But isn´t that the case wit all DOs? The IO is the first reflection as it is reflected in the second reflection.
Anyway, is this maybe an interesting topic, Gotthard Guenther and the logic of reflection?
Best, Helmut
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List
tails here:
https://www.jyb-logic.org/MANY1-CAIRO
JYB
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRC
important
ideas in abstract algebra. But he is most famous for just one algebra.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSC
Adjournment
With best regards,
Richard Kenneth Atkins
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIR
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L
- Hajnal Andreka
- Mihir Chakraborty
Chair: Katarzyna Gan-Krzywoszynska
http://www.logica-universalis.org/wld4
Everybody is welcome !
Jean-Yves Beziau, President of LUA
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to th
>>>>>
>>>>>> So some years ago I acquired a hard copy of the currently printed
>>>>>> version from Watchmaker Publishing, but found the book still having
>>>>>> typos. This is rather frustrating, as they’ve had over a century and
rly logical work extending the
Boolean calculus, that might assist me in finally getting through Boole’s book.
Any advice or suggestions in regard to this matter will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Franklin Ransom
Sent from my iPhone
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Repl
ehend on my part, that has kept me from being able to interpret the
>> work successfully.
>>
>> So what I’d like to know is if there are possibly any publications on
>> Boole’s work, hopefully in relation to Peirce’s early logical work extending
>> the Boolean calcu
and happy new year to everyone, may 2022 be better than 2021.
cass.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT
g
> through Boole’s book. Any advice or suggestions in regard to this matter
> will be appreciated.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Franklin Ransom
> > Sent from my iPhone
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Rep
_campaign=signaturevirality11;>
۰۰/۱۰/۲۰،
۲۱:۵۸:۳۱
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@
/profiles/jean-yves-beziau
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu
with U
nal of Pictorial Philosophy
https://wjpp.org/www/
Deadline to submit a paper for the first issue: April 1st, 2022
>--
Prof. Dr. Dr. Jean-Yves Beziau
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
https://philpeople.org/profiles/jean-yves-beziau
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► P
ce’s early logical work extending the
> Boolean calculus, that might assist me in finally getting through Boole’s
> book. Any advice or suggestions in regard to this matter will be appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
> Franklin Ransom
> Sent from my iPhone
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIR
the
Boolean calculus, that might assist me in finally getting through Boole’s book.
Any advice or suggestions in regard to this matter will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Franklin Ransom
Sent from my iPhone_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" t
f9d5d8c=465a32ebdd=860edf35dc=ffad9a9917>
[image: Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp]
<http://www.mailchimp.com/email-referral/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter_medium=email_campaign=referral_marketing=2d67a1b536f133c3e9f9d5d8c=1>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply L
-universalis.org/LUAD
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEI
*
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the
o you
Beauty and terror
Just keep going
No feeling is final”
― Rainer Maria Rilke
*Gary Richmond*
*Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
*Communication Studies*
*LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply
“Let everything happen to you
Beauty and terror
Just keep going
No feeling is final”
― Rainer Maria Rilke
*Gary Richmond*
*Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
*Communication Studies*
*LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "
maticians today take their
foundation seriously.
For more about the Bourbaki, see "The ignorance of the Bourbaki" by Adrian
Mathias, https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~ardm/bourbaki.pdf . You can Google
"Adrian Mathias" and "Bourbaki" for other discussions.
John
ity of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
https://philpeople.org/profiles/jean-yves-beziau
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a
s.ca/wp/ }{ living the time
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
Behalf Of Sally Ness
Sent: 17-Dec-21 17:19
To: Gary Fuhrman
Cc: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] thoughts, signs and things
Thank you for initiating this thread, Gary.
I have often thought that Thich Nhat Hanh's teach
.ca/KainaStoicheia.htm>) that “a sign is not a
> real thing,” which has evoked some discussion on the list before, but is
> recontextualized here.
>
> Gary f.
>
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All"
thing," which has evoked some discussion on the list before, but is
recontextualized here.
Gary f.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iup
1787/updates/18988758
Jean-Yves Beziau
President of LUA - Logica Universalis Association
http://www.logica-universalis.org/LUAD
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
the line that
Rasmussen takes in his review of Speaks' book. In addressing these topics,
I hope to also address what might be called "the logic of the concept of
God".
With best wishes,
Francisco de Assis Mariano
The University of Missouri-Columbia
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscrib
unches
We look forward to seeing you in Crete next April !
Best Wishes
Jean-Yves Beziau & Ioannis Vandoulakis
Organizers of UNILOG'2022
https://sites.google.com/view/unilog-2022/
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
ith URLs in nearly every slide.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@li
for
cognition.
Can anyone think of anything simpler or more fundamental?
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To U
ot;John F Sowa"
An: ontolog-fo...@googlegroups.com, ontology-sum...@googlegroups.com
Cc: "CG" , "Peirce-L" , "Nathan Houser" , "Ahti Pietarinen" , "De Waal, Cornelis"
Betreff: [PEIRCE-L] A universal top-level ontology
Barry> Landgreb
: Dienstag, 07. Dezember 2021 um 23:38 Uhr
Von: "John F Sowa"
An: ontolog-fo...@googlegroups.com, ontology-sum...@googlegroups.com
Cc: "CG" , "Peirce-L" , "Nathan Houser" , "Ahti Pietarinen" , "De Waal, Cornelis"
Betreff: [PEIRCE-L] A universa
ces, and every form of artistic endeavor in any culture in the world
-- or even in any alien life anywhere in the universe.
I recommend it,
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L post
ves Beziau
Organizer of the Logica Universalis Webinar
President of Logica Universalis Association
http://www.logica-universalis.org/LUAD
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should
fruit fly.
As for ontology, I strongly recommend sli de 30 of
http://jfsowa.com/talks/patolog4.pdf (and the other slides before and after
plus all the references in the slides and at the end).
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or
of Logic and
Ontology. For the slides of the other days, see patlog1, 2, 3, and 5.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRI
Each of the 'roles' in the event (active or passive) is a
dyadic predicate of the form (, ). And, not
coincidentally, this is exactly the 5th normal form rendering of a complex
relation (which is a DBMS representation of a 'situation').
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on &qu
t;. In this translation of an obligatory triad to a monad and three dyads, the act of giving X has three parts that must occur at the same time.. You can't perform the different dyads in separable actions.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or
ligatory triad to a monad and three dyads, the act of
giving X has three parts that must occur at the same time.. You can't
perform the different dyads in separable actions.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to RE
t, fragile tissue and all which brings together these
> parts into a whole); that is, everything prerequisite for their eventual
> forming viable structures via Deacon's 'constraints' into such structural
> arrangements as crystals, and organisms such as bees (further manifesting
&g
nts', in this
>> sense, result in habits, result in evolutionary development.
>>
>> JAS (quoting Peirce): "The materialistic doctrine seems to me quite as
>> repugnant to scientific logic as to common sense; since it requires us to
>> suppose that a certain kind of
laim that this is
> *strictly* Deacon's view, but it is in my view possible to argue it based
> in part on certain of his insights; but Deacon himself is a materialist.)
>
> Best,
>
> Gary R
> “Let everything happen to you
> Beauty and terror
> Just keep going
> No feeling is final”
&g
t;>
>> Several features of Peirce semeiotic also appear prominently in *Incomplete
>> Nature*, For example, interpretants are discussed in consideration of
>> the communication theory involved in Deacon's theory (see, for example,
>> 443). However, in an endnote he remarks t
his
> "effort to map Peirce's object terms" onto his theory than he is with his
> use of the concept of interpretants (564, n.9), a remark which I found
> telling.
>
> I hope my comments aren't too much of a divergence from the topic of
> abioticsemiosis while th
nything comparable to that.
>
>
>
> Perhaps Peirce’s cosmological theory implies a more inclusive definition
> of “life,” but I don’t think that justifies reducing an “interpretant” to
> one end of a dydadic relation, no matter how long the chain of efficient
> causations that pr
>> simplest, are complex adaptive systems which *respond* to contacts with
>> their environments, and semiosically respond to signs in such a way that
>> their interpretant responses are triadically related to the signs *and
>> their objects*. The cells of our immune systems
ties doing anything comparable to that.
>
>
>
> Perhaps Peirce’s cosmological theory implies a more inclusive definition
> of “life,” but I don’t think that justifies reducing an “interpretant” to
> one end of a dydadic relation, no matter how long the chain of efficient
> caus
.
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu On
Behalf Of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: 21-Nov-21 21:09
To: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] "A necessary condition for proof of abioticsemiosis"
Gary R., List:
GR: But why limit the meaning of 'bio-' here, that is, in consideration of
.
Professor of Communication Studies
School of Communications and Arts
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
www.minutesemeiotic.org
www.semeiosis.com.br
Skype:vinicius_romanini
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to th
d causa
>> exemplaris), which is abductive plausibility, the O-R-I is
>> result-rule-case. E,g.: A neural image is a result (e.g of vision or
>> smelling) and the object of an animal´s nervous system. About this object
>> exists an abductive rule of plausibility, e.g. it is p
ess from living mind. . " As I see it, *living mind* is there from
> the get-go in Peirce's sense (although, again, I agree, most likely, not
> Champagne's). It would seem to me that from this Peircean perspective,
> there is actually no need for a "proof of abioticsemiosis.&q
d or bad for the organism. This feeling of good or bad is the representamen. The case is that then the organism either pusues or flees it (interpretant).
Is this far-fetching to press it into a table? Just an attempt.
Best, Helmut
Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. November 2021 um 07:32 Uhr
Von: &quo
far-fetching to press it into a table? Just an attempt.
Best, Helmut
Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. November 2021 um 07:32 Uhr
Von: "Gary Richmond" <gary.richm...@gmail.com>
An: "Peirce-L" <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
Cc: "Jon Alan Schmidt" <jonalanschm...
his feeling of good or bad is the representamen. The
> case is that then the organism either pusues or flees it (interpretant).
>
> Is this far-fetching to press it into a table? Just an attempt.
>
> Best, Helmut
>
> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 21. November 2021 um 07:32 Uhr
>
is that then the organism either pusues or flees it (interpretant).
Is this far-fetching to press it into a table? Just an attempt.
Best, Helmut
Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. November 2021 um 07:32 Uhr
Von: "Gary Richmond"
An: "Peirce-L"
Cc: "Jon Alan Schmidt"
Betreff: Re: [PE
viewing one of
>> the "components of a triadic sign" as *not* abiotic ("signs grow" CSP)?
>>
>> A theist might argue that this aboriginal semiosis is *not *strictly 'a
>> *bio*tic', that it comes from the 'action' (so to speak) of a "*living*
>> God.&
f New York*
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu
with UNSUBSCRIB
all the components of a
>>>> triadic sign – *including the interpretant* – would have to be abiotic"
>>>> (emphasis added).
>>>>
>>>> But is this necessarily so? Or rather, is there a way of viewing one of
>>>> the "components
(2012), which I have always
>> thought would be more accurately subtitled, "How mind emerged from
>> *constraints
>> on* matter." But does that approach in a way beg the question? Whence
>> those 'constraints'?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Gary R
led, "How mind emerged from *constraints
> on* matter." But does that approach in a way beg the question? Whence
> those 'constraints'?
>
> Best,
>
> Gary R
>
> “Let everything happen to you
> Beauty and terror
> Just keep going
> No feeling is final”
ing
No feeling is final”
― Rainer Maria Rilke
*Gary Richmond*
*Philosophy and Critical Thinking*
*Communication Studies*
*LaGuardia College of the City University of New York*
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this
s University
Florida, USA
===
A Clerk ther was of Oxenford also,
That unto logyk hadde longe y-go..
Sownnge in moral vertu was his speche,
And gladly wolde he lerne and gladly teche.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply
be from this list
<https://peircesociety.us15.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=2d67a1b536f133c3e9f9d5d8c=465a32ebdd=860edf35dc=4bb55b4e11>
[image: Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp]
<http://www.mailchimp.com/email-referral/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter_medium=email_campaign=referral_marketin
is Mariano
The University of Missouri-Columbia
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRC
is Mariano
The University of Missouri-Columbia
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRC
between the hypothetical science of mathematics and
the normative science of logic. Speaking of phaneroscopy ...
BM: Not doing so will lead to render phaneroscopy a simple paraphrase of
semiotic, ending into some kind of tautology between them.
This is from the post last week that prompted me
le/10.1007/s11787-021-00267-4
To attend, register here:
https://www.springer.com/journal/11787/updates/18988758
Best Wishes
Jean-Yves Beziau
Organizer of the Logica Universalis Webinar
President of Logica Universalis Association
http://www.logica-universalis.org/LUAD
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L s
specific bearing do they have on the order
of the last six trichotomies for sign classification?
My concern is to decipher what was at stake with the "second way
of dividing signs". I had come to think that CSP was elaborating
some kind of benchmark in order to make possible a kind of measure
logical side, implanted on philosophy, he was
> searching after what the practical observation of phanerons could reinforce
> or dismiss.
>
>
> JAS: Again, please elaborate. I generally agree with these statements, but
> what specific bearing do they have on the order of the last six
>
a solid house on the logical side,
implanted on philosophy, he was searching after what the practical
observation of phanerons could reinforce or dismiss.
Regards
Bernard
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to
uth of the three categories. After having
> built a solid house on the logical side, implanted on philosophy, he was
> searching after what the practical observation of phanerons could reinforce
> or dismiss.
>
> Regards
>
> Bernard
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscr
own in the Fig. 14 of divisions III -> II ->
I -> IV -> X -> IX -> VIII -> VII -> VI -> V after recognizing
the construction Peirce used in his own labelling of these
divisions.
I totally agree too with the remark from Liszka that you are
quoti
may be there: its place is taken by the "Normal"
>> Interpretant which I interpret as normal or usual course of things (Not
>> what can be supposed to be reached in the long run and thus not yet
>> actually known). This I think is the very sense of "Destinate". I came to
>>
I fully associate myself with this initiative which has the remarkable
characteristic of adding an opening to Peirce-L without subtracting
anything from it... it is perfectly justified, and it puts an end to a
malaise which has lasted for too long...
Le jeu. 11 nov. 2021 à 23:46, Edwina Taborsky
run and thus not yet
> actually known). This I think is the very sense of "Destinate". I came to
> the ordering shown in the Fig. 14 of divisions III -> II -> I -> IV -> X ->
> IX -> VIII -> VII -> VI -> V after recognizing the construction Peirce us
Peirce-L list but an
additional site for a more expansive type of discussion.
Edwina
On Thu 11/11/21 4:22 PM , "John F Sowa" s...@bestweb.net sent:
In the good old days of Peirce-L, there were friendly, collegial
discussions with no winners or losers. All participants c
-> VI -> V after recognizing the
construction Peirce used in his own labelling of these divisions.
I totally agree too with the remark from Liszka that you are quoting.
Apologies for the french language in the added figure.
Regards
Bernard Morand
fig14.pdf
Description: Adob
us of Logic.” He uses as an example: '“Philip
> of Macedon” is still capable of logical division—into Philip drunk and
> Philip sober.”
>
> I have learned that speculative grammar may fit the Play of Musement but
> not The Logic of Relatives.
>
> Thanks for your time and attention.
ank you each (Jon and Vincinius) for your replies - both were helpful in
>> trying to actualize theory-heavy terminology.
>>
>> Also wanted to say that Robert Marty's Podium diagram is maybe the most
>> helpful of all resources I've yet looked through. It's this variety of
>&
JAS: His 1903 taxonomy is fairly straightforward and useful as far as it
> goes, which is probably why it remains popular despite his subsequent
> revisions. Those later taxonomies are indeed much more difficult to
> "reconstitute" since they mostly come from various Logic Noteboo
llabus of 1903, things get confusing. Hartshorne and
Weiss tried in several footnotes to amend Peirce and made things worse (at
least for me).
Regards,
Vinicius
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to t
ariety of
> "concreteness" which could be helpful in conceptualizing relations between
> the one sign, its two objects, and its three interpretants. Maybe such
> already exists?
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List
sitant can be determined by
>> nothing but a Necessitant" (EP 2:481, 1908). This is another reason why I
>> maintain that "the Destinate Interpretant" is the final interpretant, not
>> the immediate interpretant.
>>
>
> Here is where the conf
ful "owner" or "proper interpreter" of Peirce, but I like to engage
cross-discipline as it helps me see/feel what other perspectives look like.
Best
Jack
From: robert marty
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 7:22 PM
To: JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
Cc: Jon Ala
ium diagram is maybe the most
> helpful of all resources I've yet looked through. It's this variety of
> "concreteness" which could be helpful in conceptualizing relations between
> the one sign, its two objects, and its three interpretants. Maybe such
> already exists?
>
&g
t's this variety of
> "concreteness" which could be helpful in conceptualizing relations between
> the one sign, its two objects, and its three interpretants. Maybe such
> already exists?
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iup
usion begins. Peirce seems to use "determine" with
different meanings in different MS. Sometimes it seems to mean "determines
at least", some others "determines at most".
I gave up trying to reconstitute the exact thread of Peirce's proposals (if
ever there was a un
of "concreteness"
which could be helpful in conceptualizing relations between the one sign, its
two objects, and its three interpretants. Maybe such already exists?
Best
Jack
____
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday,
To attend, register here:
https://www.springer.com/journal/11787/updates/18988758
Jean-Yves Beziau
Organizer of the Logica Universalis Webinar
President of Logica Universalis Association
http://www.logica-universalis.org/LUAD
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List"
The
> first uses degenerations, the second does not and by choosing so Peirce had
> to deal with a much longer array of aspects.
>
> Speculative Grammar is not easy.
>
> All the best,
> Vinicius
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List"
t; Best regards,
>
> Robert Marty
>
> Honorary Professor ; PhD Mathematics ; PhD Philosophy
> fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty
> *https://martyrobert.academia.edu/ <https://martyrobert.academia.edu/>*
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or
original
>>> effect of musement.
>>>
>>> Well, maybe things are now more complicated than when we started. Sorry
>>> for that.
>>>
>>> Vinicius
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 10:53 AM JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY <
>>> jack.cody.2
eirce?) do, and maybe this gets close to the core of the differences
> between us in how we experience the world. I appreciate the signs of
> signlessness <https://gnusystems.ca/TS/ydb.htm#x32>, as some Buddhists
> call it. (Maybe my unintentional white-on-white text betrays that!)
>
&g
men but firstness for the final interpretant.
>>> I wonder if you would be able to clarify on this notion a little.
>>> Perhaps delineating exactly what you consider a "degenerate legisign" to
>>> be, and then how it alters when the mode is "thirdness for representament"
>>> and &
and maybe this gets close to the core of the differences between
us in how we experience the world. I appreciate the signs of signlessness
<https://gnusystems.ca/TS/ydb.htm#x32> , as some Buddhists call it. (Maybe my
unintentional white-on-white text betrays that!)
Gary f.
Fro
WL, and my goal is to persuade people to adopt EGs and related
graphic notations
From: "Mike Bergman"
Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 2:17 AM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Signs, Typ
, a good story can often be more persuasive
> than a sound argument.
>
> GF: Yes indeed. Especially if the person hearing the story is not
> conscious of being persuaded.
>
> Gary f.
>
> } O Loud, hear the wee beseech of thees of each of these thy unlitten
> ones! [*Finneg
res a composer. Likewise, if the entire universe is conceived as "a single grand narrative," then it seems to me that it requires a narrator.
GF (https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-11/msg00028.html): A narrative is basically a representation of a sequence of events which is not necessari
conceived as "a single grand narrative," then it seems to me that it requires a narrator.
GF (https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2021-11/msg00028.html): A narrative is basically a representation of a sequence of events which is not necessarily meaningful in any way.
On the con
1001 - 1100 of 15242 matches
Mail list logo
