Anti-Aircraft. Replaces errant jets and jet trails with realistic sky
color based on the current background.
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 14 May 2005 at 8:21, Bob W wrote:
AA filter? Does that prevent Leica photographers taking photos like Ansel
Adams?
If not, what actually is an AA filter?
Beautiful.
Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso16.html
Comments (of any variety) welcomed.
-Marco
Shouldnt the title be Flea on a Cat on a Boat on a Trailer? Don't you
see that flea on his left ear?
lol.
I like it frank.
rg
frank theriault wrote:
When I was in Nova Scotia last month, I got a rare opportunity to take
a walk at dusk with my eldest daughter, Anne. Now that she's quite
grown
LOL. Awesome. It sounds like you're ready to start producing and
selling these custom extensions for tall men. Did the cats like the show?
rg
Cotty wrote:
Very slack at work so far today and the weather is nice so I've been out
on the patio with the gear. I took a few shots of birds with
Thank you Adelheid, a fine collection as usual.
rg
Adelheid v. K. wrote:
Hi folks,
The June PUG is available on my website AND on the komkon server.
http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/05jun
and http://pug.komkon.org
Cheers
Adelheid
Mark Roberts wrote:
It's a 360-degree panorama of a Neolithic stone circle near Penmaenmawr,
Wales. It's known locally as the Druid Circle, but it actually
predates the Druids by roughly a thousand years(!)
Its because its the site of the last known landing of Princess Vespa's
craft before
Henk,
I really like your gallery. I esp like Italian contrasts in the people
folder. It is a fantastic photograph that would benefit greatly from a
tight crop.
rg
Henk Terhell wrote:
Kostas, I use jalbum, see http://jalbum.net/
It is easy to learn and there are plenty of lay-outs to
Anyone on the list have one of these? Do you have sample pics you could
share? How does it compare to using a soft filter or mist filter?
TIA
rg
Yea, too bad they don't make a 50mm soft. How do they even do the
effect to begin with?
Thanks Bruce,
rg
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Boris has my old one. I sold it to him back when I was shooting
medium format. I can say that I have not been able to fully duplicate
the effect it has with
Amita Guha wrote:
Also, I'm flying tomorrow
and I might have a chance to shoot some deer,
Amita
Are they in season?
rg
I looked through Boz's site, and it appears that there are several
versions of this lens. Are there more desirable ones from the available
selection? The K sounds interesting in that its a wysiwyg, i.e. as you
change the aperture to control the softness, you see the result in the
viewfinder,
Thank you Boris, that answers my questions. I want one.
rg
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Boris has my old one. I sold it to him back when I was shooting
medium format. I can say that I have not been able to fully duplicate
the effect it has with filters or post processing. It would be on my
Sign me up too!
rg
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Toralf Lund wrote:
I expect to get one - the FA variant - in the post in a couple of days.
Paid NOK 1000,- for it. That would be about 125 euros, I believe. Quite
reasonable, don't you think?
Very. If you find another
I remember seeing this before.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I sent this to a friend who was interested in what another friend had done
when remodeling her kitchen. Thought I'd post it here as well just for
grins ;-))
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/ceiling.html
Made with the little
http://tinyurl.com/ak4zg
Must admit tho, was quite pricey even for a black one. Would've had to
done some serious dancing for the treasury dept. ;)
rg
I like em Frank. Very sharp. The bokeh on that lens seems rather rough
though.
rg
frank theriault wrote:
A couple of the cougar:
Looking Aloof:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3440167size=lg
and, Before His Morning Coffee:
P. J. Alling wrote:
You're no Old West Judge, I'd a' hanged them. (In Texas the old Gent
could have shot them on the spot).
keithw wrote:
Oh yeah, no questions asked either. Tresspassin is a shootin offense
here, keeps this kind of thing from happening.
rg
not an inconvenience in the studio.
Paul
On Jun 13, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Gonz wrote:
Yes, this is especially true with a studio flash setup. I find that I
frequently have to stop down to f8 or f11 when using my studio flashes
@ ISO 200, and for portraits, that is unacceptable.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Charles.
Once again,i was very glad to have met you at GFM thius year.
For some reason i can only open the winning picture.
Folks, the web does not do this or the other pictures on his site justice. My
mouth
dropped when i saw
Charles' shots projected on that
http://tinyurl.com/bcv59
Anyone ever seen one of these before?
Its got its own power source and AF circuitry.
rg
Here is one I got the other day.
The Brothel
Two Irishmen were sitting at a pub having beer and watching the brothel
across the street.
They saw a Baptist minister walk into the brothel, and one of them said,
Aye, 'tis a shame to see a man of the cloth goin' bad.
Then they saw a rabbi enter the
Here's a ps that my wife took of my niece:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/ksnake.jpg
But beware, its 2Mb.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Great, Dave. One or two would suffice. I was surprised to find that after
35+ years of photography there's not a single pic of mine with red eye. I
guess that's what
Ok, I uploaded a much more compressed version 130K. Its the same
location but replace ksnake with ksnake2
http://www.g0nz.com/images/ksnake2.jpg
have fun
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Thanks, Gonz, but the file's way too big for a comfortable download. I'm
on a slow, dial-up connection.
Shel
I didnt like the way the bw conversion went with my PUG entry, I redid
it here with a different approach, its a little brighter. Comments and
critiques welcome.
http://www.g0nz.com/images/womex.jpg
Thanks,
rg
Thanks for your comments John. I know, that's the hardest thing to
manage. Those gold teeth really shine bright!
rg
John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:15:26PM -0500, Gonz wrote:
I didnt like the way the bw conversion went with my PUG entry, I redid
it here with a different
- looks
as if you missed focus on 'em by a scosh. Still, there's a nice feeling to
the image overall. Work on the teeth.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gonz
I didnt like the way the bw conversion went with my PUG entry, I redid
it here with a different approach, its a little brighter
Another one from my recent trip to a village in Mexico:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/girlsmile.jpg
Tried it in BW, and the color was so much better.
Comments welcome.
Thanks,
rg
Thanks Frank, and all who commented. I really like this photo, and wish
I had taken more, but it was one of those one-shot deals pretty much.
rg
frank theriault wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005 9:29 PM, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another one from my recent trip to a village in Mexico:
http
Dang, I bought an ME with this lens last year for about $120. Some guy
emailed me later asking if I would sell him the lens for my final bid +
$10. I told him that it was the lens that I was after, not the ME body.
Anyone wanna buy an ME (black) body? LOL.
rg
Don Sanderson wrote:
From those examples, the DFA100 looks sharper and contrastier than the
F100.
rg
Johannes Schwab wrote:
Shaun Canning schrieb:
Has anybody compared the SMCP-D FA 100mm F2.8 to the standard (or old)
SMC FA 100mm f2.8 macro, particularly when using the *ist D?
Cheers
Hello Shaun,
here is one
this, as well. The expression on her face say I really
like being photographed!And those bright eyes reveal a bit more
than the photographer intended - a self portrait! Excellent
photograph of a superbly chosen subject.
On Apr 5, 2005 4:34 PM, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Frank, and all who
Nice pic. Similar to a PUG entry. See
http://pug.komkon.org/04feb/wet.html.
My daughter's btw, which is why I remembered.
rg
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out -
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Coments - yea, nay or otherwise
Thanks
Kenneth Waller
Mark Roberts wrote:
Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Scott for commenting. Yes, you can certainly see my outline in
her eyes. Its really noticeable in a 100% picture. Even tho she
appeared shy, she did not turn away when I approached for a picture, but
looked right at the camera
Mark Roberts wrote:
Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Scott for commenting. Yes, you can certainly see my outline in
her eyes. Its really noticeable in a 100% picture. Even tho she
appeared shy, she did not turn away when I approached
http://www.g0nz.com/images/sleepymanmx.jpg
This fellow likes to watch people go by near a church in a small village
in Mexico. He was keeping his eye on me, I had been snapping pics all
around him when I thought that maybe he wasnt looking and I snapped
this. But when I looked closer, I
Thanks for commenting Bruce, I'm gonna try to get a 100% crop and see if
I can enhance it a little.
rg
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I like the BW angle in this particular photo. With your explanation
it becomes more intriguing to me. I am looking close and think I can
detect his eyes upon me. Without
the photo feel more alive
and interesting.
It's a good photo, perhaps more in its potential than its actualization.
Right now I'm liking it more than when i started this message.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 4/8/2005 7:24:17 AM
Subject
Putting a brick in a box and slapping the FEDEX Label otta do it.
rg
Richard Chu wrote:
I just want to share a recent experience with everyone
so that you folks are aware of this type of fraud. I
advertised a digital camera for sale in the
Recycler.com, which I believe is a southern California
The background looks almost like a painting. Beautiful. Makes me want
to take mine out for a ride.
rg
Don Sanderson wrote:
I could carry just this one lens for a month and never
get tired of it!
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/SB2.htm
Hey Shel, is that a real photograph? ;-)
Don
that seagull is like so photoshopped and u know it. just admit it like
a man.
Cotty wrote:
Spent a week meandering along the Cornish coast, England.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/cornwall.html
Botanists and engineers alike will find the Eden Project interesting:
Nice shot. I would like the composition more if only the 4 passengers
on the right were in. The guy on the left only detracts from what
otherwise would be a great composition. Technically, I like the
tonality except for the rightmost woman's jacket, which seems to have
gotten washed out or
somewhat. What do you think, Gonz? Other comments?
Modified photo:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/cable1a.html
Original photo:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/cable1.html
Shel
luben karavelov wrote:
When I was young (15 years old, in the end of communist regime)
everybody's wish was to emigrate is US. Now nobody here (bulgaria)
intends the emigrate in US.
luben
Thats good, isn't it? I hope it means the rest of the world is getting
better, and not just that the
Wasnt the LX close to 100% coverage? I think thats the closest one IIRC.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
OK, I admit it, I'm lazy today and don't feel like pulling out all my
camera bodies to check this. Which of the following cameras shows more of
the image caught on film when looking through the
I like it, cute pic, nice bokeh. Did u try other angles?
This is they way i like cats to be, i.e. inanimate objects. I think
cats are cool, but they are too destructive of our habitat, killing too
many birds and small mammals.
BTW, both links work for me.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Another in
I like it, the tree on the left looks like it has two arms outstreched
toward the other tree. And the trees behind them look as if they are
part of it in some way, like an ancient dance between women on one side,
men on the other, it even looks like they have one of those ridiculous
wigs they
Congrats Wendy! That is an awesome picture. I'm sure it would have
been even more spectacular had it been taken with an *istD. ;)
Kidding aside tho, it really is worthy of a front cover, its a
spectacular shot taken at precisely the right moment.
rg
wendy beard wrote:
Not one to blow my own
Great capture. Nice lighting too.
rg
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm really liking the 70-210/3.5 Vivitar Series 1. In fact, I ebayed an
original lens cap and hood for it. I shot this at 210 mm the other night
while I was watching tv. The light is from the Sigma 500 Super bounced
off the ceiling.
Try the higher voltage lithium batteries like the ones that came with
the camera. Are you running it with a micro-drive CF card, or solid
state? That can also drain the batteries faster. Using the flash can
do the same thing.
rg
Tan and Steve wrote:
Hi guys and gals,
Just home from a
This appears to be the latest pro-sumer scanner from epson. I was
looking to get the previous generation epson 4870, but then this popped
up. Anybody here heard anything about it or tried one? I'm curious as
to how well it does with slides, since I have alot of chromes I want to
scan and so
Thank you for your efforts.
rg
Adelheid v. K. wrote:
Hi folks,
The May PUG is available on my website AND on the komkon server.
http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/05may
and http://pug.komkon.org
Cheers
Adelheid
Yea these threads have a magical way of turning into tapestries.
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/4/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, he was rather frayed. Anyway, shall we cut this particular strand?
If we don't, I'll have to string someone up!
I knew I
How did u get such a DR? Grad filter or flash, or what?
rg
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Recently, I had the chance to have Larry from Prescott, of the list,
produce a large print for me. The image was this one:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0100.htm
I have to say, that he did a marvelous
Dynamic Range. I would have not expected such a scene with the bright
sky and the ground to be captured without some type of trick, such as a
grad-filter, dual images @ different exposures and post processing to
merge, or a flash.
rg
Bruce Dayton wrote:
DR? What is that?
Brilliant! True world class. Funny too!
rg
Juan Buhler wrote:
Most street photographers in the last 10 years or so have taken the
picture of two or maybe more people talking on a cellphone.
This is my take on it:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=160
(ist D, A35-70/4)
Just
It would have to be the *istD, no contest. I've never taken so many
pictures in my life, and satisfying ones at that. I probably have taken
more pictures with it than all my other cameras combined. And I have 8
other pentaxes, including some other favorites: the MX and ME-Super.
The whole
Please, can we keep politics out of such a horrible tragedy?
rg
Graywolf wrote:
Still if our governments were truely making war on terror those guys
would be to busy ducking and dodging to do things like that. Instead we
have some politicians' personal agenda.
I am glad everybody I know
I mean people putting their own political spin on this event using this
thread. Not the external political climate that may have lead to this
tragedy or 9/11. Its pathetic really.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gonz Subject: Re: OT: London Horror
Please, can we
ME-Super 1980. Friend had a Nikon FM2 with the legendary 50 1.4 that he
let me borrow for a weekend, but I could not afford the combo. The
ME-Super with a 50 1.4 was lighter, filled with more features, and less
expensive.
Sid Barras wrote:
The favorite pentax poll generated lots of good
Hey, we could have a CENTEX Pdml gathering. Has there ever been such a
thing? I know Chad is also from the hill country, and there was a
pdmler from Pflugerville.
The pentax/get-in-free dates are July 14,28 and Aug 4,18. We might go
again on Aug 4. The July dates are probably not going to
Sorry to hear that, I hope u feel better. In TX its easy to register to
carry (a weapon) as long as you dont have a criminal record, and thugs
here generally have to think twice before attempting to do what was done
to you in baltimore.
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
Note to self: if I'm ever
They may claim it works this way, but I have frequently resorted to
removing the grip when the battery depleted indicator comes on and
either run with the in-camera batteries or switch the batteries from the
grip to the body, and get quite a few more pics out of them. So they
are not
You shouldnt have any problem with 4wd. We went up to marble in a
rented car, and were advised not to go up to Crystal unless we had a
jeep because of the current road conditions, apparently there had been a
rock fall or something, its normally a rough road and you've also got to
deal with
I like this guys website on lightning photography. I've had trouble in
the past with too much city light. A dark rural location is best.
http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~doswell/ltgph.html
rg
Dave Kennedy wrote:
Had a lightning storm roll through the area around dusk last night.
Generally we get
Now you have to send us the pictures that you mentioned!
rg
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Your new housing plan sounds great. I assume Corona is a Tucson suburb?
And your son's house is in the same area? It's nice to have kids with
..
CLIP
..
Paul
On Jul 14, 2005, at 9:47
Beautiful shot. BTW, your text has it Bubmle bee.
rg
Jostein wrote:
I told this girl she wasn't supposed to fly away. At least she stayed
long enough for a pose. :-)
http://www.oksne.net/paw/humle.html
Jostein
Frank Wajer wrote:
Yep. I saw it four or five days ago. Been watching it all week. Please don't
mention ebay auctions on the list.
Paul
sorry, I didn't know this was pdml policy.
Now go say 10 Hail MX's and 10 Our FA85*'s.
Frank
Hi all,
just saw an A* 600 f5.6 on Ebay. This lens
Tom Reese wrote:
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Tom Reese wrote:
I just don't buy this argument. eBay has enough people looking at
their auctions that a few PDMLers won't make any difference.
That lens isn't mislisted under Kowa medium format or something where
it's hard to find. Anyone who does
Sounds like fun Ann. Enjoy your trip. Take lots of pics.
rg
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I haven't even really been here - got a glimpse of
a couple of Peso's and
see that one W Robb won the 600 - I hope it gets
to him before I do (aug 10)
maybe he will let me take a few shots with it.
So here is
PlayBunny
BlurBoy
seLXy
Butch Black wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
As far as nicknames, no I don't have one.
Rabbit.
Tom Reese
I think we should start a contest to give Frank a nickname. Keeping in
mind the nicknames of his friends (Pirate Jenny, Ninja, Porno) my
suggestion
Guess I must have missed that post. Is anyone else seeing the missing
post problem again?
rg
P. J. Alling wrote:
I suggested fuzzy bunny before but I think we should just shorten that
to fuzzy...
Gonz wrote:
PlayBunny
BlurBoy
seLXy
Butch Black wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
As far
LOL!
William Robb wrote:
Enough of this shit already.
I bought a fucking lens.
It was expensive.
Mind your own god damned business.
Regards
William Robb
- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: Re: A* 600
f5.6 on Ebay - won by warobb
Do an eBay search on the bidder's
Wow. How horrific can you make a face look? They look like they belong
in the recycle bin.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://beckycarter.com/color.html
This is absurd!
Shel
How do they do that anyway? Its a strange effect. Is it the healing
brush or something? Its not blurry, just plasticky.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://beckycarter.com/color.html
This is absurd!
Shel
Well, I cannot contest what he likes, use what equipment you feel
comfortable with and lets you concentrate on the image and moment you
want to capture. I do contest however, his obsession with the technical
aspects of the equipment and especially the lens choice. While it is
true that there
: Gonz
Well, I cannot contest what he likes, use what equipment you feel
comfortable with and lets you concentrate on the image and moment you
want to capture. I do contest however, his obsession with the technical
aspects of the equipment and especially the lens choice. While it is
true
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Quality and the fingerprint of a lens are often very personal choices,
and subtle differences may decide one's preference in choosing a lens. If
you've not spent some time using a Leica you may not know, understand, or
appreciate the difference between it and an SLR. If
I dont know. Why dont you stop by again and we'll let you know.
:)
rg
Cesar wrote:
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Gonz wrote:
Hey, we could have a CENTEX Pdml gathering. Has there ever been such
a thing? I know Chad is also from the hill country, and there was a
pdmler from Pflugerville.
San
Another great flash system was used by the inventor of flash, Doc
Edgerton. He once took a picture of Cambridge, MA at night from a
plane. The power was so great it melted the giant quartz xenon tube he
had made for that purpose. The tube and the picture are on display down
the hall at MIT
Size does matter
rg
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RAF Brize Norton this morning. Snapped through a bus window by friend and
colleague Barry Clack, a freelance photographer from Oxford, on his Nikon
D2X, so this is OT I suppose ;-)
I'm a big bloke, but *that's* a big
Paul, that pic is simply outstanding. Thanks for sharing.
rg
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Two weeks to the Dream Cruise and traffic is building on Woodward
Avenue. Must have been several thousand enthusiast type cars of various
genres out tonight. In two weeks there will be 50,000 or so. But there
Now is there an opposite version, or would that be problematic for the
optics, being that the canon glass has a larger diameter?
Cotty wrote:
I've enabled myself with one of Mr Rolfo's adapters:
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=26054item=7535484070
and will be testing it
I can't imagine what Pentax engineers must feel like when they see
something like this.
Cotty wrote:
Speculation or a leak?
web page:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/62649
PDF download in Spanish:
http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Christian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: OT - Upping the anti
I can't imagine what Pentax engineers must feel like when they see
something like this.
Hard for them
How do you nominate a guy for the Darwin award? This guy is definitely
prime material.
http://tinyurl.com/dz23e
rg
Cotty wrote:
On 10/8/05, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
(or, more properly, Dr. Knarfenstein)
I think you've created something here.
ITS ALIVE!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
This guy is selling 3 @ $269.99 each on ebay using buy it now.
http://tinyurl.com/8pmo3
rg
John Graves wrote:
Is the FA 50mm 1.4 gone or has production has been cut back. Everyone
seems to be OOS of the lens.
John G
I got the same thing. It comes from email harvesters that found our
email address on the PUG site.
I traced it to some computer in Poland.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
today I got this message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear user of Mindspring.com,
Your e-mail account has been temporary
I love it. I really like the dangling hand, it looks like part of the
bike in the background, at first I thought it was some wierd bike stand.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2183396
I know, the bikes in the background really distract from the hand in
JM pontificated:
A little further back in the newspaper there is another list of
crooks, published every day. The same names show up day after day
after day. This list of crooks is much longer than the list of drunk
drivers. Most everyone on the list really is a crook, potentially a
I'm getting mine from Dell in May, supposedly. I guess I missed the
original window for getting them early.
Can you try an experiment for me? Turn the drive mode on continuous,
and see how many pics you can take in 1 minute.
Thanks,
rg
zoomshot wrote:
I just got my Nomad Muvo 2 and
All bad apples. Hah hah hah hah hah hah.
Really John, the hyperbole is a bit over the top.
John Mustarde wrote:
On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 23:34:30 -0600, you wrote:
Gimme a break. That is a gross oversimplification and generalization of
some problems with a couple of bad apples.
Two
Interesting. I do see the edge difference. I also see a general
difference in the color balance. The pentax version looks more
saturated to me, maybe a little warmer also.
rg
Rob Brigham wrote:
I have been reading many people sceptical about the differences in the
quality produced by the
I remember reading about this a couple of years ago in a scientific
journal. The cover image was freaky like this. Our eyes/brain do alot
of processing that may leave information in an ideal state for abstract
recognition, but its not prepared to do lower level comparisons of
John Francis wrote:
OK - here's as close to the RAW sensor data as you are likely to get.
http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/pef1127.jpg
The only processing done here to go frow raw sensor data to RGB is:
o Fill in missing sample values (average of closest neighbours)
I'm wondering, do you
Shaun,
Hate to point out problems, but you seem to have a bad sensor. I
noticed several shots that consistently showed stuck/hot pixels,
especially the dragon fly stills. There are at least three distinct
bright dots on those pictures, which may be each composed of one or more
stuck/hot
I'm sorry, in my haste to warn you about the stuck pixels, I forgot to
say that the pics are really nice. I especially like the shot of the
tandem-flys, how did you manage to get that shot!!!
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
Here are the results of my first foray into the bush with an
Shaun,
Hate to point out problems, but you seem to have a bad sensor. I
noticed several shots that consistently showed stuck/hot pixels,
especially the dragon fly stills. There are at least three distinct
bright dots on those pictures, which may be each composed of one or more
stuck/hot
I'm sorry, in my haste to warn you about the stuck pixels, I forgot to
say that the pics are really nice. I especially like the shot of the
tandem-flys, how did you manage to get that shot!!!
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
Here are the results of my first foray into the bush with an
That is so cool! I wish you would remember the names of the dusty small
towns that you came from, my grandparents are from that general area!
The pic evokes so many memories of going down there to visit relatives.
Celaya was the big town, then closer by was Salvaterria, and
Acambaro. My
301 - 400 of 2292 matches
Mail list logo
