K-x with 18-55 and 55-300 for $569.99
Seems like a good deal if someone is thinking about getting into a kit for a
reasonable amount.
This is time-sensitive (deal is online until they're gone) so if you're
excited, jump now!
(Maybe it's not OT, not sure)
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson -
Useless post without a link. Late post, even if it had a link:
Sellout time: 3:20:57 PM Central Time
(2 minutes before the email was sent).
Now THAT's time sensitive.
: )
Darren
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
K-x with 18-55 and 55-300 for $569.99
On Aug 17, 2011, at 15:33, Darren Addy wrote:
Useless post without a link. Late post, even if it had a link:
Sellout time: 3:20:57 PM Central Time
(2 minutes before the email was sent).
Now THAT's time sensitive.
: )
I thought woot.com pretty much summed it up in terms of links.
I
Well, if you're just itching to spend some dough and don't already have
LR 3, here's a pretty good deal:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B003739DVY/?_encoding=UTF8tag=wwwviolentkicomlinkCode=ur2camp=1789creative=9325
-- Walt
On 8/17/2011 3:38 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Aug 17, 2011, at 15:33,
On May 1, 2010, at 10:02, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Does anyone know why the body only in black is more expensive than a colored
body with the zoom lens? I would prefer not to buy the kit lens as it is
really not a good substitute for either of the zooms I now own.
Get it with the kit and then
I used the kit lens on my K-x once, to see how it worked. Most of the
IMGP shots in this set were shot with it:
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157623732458488/
For a kit lens, it doesn't suck. Apart from my DA40 it might also be
my lightest lens. Which has some benefits.
On
Actually, it isn't bad. I didn't see anything that flew out at me as poor
optics. I'll give mine a whirl when it arrives.
Jeffery
On May 2, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I used the kit lens on my K-x once, to see how it worked. Most of the IMGP
shots in this set were shot with it:
For some reason this flacker link is causing my system to reboot.
(Win2K SP4, Firefox 3.6.3), I tried it three times, three reboots. I'll
only hit myself on the head with a hammer so many times.
On 5/2/2010 4:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I used the kit lens on my K-x once, to see how it worked.
Oh dear, my iMac is not having a problem with it.
Here we go again ;-)
Jeffery
On May 2, 2010, at 4:15 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
For some reason this flacker link is causing my system to reboot. (Win2K
SP4, Firefox 3.6.3), I tried it three times, three reboots. I'll only hit
No problems here...Win7/64 - Firefox 3.6.3
-p
On 5/2/2010 4:27 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Oh dear, my iMac is not having a problem with it.
Here we go again ;-)
Jeffery
On May 2, 2010, at 4:15 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
For some reason this flacker link is causing my system to
On May 2, 2010, at 2:15 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
For some reason this flacker link is causing my system to reboot.
(Win2K SP4, Firefox 3.6.3), I tried it three times, three reboots.
I'll only hit myself on the head with a hammer so many times.
Weird. The reboot problem, not the fact
Jeffery Smith wrote:
While it is apparently marketed toward the average Joe/Jane who might want a
bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on the Pentax K-x? Does anyone
on the forum have and use one?
Yes. Buy it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
2010/5/1 William Robb war...@gmail.com:
Pentax knocked one out of the hockey court with this one.
The what?
Stick with ballparks.
There's a par for every course, isn't there? :-)
I have only played with a K-x for a couple of hours, but it seems like
a very nice little camera. I got a
Does anyone know why the body only in black is more expensive than a colored
body with the zoom lens? I would prefer not to buy the kit lens as it is really
not a good substitute for either of the zooms I now own.
Jeffery
On May 1, 2010, at 3:56 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
2010/5/1 William Robb
Does anyone know why the body only in black is more expensive than a colored
body with the zoom lens?
Marketing.
On 5/1/2010 11:02 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Does anyone know why the body only in black is more expensive than a colored
body with the zoom lens? I would prefer not to buy the
Figures.
On May 1, 2010, at 10:08 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Does anyone know why the body only in black is more expensive than a colored
body with the zoom lens?
Marketing.
On 5/1/2010 11:02 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Does anyone know why the body only in black is more expensive than
Like P.J. says it's Marketing.
You've got to learn to think of it as a special deal only available on
the colored bodies.
I'd like a yellow one please.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:08 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know why the body only in black is
Our major crack house, Henrys Cameras, has the body only about $20
less than with the kit lens.
Dave
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
Figures.
On May 1, 2010, at 10:08 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Does anyone know why the body only in black is more
It begins to sound like you should get the body with the kit lens, those
usually sell for about $100 on ebay. So you'll come out ahead.
On 5/1/2010 12:46 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Our major crack house, Henrys Cameras, has the body only about $20
less than with the kit lens.
Dave
On Sat,
It's the new DA L kit lens, not the mechanically better DA or DA II
version which are the ones which go for $100. Plastic mount, no hood
and no QSF, same optics as the DA II and WR versions though.
-Adam
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:00 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
It begins to
The uninitiated will still pay $100.00.
On 5/1/2010 1:09 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
It's the new DA L kit lens, not the mechanically better DA or DA II
version which are the ones which go for $100. Plastic mount, no hood
and no QSF, same optics as the DA II and WR versions though.
-Adam
On Sat, May
But it would have to be delivered. Thats a no no here, if i want to
see my 58th BD.
dave
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:00 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
It begins to sound like you should get the body with the kit lens, those
usually sell for about $100 on ebay. So you'll come
While it is apparently marketed toward the average Joe/Jane who might want a
bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on the Pentax K-x? Does anyone
on the forum have and use one?
Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
On 4/30/2010 4:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
While it is apparently marketed toward the average Joe/Jane who might want a
bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on the Pentax K-x? Does anyone
on the forum have and use one?
there are probably half a dozen of us that bought one
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
While it is apparently marketed toward the average Joe/Jane who might want a
bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on the Pentax K-x? Does
anyone on the forum have and use one?
Jeffery Smith
Several of us
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen
Subject: Re: Pentax K-x - What say you?
Pentax knocked one out of the hockey court with this one.
The what?
Stick with ballparks.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
On 01/05/2010, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
While it is apparently marketed toward the average Joe/Jane who might want a
bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on the Pentax K-x? Does
anyone on the forum have and use one?
Hi Jeffery,
Firstly welcome aboard, it's a great
for about 5 years because of their famed low noise
at low light levels, but didn't want to switch to the Nikon lens format. The
Pentax K-x is priced about the same as a digicam, and I have several fast
lenses (Sigma 30/1.4 and Pentax 50/1.4) that I could put to good use on the
K-x
between my K-x and K20D, it would be the K-x.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, April 30, 2010, 4:15:38 PM, you wrote:
JS While it is apparently marketed toward the average Joe/Jane who
JS might want a bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on
JS the Pentax K-x? Does anyone on the forum have
:
JS While it is apparently marketed toward the average Joe/Jane who
JS might want a bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on
JS the Pentax K-x? Does anyone on the forum have and use one?
JS Jeffery Smith
JS New Orleans, LA
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
a bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on
JS the Pentax K-x? Does anyone on the forum have and use one?
JS Jeffery Smith
JS New Orleans, LA
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, April 30, 2010, 4:15:38 PM, you wrote:
JS While it is apparently marketed toward the average Joe/Jane who
JS might want a bit better digital camera, what is the verdict on
JS the Pentax K-x? Does anyone on the forum have and use one?
JS Jeffery Smith
JS New
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool!
Did you try out the ISO 12,800? How would you compare the IQ to the
K-7? I have a feeling Sony sensors are better than Samsung sensors,
and the K-x vs the K-7 is reminiscent of the K100D vs K10D: lower MP
count,
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 21:13:13 +0800
Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
It feels more like the *istD vs. *istDS where the 'lesser' model
somewhat improves on the 'higher' model. I did not get to try the
ISO12.8k (out of
Very cool!
Did you try out the ISO 12,800? How would you compare the IQ to the
K-7? I have a feeling Sony sensors are better than Samsung sensors,
and the K-x vs the K-7 is reminiscent of the K100D vs K10D: lower MP
count, but better high-ISO performance (and higher ISO available) went
to the
Just some shots with the K-x ...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/sets/72157622367038869/
Bong
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
The local Pentax dealer got me to try out the K-x for a spin!
My initial impressions are:
1. It's black :-)
2.
The local Pentax dealer got me to try out the K-x for a spin!
My initial impressions are:
1. It's black :-)
2. It's the K-m that grew extra megapixel, live view and video plus
other improvements.
3. I never let go of it during our brief road trip; I let my son
handle the K-7 ...
Will PESO photos
37 matches
Mail list logo
