Gary F, list
1] Your definition of 'tribalism' - which is unique to you, means,
as far as I can understand it, that tribalism refers to a perspective
that is held by a number of people. What you are misunderstanding is
that this perspective might be valid, logical, rational.
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert, list
Thanks for the quotations.
My view of De Tienne is that he is an idealist, separating Mind and
Matter. Each has their own 'scientific method' so to speak, but I've
no idea how they
to distinguish
himself from the platonic tribe, and start his own tribe?Best,
Helmut 18. August 2021 um 19:27 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
wrote:
List
The problem that I have with this slide of De Tienne, is that it
seems to be operating within a Platonic ideal
List
The problem that I have with this slide of De Tienne, is that it
seems to be operating within a Platonic idealism, where a
pre-existent Form 'exists' [as that form/format/ without matter] and
is then articulated within existential material reality. That's not
Peirce's
Gary F, Bernard, List
"'Phenomenology, which does not depend upon any other positive
science, nevertheless must, if it is to be properly grounded, be made
to depend upon the Conditional or Hypothetical Science of Pure
Mathematics"..."A phenomenology which does not reckon with
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John, list
I would be against setting up 'Peirce' as a tribe or tribalism.
Certainly, many tribes define themselves as having their origins in
some mythic and powerful ancestor but the nature of a tribe is its
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt [1] - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
[2]
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 8:24 AM Edwina Taborsky < tabor...@primus.ca
[3]> wrote:
Gary F, list
It is commendable that you have removed Bernard Morand as a tribal
member - and are willing to
, Aug 17, 2021 at 8:24 AM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
Gary F, list
It is commendable that you have removed Bernard Morand as a tribal
member - and are willing to engage with him as an individual - but
this still leaves the problem of the existence, as you outline, of
others " who
Gary F, list
It is commendable that you have removed Bernard Morand as a tribal
member - and are willing to engage with him as an individual - but
this still leaves the problem of the existence, as you outline, of
others " who have demonstrated the tribalistic tendencies ".
of the vincula.
In this regard, to 'transition out of mathematics’ infers, from
the perception chemical signs, transitioning out of Peirce.
Cheers
Jerry
On Aug 15, 2021, at 12:50 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
Jerry, list
That's an interesting comparison.
So- if the first v
Schmidt [2]
- twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt [3]
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 9:35 AM Edwina Taborsky < tabor...@primus.ca
[4]> wrote:
Robert, list
And here is the scientific method as outlined by Robert - and, in my
view, Peirce. It seems different from that outlined by De Ti
List:
If I just take this exchange as an example of what I see as a
problem with the focus of this List:
BM: But I am wholly astonished by the rigorus property you are
attaching to definitions or descriptions made by Peirce. He was not
God the Father. Surely we have to
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert, list
And here is the scientific method as outlined by Robert - and, in my
view, Peirce. It seems different from that outlined by De Tienne.
And I have several questions about these differences.
athematics.
Regards,
Jon S.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 6:28 PM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
JAS, list
By factual world, I am referring to the sensate world of the
particular - and that includes the images in my mind. I don't mean,
by factual world, the quantitative alone but include the q
twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt [2]
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 1:37 PM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
Gary F, list
This is exactly what some of us have been saying - in our
questioning of the isolation by De Tienne of mathematics from the
Real World. And asking - if the practice of mathemati
Gary F, list
This is exactly what some of us have been saying - in our
questioning of the isolation by De Tienne of mathematics from the
Real World. And asking - if the practice of mathematics is so
cerebral, so detached from material reality, so isolated - then,
what's its
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}List,
JAS wrote: "Any quotation of any author is removed from its original
context, so an argument is needed to demonstrate that a particular
quotation is being interpreted and presented in a way that somehow
ally constructed schemata". This to me seems
completely different from pure deduction. I donot undertand what is
meant by it. Can you give an example for such a constructed schema?
Best, Helmut 11. August 2021 um 19:54 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
wrote:
Bernard, JA
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Bernard, JAS, Gary F, Robert, list:
The problem I have with De Tienne's outline of mathematics is the
intense focus he gives to its essential irrelevance to we who live in
the real world. I don't think it can be
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert, List
I agree; your post leads me to ask again - what is the point of De
Tienne's 'argument' against mathematics?
There is no question that we all agree that 'phaneroscopy does not
provide
pragmaticism is most concerned to insist upon" (CP 5.453, EP 2:354,
1905; emphasis added).
Regards,
Jon S.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 9:14 AM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
JAS, Robert, Gary F, list:
The fact that De Tienne changed a Peircean quotation and inserted
other words from Peirce [an
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}JAS, Robert, Gary F, list:
The fact that De Tienne changed a Peircean quotation and inserted
other words from Peirce [and not His Own Words] doesn't change the
FACT that De Tienne changed the meaning of that quotation by
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert, List
Thank you for this clarification of the role of mathematics.
1] I find that De Tienne's slide 23 is troubling. Note how his five
paragraphs, which include an example of a mathematician, seem
Gary F, list
That's an interesting differentiation; that the world of imagination
is in a mode of Firstness and the actual world is in a mode of
Secondness. What about the play of..Hamlet; it's in the world of
imagination - but, is it in a mode of Firstness? Alice in
- we may
agree on the majority of what a text means, but it will never be an
identical agreement).
Jack
-
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
on behalf of Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Saturday, August 7, 2021 12:50 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}List
I think that's an interesting question from Gary F - how do we
distinguish between the actual and the imagined world.
It's not that easy; we know this from the morass of misinformation
that we,
Jack, John, list
I don't think that objective vs subjective experiences play
different roles in mathematical reasoning.
If one considers that mathematical reasoning is the development of
hypothetical patterns/relations about all that one experiences [both
objective
[that] would happen under certain conditions. this
anticipatory model enables the falcon to interact with the bird in a
successful hunt. The concept of anticipation is an integral component
of the relational nature of semiosis.
Edwina
On Thu 05/08/21 2:46 PM , Edwina Taborsky tabor...@p
Jerry, list
Thanks - very nice post .Much better description than mine - it's
what I was trying to say.
Heteropathy..".this transformation of matter into novel forms with
semantic attributes UNRELATED to the semantic and quantitative
attributes of the elements. "
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John, list
No-one is denying that 'emergence' is only the beginning of a
complex study. But, as with any situation in the phaneron, what we
observe is, so to speak', 'what we observe' - and we have to
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John, Helmut, Jon, list
I must admit that I'm baffled over the various comments about the
use of the term 'emergence'.
I am obviously missing some nuance of meaning!
All it means in my reference
-theory, fine structure, vacuum-, or
zero-point-energy, et cetera, in order to get disciples, and to sell
their paraphernalia, wands, pendulums, purifying crystals, and
miracle medicines. I am sure, some of them also use "emergence".
Best, Helmut 03. August 2021 um 16:30 Uhr
"
ot completed, that´s why I think, that
> the phenomenon emergence is not fully explained. Partly so, because "habit"
> is such a word too, I suspect, that should not just be taken for granted, but
> itself further investigated.
>
> Best,
> Helmut
>
>
arise
from the primordial muck and ooze of
icons and indices -- there's the rub!
Triadic Relation Irreducibility says
triadic relations are the primordial
stuff -- if not there from the first,
there is no way they can ever emerge.
Cheers,
Jon
On 8/2/2021 12:10 PM, Edwina Taborsky wro
here is no way they can ever emerge.
Cheers,
Jon
On 8/2/2021 12:10 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
>
> Jon - could you explain? I don't see any reductionism when one
uses the term 'emergence'.
>
> You are perhaps associating the term with a mechanical process
where a,b,c,d mix up a
of
backhanded reductionism.
Cheers,
Jon
On 8/2/2021 11:55 AM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
>
>
> Here's an interesting abstract of a forthcoming article in
> BioSystems journal [coming in October].
>
> Scroll down for the abstract.
>
> Title is: Code Biology and
Jon, the focus on discrete objects, that mechanical perspective, reduced
relations to equally mechanical interactions between A and B. Peirce’s
categories switch the focus to the three categories as agential morphological
forces. They actually form the object.
I like your ‘that which changes
the nominalistic. They are material, biological-
physico-chemical realities.
Edwina
On Thu 29/07/21 10:45 AM , Jerry LR Chandler
jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com sent:
Edwinia:
On Jul 25, 2021, at 12:11 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
Yes, of course. I see what you mean. His categories are indeed
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Jon, list
Hmm. Does this claim,
" the difference
between people who "think in words about thinking in diagrams"
and people who "think in words about thinking in words".
1]..not lead to
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert, list
1] If I understand your question correctly - is it
- our first experience is: the phaneron. This is essentially the
qualisign experience of one material entity with its surroundings.
I'd
Thanks, Edwina, for this prompting to think about these matters!
One Peace,
Terry
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
On Behalf Of Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2021 10:27 AM
To: h.raul...@gmx.de
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu; s...@bestweb.net
Subj
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert, List
1] What?! Language is fascist?! Does he even know what the term
means? Most people who fling out this term have no understanding of
its meaning. No, he's ignoring the work of, if I recall, someone
oncept of "human" itself conceals a whole nexus of
culturally received categories which vary accordingly from group to
group (from culture to culture).
Best
Jack
-----
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
on behalf of Edwina Taborsky
Sent: S
dynamic diagrams in each Peircean category :
https://otterserver.com/logically-consistent-knowledge-graphs/peircean-categories-visualization/Tom
Tinsley
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Edwina Taborsky Date:
7/25/21 8:55 AM (GMT-05:00) To: tab
ral is imperfect,
so graphs are a good thing I guess. But you can easily translate a
complex novel from one language into the other, but try to translate
"Finnegan´s Wake", or just "Yankee Doodle came to town" into graphs.
At least I have not seen anything like that
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John, list
I wonder if diagrammatic thinking is focused more on relations than
specific and separate individual units, i.e., verbs and
subjects/objects.
That is, I long ago noticed that some indigenous
John, list
I agree that diagrams are more fundamental than words, since their
attributes are less open to multiple interpretations. That includes
both the written and spoken word, with the latter overlaid with
meanings provided by tone and rhythm and the former open to many
Jerry, list
I'm not sure why you included me in your post, as I am not a chemist
- but - I do acknowledge your [and Peirce's] outline of the analogy
of chemical valences with the structure of the phaneron.
Both deal with 'relations' of matter-to-matter, so to speak,
Helmut, list
I've known Stan Salthe for many years. His email, if I recall, is
ssal...@binghampton.edu [1]
He writes primarily in the biosemiotics field; strange that 'The
Powers' on this list consider that I am, to quote, 'long discredited
in the biosemiotics
y is independent of humans, but if humans
were almighty (infinite inquiry, infinite group of inquirers), what
they are not, then it would be the result, which it is not. So in
reality reality is independent. Best Helmut17. Juni 2021 um
16:34 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
wrote:
om/JonAlanSchmidt [4]
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:12 AM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
List
I think that Auke has brought up a vital analysis of 'what is
reality'.
JAS provided us with Peirce quotations that asserted that 'what is
true' is reality. I have a problem with such a
s it from semeiotic.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USAStructural Engineer, Synechist
Philosopher, Lutheran Christianwww.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt [1]
- twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt [2]
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 7:38 AM Edwina Taborsky <
tabor...@primus.ca [3]> wrote:
A
OU
BEAUTY AND TERROR
JUST KEEP GOING
NO FEELING IS FINAL”
― RAINER MARIA RILKE
Gary Richmond
Philosophy and Critical ThinkingCommunication StudiesLaGuardia
College of the City University of New York
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:46 PM Edwina Taborsky <
tabor...@primus.ca [1]> wrote:
.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt [1]
- twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt [2]
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 7:38 AM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
Auke, list
Exactly. Splitting up areas into separate domains might give one the
feeling of being-in-control, but the dynamic object of science,
namely, reality - ha
List
I think that Cathy's leaving this list, and her critique of it
[Cartesian, Platonic] should not be overlooked.
Edwina
On Wed 16/06/21 10:32 AM , g...@gnusystems.ca sent:
Jon AS, list,
I’m looking forward to the part of our slow read that delves
urther in forthcoming slides of the slow
read.
Regards,
Jon S.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:39 PM Edwina Taborsky <
tabor...@primus.ca [1]> wrote:
JAS, list
1] JAS wrote, in reply to my first question:
"Therefore, the proper interpretation of the results
eno.htm [1]).
Regards,
Jon S.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:48 PM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
JAS, list
1] I think your statement:
"Phaneroscopy examines whatever is or could be present to the mind.
Semeiotic studies only signs and semiosis."
is confusing.
of academia, and into real world dialogue.
https://youtu.be/GITVPh7GVSE [1]
Cathy
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 1:15 PM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
Cathy, list
Thank you for the links. I'm aware of both authors, I have, myself,
even given conference papers on Bakhtin [one in Moscow, which
nAlanSchmidt [2]
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:34 AM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
List
I have several comments
1] First, a question to Gary R and John Sowa: What is the
functionality of putting an area of study, such as Jappy's work,
into 'semeiotic' rather than 'phanerosc
links to help further explore this topic.
Semiotics between Peirce and Bakhtin (semio2014.org) [1]
DEED, OTHERNESS AND LOVE IN BAKHTIN AND PEIRCE (iass-ais.org) [2]
Cathy T.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:34 PM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
List
I have several comments
1] First
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}List
I have several comments
1] First, a question to Gary R and John Sowa: What is the
functionality of putting an area of study, such as Jappy's work,
into 'semeiotic' rather than 'phaneroscopy'? How
- Original Message -
From: Edwina Taborsky tabor...@primus.ca
To: , @, @, @, Invalid address spec. Unmatched quote or
bracket ( , @, @, @
Sent: Sat 12/06/21 6:17 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L]André De Tienne
lence
without the musical notes, nor is there a recognizable note without
the silence between them.
I will find some more Peirce references to post here when I have
some time a little later to dig them up.
Cathy
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 10:09 AM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
-
21 at 8:32 AM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
Cathy, List
Yes, "There are Real things, whose characters are entirely
independent of our opinions about them; those Reals affect our senses
according to regular laws..." 5.384.[Fixation of Belief].
See also
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Jon, list
Agree - but I think there are two dangers not one.
Nominalism, the epitome of the subject-as-King, is indeed a danger,
where individuals can insist that if they perceive that a statue is
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Cathy, List
Yes, "There are Real things, whose characters are entirely
independent of our opinions about them; those Reals affect our senses
according to regular laws..." 5.384.[Fixation of Belief].
See
Jerry, list
This is a very densely packed outline, and therefore, at the moment,
I have just a few comments.
1] I note that you wrote: "semiosis of singular (unique) objects,
identified (termed) “sin-signs” by CSP. "
I am pleased to see that you define a
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Jon, list
Jon - you wrote:
"I think we are dealing with the scientific analogue
of the moral figure above. To inquire is to act
as if inquiry pursued far enough will end in truth.
It's a
ion."
Best,
Gary R
“LET EVERYTHING HAPPEN TO YOU
BEAUTY AND TERROR
JUST KEEP GOING
NO FEELING IS FINAL”
― RAINER MARIA RILKE
Gary Richmond
Philosophy and Critical ThinkingCommunication StudiesLaGuardia
College of the City University of New York
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:35 PM
iguous here. Your view is a misinterpretation of Peirce's clear
meaning.
Best,
Gary R
“LET EVERYTHING HAPPEN TO YOU
BEAUTY AND TERROR
JUST KEEP GOING
NO FEELING IS FINAL”
― RAINER MARIA RILKE
Gary Richmond
Philosophy and Critical Thinking Communication StudiesLaGuardia
College of the City U
Christianwww.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt [3]
- twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt [4]
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:04 AM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
John, list
You wrote:" Re mathematics: It's not necessary to accept Plato's
claim that the mathematical forms are more fundamental tha
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John, list
You wrote:" Re mathematics: It's not necessary to accept Plato's
claim that the mathematical forms are more fundamental than physical
things. An Aristotelian position is more acceptable:
l then add the device to its
list of authorized devices to access your account.
Tom
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
On Behalf Of Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 11:12 AM
To: tabor...@primus.ca; ttins...@tampabay.rr.com
Cc: PEIRCE-L@list.iupui.edu
S
ded, I will post the results.
Respectfully,
Tom T. - OtterServer.com [1]
From: Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2021 1:33 PM
To: ttins...@tampabay.rr.com
Subject: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Peircean Categories
Tom
I think the key t
ts to the person.
Your insight has only given me greater enthusiasm for the Peirce
framework and its applicability to digital system. As I follow up
with the contacts you have provided, I will post the results.
Respectfully,
Tom T. - OtterServer.com [6]
From: Edwina
List, Mike, Bruce
Thanks to Mike and Bruce for these comments on hierarchies - and -
the triadic infrastructure that enables hierarchies - and - as Mike
points out, the three Peircean categories that are the foundation of
the triad. I think that not enough attention is paid to
l Engineer,
Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt [1] - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
[2]
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:07 AM Edwina Taborsky wrote:
John, list
I'm not sure about this; don't the models [and graphs are, after
all, mod
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John, list
I'm not sure about this; don't the models [and graphs are, after
all, models], have to show and explain Peircean semiosis - which is
triadic?
After all, semiosis is all about Mind-as-Matter,
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John, list
I think a key point about logic is that it must refer to or
represent the real world and is not an isolate intellectual
construct.
Therefore since Peirce rejects reductionism and a mechanical
RCE-L] Inference as growth Edwina,
List, uh, language is very inaccurate and tricky. I have made some
mistakes in my previous post. I have to reformulate it all, paying
attention to formulations. For example, "The class of tigers does
physically exist" is perhaps not equivale
art,
the said conclusion is not guaranteedly valid: Intuitionistic logic.
Best, Helmut 02. Februar 2021 um 18:35 Uhr
Von: "Edwina Taborsky"
wrote:
Helmut, list
To say that 'A exists' - can be translated, I think, into a
syllogistic sentence of, for example:
).
About the unicorn I think, that "Unicorn" (put in quotation marks)
exists, but not a unicorn. Best, Helmut 01. Februar 2021 um
20:16 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
wrote:
Helmut, list
1] I'm not sure what a 'universally valid law' means. After a
o, that unicorns don´t exist, but are real? Or
have I mixed it up again? Anyways, can anybody see through all the
mistakes I have written that what I was meaning to tell, whether it
is all bull or there is something about it? I thought having refuted
the "transparent-world"-hypothesis and
Helmut - a few comments:
1] I think the semiosic process begins with 1ns, a sensation...and
moves into awareness [2ns]..
2] With regard to your statement 'There is no unicorn that is not
pink' - I think that this is what is known as an 'E' or negative
form. Essentially
John, my interest in the article wasn’t about the symbols used to refer to
logical processes but about the processes of the triadic sign, ie, that it is
an asymmetrical and generative process, not a representative process. And I was
pleased to see a scholar in both philosophy and Peirce refer
Hmm. You seem to be defining 'thinking' as only an act of abstract
intellectual analysis.
But Peircean 'thinking' includes non-analytic feeling [Firstness] as
well as direct physical experience [Secondness] and also, that
abstract analytic process [Thirdness].
Edwina
Helmut - if you read Peirce's cosmological outlines [6.203 and
1.412], he begins with 1ns, moves on to the instantiations of 2ns,
and then, into the developing habits of 3ns. So, the 'actualization'
of the modes in spatiotemporal existence is linear.
But - all three modes are
. I don´t think, that all
knowledge is incomplete. Due to Goedel, as far as I have understood,
merely the knowledge about a system of which the knower is part of,
is. Best, Helmut 25. Dezember 2020 um 19:10 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
wrote:
Helmut - No, I don't think th
Helmut - No, I don't think that Godel's incompleteness theory has
anything to do with democracy. After all, if we take as a given, that
all knowledge is incomplete [and Peirce would be the first to say
this!], then, we'd have to question other historical forms of
governance - such as a
Steven - no, I don't think the problem is semantic. I think that we
differ theoretically!
Edwina
On Thu 17/12/20 8:55 PM , "Skaggs,Steven" s.ska...@louisville.edu
sent:
H,
Differences in how far we extend words and categories and
metaphorical uses of them is often a
17. Dezember 2020 um 20:22 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
wrote:
Steven - I don't consider that adaptation is akin to induction. It's
akin to abduction.
1] And I disagree with your comment about random mutation - which
you seem to suggest is sufficient to provide
Steven - I don't consider that adaptation is akin to induction. It's
akin to abduction.
1] And I disagree with your comment about random mutation - which
you seem to suggest is sufficient to provide a species with an
adaptive capacity. As I pointed out, for the reasons of both
an extreme position, one that cannot be
tested.
SxS
—
On Dec 16, 2020, at 2:49 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of our organization. Do
not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you recognize
the sender's email address and know th
s known to be in the bag. Best, Helmut 15.
Dezember 2020 um 21:47 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
Helmut - No, the beak is a NEW form, not the old form of the beak,
and it developed in 'intelligent' response to the NEW harder seed
shell. This is novelty; this is abduction.
Yes, m
15. Dezember 2020 um 21:47 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
Helmut - No, the beak is a NEW form, not the old form of the beak,
and it developed in 'intelligent' response to the NEW harder seed
shell. This is novelty; this is abduction.
Yes, mutations [new forms] are the result
scale
this might be interpreted as hypothesis? Or would such an
interpretation be anthropo- or neurocentrism? Best, Helmut14.
Dezember 2020 um 21:12 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
wrote:
Helmut - the point of abduction is the appearance of a novel
situation - and the
.
To mentally abduct something means to copy it. Chance is just
incertainty. Incertainty occurs in the physicochemical realm, but the
ability of copying something reqires neurons. I dont know what is
wrong with that. Sorry, best, Helmut 14. Dezember 2020 um 20:08
Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky&quo
neuron,
or two of them, I dont know, but anyway with neurons, is what I think.
Best, Helmut 14. Dezember 2020 um 19:39 Uhr
"Edwina Taborsky"
wrote:
Helmut - you are ignoring the role of Firstness, or chance, within
the inanimate and animate world.
Chance, s
gnified by the Sign.
(CP 8.179, EP 2:494, 1909)
---end quote
And finally, as I recall in defining existential graphs Peirce held
that the sheet of assertion represents truth, the context within
which assertions are inscribed.
Regards,
Charles Pyle
And finally, as I recall in defining existential graphs Peirce held
that the sheet of assertion represents truth, the context within
which assertions are inscribed.
Regards,
Charles Pyle
From: Edwina Taborsky
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 8:11 PM
To: Jerry L
201 - 300 of 1728 matches
Mail list logo
