Huh. You do this every now and then just to remind us all who's the
Daddy.
Quite a few there that I haven't seen before, so a treat for me.
Design and navigation are fine.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Juan Buhler
Sent:
Doug Franklin wrote:
David Savage wrote:
It's called trap focus you can already do it.
But it only works with MF lenses or AF lenses that turn off all their
(digital?) electronics when in MF mode. For example, my SMCP-FA*
200/2.8 won't do it in any (lens) mode. My Sigma APO
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4825/camera-of-the-year-2007.html
Which one you'd vote for?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/29 Thu AM 02:06:46 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Prague - day 2
frank theriault wrote:
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another entry from my photo blog:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/29 Thu AM 02:22:15 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Taking photos with nED
Once or twice a week someone finds my web page and email me a question
about Pentax cameras or lenses. Today I got one asking for
Can anyone tell me what the designation (645) means after a lens. Will this
lens fit on my digital ist D.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Sydney Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Hi Charles
Quoting Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can anyone tell me what the designation (645) means after a lens.
Will this
lens fit on my digital ist D.
Those lenses are designed for the Pentax 645 medium format system.
As far as I know they will fit the K mount cameras with an
On Nov 27, 2007 10:06 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this one Dave.
Even with a tight crop, you know what is going on. Looks pretty crisp
for what is mostlikely a panned shot.
Thanks Dave.
That 77 is a pretty crisp lens. I know that both her her dad (who
she was roping
On Nov 28, 2007 2:11 AM, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 8:02 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Took this one while on my holiday earlier this year. It's really
nothing more than a family snap, but the expression makes it I reckon.
(~160kb)
On Nov 28, 2007 2:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/27/2007 5:04:42 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP5212.jpg
=
It has a lot of power.
Thanks Marnie.
It was a pretty cool experience
There is a 645 to k adaptor, but they seem to be significantly rarer
than hen's teeth.
Peter
David Savage wrote:
645 = 6 x 4.5cm negative/transparency.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 8:11 PM, Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the designation (645) means
Thanks Paul.
It seems I may have underestimated this one a bit.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 27, 2007 11:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Better by far than a family snap. Both the expression and the composition are
excellent.
Paul
-- Original message --
From:
645 = 6 x 4.5cm negative/transparency.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 8:11 PM, Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the designation (645) means after a lens. Will this
lens fit on my digital ist D.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Sydney Australia
--
PDML
On Nov 29, 2007 5:20 AM, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 8:26 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Another shot of one of my favourite subjects/locations:
Small (800x536, ~90kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_sml.jpg
On Nov 29, 2007 3:02 AM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent indeed!
Boris
Thank you Boris.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
On Nov 29, 2007 6:49 AM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
I love how the horses mane and woman's hair are both flowing.
A shot displaying power, energy, and concentration by the rider.
Nice work!
I like the hair/mane relationships also.
Thanks for looking.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov
Thanks Godders.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 27, 2007 10:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice! Great sense of motion, a solid tight view that tells the
whole story.
Godfrey
On Nov 27, 2007, at 5:02 AM, David Savage wrote:
Hi Gang.
I am having my electrical panel up grade form 60-100 amps all day
Friday, so i won't have any internet access all day.
Re offering these two cameras below:
I have, half heartedly, offered these up in the past and am doing so again.
SF-1: KEH has one in bargin condition for $35.00. I
I;ll wait to see what KR picks, so i know what not to buy.:-)
I have tried a Sigma, and don't like it at all.
I have heard good things about the Alpha.
Dave
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 3:59 AM, Roman Melihhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good creative fall shot Bruce.
Nice OOF back ground and exposure.
Those 4 you have choicen are great.
Dave
On Nov 28, 2007 11:43 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This leaf almost made it down. It was caught by this evergreen
providing contrast in color along with the life and death
I like the seperation of the two main colours.
Nice and crisp shot.
Dave
On Nov 28, 2007 11:37 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, not a dog bark, but tree bark.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 95mm
ISO 200, 1/60 sec @ f/6.7, handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5295.htm
Love this one. Good comp. Not sure about that object in the for ground though
Dave
On Nov 28, 2007 11:40 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This particular mountain really juts out and demands to be noticed.
The morning light hits it at a very good angle to show off its
ruggedness.
What Bob said.
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 3:41 AM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh. You do this every now and then just to remind us all who's the
Daddy.
Quite a few there that I haven't seen before, so a treat for me.
Design and navigation are fine.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
I can see shy, good exposure on this, and nice lines.
Dave
On Nov 28, 2007 11:45 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The early morning lighting on this old porch really drew my attention.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 58mm
ISO 200, 1/350 Sec @ f/8, Handheld
On Nov 28, 2007 9:06 PM, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall, I am surprised why the manufacturers of digital cameras have
reserved only unique file names for their cameras (even
though I understand their desire to stay with 8+3 naming scheme).
I wish they would allow the
Derby Chang wrote:
Doug Franklin wrote:
But [trap focus] only works with MF lenses or AF lenses that turn off
all their (digital?) electronics when in MF mode. For example, my
SMCP-FA* 200/2.8 won't do it in any (lens) mode. My Sigma APO 400/5.6
Macro, though, will do trap focus when
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: Camera of the Year 2007 - - PopPhotoNovember 2007
I;ll wait to see what KR picks, so i know what not to buy.:-)
I have tried a Sigma, and don't like it at all.
I have heard good things about the Alpha.
The Nikon boys are
Never knew that was what Orwo stood for:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FEBB9jnaUYfeature=related
Slight amount of nudity involved.
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
--
PDML
Very nice light, Bruce. :-)
G
On Nov 28, 2007 11:45 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The early morning lighting on this old porch really drew my attention.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 58mm
ISO 200, 1/350 Sec @ f/8, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5287.htm
--
PDML
What Dave said. Love the color. Do wish that thing wasn't there.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Love this one. Good comp. Not sure about that object in the for ground though
Dave
On Nov 28, 2007 11:40 PM, Bruce Dayton
I like this one. I might like it more with some cropped off the top and the
right. Not sure though.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like the seperation of the two main colours.
Nice and crisp shot.
Dave
On Nov 28,
It's a file naming standard. I guess the various manufactures are
sticking to it, though they often seem to violate other standards often
enough.
David J Brooks wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 9:06 PM, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall, I am surprised why the manufacturers of digital
It would be nice, (and probably easy), to add a firmware switch to
enable it with any lens, but I expect that Pentax wants to avoid a lot
of returns for repair when the camera stops autofocusing properly.
Beaker wrote:
Dooh.. (slaps forhead)
Dang- trap focus, why it's obvious, once you
With an adapter. 645 is the designation for one of Pentax's two lines
of medium format SLRs. The lens will work much like an M43 mount lens
on K mount cameras.
Charles Wilson wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the designation (645) means after a lens. Will this
lens fit on my digital ist D.
I liked every thing else that you've posted in the last couple of days
better. This reminds me of just about every attempt I've made to shoot
stairs, my stair shots occasionally rises to this level, but it's still
not good enough.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
The early morning lighting on this old
That should be M42 mount lens, of course.
P. J. Alling wrote:
With an adapter. 645 is the designation for one of Pentax's two lines
of medium format SLRs. The lens will work much like an M43 mount lens
on K mount cameras.
Charles Wilson wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the designation
Mark Roberts wrote:
Once or twice a week someone finds my web page and email me a question
about Pentax cameras or lenses. Today I got one asking for information
on a Pentax model I'd never heard of (neither had the person who
emailed me, obviously). It was identified as a Pentax nED film
P. J. Alling wrote:
It would be nice, (and probably easy), to add a firmware switch to
enable it with any lens, but I expect that Pentax wants to avoid a lot
of returns for repair when the camera stops autofocusing properly.
Sad but true.
I've been told be people associated with Pentax and
With all that extra space you have room for a darkroom.
Jens Bladt wrote:
For what it's worth:
My dear grilfriend and I have just bought a new home.
It's a very traditional 1970'es house, but inside it's quite charming.
We'll be living there from April 1st. 2008.
Best of all - there's a
Kenny boy will choose the Nikon, (that's my prediction), it would have
to be below dreck on a scale of wonder-camera to crap for him to do
otherwise.
David J Brooks wrote:
I;ll wait to see what KR picks, so i know what not to buy.:-)
I have tried a Sigma, and don't like it at all.
I have
In a message dated 11/28/2007 8:42:45 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This particular mountain really juts out and demands to be noticed.
The morning light hits it at a very good angle to show off its
ruggedness.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 115mm
ISO 200, 1/180 sec @
In a message dated 11/28/2007 8:38:35 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, not a dog bark, but tree bark.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 95mm
ISO 200, 1/60 sec @ f/6.7, handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5295.htm
Comments welcome.
--
Bruce
I'd
In a message dated 11/28/2007 7:59:04 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Coming out of my usual lurking to send a link to my own site... How nice,
huh?
I have completely changed the galleries in my site, leaving behind
about seven years of static html generated
In a message dated 11/28/2007 5:54:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was poking about in what I've taken over the past year with the
Treo 650's camera. I built a little gallery of eight shots that I
liked ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/treopix-20071128/
Low
In a message dated 11/28/2007 1:50:04 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For what it's worth:
My dear grilfriend and I have just bought a new home.
It's a very traditional 1970'es house, but inside it's quite charming.
We'll be living there from April 1st. 2008.
Best of all
Charles,
Pentax makes a variety of film format cameras.
The *ist D is a 35mm film format camera, even though no film is involved.
It uses Pentax K mount, 35mm format lenses. (think 24mm x 36mm film)
In a pinch, with a $10 adapter, the Pentax screwmount 35mm format
lenses can be mounted.
Pentax
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
Sigh...
Luckily I wasn't hurt, other than the usual stiffness. My road bike
wasn't so lucky.
Sigh...
cheers,
frank
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Happy to hear you weren't severely injured. Hope you can get the [EMAIL
PROTECTED] to cough up some dough for your bike.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
After reading a few of the latest Pentax Gallery threads, i decided to
enter two of my best like photos, as decided by me and others
comments.
I checked the site today and they have been rejected.
At least i have my original four still there.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
Jens, I think that Godfrey's suggestion is the hmmm technologically the
most well thought through. Indeed you could make a set of settings of
your K10D (or any other digital camera) and have it dedicated for the job.
The problem of film is that of white balance during scanning.
Boris
Jens
Darn!
Although you say that the SUV driver was probably just negligent and not
paying attention, she deserves to be prosecuted or at least to be put
through the legal paces by the full measure. The fact that one is
driving a big (perceivably safe) vehicle is no excuse for negligence...
I wish
Jens Bladt wrote:
Godfrey, I wouldn't want to rely on a digtial camera to be operational over
this long period of time - eight years is a long time. Can I still get
battteries for it in 8 years? If it dies, can I replace it with a compatible
one?
Jens, you could buy a set of batteries for
Glad your ok Frank. Your right, could have been worse.
I hope you can get some renumeration from her, as its a his word
against mine story. I 'm sure the cop can read between the lines. Bob
Rae's no fault comes back to haunt another Ontarian.
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 11:46 AM, frank theriault
Glad to hear you're not too badly damaged. Bike looks like shit
though. Are you insured? If so your insurance company should be able
to get after her. If you're a member of some kind of cycling
organisation your membership may include insurance - worth checking.
Sorry mate, didn't see you there
Not sure. I am hit and miss with picasa. Some days it will load, and
some days it just sits there for ever doing nothing.
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 1:15 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Ladies and gents, a question for you. I am sitting at 1.5 MBps
downstream DSL connection at
Hi!
Ladies and gents, a question for you. I am sitting at 1.5 MBps
downstream DSL connection at home. It is fast enough for everything I am
doing. However Picasa images load slow as molasses...
Is there anything I could do to remedy this except lots of patience?
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Frank, I cannot be certain what you intended to say with this image,
but... It looks extremely lonely, being thrown out of the company...
This is what it makes me feel at least.
Cheer up!
Boris
frank theriault wrote:
Back after a couple of weeks away from the list. A few personal
issues
Well, I haven't converted in a religious sense of the word. I am still
Jewish ;-) and I still prefer full frame top quality prime lenses. But
yes, DA 21 is a good lens. I cannot deny the obvious, you know. It won't
be faithful ;-).
Boris
Derby Chang wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Here
Now, you're making me feel bad. I will feel better after my 43 is
repaired or replaced should it turn out to be impossible to repair
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Here is the start of the short write up I am going to produce about my
trip to Prague.
What Godfrey said!
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007, at 5:42 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210340/Large
I like this, a nice composition and good tones, colors, etc.
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384/1/225210306/Large
On Nov 29, 2007, at 8:46 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
That sucks.
Luckily I wasn't hurt, other than the usual stiffness.
That's the good part.
Hopefully you can get some compensation out of the driver who hit
you. Nothing
Picasa is very slow to load on my system as well. I would guess a Picasa pic
takes three to five times longer to load than a photo.net pic.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure. I am hit and miss with picasa. Some days it
Same here. As much as I despise flickr, when used without javascript
enabled it's very responsive. Picasa is nearly useless without javascript.
David J Brooks wrote:
Not sure. I am hit and miss with picasa. Some days it will load, and
some days it just sits there for ever doing nothing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the people moving shot and the beer shot. I think the square shot is
too dark. Nice angle on the beer signs, makes one feel a bit woozy.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Thanks, yep, I struggled a bit with the angle for the beer sign shot.
But I kinda liked the idea of
On Nov 29, 2007 1:06 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
she's obviously guilty and you're within your rights to execute her.
Trust me, I'm a lawyer.
We can not execute here, we just force them to watch the NFL for a
Sunday. That usually gets em.:-)
Dave
--
Bob
-Original
I was rather exhausted on the third day - no significant pictures were
taken. However on the last (fourth) day I was shooting wildly (about 100
shots all together). I am processing them and soon they'll be published.
Thanks!
Boris
Rick Womer wrote:
Sigh. I love European cities. The
Thanks, Paul!
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Very nice. I like all the pics.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Jaume, I realize I cannot shoot on purpose. I really cannot. I can
however be in the mood for shooting and shoot whatever I see or whatever
I like.
;-)
Boris
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Boris !!
Where are the 'postcards' that you promised to me?
These aren't...
;-)
I am glad you enjoyed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What he said. And the church shot. I like the wedding shot very much --
captures the feeling.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
I got so engaged in that dance that I almost couldn't shoot on the next
day...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
All lovely, but I especially like the Wedding Dance photo! Nice use
of motion blur.
cheers,
frank
Now, that's quite a compliment. Thanks, Frank!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Mark Roberts wrote:
Having Frank compliment you on your motion blur is like having Fred
Astaire compliment you on your dancing.
:)
Duly noted ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Frank, your skills are considerable enough now that you have overdone
it, IMHO.
Boris
frank theriault wrote:
I posted this way back in the spring, as an unsized, completely
unprocessed shot right out of the camera.
So, using my now-considerable PS skills, I've done a BW conversion.
It
Godfrey, I have to join those voices who commended about the bigger weed
on the backgroun, one that is out of focus. It is simply too big. You
see, the picture is extremely delicate. And this big dark hmmm chunk of
form is really out of place here.
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Back to
[Rant mode ON]
David, loads of very nice picture are rejected and I suspect some do
vote gainst because they feel s bad their pics have been rejected
as well. Really.
I'm quite deceived by all this voting thing. When they first launched
the website it was much better. I know I took ages
Thanks!
David J Brooks wrote:
A good way to remember a special trip.
Great photos.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 29/11/07, Roman Melihhov, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4825/camera-of-the-year-2007.html
Which one you'd vote for?
None of those!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I think it is the other way around. I agree with it ;-).
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Another fine set of photos, Boris. I think that DA21 agrees with
you. :-)
Godfrey
On Nov 27, 2007, at 9:14 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Yet another entry from my photo blog:
mike wilson wrote:
Definitely Mark!
LOL ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I agree with Boris.
Igor
Thu Nov 29 12:16:06 EST 2007
Boris Liberman wrote:
Darn!
Although you say that the SUV driver was probably just negligent and not
paying attention, she deserves to be prosecuted or at least to be put
through the legal paces by the full measure. The fact that
On 29/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Looks great, Juan. The only thing I might change is the forward and
backward
button at the bottom of the photos. (I looked at the top, small gallery).
It's only a or , those are pretty small to click on. Something larger
would be
Did you hear that, Frank? You're TOO good. :)
Boris Liberman wrote:
Frank, your skills are considerable enough now that you have overdone
it, IMHO.
Boris
frank theriault wrote:
I posted this way back in the spring, as an unsized, completely
unprocessed shot right out of the camera.
On 28/11/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Once or twice a week someone finds my web page and email me a question
about Pentax cameras or lenses. Today I got one asking for information
on a Pentax model I'd never heard of (neither had the person who
emailed me, obviously). It was
On 29/11/07, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
Sigh...
Luckily I wasn't hurt, other than the usual stiffness. My road bike
wasn't so lucky.
Sigh...
cheers,
frank
Inattentiveness is no excuse - here in the UK,
On 28/11/07, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hello,
Coming out of my usual lurking to send a link to my own site... How
nice, huh?
I have completely changed the galleries in my site, leaving behind
about seven years of static html generated by csh/awk scripts. I made
new galleries
Thanks!
Now I only wish that my 43 was there for the wedding dance shot...
Boris
David J Brooks wrote:
Another interesting read, Boris.
The postcard shot and the wedding shot are very good. I love the
motion blur in the wedding shot.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Will the result be some Ben-gay and a 'new' road bike? Too bad!
Were you shooting more pictures at the time? ;)
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
Sigh...
Luckily I wasn't hurt, other than the usual
I'm not angry, just a bit disappointed. These, i felt we're two of my
best photos from the past 12 months, but I just wanted to see what
happened.
I guess it takes more than 3-4 people liking a photo.:-)
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 1:24 PM, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Rant mode ON]
David,
what's your upload speed? My guess is it's roughly .25 MBps, and the
effective speed less than that. I don't know the picasa interface, but
if it's relatively slow, combined with the slowish u/l of a dsl, I could
see where it would be frustrating.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Ladies and
Well seen captured.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 7:35 PM
Subject: PAW 2007 - 49 - GDG
I found this one in a set from last year on the Isle of Man...
Probably a nice idea, but it lacks in execution.
A major issue for me is that the background is too distinct distracting.
I'd also like better exposure on the pine needles to bring out the green
color.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bruce
The early morning lighting on this old porch really drew my attention.
I can cetainly see why.
If it were mine I'd either include more of the pot or totally eliminate it
entirely.
I'd also crop out some about half of the black above the top stair.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
Nice subject, exposure light, but I find the reddish tree on the right to
be distracting - it conflicts with the rest of the greenery.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Mountain Majesty
This
frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
Sigh...
Luckily I wasn't hurt, other than the usual stiffness. My road bike
wasn't so lucky.
Sigh...
cheers,
frank
Heh, new PDML acronym; YABA.
Glad you're ok, sorry about the bike.
Very nice but I prefer a tighter central crop - eliminating about 25% of the
outer most part of the image.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Bark
No, not a dog bark, but tree bark.
Pentax K10D,
I think you should invest in a nice set of reinforced Kevlar armor, with
leather patches in the proper places to absorb the inevitable road
rash. Otherwise I'm glad to know you're all right.
frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
Sigh...
Cotty wrote:
On 29/11/07, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
Sigh...
Luckily I wasn't hurt, other than the usual stiffness. My road bike
wasn't so lucky.
Sigh...
cheers,
frank
Inattentiveness is no
On Nov 29, 2007 12:13 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading a few of the latest Pentax Gallery threads, i decided to
enter two of my best like photos, as decided by me and others
comments.
I checked the site today and they have been rejected.
At least i have my original
Trust me, I'm a lawyer
MARK!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT - Yet Another Bike Accident
Glad to hear you're not too badly damaged. Bike looks like shit
though. Are you insured? If so your insurance
or is it that pesky winter blooming jasmine?
I keep thinking forsythia - being sure I saw it as such in the Spring at
that location more than once...
I'm confused myself as to what the purple-tinted leaves are around it...
This is a section of stuff that wasn't planted.
As a photo this is
How much would you be willing to pay to sign up for a one-day
session? or a two-day?
Godfrey, Over the years I've attended numerous one two day photo
seminars. Everything from basic photo instruction, to specialized
photoshop instruction. I recall paying as little as $75, years ago, for 2
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
