This is a real question for me. KEH will be nearby on Saturday, and
it got me to thinking about selling my K7 to buy the K-01, given that
the latter will have a much better sensor, electronics, and hence IQ.
Thoughts on this?
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
It's actually a great shot of Frank, bunny ears aside. GFM makes a
great background, nice bokeh, etc.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:17 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran across this the other day
A neat pattern of snow on the skylight in my building:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/15174580_3zgwM8#!i=1718851663k=R32D9mJlb=1s=O
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
I like the way (on my monitor) her shirt disappears into the background.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:16 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Works for me. Well done,
Dave
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:48 PM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
Here's one of yesterdays
be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Sent: February 20, 2012 2/20/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: POA (Picture once again): Mountain Man
It's actually
Maybe hen thought you were cute, Dave.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:15 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
Interesting post by David duChemin on his PixelatedImage blog.
I meant he but it could have been a chicken.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe hen thought you were cute, Dave.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:15 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas
Nice catch. I can't imagine the power in such a thing.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Dave.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:16 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
I
I ran across this the other day and this morning's conversations made
me think of it. It's a re-post but a time honored shot of our
favorite Canadian.
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/15174580_3zgwM8#!i=1717179779k=4W26Qkzlb=1s=O
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
That is a great shot. That one plane of focus anchors the image.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:01 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
Den 17. feb. 2012 kl. 00:47 skrev Larry Colen:
On 2/16/2012 2:06 PM, DagT wrote:
Thanks Dan, Dave and Frank!
I was a little uncertain here as I wanted to focus
Tonal range is perfect.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Lighting and composition exceptionally nice,
Jack
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday,
I like it.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Time well spent, John. Very nice ambiance.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
To: pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:05 PM
Subject: PESO - Rocket's
Nice set. Good technically and you caught the right moment.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
An interesting and amusing set of images.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:57 AM, David J Brooks
What wonderful shot. When those later yearbooks or celebrations need
pictures of her as a child, there will clearly be no lack.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:54 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Lovely pose
Dave
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Platonic or romantic love?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I haven't check the veracity of this, but it could be interesting if it's for
real:
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/etc/2849892966.html
The Adobe User Research Digital Imaging Team is setting
It looks like my work area, except there stuff only comes apart. I
always like pictures of workshops.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:37 AM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 14/02/2012 04:06, frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2012/02/genius-at-work.html
He and
What a lovely Valentine's Day image. I assume you went unnoticed or
at least could outrun her?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Michael Beacom mbea...@mac.com wrote:
Gze Frank,
Think you could teach me what you don't know?
Cheers
Mike
On Feb 12, 2012, at 6:09 PM,
When were you in Hawaii?
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
The State Bird of Hawaii:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15151472
Comments and criticisms are welcome.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML
You're doing it wrong. Sex in a bed, take pictures of it with a camera.
Yeah, but this time be sure to use high def this time.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 11/2/12, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
at 4:51 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:39 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
wrote:
A student of mine, also a good friend:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml
Freaky, but I like quite a bit.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:27 PM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
One from last night:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/6859565685/in/photostream/lightbox/
Direct link:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7037/6859565685_326604dd3d_o.jpg
One model has GPS and the other doesn't. It actually correlates with
the color of the body, but I can't remember which is which.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Optio WG-2 is now showing on Adorama ($399) and BH ($349) for preorder.
BH price is $50
The most important function of auto-correct is turning an annoying
misspelling into fun for all.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Philip Northeast
rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Maybe it was a Freudian slip?
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 10/02/12 5:34 PM, P. J. Alling
Wow. I can even hear the voice in my head.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:53 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I will name him George, and I will hug him and pet him and squeeze him ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Through the wonders of the net: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JlVqfC8-UI
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Reminds me of One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish by Dr Seuss:
Look what we found
in the park
in the dark
We will take him home. We will call
Brian is right:
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Pentax_K2
(It's not that I doubted you, Brian; I just didn't believe you.)
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
It's the weird type styles they
of money with that new OM-G body and Pentax
could have done the same. The trick is no to mess with the basics by
sticking in random modern styling elements. Cotty and I would buy it.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Brian is right:
http
A student of mine, also a good friend:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/15174580_3zgwM8#!i=1706338804k=4xLjTcNlb=1s=O
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Splash!!
Just kidding. Nice for a lo res clip! I never do video and I
probably should try sometime.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
http://vimeo.com/user2607591/review/36578528/fa84c56f73
Accidentally had the video set for 640X480 !!! Oh well. Here it is
According to Thom Hogan, the yellow K-01 is being nicknamed the
Tonka. I at least find that hysterical.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:42 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2012-02-09 21:27 Darren Addy wrote
PPS... that includes the 40mm pancake and is $100 less than Amazon's
current
Was there a camera in that picture?
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/9/2012 12:59 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
On 9 February 2012 15:16, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe because they couldn't even photograph it to look like a Spotty,
Funny how that K10D Spotmatic just doesn't work.The rounded parts
just clash with the angle parts.Maybe Pentax should use old
Olympus designs. ;-)
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:05 AM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/9/2012 2:34 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 2/8/2012 11:25
Definitely the MX. Don't mess with it, just modify enough to be
digital and then stop.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Was there a camera in that picture?
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/9/2012 12:59 AM
April 1, huh? I wonder how much PRI will be run by Pentax an dhow
much by Ricoh. I know this will sound odd, but I get the feeling
that the success of the camera division is a source of pride for
Ricoh, if that's the right word.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I just meant that I don't think Ricoh acquired Pentax to make a bunch
of money. They want to make cameras for PR reasons, or something like
that.
BTW, the reaction to this news from some folks with the GXR is not
altogether happy. I guess they are afraid Pentax will mess up the
Ricoh offerings.
It would never sell in any significant numbers. i can't imagine
trying to navigate menus through an EVF. Besides, most people like to
look at their shots on the LCD. IIRC, film SLRs had BW screens near
the end just to mange all of their electronic options.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:20 PM,
I should mention that those little screens were on top, obviously not
on the swinging film door. ;-)
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
It would never sell in any significant numbers. i can't imagine
trying to navigate menus through an EVF. Besides
Very nice. If you PP in PS, you could try adding some film grain
using the filters. It would mask some of the noise and keep the
details. for some reason, folks seem more accepting of grain than
noise.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
As always Frank you
Sell it while it's worth good money and put the money toward the K-5
replacement. Seriously. If you have to ask, then it's probably not a
lens your really use.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:40 PM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
What would you do with a 50 1.2?
I'd keep the lens
Geoffrey? rotfl! That's a new low for the autocorrector. At least I
don't think I accidentally spelled another name.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:52 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/02/2012 3:15 PM, mike wilson wrote:
On 09/02/2012 16:28, Darren Addy wrote:
Surely one
Still, we only have to remember the reaction to the K-01 to understand
why they do it. Making the K=01 look like a smaller version of a
Spotmatic would have been a much better design choice form a sales POV
than the what they did.
As mentioned, fabulous spell checker miscue!
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012
See, my from/form error and extra the aren't nearly as amusing.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Still, we only have to remember the reaction to the K-01 to understand
why they do it. Making the K=01 look like a smaller version of a
Spotmatic would
Even at the effective focal length of 75mm, I seem to remember Pentax
having a very successful limited lens with a focal length of 77mm.
Short teles are very useful. My FA50 is my favorite lens on the K7.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Bipin,
I used a
Woohoo!! Free for all
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL! How True!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
On 2/8/12 2:08 PM, Larry Colen
The Pen-style e-p1 was a huge hit. The new OM-D looks to be popular.
I hope for Pentax's sake that those younger folks line up for the
K-01. ;-) Seriously, the retro designs seem to cross generational
lines. No explanation here, just an opinion based on observations of
recent successful
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/shop/dp2-merrill-compact-digital-camera.cfm?link=feb_m_2_dp2
There is also one with a 19 mm fixed lens.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
You're an ingenius and courageous man, Don.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Very clever good job spotting it. But not safe for wife viewing especially
in Feb. I am planning to get her a new lens -something light so she can
carry it for me on photo walks.
Oh. We all bought new computers to fix the problem.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
You too?. ;)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012
I heard of the new lenses in an email from Pentax forums. I clicked
on the link to take a look, and I saw this comment below the
announcement:
560mm lens a bit much? 840mm eff? Good luck keeping that steady.
Seriously? Am I missing something or is this comment as ridiculous as
it sounds?
More
Lovely. Where were you?
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15128459size=md
Comments and criticisms are appreciated.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Yeah, I was also thinking bout the price difference. $3K vs. $10K is
a really big difference. especially when the Nikon body comes with
Nikon's lens selection.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/7/2012 3:21 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
P. J.
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/15174580_3zgwM8#!i=1701763238k=BSChjgGlb=1s=A
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
I prefer the first one, but I like machinery shots.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Well I have a slight preference for the close-up but they are both PUG
worthy I think
ann
On 2/5/2012 13:29, P. J. Alling wrote:
No the PUG isn't rejecting
The ultimate disrespect for the K-01: it lost the battle for the
hearts of the PDML to toast.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
The breadth and depth of the arcane pedantry on this list is truly
impressive.
On 2/5/2012 4:07 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sun,
Getting old and confused also slows down the the process and it's much
cheaper than an MF camera. OTOH, it would be really fun to get one
and bombard the PDML with 100% crops of the model's nose hair.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/4/2012 9:17 PM,
Sigh. They just don't make cheap pieces of tin crap like they used to.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:24 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2012-02-03 17:02 Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Charles Robinsoncharl...@visi.com
wrote:
Great camera, but I still feel
BH has it for pre-order. Good product images and specs for those interested.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Underpaid N. Overpentaxed
overpenta...@googlemail.com wrote:
Mark!
2012/2/3 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
Look, Stan, if you're just going to be reasonable I'm going to have
Pentax sold a bunch of Kx's in Japan by making them in wild colors and
blister packs. Oly made a bunch of money with their retro designs and
admitted that the new e-PM1 was aimed at women who wanted a
fashionable camera. Given the that ultimate goal of Ricoh-Pentax is
to make money not cameras,
There it is. K5 sensor, no EVF, $750 body only. $899 including the
40 might be the best deal. It would definitively look better in all
black, and I assume the yellow one is aimed at some market I'm unaware
of. No that exciting , but it's very possible that the IQ is
excellent and it's quiet,
It won't be great in bright light since none of them are. You'll need
to get one of those Delkin hoods. I have one on my E-P2 and it helps
a lot.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Well, the rumors were pretty much on target.
Here's the Press
Here is a telling shot form dpreview. It really is as big as the K5
for all practical purposes.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
It won't be great in bright light since none of them are. You'll need
to get one of those Delkin hoods. I have one on my
Hey, Mr. alling, when did you go all ee cummings on us? (;-)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:55 AM, p. j. alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a slightly modified K-5 without a viewfinder. So now we know
what a good optical viewfinder w/reflex mirror assembly costs, about
$700.
On Wed,
At your lowest point at the beginning of WWII, we sent you Spam.
That's hard to beat.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, p. j. alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I used to write poetry in that style mostly because it was annoying.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Steven Desjardins
I could see the following strategy. Put a really good sensor and
electronics into a minimalist body and sell it as cheap as you can in
a K mount body. Don't worry about size or weather sealing or any of
that stuff. High IQ and low price are the only notable features.
Maybe they were trying for
BTW, I can't find any info on whether this thing will AF with the old
screw drive lenses. Anybody?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I could see the following strategy. Put a really good sensor and
electronics into a minimalist body and sell
The little hole is to fit an inflation nipple like for a basketball.
Add some air and it turns into a K5.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:31 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Well, the rumors were pretty much on target.
Here's the Press
What an odd image! The clarity is wonderful. I find the rendering of
the fingers striking.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was combing through my archives (as it were) and came across an image and
thought I should get some input on it.
Wow, you really do live in the sticks.
It is nicely done. BTW
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Nice pic. I concur on the crop.
On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:46 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Thank you all, friends.
The cropping suggestions sound good, I
Finally, someone more deluded than Pentax ;-)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
how the hell are you
supposed to use it with anything longer than (say) 150mm lenses?
There's
Composing on the rear screen is just dandy with a tripod or monopod.
I use a monopod at the races and it works fine. Handholding a big
lens without an eye-level VF is just nuts.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally, someone more deluded than Pentax
This is true, larry, but these complaints typically come from
different people. Most of the PDMLers are just fine with the K5, and
OK with the Kr. The 645D is REALLY expensive, and the Q is a bit
nichey for the price.
This camera directly competes with the NEX 5N, which is about $700
with a kit
Look, Stan, if you're just going to be reasonable I'm going to have to
go over to the Pentax Forums for entertainment.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
This is true, larry, but these complaints
Maybe it's just me, but I think she has a doll-like quality in this
shot. As a matter of fact, I would have believed it was a doll if you
had told me that. Maybe it's just bedtime.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:47 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 February 2012 04:49, Larry Colen
It's OK. I had to laugh at the designer's signature.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
If the price point is right and it's a K5 sensor that it might be
quite a deal. It doesn't look like there is an EVF, which would be
bad for long lenses. I think that new 40 might get all the press.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:05 PM, George Sinos gsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure if this link has
The biggest problem may simply be the lack of any advantages. It's
not that much smaller, no eye level viewfinder, kind weird looking,
etc. I don't see it being cheaper than the Kr. At least the Q was a
compact.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Heh:
Between the US and the UK, we've fought almost everyone at least once,
including each other.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/02/2012 6:18 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Ritax? This being a Pentax list I think Pentoh is more appropriate
Be careful how you reply, Cotty. He's from California and that stuff
is legally binding.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:06 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 30/1/12, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Of course,
that's what makes the
The funny part of the rumors is that someone form photoblog or some
other such site supposed called it butt ugly. I'm really curious at
this point, if not flush with buying cash.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't remember if this was linked in
Wow. I can only defer to your hyperpunousity. Neat picture, BTW.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Larry Colen
This weeks entrant in the field of perseverance in the face of
adversity:
Geez, Frank, how do you find these shots?
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Paul Stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
A nice moment.
On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:45 PM, frank theriault wrote:
In Canada, a gentleman always ties his lady's skates:
The DR of film cured many ills, at least if you didn't shoot slides.
I generally rely now on AE in reasonable light, but switch to manual
and the histogram otherwise. Of course, that's often simply making
the best of a bad situation. As for viewfinders, all I have to do it
pick up my old SP500
Pics or it didn't happen. ;-)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:05 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all.
Was invited to my daughters house last night for supper, and took the
K-5 to play with the low indoor light at her townhouse, and take
photos of her new kitten.
Set the ISO
Nobody belongs in Saskatchewan. . . .And to a first approximation,
nobody lives there either.
Oooh. A joint Mark!
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:24 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody belongs in Saskatchewan.
And to a first
Good work. Hope it goes well. Also, good luck on the lottery ;-)
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Jens,
Congratulations and good for you!
The late 50's and early 60's are dangerous ages for employment.
You frequently know too much and grow
I recently asked for this in a DSLR.
And people scoffed ...
But we always scoff at you, Colin.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
I recently asked for this in a DSLR.
And people scoffed ...
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who
http://www.amazon.com/Pentax-K-x-Digital-18-55mm-Navy/dp/B002PJ40RI/ref=pd_rhf_ee_p_t_1
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
All gone. I guess it was one of Amazon's flash sales.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Pentax-K-x-Digital-18-55mm-Navy/dp/B002PJ40RI/ref=pd_rhf_ee_p_t_1
--
Steve Desjardins
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
In Virginia that would be a real gun. ;-)
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:25 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
The title is a line from a favourite Guess Who song, Rain Dance.
Don't know why I like it, but I do:
Very good. I wouldn't have known it was an HDR image.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Mark, I don't think the bit of movement does any real harm, but did you avoid
high ISO? What camera did you use?
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Mark
Batch of Low Light Stuff describes it perfectly. Not. ;-) That's a
wonderful set of images.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:09 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome, with the emphasis on awe.
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed
That's pretty clever in a PS. Are any others like this?
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
I recently asked for this in a DSLR.
And people scoffed ...
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he
That's OK. We're not a particularly subtle group.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Sam L samthegr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On 1/24/2012 1:00 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Sam L samthegr...@gmail.com:
snip
I am a new
watches. I have one from my grandfather(mom's
side() but its in a safety deposit box along with some jewelry.
Dave
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
My grandfather's gold pocket watch, form about 1965:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml
On consumer PS cameras, it's one more thing to explain and
potentially support. Since the vast majority of PS owners don't even
know what RAW is, the manufacturers just don't want to complicate
matters. IMHO, that is ;-) DSLRs, EVILs, and advanced compacts that I
know of all support RAW.
On
I really like these. I didn't recall you getting the M9, but that's
only a small example of my forgetfulness. If I had gotten an M9, it
would be the right camera for a long time ;-) What lens?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 24, 2012, at
What was your opinion, Dario?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
John Coyle wrote about of the Q:
Dario had one when we met in Ravenna.
Not mine. I got it from Pentax importers for testing and tell them my
opinion.
Dario
--
PDML
To be fair, he openly admits to his reaction and tacitly acknowledges
a problem with it. He needs the photo equivalent of AA.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Underpaid N. Overpentaxed wrote:
snobs have class or try to. this sounds more like a
It doesn't look that sturdy.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On 1/25/2012 12:00 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I present a perfect gift from/for a PDMLer ... http://goo.gl/e0IqO
And I quote:
Riding in style doesn’t mean you can’t be packing.
--
Larry
The Email system at my University keeps every email sent. It's
required by US law.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
P. J. Alling
*http://preview.tinyurl.com/7jn8rdj
Makes me glad that
801 - 900 of 3764 matches
Mail list logo
