On 12/9/06, Jim Apilado, discombobulated, unleashed:
I believe Canon made a camera that can use both CF and
SD cards. I have a few cf cards for my *ist D.
1DmII and 1DSmII. I have yet to use the SD slot, but it is a useful addition.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On 13.09.2006, at 04:12 , Jim Apilado wrote:
Also, the SD card. I believe Canon made a camera that can use
both CF and
SD cards. I have a few cf cards for my *ist D.
Well, you can always wait for 645D which seems to have dual cards
slot :-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 13/09/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Canon has done a couple of very nice bodies that take both CF and SD cards.
Unfortunately they're twice the size and weight of the K10D. I'd rather
stick to SD cards and get a K10D sized body than have both in the
DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:58:15 -0700
To: PDML List PDML@pdml.net, DUG [EMAIL PROTECTED],
SeePhoto Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax K10D press release ...
Steve's Digicams posted the press release a day early ... I'm
Maybe you need a new computer. The real question might be how much larger
would the K10D be if it used CF cards. You can't really compare the D and
the K10D as they have a different set of features and design. Or, another
way of looking at it might be to consider how much smaller the D would be
graywolf wrote:
That does not compute. The *istD is smaller than the K10D, yet has a CF
card. If you think CF or CF SD would have made the camera larger you
are most likely wrong. The decision was 98% marketing, millions of
folks already have an SD card for their phone. Luddites and
At 10:35 PM 13/09/2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Or, another way of looking at it might be to consider how much smaller the
D would be
if it used an SD card.
You've seen and handled both the D DS, how much different are they WRT size?
Of the *ist range the only other one I've handled is the DL
The dimensions are 125 x 92.5 x 66 for the DS and 129 x 95 x 60 for the D
but the D feels much larger because it's design is a little different.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
You've seen and handled both the D DS, how much
different are they WRT size?
Of the *ist
If you've never used it, how would you know...
Cotty wrote:
On 12/9/06, Jim Apilado, discombobulated, unleashed:
I believe Canon made a camera that can use both CF and
SD cards. I have a few cf cards for my *ist D.
1DmII and 1DSmII. I have yet to use the SD slot, but it is a useful
My theory is that they got so much flack for the implementation of the
CF slot on the *ist-D that marketing decided to use something harder to
complain about.
graywolf wrote:
That does not compute. The *istD is smaller than the K10D, yet has a CF
card. If you think CF or CF SD would have
Just for the record the D isn't much different size than the Ds/Dl/2
body cameras. The actually looks smaller when they are near each other
due to the different shapes of the prism/RTF housing, until you look
closer, and you realize they just have slightly different shapes.
David Savage wrote:
On 13/9/06, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you've never used it, how would you know...
Because I'm smart and not an arse.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
Sez you.
Cotty wrote:
On 13/9/06, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you've never used it, how would you know...
Because I'm smart and not an arse.
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
That's what I thought.
Which leads to the point I was obtusely trying to make. One uses CF, the
other uses SD there is very little physical difference between them.
So when people argue that SD cards make for a smaller camera, I can't help
thinking that it's not that big a factor.
Cheers,
David Savage wrote:
So when people argue that SD cards make for a smaller camera, I can't help
thinking that it's not that big a factor.
Maybe I'm stupid, but it seems to me that the pentamirror/pentaprism
takes up _a_ _lot_ more room than an SD or CF card interface.
--
Thanks,
DougF
On Sep 13, 2006, at 10:14 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
So when people argue that SD cards make for a smaller camera, I
can't help
thinking that it's not that big a factor.
Maybe I'm stupid, but it seems to me that the pentamirror/pentaprism
takes up _a_ _lot_ more room than an SD or CF card
Steve's Digicams posted the press release a day early ... I'm sure
someone is pissed off at them now. I rendered a it into PDF form for
your amusement. ;-)
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/SD-K10D-PR-20060912.pdf
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 13/09/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve's Digicams posted the press release a day early ... I'm sure
someone is pissed off at them now. I rendered a it into PDF form for
your amusement. ;-)
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/SD-K10D-PR-20060912.pdf
Ahh, that answers it, the
On 9/12/06 6:09 PM, Digital Image Studio, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, that answers it, the seal is between the body and the mount not
on the mount surface, relax guys :-)
Yeah, that's it. Then it works with any lens. I took a look at my water
proof Minolta V-mount :-), and that's how they
Thanks for that, Godfrey.
I didn't see the original post.
The 70 limited looks like a nice lens, too (even w/out
the aperture ring) ;-]
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve's Digicams posted the press release a day
early ... I'm sure
someone is pissed off at them
On 13/09/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's it. Then it works with any lens. I took a look at my water
proof Minolta V-mount :-), and that's how they seal the mount. But I also
found that the O ring have been flattened in a few parts :-(.
Hope Pentax use high quality
On 9/12/06 7:05 PM, Digital Image Studio, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's it. Then it works with any lens. I took a look at my water
proof Minolta V-mount :-), and that's how they seal the mount. But I also
found that the O ring have been flattened in a few parts :-(.
Hope Pentax use
On 9/12/06 7:41 PM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Minolta has a lens to mount seal (works as the body seal too). It is a
rubber O ring which slightly protrude above the mount surface, thus seals the
lens to body.
I am sure Pentax can do the same.
And Canon has no contacts on
I just rang Digital City (formerly Fletchers Fotographics) here in Canberra
and the guy I spoke to knew less than me about the K10D. I was hoping to
find out when it will be available, what lens it will be sold with and what
price (although CR Kennedy have already told me $1499 with lens).
I
],
SeePhoto Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax K10D press release ...
Steve's Digicams posted the press release a day early ... I'm sure
someone is pissed off at them now. I rendered a it into PDF form for
your amusement. ;-)
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/SD-K10D-PR-20060912.pdf
G
]
Subject: Pentax K10D press release ...
Steve's Digicams posted the press release a day early ... I'm sure
someone is pissed off at them now. I rendered a it into PDF form for
your amusement. ;-)
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/SD-K10D-PR-20060912.pdf
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
On 13/09/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Canon has done a couple of very nice bodies that take both CF and SD cards.
Unfortunately they're twice the size and weight of the K10D. I'd rather
stick to SD cards and get a K10D sized body than have both in the 1D/1Ds
form factor.
So are you
27 matches
Mail list logo
