round of changes of form is described over and over again whatever be
>>> the matter of the thought or whether, in addition to such a repetitive
>>> order, there be also a greater life-history that every symbol furnished
>>> with a vehicle of life goes through, and what
gt; hypothesis concerning the life of great symbols is something that caught my
>> eye. I also think his remarks about the logic of Pooh-Pooh arguments might
>> be interesting for those who think there is no real observational support
>> for his hypothesis concerning the reality of God.
11)
>>
>> 5. The explanation of the proof that is offered in support of his
>> hypothesis concerning the life of great symbols is something that caught my
>> eye. I also think his remarks about the logic of Pooh-Pooh arguments might
>> be interesting for those
gic of Pooh-Pooh arguments might
> be interesting for those who think there is no real observational support
> for his hypothesis concerning the reality of God.
>
> --Jeff
>
> Jeffrey Downard
> Associate Professor
> Department of Philosophy
> Northern Arizona University
significance, as will be shown. Logic, too,
shines forth with all is native nobility."
So, let me ask, what does Peirce mean when he says that "it is so connected
with a theory of the nature of thinking that if this be proved so is that." In
what sense is each being "p
Gary, list:
I think this answers your question but it’s a little mysterious. I will
leave it at that but do want to emphasize choice of the word retroduction
over abduction, that is, choices that are adopted after the fact and not at
the outset.
“Further, just as in arguments about mathemati
Jon S. List,
Jon cloncluded his post by writing:
Peirce's favorite name for his comprehensive system of thought was
*synechism*, because it "insists upon the idea of continuity as of prime
importance in philosophy" (CP 6.169; 1902). The hypothesis of God as *Ens
necessarium* explains not only th
cquires a new
> significance, as will be shown. Logic, too, shines forth with all is native
> nobility."
>
> So, let me ask, what does Peirce mean when he says that "it is so
> connected with a theory of the nature of thinking that if this be proved so
> is that."
8354
____________
From: Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 1:37 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Instinctive Reason and Metaphysics
List:
In the thread on "Peirce's Theory of Thinking," we discussed what Peirce might
have meant in the
List:
In the thread on "Peirce's Theory of Thinking," we discussed what Peirce
might have meant in the first additament to "A Neglected Argument for the
Reality of God" (1908) when he wrote that proving his "theory of the nature
of thinking" would also prove the hypothesis of God's Reality (CP 6.4
10 matches
Mail list logo
