Re: Hi to Cotty...

On 23/4/21, Cameron Hood, discombobulated, unleashed: >Just stopped by to say hi. I'll drop you a line again when I get back to >the UK. Cheers dude! -- Cheers Cotty -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pd

Hi to Cotty...

Just stopped by to say hi. I’ll drop you a line again when I get back to the UK. Take care. Thanks, Cameron Sent from my iPad -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and

Re: Cotty

On 12/4/21, l...@red4est.com, discombobulated, unleashed: >Yup, and getting rounder all the time. True. -- Cheers Cotty -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the l

Re: Cotty

On 12/4/21, Cameron Hood, discombobulated, unleashed: >Just wondering if Cotty is still around? I've been to England twice now >and forgot to look him up. Known him online since the 90's. Well there's a blast from the past. Luckily my hiding place was a good one ;-) I'm still here - I do

Re: Cotty

Cotty just posted something a couple of hours before you asked.. alive and well vac'd too. ann On 4/12/2021 1:52 PM, Cameron Hood wrote: Just wondering if Cotty is still around? I’ve been to England twice now and forgot to look him up. Known him online since the 90’s. Thanks, Cameron Sent

Re: Cotty

On April 12, 2021 10:52:05 AM PDT, Cameron Hood wrote: >Just wondering if Cotty is still around? I’ve been to England twice now >and forgot to look him up. Known him online since the 90’s. Yup, and getting rounder all the time. > >Thanks, >Cameron >Sent from my iPad >--

Cotty

Just wondering if Cotty is still around? I’ve been to England twice now and forgot to look him up. Known him online since the 90’s. Thanks, Cameron Sent from my iPad -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: Happy Birthday Cotty

On 15/1/21, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: >And many more of them! Cheers Michael -- Cheers Cotty -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link direc

Re: Happy Birthday Cotty

On 14/1/21, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed: >Ya doddering old sod. Cheers! I prefer Old Fart. -- Cheers Cotty -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vi

Re: Happy Birthday Cotty

And many more of them! > On 15 January 2021 at 01:11 Larry Colen wrote: > > > Ya doddering old sod. > > -- > Larry Colen > l...@red4est.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Happy Birthday Cotty

Ya doddering old sod. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: PESO: Blue Iris -- Caution! PUN thread started by cotty!

On 5/19/2020 8:12 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 18/5/20, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed: The first of our iris to bloom this spring: http://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2020/5/18/iris Fabulous shot Dan. The subject line caught my eye ;-) | It looked really

Re: OT: For Cotty

ngthy hiatus, she'll be doing some more podcasts soon so she's very much in full-on music mode atm. I'm just the techy who makes it all work ;-) -- /|___ Cheers ///|

Re: OT: For Cotty

Very nice. I thought the name Darling West sounded familiar, KPIG played their latest album 2 cuts at a time a few weeks ago on their fresh pork chops feature. On April 30, 2020 9:15:59 AM PDT, John wrote: >You've posted here before about your wife's American Roots Music >podcast, so >when I

OT: For Cotty

You've posted here before about your wife's American Roots Music podcast, so when I ran across this I immediately thought of y'all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55sJZrEJjrQ ... a couple of bands from the AmericanaFest UK got together to make a YouTube video covering an old Jackson Browne

Re: GESO: Olifants views for Cotty et al

Makes me kind of wonder if they're "Hungry, Hungry". On 10/14/2018 17:07, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: That's a lot of Hippos! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 8:24 AM Alan C wrote: Olifants in flood, March 2014. Olifants low water, August

Re: GESO: Olifants views for Cotty et al

Thanks, Dan. I make it 60+. Alan C On 14-Oct-18 11:07 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: That's a lot of Hippos! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 8:24 AM Alan C wrote: Olifants in flood, March 2014. Olifants low water, August 2013 Hippos -

Re: GESO: Olifants views for Cotty et al

That's a lot of Hippos! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 8:24 AM Alan C wrote: > Olifants in flood, March 2014. > Olifants low water, August 2013 > Hippos - FF. > Ellies - FF - to the left of the Hippos & somewhat further away. > > All

Re: GESO: Olifants views for Cotty et al

On 14/10/18, Alan C, discombobulated, unleashed: >Hippos - FF. <https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/44399003155/in/album-72157696548914240/> Wider! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and || (O) |Live Broad

GESO: Olifants views for Cotty et al

Olifants in flood, March 2014. Olifants low water, August 2013 Hippos - FF. Ellies - FF - to the left of the Hippos & somewhat further away. All looking about SSW from the Olifants Camp viewpoint This lot should give you a good idea of the environment. Enough water but no grazing.

Re: the full not for Cotty gallery

t's with all the shithouses Future calendar Dave > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, > || (O) |Web Video Production > -- > _ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L

Re: the full not for Cotty gallery

On 18 Oct 2016, at 22:28, Steve Cottrell wrote: > > On 18/10/16, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2016-fall-1/album/index.html > > > Holy Mary Mother of God. > > 875 for me. > > What's with all the shithouses Mark!

Re: the full not for Cotty gallery

On 18/10/16, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: >http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2016-fall-1/album/index.html Holy Mary Mother of God. 875 for me. What's with all the shithouses -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Product

Re: the full not for Cotty gallery

David, I believe photography was just the icing on the cake; being there alone must have been a most pleasant experience itself. Thanks for the feel. Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/

RE: the full not for Cotty gallery

David J Brooks wrote: http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2016-fall-1/album/index.html Great gallery. Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

the full not for Cotty gallery

http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2016-fall-1/album/index.html Dave -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to

Re: OT - RIP Rover Defender - For Cotty

_campaign=awdailydrive Thanks Ken. Yep well aware. Also - nearly 70 pc of Defenders (inc original Land Rovers pre 1983 when the marque was designated 'Defender') are still on the road. Mine's a 2011 model with 60k miles and only just run in ;-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corpor

PESO(s) A couple of old defenders for Cotty.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20dkgreen.html https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20ltgreen.html I went to a memorial service for an old friend today, and probably wouldn't have taken these photos if it weren't for all the defender talk

OT - RIP Rover Defender - For Cotty

Sad but true. Over 2 million built since 1948 http://autoweek.com/article/car-news/land-rover-defender-production-ends-friday?utm_source=DailyDrive20160129_medium=enewsletter_term=headline-center_content=body_campaign=awdailydrive Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

Re: [OT] It's British and involves a cat, Star Trek and puns: It has "Cotty" written all over it.

On 12/11/15, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: >http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-norfolk-34797513 Nowt to see 'ere. Best line: Staff at the centre floated a number of names but settled on Brian -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Vi

Re: [OT] It's British and involves a cat, Star Trek and puns: It has "Cotty" written all over it.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, at 07:13 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: > On 12/11/15, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-norfolk-34797513 > > Nowt to see 'ere. > > Best line: Staff at the centre floated a number of names but settled on > Brian > An excellent

[OT] It's British and involves a cat, Star Trek and puns: It has "Cotty" written all over it.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-norfolk-34797513 -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

On 9/2/15, John, discombobulated, unleashed: unless he decides he ain't gonna' do it. I keep my word. I may not eat the whole hat as I like to wear it now and again. But I will eat it. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

I don't want to think how you intend to get it back after it's been digested. EEE!!! Jack - Original Message - From: Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 7:11:57 AM Subject: Re: Easy on Cotty, folks On 9/2/15, John

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 7:11:57 AM Subject: Re: Easy on Cotty, folks On 9/2/15, John, discombobulated, unleashed: unless he decides he ain't gonna' do it. I keep my word. I may not eat the whole hat as I like to wear it now and again. But I will eat it. -- I don't want

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

Nobody has yet offered a cogent explanation of why ANYONE should be easy on Cotty... http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:26 AM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Anybody who's pulled a string out of a cat understands this... On 2/10/2015 10:21 AM, Jack Davis

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

Am 10.02.15 um 16:11 schrieb Steve Cottrell: I keep my word. I may not eat the whole hat as I like to wear it now and again. But I will eat it. You mean you can eat your hat and have it? Ralf -- Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

Well actually the Q was released as a crop frame camera, the Q-7 was full frame unless there's a larger sensor Q in the future... On 2/9/2015 3:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote: CollinB wrote: This is, after all, a forthcoming Ricoh body. Pentax is not a company. It is merely a trademark. That

RE: Easy on Cotty, folks

That's no excuse, Collin! If it says Pentax on the camera, Cotty has a moral duty to break out the sauce. John in Brisbane - Original Message - From: CollinB coll...@brendemuehl.net To: PDML pdml@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2015 9:10:11 AM Subject: Easy on Cotty, folks

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

CollinB wrote: This is, after all, a forthcoming Ricoh body. Pentax is not a company. It is merely a trademark. That brings up the question of whether he said If Pentax releases a full frame or if he said If there is a Pentax full frame. One could argue that if he said full frame

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

If some corporate entity owning the rights to Pentax trade dress produces a DSLR having a sensor the same size as a 35mm film frame with PENTAX on the front of the penta-prism housing, Cotty eats the hat. ... unless he decides he ain't gonna' do it. In the meantime all the barracks house

Easy on Cotty, folks

This is, after all, a forthcoming Ricoh body. Pentax is not a company. It is merely a trademark. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

I believe I just heard Cotty exhale. Well, I guess it could be the local Beale air base launching a squadron of U2's. Jack - Original Message - From: CollinB coll...@brendemuehl.net To: PDML pdml@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2015 9:10:11 AM Subject: Easy on Cotty, folks

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

I don't remember Cotty qualifying his eat hat statement. NO LOOPHOLES!!! Sheesh, we don't need lawyerially thinking in PDML. Marnie aka Doe ;-) (I am pretty sure that Cotty has an eatable hat stashed away somewhere anyway.) In a message dated 2/8/2015 9:10:24 A.M. Pacific Standard Time

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

...@aol.com wrote: I don't remember Cotty qualifying his eat hat statement. NO LOOPHOLES!!! Sheesh, we don't need lawyerially thinking in PDML. Marnie aka Doe ;-) (I am pretty sure that Cotty has an eatable hat stashed away somewhere anyway.) In a message dated 2/8/2015 9:10:24 A.M. Pacific

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

Quoting Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com: I don't see any cameras being now offered for sale. Nor do i think that time passed does not nullify Cotty's promise... In other words, certain hat lives to cover a certain head for another day. .. Yes - but the days are getting fewer. --

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

No way. He must be forced to eat the entire millinery department of Bloomingdales, Harrods and Galeries Lafayette one after the other and not allowed so much as a drop of Earl Grey in between. Let him eat titfer! B On 8 Feb 2015, at 17:10, CollinB coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote: This is,

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

On 8/2/15, CollinB, discombobulated, unleashed: This is, after all, a forthcoming Ricoh body. Pentax is not a company. It is merely a trademark. Hmmm - the legal ramifications re a 'FF Pentax DSLR' could rumble on longer than my tummy -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

On 8/2/15, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed: In other words, certain hat lives to cover a certain head for another day. .. I agree, Boris. In fact it it's waiting on the plate http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/yum.html -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

-- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production --www.seeingeye.tv _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

This too will pass. Hopefully not too painfully.(OUCH) Jack - Original Message - From: Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2015 2:50:27 PM Subject: Re: Easy on Cotty, folks On 8/2/15, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

: Easy on Cotty, folks On 8/2/15, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed: In other words, certain hat lives to cover a certain head for another day. .. I agree, Boris. In fact it it's waiting on the plate http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/yum.html -- I don't want to achieve immortality

Re: Easy on Cotty, folks

Pt - Cotty - bake a cake, put it on your head, take if off and enjoy! Make a video and prove it to the world. On 2/8/2015 5:49 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 8/2/15, CollinB, discombobulated, unleashed: This is, after all, a forthcoming Ricoh body. Pentax is not a company. It is merely

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

W, discombobulated, unleashed: And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it. I am, slowly being won around. This one is OLED and supposedly one-tenth of the lag rate of previous incarnations... -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, || (O

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

The mirrorless seem to be getting CLOSE to what I want. Sort of like, I'll know it when I see it. Marnie aka Doe :-) In a message dated 1/31/2014 4:46:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, godfreydigio...@me.com writes: On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:31 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote: .. I am still sort of

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On January 31, 2014 7:45:17 PM EST, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote: On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:31 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote: .. I am still sort of the opinion that *my* perfect camera hasn't been made yet. .. It's probably a fact that no camera can ever truly be perfect. I've

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On February 1, 2014 9:37:58 PM EST, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote: On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote: On 1/2/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: If there's one beef I have with all the Fuji cameras of recent years (aside from

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On 3 February 2014 08:18, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: If camera makers opened up their firmware, then I'd probably be able to end up with a 98% perfect camera for no extra money, but nobody listens to Thom Hogan, let alone to me :-/ Cheers, Amen, the Sony RX100.. could benefit

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On Feb 2, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: I've thought about that for the last 5 years or so. Shame there are no custom camera builders, like there are tailors, architects or carpinters; at this point I get so worked up by imperfect cameras that I'd be willing to pay a

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

-first- hands-on-impressions.html?m=1 -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production --www.seeingeye.tv _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On Feb 1, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote: On 31/1/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: I've come across a few that were quite nice, however. This bloke seems to think the EVF is something special. Bit of a fanboy maybe but he's not 100% on it.

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Hmmm. Interesting! Thanks, Cotty. On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote: On 31/1/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: I've come across a few that were quite nice, however. This bloke seems to think the EVF is something special. Bit of a fanboy

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

don't know whether that solution is possible on the Fuji. Interesting! I find moving the EV dial very easy with just my right thumb, without moving my right hand at all. Cat skin ;-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote: On 1/2/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: If there's one beef I have with all the Fuji cameras of recent years (aside from the weird processing required for the X sensors), and with the Sony A7, it's the

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Heh. I thought saw a X-M2 at CES. No longer sure, maybe it was the X-T1. Or the X-E2. Whatever it was, it was brand, brand new. MarnieHuh, probably not. I have conflicting desires to dump my Canon equipment and get the K-3 or a Fujifilm or something similar that is smaller. But the

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On 31/1/14, eactiv...@aol.com, discombobulated, unleashed: *my* perfect camera hasn't been made yet. Mark. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production --www.seeingeye.tv _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote: Heh. I thought saw a X-M2 at CES. No longer sure, maybe it was the X-T1. Or the X-E2. Whatever it was, it was brand, brand new. Marnie Huh, probably not. I have conflicting desires to dump my Canon equipment and get the K-3 or a Fujifilm

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:31 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote: .. I am still sort of the opinion that *my* perfect camera hasn't been made yet. .. It's probably a fact that no camera can ever truly be perfect. I've come across a few that were quite nice, however. G -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On 29/1/14, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed: Give me a bag of cormorants any day. MARK! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production --www.seeingeye.tv _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML

Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

It's a very nice body, similar to OM-D E-M1. I don't mind EVF, the latest iterations are quite good. Magnification could be better though. I'm not planning to get a mirrorless system, but now it would be a tough choice between this and the Olympus. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

The Olympus looks really good, but I'd be leaning towards the SONY a7, despite it's now documented shortcomings, with an adapter it would make my full frame K and M lenses their proper focal lengths again. I really don't like the fly by wire focusing that seems to be the new normal for most

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it. I am, slowly being won around. This one is OLED and supposedly one-tenth of the lag rate of previous incarnations... -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- www.seeingeye.tv

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

of previous incarnations... -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- www.seeingeye.tv _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

. The 56/1.2 looks pretty cool: http://cdn0.mos.techradar.futurecdn.net//art/cameras/Fujifilm/Fuji%20X- T1/Product%20Shots/Fuji_X-T1_34-580-90.jpg or http://tinyurl.com/givesmehorn Cameraporn!!! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production

RE: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

-Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell [...] X-T1 and X100s black. The 56/1.2 looks pretty cool: http://cdn0.mos.techradar.futurecdn.net//art/cameras/Fujifilm /Fuji%20X- T1/Product%20Shots/Fuji_X-T1_34-580-90.jpg or

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

, however hard they push it. I am, slowly being won around. This one is OLED and supposedly one-tenth of the lag rate of previous incarnations... -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- www.seeingeye.tv

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Good point, Bob! Though 80 cormorants would make for a spikey camera... Cheers, --M. \/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment On 29 January 2014 17:26, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: -Original

Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:00:04PM +0200, Attila Boros wrote: It's a very nice body, similar to OM-D E-M1. I don't mind EVF, the latest iterations are quite good. Magnification could be better though. I'm not planning to get a mirrorless system, but now it would be a tough choice between this

OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

://tinyurl.com/phtktos -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production --www.seeingeye.tv _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

) ? That price will come down a bit by the time I could have one, so yes, very interested. DPR: http://tinyurl.com/p34x4jl and http://tinyurl.com/phtktos -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production --www.seeingeye.tv

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

) ? That price will come down a bit by the time I could have one, so yes, very interested. DPR: http://tinyurl.com/p34x4jl and http://tinyurl.com/phtktos -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production --www.seeingeye.tv

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Looks like a nicely designed body, similar aesthetic to the Nikon Df with many discrete dials, buttons and knobs. I hope it has an up to date EVF (on par with the Sony A7/A7r or Olympus E-M1) and feels good in the hand. I know Fuji's lenses are generally quite good; they're building up a decent

Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Nice, but I won't buy one until they come out with a Full Frame model. Wah, wah, wah! ;-) On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)

Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Kind of looks like someone took parts of Sony's new FF mirrorless, and the Olympus OM-D, (doesn't matter which one really), and built a new camera out of the parts around an APS-C sensor. From the front it looks a lot like a nice compact film SLR from the late 80's before AutoFocus took

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

For those that are wondering, a size comparison with the K-3: http://j.mp/1f8Xz5k Pretty similar from the front, but take a look from the top; big difference there. And Cotty, I assume you saw the EVF size comparison on the DPR preview: http://4.static.img-dpreview.com/previews/fujifilm-x-t1

RE: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

-Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Miserere Sent: 28 January 2014 20:34 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out! For those that are wondering, a size comparison with the K-3: http://j.mp/1f8Xz5k

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On 28/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed: For those that are wondering, a size comparison with the K-3: http://j.mp/1f8Xz5k Pretty similar from the front, but take a look from the top; big difference there. And Cotty, I assume you saw the EVF size comparison on the DPR preview: http

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On 28/1/14, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed: And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it. I am, slowly being won around. This one is OLED and supposedly one-tenth of the lag rate of previous incarnations... -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On 28/01/2014 2:33 PM, Miserere wrote: http://4.static.img-dpreview.com/previews/fujifilm-x-t1/images/vf-sizes.jpg?v=2721 Fuji is trying really hard to make me part with my hard-earned money... Not having seen an EVF that doesn't make me hurl, I will probably like this camera from afar.

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On 28/01/2014 3:29 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: If you prefer an SLR you've got to put the mirror box somewhere. The 17.7 registration distance of the X-mount keeps the camera thinner as well. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Bob W wrote: And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it. Same for me. For now. But I expect EVF's will eventually get as good as optical viewfinders and will replace them – the elimination of the moving mirror, prism, etc. will make the cost reduction irresistible

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

On 28/01/2014 6:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Bob W wrote: And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it. Same for me. For now. But I expect EVF's will eventually get as good as optical viewfinders and will replace them – the elimination of the moving mirror, prism, etc.

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 28/01/2014 6:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Bob W wrote: And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it. Same for me. For now. But I expect EVF's will eventually get as good as optical viewfinders and will replace them – the

Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote: Nice, but I won't buy one until they come out with a Full Frame model. Wah, wah, wah! ;-) On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

We haven't seen a lot of cost reduction so far from using EVFs. Take for example two roughly equivalent cameras an EVF Olympus OM-D EM-1 at 16mp and the K-5II. The cameras spec sheets are very similar, weather sealed, Magnesium alloy bodies, With really about equal IQ, both have weather

Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Since the Fuji cameras were designed from the beginning with an APS-C sensor and a whole new lens mount so there is no existing base of lenses designed with a big enough image circle to cover a 24x36mm sensor, Demanding a FF solution is worse than silly. It would be like demanding that

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

I don't believe in the notion that EVFs are primarily intended to be cost reduction. At the present time, they represent the second most expensive single component in these cameras, the primary imager sensor itself being the first most expensive. Inexpensive pentaprism viewfinder technology is

Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Just another argument in favor of a FF DSLR from Pentax. bigger and brighter viewfinder. On 1/29/2014 1:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: I don't believe in the notion that EVFs are primarily intended to be cost reduction. At the present time, they represent the second most expensive single

Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!

Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-) http://www.fujirumors.com/wake-up-its-real-x-t1-announced-live-blogging-press-realease-pre-orders-and-more/ A digital LX? (Yeah, I know it's only APS-C, but this is a legitimate question.) Cheers, —M. \/\/o/\/\ --

Re: For Cotty!!!

On 27/12/13, CollinB, discombobulated, unleashed: http://oklahomacity.craigslist.org/ele/4238293683.html Wretched things -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production --www.seeingeye.tv _ -- PDML

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >