lens, I want something that is
fairly compact, and I want certain lens qualities that I have to
What David Mann said. I have my excellent K-5 with the 50-135 and the
old Tokina 400mm. The advantages of the X-E1 become irresistable in
situations where you’re carrying it around. In practical terms, this
means I take the Pentax to the cottage and the Fuji when I’m getting
on a plane.
The
Why not e-mail Boz, about it, he might be interested to know about it,
heck it might get hm interested in updating his web page.
I'd do it but it's your find, so...
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/authors.html
On 4/14/2013 12:52 PM, SV Hovland wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:55 PM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you deal with the lack of telephoto lenses?
I thought get closer was the correct answer.
It is, except when you’re photographing live lava. When I did that
live-lava hike there were a couple of other camera geeks
1. Note that the item pictured in the listing is not the item described in the
writeup. The write-up seems to describe an M or possibly A 50/1.7, so who knows
what he is really selling.
2. The Lock screw looks to me like it is on the ring of some sort of
aftermarket rotating tripod mount,
Not aftermarket. It clearly shows in the paperwork accompanying the
piece. However, I'm mystified.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
1. Note that the item pictured in the listing is not the item described in
the writeup. The write-up seems to
On Apr 14, 2013, at 11:20 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Why not e-mail Boz, about it, he might be interested to know about it, heck
it might get hm interested in updating his web page.
Why not email the guy selling the lens?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML
Darren Addy wrote:
Not aftermarket. It clearly shows in the paperwork accompanying the
piece. However, I'm mystified.
Is that included paperwork an official Pentax document? No Pentax logo
or any other company name/logo. It could be a slip included by some
company doing the modification.
On 4/14/2013 3:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Darren Addy wrote:
Not aftermarket. It clearly shows in the paperwork accompanying the
piece. However, I'm mystified.
Is that included paperwork an official Pentax document? No Pentax logo
or any other company name/logo. It could be a slip included by
You're right. Shooting in BW is liberating. However, it's nice to be able to
do so when I choose to.
Larry in Dallas
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cottrell
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 6:14 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: K-5 Black White
On 13/4/13, larry, discombobulated,
I did e-mail him :-)
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P.J. Alling
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 8:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Strange FA50/1,7
Why not e-mail Boz, about it, he might be interested to know about it, heck it
might
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
Pentax K-5, DA*50-135mm@75mm f/4.0, 1/125s, ISO800
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
When word of the Fuji X100 first broke, I knew I wanted one. Not out of
some displeasure with Pentax, but because it's a camera that fits what I
like to do. It's smallish, has a great FOV, and the files it produces
are gorgeous.
Now that I have one, I have truly enjoyed using it, even when it
On 13/4/13, Bill, discombobulated, unleashed:
Why have we never gotten together for a beer?
Would you bring your wife?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Producion
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML
On 14/4/13, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I must have missed the bit where you told about butchering innocent
Pentax lenses to fit Canon. I don't see switching brands as a joyful thing.
True - I skipped over that -but call it an aberration if you like. Gotta
get my kicks somewhere
I tell you what, if I suddenly had a career change and decided to become
Jostein and try and make a living in the wilds of the Northern Russian
Forrests chasing Kazak Vildebeests et al, I would have no hesitation in
acquiring a couple of 645D bodies and a set of glass. Older glass too.
Real glass.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:56 PM, larry larryl...@sprintmail.com wrote:
Some editors
actually consider converting from RAW to JPEG the same as modifications.
I guess their delicate little brains would simply explode if anyone
pointed out that the camera itself does that when JPEG-shooting is
On Apr 14, 2013, at 09:08 , John Sessoms wrote:
I must have missed the bit where you told about butchering innocent Pentax
lenses to fit Canon. I don't see switching brands as a joyful thing.
It's just a pain in the nether regions, like getting a baseball bat enema!
There are many of us
On Apr 14, 2013, at 09:29 , John Sessoms wrote:
From: Aahz Maruch
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013, Tim Bray wrote:
I considered both and ended up with the X-E1 rather than X-Pro1. That
35mm is oh my goodness. The E1 is lighter and has the same sensor, and
saves you substantial bucks because its EVF
Dag,
Good shot in very difficult setting.
Composition is very dynamic and works very well.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 3:20 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
Pentax K-5, DA*50-135mm@75mm f/4.0, 1/125s, ISO800
DagT
Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Apr 14, 2013, at 09:29 , John Sessoms wrote:
From: Aahz Maruch
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013, Tim Bray wrote:
I considered both and ended up with the X-E1 rather than X-Pro1. That
35mm is oh my goodness. The E1 is lighter and has the same sensor, and
saves you
Quoting Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com:
Spoken from the fingers of someone who just dropped over $1500 on a
complete Q kit with flash, ring flash, Auto-110 adaptor, and
Pentax's super over priced K-mount adaptor. First impressions?
Auto-110 lenses, the 70mm and 20-40mm, used with the
Nice capture.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Toine to...@repiuk.nl
Subject: PESO Plumeaux
Our cat on the kitchen table:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/251-plumeaux
shot with the Q 06 zoom. This lens is a
And I have to agree with the three of you. My best piece of photo gear
is the X key on Lightroom, and I should use it harder. The lens is still
a beauty, I promise.
Thanks for looking
On 15/04/2013 12:21 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Derby,
I have to agree with Paul and John.
Images are a bit
Maybe an aftermarket mod?
The user manual shows the screw, so it wasn't an after marker mod.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Strange FA50/1,7
A strange lens indeed. Focus
On Apr 14, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Derby Chang wrote:
And I have to agree with the three of you. My best piece of photo gear is the
X key on Lightroom, and I should use it harder.
Mark!
The lens is still a beauty, I promise.
Thanks for looking
On 15/04/2013 12:21 AM, Bob Sullivan
On 14/04/2013 2:32 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 13/4/13, Bill, discombobulated, unleashed:
Why have we never gotten together for a beer?
Would you bring your wife?
I 'd have to think about that.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
No - Sydney.
Ciao,
Pete Mac in Melbourne (ex-Sydney)
On 14 April 2013 12:47, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Is that Melbourne? -T
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I was instantly fond of this lens
On Apr 14, 2013, at 14:39 , Brian Walters wrote:
Spoken from the fingers of someone who just dropped over $1500 on a complete
Q kit with flash, ring flash, Auto-110 adaptor, and Pentax's super over
priced K-mount adaptor. First impressions? Auto-110 lenses, the 70mm and
20-40mm, used with
Your cat's staff photographer does a good job. I'm sure she's pleased.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Toine to...@repiuk.nl
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 4:16 AM
Subject: PESO Plumeaux
Our cat on the
My flow of PESOs (always fitful) was interrupted by work on our inpatient
service and a meeting in Minneapolis (where it snowed all 4 days I was there).
So let's go back to France. Someone commented that they would be interested in
seeing a version of my Rennes station photo without the
Various shots with 18-55, sigma 70-300, FA35/2
Collin
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:32 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/8641958744/
I went out exploring a local factory that has abandoned for a while.
Interesting, but I think I would rather see
Are we missing a link here?
On 4/14/2013 8:20 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Various shots with 18-55, sigma 70-300, FA35/2
Collin
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Aahz Maruch
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013, Tim Bray wrote:
I considered both and ended up with the X-E1 rather than X-Pro1. That
35mm is oh my goodness. The E1 is lighter and has the same sensor, and
saves you substantial bucks because its EVF is all E,
Comparing the image to my FA 50 f1.7 - the outer barrel appears to be
the same size but the inner barrer in the image is as far out (or
further) than mine is at the closest focusing setting. As toher's have
commented - probably modified for macro work. I hve used my M 50 f17 for
snow crystals
on 2013-04-14 19:06 Mark C wrote
I can understand why someone would want to modify it for
macro work.
indeed close focus is about the only thing i could ask to improve my A 50mm/1.7
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Another Q macro -
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php?blog=2
Permalink:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/a-little-midge
The subject is between 3 and 4 mm long. On the Q a 1.25x image (easily
done in the field) is close to frame filling. On a full frame camera it
I don't *know* anything about it, but I'd be willing to bet money an
endoscope is involved somehow.
From: Zos Xavius
A strange lens indeed. Focus limiter? No macro? Hmmm. Might be rare,
though the box and packaging would indicate mass production. Maybe an
aftermarket mod? That would be my
I wonder if it's some kind of add-on device intended to lock the focus
in place? Maybe the instructions are for the device itself.
From: Mark Roberts
Darren Addy wrote:
Not aftermarket. It clearly shows in the paperwork accompanying the
piece. However, I'm mystified.
Is that included
John Sessoms wrote:
I don't *know* anything about it, but I'd be willing to bet money an
endoscope is involved somehow.
Well *that's* gonna make the 2013 quotations list. Taken completely
out of context, of course.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML
Yeah. It's the business end for an endoscope used on elephants and
hippopotami.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
To: pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: Strange FA50/1,7
I don't *know*
On Apr 14, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Yeah. It's the business end for an endoscope used on elephants and
hippopotami.
I see a new marketing slogan:
Pentax, for big assholes.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 14, 2013, at 18:03 , Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Aahz Maruch
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013, Tim Bray wrote:
I considered both and ended up with the X-E1 rather than X-Pro1. That
35mm is oh my goodness. The E1 is lighter and has the same sensor, and
On Apr 14, 2013, at 19:14 , Mark Roberts wrote:
I don't *know* anything about it, but I'd be willing to bet money an
endoscope is involved somehow.
Well *that's* gonna make the 2013 quotations list. Taken completely
out of context, of course.
Rick - Yeah. It's the business end for an
The link has relaxed away.
:-)
Sun Apr 14 20:59:58 EDT 2013
Mark C wrote:
Are we missing a link here?
On 4/14/2013 8:20 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Various shots with 18-55, sigma 70-300, FA35/2
Collin
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
...at this point in the digital era, almost all cameras are highly
competent. At the DSLR level, image quality even with the entry models
surpasses what most people could have gotten from film SLRs (assuming
you understand the camera, what it can actually do, and how to make it
perform
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
This old building soon to be razed for a new development.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/8641854465/lightbox
Soon Gone #1 - Douglas 2013
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/8642955740/lightbox
Soon Gone #2 - Douglas 2013
Are these
92 matches
Mail list logo
