decent pic last year with it!
Perhaps this time next year after the legislation is clarified we will
be able to compare probation officers and custody sergeants
Regards
Peter
On 18/04/2008, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/4/08, Peter Fairweather, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was prohibited
I was prohibited from taking pictures of my grandson's under 10
football team by a league official
I looked up the Football Association guidelines which were eminently
sensible and pointed out the legal rughts we have to take pictures in
public places.
I did make one unpardonable error which
Brian
My favourite reject is the church
http://supera.myjalbum.net/Pentax_Photo_Gallery_Submissions/Declined_Images/slides/IMGP2987pg.html
Not too fussy for me anyway and fantastic lighting
Thanks
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I like interiors so I've tried walking around with a 8mm Peleng. It's
unlikely that I'll ever be allowed ro stand where I like in the Blue
Mosque in Istanbul again. ( I was with a party of police officers )
More practically the 12-24mm Sigma is good in churches too.
The essential accessory is
Godfrey
The left side of the photo appears blurred. Is this a centering defect
in your Pentax 16-50 DA*?
If not can I be the first to out you as a Sigma user???!!
Peter ;)
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/12-goofin.jpg
Goofin' - San Francisco 2008
Pentax K10D + DA* 16-50/2.8
ISO 800 @
On 25/03/2008, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 8:33 AM, David Savage wrote:
I see it as a means of providing 'creative constraint' ... limiting
yourself to just so many exposures, just that spectral response,
speed, grain, etc frees
I didn't even nknow that the minimum setence had been reduced!
Peter
On 23/03/2008, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/3/08, Cesar Matamoros II, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am way behind on the list - thus the tardy reply...
I spent a month in Australia in 2006
This could explain a
I bought mine mainly after reading the excellent reviews on here, in
particular from Godfrey.
I'm currently thinking of selling some lenses I don't use that much
such as the FA 28mm, but this one will stay. It is light, high
qualityand unobtrusive. An ideal walk around lens
Peter
On 14/03/2008,
Here goes, not all these answers are serious ;)
Peter
On 06/03/2008, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. How long will it take for my hand to stop telling me the front
back wheels are awkwardly placed after 4 years carrying a *ist-D?
Not before you have upgraded to the model after next
Please don't, I've seen some worryingly good photos from the K20D.
Looks about the best IQ around. Must buy a lottery ticket to raise the
cash.
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Mark
And the conclusion is? Not one to criticise surveys but I trust you
don't teach Research Methods ;)
Peter
On 28/02/2008, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AlunFoto wrote:
I like IE7.
Never seen any of those clusterphuck issues you mention, whatever
that word means... :-)
Yeah, but did they *have* to talk about megapixels?
Yes!!!
It's the high megapixel count that makes the K20D a possible success
story. I wouldn't even mention the weather sealing. Definitely no
reference required to the quality of the pictures!!
I worked out that a full frame
I might be wrong but doesn't the guide number go up ny the square root of two.
If the GN is 30 at 100 !SO it is 40 at 200 ISO and 60 at 400 ISO
Peter
On 28/02/2008, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry that was a bit convoluted. Just remember the GN (in this case 22
in meters)
Wendy
Another thing which I have read is that the guide numbers are based on
the flash being used in an averagely reflective room. Outdoors the
guide number is effectively reduced by one stop. So the 36 0f the 360
Pentax flash becomes 25.
The other dodge to watch out for is which focal length
Next week's Amateur Photographer in the UK has a newspaper style
insert, The Amateur Photographer Iformer
Samsung feature very strongly with a 2 page advertisement centre
spread on the GX20. On the front page you can read about their plans
to produce their own lenses rather than rely on Tokina.
Okay, let's get this straight:
But Samsung do seem increasingly to be trying to distance themselves
from Pentax, at least for public consumption.
Joe
I agree. So why would a company with a very limited background in this
field be trying to distance thenselves from Pentax?
Do they know
This is in good condition with front and rear caps. Can take Paypal or
UK cheque.
Turns manual lenses into AF so my A*200mm f/2.8 becomes a 340mm f/5
An absolute bargain at £210. UK postage free. At cost to other countries
I might even be tempted to sell the 200mm soon, as at my age manual
Most people on this forum won't be bothered one way or the other ;-)
Peter
On 21/02/2008, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds cool. I'll be interested to hear what you think of it in use. :-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Interesting to see whether the DA*300 is better. As I'm thinking of
selling my FA300mm, I have a perverse interest in a poor review from
Klaus!!
Incidentally how many people use a telephoto for the pupose of
photographing tree branches against the sky. Secondly what do they
photograph instead
Is that a typo? Sep 2008 I Thought!
Peter
On 17/02/2008, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/02/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just know that
they will come up with a full frame, full K-Mount compatable pro
specified body in September
2009.
Yer drinking moose-juice
Three is always the great Nobel prizewinner himself!!
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/compatibility-lens.htm
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
I'm not sure about the full amount but I'm sure that I could manage a
substantial deposit!!!
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Thiboiulle
Thanks for this. I've put on my special VDU focal length glasses and
blown up the images a bit on my 24 monitor. So that they just fit on
the screen. Here are my completely unscientific conclusions.
C*n** 40D. Rubbish, does not resolve the detail on the flower on the
shoulder even at
for
atmosphere in BandW can look just plain wrong in colour.
Peter
On 08/02/2008, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Fairweather wrote:
C*n** 40D. Rubbish, does not resolve the detail on the flower on the
shoulder even at low ISO.
It was out of focus to begin with. if you look
Give the guy some credit, he was a trailblazer who transcended the
petty link between the review of a camera and the need to actually
hold it.
Many have followed his lead. In next Tuesday's Amateur Photographer
there is a comparison between the Canom 1DsIII, medium format film and
the Mamiya ZD.
It might be rubbish but on this occasion he acknowledges his source
which is a direct paste from Pentax. Hence the rubbish??
Peter
On 25/01/2008, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 1:47 AM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Looks more like a rosé drinker's hat to me. Unfortunately it also
looks safer and safer as each cropped body comes out. The K1D will not
be full frame and I don't hold out much hope for the K0.1D either.
Silly name for a camera? Now there's one area that Pentax lead the field in!!
Peter
On
Mr Davis
It's a shame your grammar school did not teach you that the poop is
not the same as poop. So the poop on Ken Rockwell's complexion is
that it is poop coloured.
You old Nikon users need to move with the times.
Peter ;)
On 25/01/2008, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr Rockwell,
Sorry can't let this attempt to demonise phone users pass.
Of course it's not a good idea but in the scale of things which cause
the driver to lose concentration it comes well below driving with
Small children
Dogs
Full colour screen sat navs
lighting cigarettes
and last but not least (in your
Probably just looks as though it needs something to liven it up
because of the rather flat colours from the CMOS sensor in his
favoured make of camera.
Trouble is that effect will be available for us, if the rumours of the
new sensor are true!!
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I have also read that there is no improvement with hands free.
IF this is true it would hardly be surprising given the false sense of
security which you would expect to be associated with these smug folk
prattling away.
Except for those who were choking on the hat of their choice of course.
As is damnation!!
On 14/01/2008, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment is irrelevant.
Irrelevance is futile.
Futility is hopeless.
Hope is eternal...
-p
Ken Waller wrote:
Enlightenment is irrelevant.
Irrelevance is futile.
Futility is hopeless.
Kenneth
Excellent stuff. Mind you as a marketing strategy it's an improvement
on the TWO page advert for the about to be discontinued K10D in this
week's Amateur Photographer magazine in the UK.
Sometimes I despair of their marketing people
Peter
On 14/01/2008, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point Paul. I just checked in my new diary. It doesn't even have
a provisional date for hell freezing over, let alone the K20D in the
shops.
Mind you with the Borg due to assimilate us in just over three
centuries, I hope Pentax get their act together in time to ensure a
reasonable return
What is wrong with Tuvok? Spock looks like a superannuated Nikon F
user from the sixties.
Peter
On 14/01/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/14/2008 10:43:37 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can't find the Call Spock, button
Dave
I've got one with exactly the same problem. Is their a cure as it's
nice to have a light body with my 12-24mm Sigma? The grip adds too
much weight
Mine isn't for sale (yet)
Peter
The *ist would work nicely. It just so happens that I have one with a
dysfunctional shutter release. The
The answer is in your first post
CW
grumpy because the wife is late getting out of work and we're supposed to go
out for dinner.
Get her a second job. This should both improve her timekeeping and
provide you with the money for essential purchases!!!
A further benefit will be to your self esteem
The Christmas show Extras written by and starring Ricky Gervais had
a couple of scenes where a member of the paparazzi was carrying a K10D
with a 50-200 DA zoom.
Well done Pentax, good product placement
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
All Islay malts have what they describe as a peaty or smoky
flavour. I found it disgusting too.
Speyside malts are better. I was also partial to any type of Glenmorangie.
Since it's three years since I gave up drinking, my recollections may
be faulty!!
Peter
On 28/12/2007, keith_w [EMAIL
I like the gritty look. Is this creative use of the noisy small sensor? ;)
Peter
On 21/12/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007, at 12:06 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/52d.htm
Pretty in an industrial sort of way.
I'm thinking of selling my FA 50mm f/1.7. Bought it new three years
ago. Excellent lens
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
A
Contax RTSII with Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 - sold when I got divorced. As the
lens said made in West Germany, it's probably worth more now.
B
Given that I rarely use my Z1p why would I want an LX and a MZ-S? It
must be some form of addiction.
Since I got my 67II, the only excuse left for poor
Watching people taking flash pictures at large sporting events and
producing perfect pictures of the row in front of them
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
I'm sure this is just stupidity on my part but I'm fairly new to the
K10D as well.
I bought my camera nearly new a month ago. Every time I download the
pictures via the card reader, I delete all the images on the card when
it is back in the camera. Unfortunately the numbering system reverts
to
turn on file name.
Dave
On 11/1/07, Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/1/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Fairweather wrote:
I've even looked at the manual without success. I'm sure this wasn't a
problem on my DS. Any hints?
Darn, I'd swear
John
Thanks to advice received here I've cracked the numbering problem.
I do wonder whether formatting the card each time is better than deleting all.
Perhaps someone can enlighten os?
Peter
On 01/11/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Peter Fairweather
I'm sure
But despite all the hype about huge resolution, none of then have an
output exactly at 1080 which is needed for widescreen or support the
1080p standard.
Or should I be more sceptical about what I read on the internet?
Peter
On 30/10/2007, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: William
On 20/10/2007, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd actually be surprised if they went for a 12 or 14 bit variant from
Sony, or any 3rd party producer, seeing as the K10D has a special A/D
converter designed by Pentax.
I don't believe
It'll need more than that to create the horizontal and diagonal lines
to match the existing vertical patterns ;))
Peter
That depends, if those extra 2MP come with a stop or two better noise,
they just might.
I can only confirm it won't be just 2 MP of difference ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
The A* 200/2.8 was my first foray into good glass. I've still got it,
and with the smaller sensor of the DSLRs it's getting a fair bit more use,
especially paired with the AF 1.7x adapter
Oddly enough I am thinking of selling this combination. My eyesight is
not up to manual focus and I have the
On 15/10/2007, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/10/07, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
Make it so.
- Jean Luc Picard
Cheers,
Cotty
Indeed!
-Teal'c
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
In the words of Commander Data
Could you please continue the petty bickering? I find it most intriguing.
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Good point!! I'll let you know how it's done when I've got the back open.
On 26/09/2007, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Winder!
Man, I didn't know I could load film into the d camera!
BTW the extra batteri unit is excellent. It's great to have two batteries -
at leas one of them
fora!!
Regards
Peter
On 27/09/2007, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A hammer cold chisel would be more entertaining.
Cheers,
Dave
On 9/27/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A band saw will probably help you in that endeavor.
Peter Fairweather wrote:
Good point!! I'll
Doesn't it depend on which endo you start from??
Peter
On 26/09/2007, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine doesn't, Tom.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack, that just plain stinks.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
This is as much a monetary as a photographic question. I have found
the Grand Prix model of the K10D complete with upgraded software and
winder for less than £600.
Opinions seem divided here on the value of the winder. I've even seen
it blamed for VPN, but that was on another less knowledgeable
Thanks for the advice everyone. The collectible aspect is a red
herring (as opposed to a gold and snakeskin LX one!!) unless you keep
it unused in the unopened box.
I'm off tomorrow to look at a K10 refurb with 12 months Pentax
guarantee for £370. Guess I can download the latest version of the
Now Cotty, if you were to take a hammer to the lens mount so that it
could be used on a 4/3rds mount Olympus, it would be a 4000mm lens
equivalent. Then there is the cost of the concrete required as a solid
block to mount it instead of a tripod to cut down the vibrations. Then
there is the truck
Isn't that an amazing font he uses on his graphics program? I hope you
sent him a donation to further his work
Peter
On 15/09/2007, Peter Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a bit like my dog explaining quantum mechanics.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mtf.htm
Thew most accurate and
On 15/09/2007, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scintillator
scintillator (sîn´tl-â´ter) noun
A substance that glows when hit by high-energy particles or photons.
So would that account for the very odd skin colour he has in some of
his self portraits?
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Did any of you know that it is possible to fit an EOS lens to the K10D?
This chap was selling a 600mm f/4 with IS. In one of his sample images
there is a white object with a brown background.
Thanks Godfrey. Playing with ACR 4.1 has encouraged me to shoot a lot
more RAW images. Now I have no excuse for not buying the K10D!!
Peter
On 01/09/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 1, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Peter Fairweather wrote:
I was looking at the sliders in RAW ( after
I was looking at the sliders in RAW ( after loading an image in ACR
4.1 in CS3 ).
There is one called clarity in the same group as vibrancy and
saturation. What is it? Neither of my books show it. I am using the
Windows version, their images appear to be from the MAC version.
It appears to act
I found the following comparison on photo net in the Pentax 67 forum.
I hope the author doesn't sue me for breach of copyright
I've used both lenses extensively and must say I prefer the
performance of the 105 mm at middle apertures in landscape
applications. The 90 is quite uniform in contrast
I thought it might be helpful to give a more accurate translation of
no longer a priority
Imagine the scene. As far as the eye can see, there is a solid sheet
of ice. The only living things are a pig circling in the sky and
Mephistopheles trying to take a picture of this desolate vista but
Should be some cheap FA 77's for sale soon!!
Peter
On 07/08/07, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to be excellent performer, in picture center almost as good
as FA 77 at the same aperture!!!
http://forum.digitalfotonetz.com/viewtopic.php?t=38914
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
I bought the A*200mm f2.8. It has stunning bokeh, but I find that the
manual focussing is tricky for my level of eyesight. Beautifully made
- of course.
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 27/07/07, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? Where is it under £400.00? Or do you mean before VAT?
John
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:51:00 +0100, Peter Fairweather
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The K10D body has dropped from £550 a month ago to under £400 in the
UK. Sounds like a major
The K10D body has dropped from £550 a month ago to under £400 in the
UK. Sounds like a major new camera release is about to happen.
I'll hang on to my wide angle primes for a bit until the size of the
new sensor is known.
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Michel
It all depends on whether the fireworks are tungsten or daylight balanced!!
Excellent shots, much better than I have managed. Of course a tripod
is a good idea provided you can set up in advance. The last time I
missed most of the display as I hunted for mine.
ISO 800 is good on my DS
Read all about it!!!
http://www.pentaximaging.com/footer/news_media_article?ArticleId=9997175
6mp, dudst removal, support for SDM lenses
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hardly worth the cost of repair. I'll take it off your hands if you
pay half the postage ;)
On 05/06/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a classic example of a sticky aperture lever. Flip the lever
on the lens a couple times, if it's at all slow in returning, get the
lens
Excellent picture Paul to inspire those of us with lesser skills.
For Photoshop, beginners might find Ken Rockwell's tips useful. I certainly did.
This is neither a jest nor an attempt to become the first person to be
barred from the list!!
Peter
On 28/05/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It makes a nice change to see someone trying to measure real life
computing speed with a package I actually use.
In the UK the magazine tests involve games I've never heard of. Having
thankfully missed out on versions 1 - 26 of Doom or whatever, the
fact that Doom 27 can be run at even higher
Can't the focus just be set to infinity?
Peter
Mmm my any approaching experience has been trying to focus my Tamron
500/8 on my K10D (with tripod of course). I was inside and tried to
shoot the moon through the window.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
What about the *D or theKIst??
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Arrived today for only £205 for the extended version.
I love these UK prices!!
Regards
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Helps to work at a university with Adobe of course
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Looks like you rich American O'C**'s win again!!
Peter
US educational price for CS3 extended (full version, not an upgrade)
is $289.95.
I think with current exchange rates, we get a better deal over here. :-)
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
This whole SDHC issue confuses me. At the moment I use a Transcend 2Gb
150x card on my DS. Although the camera doesn't use all the speed, the
card reader does when downloading. I am now thinking of moving to SDHC
and 4gb for when I get the K10d or start shooting more RAW. This is
the choice in the
wrote:
Peter, class 6 means 6MB/s minimum.
There's no class faster than class6. An hypthetical card at 80MB/s
would still be labeled class6, as for current specifications.
2007/3/27, Peter Fairweather [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This whole SDHC issue confuses me. At the moment I use a Transcend
Please do not ask equipment questions which you think Godfrey will
respond to. I had enough trouble explaining to senior management where
the 20-35mm had come from. Now I will have to go through the same
process with the 14mm!!
Fortunately I do not have to worry for the next month as my DS is in
I'm betting it will be very similar in size and weight to the 645NII
model, overall. That doesn't bother me at all for this kind of
camera. A system kit with a wide and a very wide lens, lots of
battery power and storage cards, a sturdy tripod and remote
release ... I'll be in heaven.
If
uhh... who here has *NEVER* misread something?
Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone.
So far as I know only one member of this list has never misread anything!!
I'm not sure that the word stone adequately represents the very
glutinous nature of the object being throwm
Peter
--
Why are you so cruel to Kenny. He was right about the D40X before it came out.
After Reagan Clinton and Bush, I would have thought he was a
reasonable bet for President!!!
Peter
On 3/6/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He had credibility before this
Mike Hamilton wrote:
The UK magazine Amateur Photographer has its prize winner issue out.
The K100D wins budget SLR!
Even more remarkably, the front cover opens out to give a THREE page
advert from Pentax for the camera.
As a bonus, the new editor is the man who recently gave the K10D a
very good review
Whatever
Jim
Thanks for the advice, the price is really tempting. I've bookmarked the site
Peter
On 2/17/07, Jim King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim King wrote on Saturday, 17 feb 2007
If you could buy a K10D for the price of this Pentax lens may I
suggest a very good and much cheaper alternate?
Dear List
As I have a birthday coming up, it is sometimes possible to persuade
the financial controller of the importance of a special purchase.
I have located the Pentax 1000mm mirror lens at a fairish price. Has
anyone here experience of it?
I have a 500mm Tamron mirror lens which is OK but a
On 2/15/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Fairweather wrote:
Dear List
As I have a birthday coming up, it is sometimes possible to persuade
the financial controller of the importance of a special purchase.
I have located the Pentax 1000mm mirror lens at a fairish price
Of course the hacksaw is an extra cost if you buy the A* 85 F1.4
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Godfrey
So after frequently extolling to us the virtue of the 20-35mm f4 zoom,
it didn't make the final line up!!!
I used my new one for the first time at the weekend on a Z1p, looking
forward to seeing the results
Regards
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Remember the fuss about pirate Sandisk cards on the internet? I'm
afraid it's still caveat emptor whatever the label says on it.
Although I've seen the opposite advice, I agree with Godfrey about
using the camera to delete, format etc. Why introduce another possible
set of incompatibilities and
There have been quite a few obsolete formats. Remember APS film
cameras? Soon be able to add th and the digital equivalent APS-C to
the Wikipedia lists together with the DA lenses!!
Peter
Full frame Pentax Lenses a speciality
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yet another offer only available to our former colonial empire.
Perhaps the Japanese emperor could put in a word on behalf of we
former colonial masters in the UK!!
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
How can you even be DISCUSSING this device when it doesn't have an FM
SIMULATOR. All my SPECIAL AERIALS are now made OBSOLETE for the sake
of a PART which would cost less than 10 cents.
Peter
On 1/12/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Erickson
I run a university business school in Kent. I'm attempting to retire
early as the best part of the job has become taking photos for the in
house magazine and the external relations department.
Why are their so few female contributors to this list? Does this
reflect camera users as a whole or just
Instead of being cruel about Ken Rockwell, try reading his work.
Nowhere also has the basic spec of the new Canon 7d. Not only can he
review cameras he hasn't used, he can even do this for cameras which
don't yet exist. 24 meg sensor, 3.1 frames per second continuous he
informs us. What a guy!!
Not as perverse as using C***n cameras
Peter
On 1/2/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/1/07, Peter Fairweather, discombobulated, unleashed:
Why are their so few female contributors to this list? Does this
reflect camera users as a whole or just list users possibly?
I have
£499 body only at Wilkinson camera advertised in Amateur Photographer
6th Jan p85.
Website shows £100 more.
Anywhere cheaper in the UK? Just bought a TV so I'll be passing this
time. The Chief Accountant would not be amused
Also there was an actual siting of the camera on the shelf in Jessops
in
The ebay santa gave me a 90-180 zoom for my 67ii. Mrs Santa gave me
some warm clothes for standing still while it chugs away on f45. Now
all I need is a custom built concrete block for my tripod and an
overdraft for a selection of 95mm filters
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
