Please find:
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/2010/02/seven-days-between-parrot-and-camel.html
Lithos
Please find:
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/2010/01/seven-days-between-parrot-and-camel_26.html
Lithos
Please find:
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/2010/01/seven-days-between-parrot-and-camel_15.html
Lithos
Please find:
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/2010/01/seven-days-between-parrot-and-camel.html
Lithos
Please find:
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/2009/12/seven-days-between-parrot-and-camel_28.html
Lithos
Please find:
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/2009/12/seven-days-between-parrot-and-camel_22.html
Lithos
Please find:
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/2009/12/seven-days-between-parrot-and-camel_13.html
Lithos
Please find:
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/2009/12/seven-days-between-parrot-and-camel.html
Lithos
[now CC-ing the list, d'oh!]
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell ge...@broadwell.org wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 01:15 +0100, Lithos wrote:
Today I posted my first attempt at summarizing Perl 6 and Parrot things at
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/
Any comments and
Hello!
I posted my first attempt at summarizing Perl 6 and Parrot things at
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/
Any comments and corrections welcome!
Lithos
Lithos wrote:
I posted my first attempt at summarizing Perl 6 and Parrot things at
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/
Any comments and corrections welcome!
Looks good so far.
If you intend to do that weekly, it should be a valuable service, like the
summaries done years ago.
I also
Hello!
Today I posted my first attempt at summarizing Perl 6 and Parrot things at
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/
Any comments and corrections welcome!
Lithos
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 01:15 +0100, Lithos wrote:
Today I posted my first attempt at summarizing Perl 6 and Parrot things at
http://lith-ology.blogspot.com/
Any comments and corrections welcome!
This is *very* valuable to us. Please keep it up!
-'f
On 2/18/06, The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smart match table
Robin Houston had some questions/observations about the smart match
table in synopsis 4. This is the table that describes how the smart
match (~~) operator does its comparisons. It turns out that the
The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2006-02-12
Did I say Thursday night? What was I thinking? Blame Nikon for finally
delivering my D200; or just blame me for being a lazy git who spent
Thursday night recovering from the drive home from Liverpool and Friday
playing with a new
The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2006-02-12
Welcome to part one of this week's summary. Owning to chronic problems
with deadlines I've only got time to summarize perl6-compiler and
perl6-internals tonight; I'll do perl6-language when I get back from
$paying_job on Thursday
Perl 6 Summary for 2006-01-24 though 2006-02-07
All~
Welcome to another fortnight's summary. I would say more, but my throat
really hurts.
Perl 6 Language
Pugs's Minimum GHC
Darren Duncan proposed moving the minimum GHS requirement from 6.4.0 to
6.4.1. Based
Matt Fowles wrote:
LuaNil Morphing
Klaas-Jan Stol proffered a patch which changed LuaNil from a singleton
and made it morph to other Lua types when asked. Warnock applies.
Actually, François Perrad applied this patch, but I think he only sent a
reply to me.
http://xrl.us/jpww
Perl 6 Summary for 2006-01-10 though 2006-01-24
All~
Welcome to another fortnight's summary. This summary marks a return to a
Tuesday schedule for summaries. Hopefully this will help me get
summaries to you on time. Oddly appropriate that I just started reading
Don Quixote
Unless Matt takes pity on me, and writes a summary at disgustingly
high speed, there won't be a summary this week. Assorted things got in
the way on Monday or Tuesday, and I'm now at my consulting gig 'til
the end of the week with no time for summarizing.
I'm really, really sorry.
--
Piers
Perl 6 Summary for 2006-01-02 though 2006-01-09
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary. On a complete tangent, if you are
playing World of Warcraft and see a troll hunter named Krynna, she
rocks. She royally saved me. Be nice to her.
Perl 6 Compiler
PIL Containers and Roles
The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2006-01-01
Another year, another summary. You might think I'm going to summarize
the events of the whole year, but it turns out that chromatic's already
done it. So in the spirit of laziness, I'll just point you at his year
end summary
ti, 2006-01-03 kello 13:57 +, The Perl 6 Summarizer kirjoitti:
Planet Perl Six is a handy news aggregator of several Perl 6 related
sources.
http://planet6.perl.org/
I believe that is actually http://planetsix.perl.org
Thanks for the great summary!
--
wolverian [EMAIL
The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2005-12-18
Welcome to another Perl 6 summary. This has been a week of shootouts,
cleanups, relationships and cunning translations. Read on for the
details (or, this being a summary, pointers to the details).
This week in perl6-compiler
2
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-12-05 through 2005-12-12
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 summary. This week, like last, Parrot has
produced the highest volume of emails. Fine by me, Parrot tends to be
easiest to summarize. This summary is brought to you by Snow (the latest
soft toy
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-12-04
I heard a rumour on the London.pm mailing list week. Apparently the Perl
6 Summaries are no longer being published. As I'm sure you can imagine,
it came as something of a surprise to me.
This week has been all about Parrot, Leo's
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-11-27
Another week passes. Another summary is written. Another sentence
remains steadfastly in the passive voice.
This week in perl6-compiler
Perl 5 tests for PGE::P5Regexp
Jerry Gay announced that he'd checked in a subset of perl 5.9.2's
this week's summary. I hope to be writing next week's summary as well
because the week after I'll be moving house and don't quite know when
I'll have my bandwidth back.
That sounds fine to me. After next weeks I will start writing weekly
summaries until you send me an email saying you
On Nov 23, 2005, at 3:06, chromatic wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 01:39 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
But my argument was: whenever you
start introspecting a call frame, by almost whatever means, this will
keep the call frame alive[1] (see Continuation or Closure). That is:
timely destruction
On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:40, Matt Fowles wrote:
Call Frame Access
Chip began to pontificate about how one should access call frames.
Chip
suggested using a PMC, but Leo thought that would be too slow.
No, not really. It'll be slower, yes. But my argument was: whenever you
start
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 01:39 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
But my argument was: whenever you
start introspecting a call frame, by almost whatever means, this will
keep the call frame alive[1] (see Continuation or Closure). That is:
timely destruction doesn't work for example...
Destruction
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-11-14 through 2005-11-21
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary. The attentive among you may notice
that this one is on time. I am not sure how that happened, but we will
try and keep it up. On a complete side note, I think there should be a
Perl guild
The Perl 6 Summary for the fortnight ending 2005-11-13
Welcome to another fortnight's worth of summary. We'll get back to a
weekly schedule one of these fine days, you see if we don't.
This fortnight in perl6-compiler
There was a surprisingly large amount of activity on the list
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Perl 6 perlplexities
Michele Dondi worries that the increase in complexity of some aspects of
Perl 6 is much bigger than the increase in functionality that the
complexity buys us. In particular Michele is concerned that the Perl 6
On Nov 15, 2005, at 17:24, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The Perl 6 Summary for the fortnight ending 2005-11-13
string_bitwise_*
Leo, it seems to boil down to a choice between throwing an
exception or
simply mashing everything together and marking the 'resulting bit
mess
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Slightly tangentially to this, Dan Sugalski blogged a couple of weeks
ago about his successes and failures with Parrot. The comments are worth
reading -- there's a fair few more or less well founded complaints about
the way the Perl 6
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-10-30
Hmm... Thursday afternoon and I've only just started writing the
summary... What happened to professionalism? What happened to rigid,
albeit self-imposed deadlines?
Um... I've had a cold. The cats ate my homework.
This week
The Perl 6 Summarizer skribis 2005-11-04 14:34 (+):
$_ defaulting for mutating ops
Probably I have not been clear enough about that I no longer think this
is a good idea.
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
=head1 Perl 6 Summary for 2005-10-10 through 2005-10-18
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary. Sadly, this week's summary is not
brought to you by cookies as I already finished them. Sadder still,
it is also brought to you a week late. On the plus side, Mike
Doughty's Haughty Melodic
survived the experience and did what was needed in
there, though I think maybe my post about that was missed in the summary.
I've got just a couple of small things to clear up now, but otherwise the
PASM/PIR debug seg stuff is about done. Next up: HLL debug segs.
Thanks for the summary,
Jonathan
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-10-09
Hello, and welcome to the first Perl 6 Summary to be published on my
website rather than its former home at http://www.perl.com/
This week in perl6-compiler
PGE error on failing subrules
Allison broke the resounding silence
function (__add) - I
should have mentioned this in the first place. 'is no longer necessary'
isn't quite correct. Usually there is no need to call any of these
builtins directly, as Parrot's MMD system handles operator overloading.
And finally: the bug is fixed.
Thanks for the summary,
leo
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-09-26 through 2005-10-02
All~
Welcome to another summary, this time a day late because I was in Philly
for Serenity. If you haven't seen Serenity yet you should stop reading
this summary and go see it. The summary will be here when you get back.
I
HaloO,
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Meanwhile, in perl6-language
\(...)
Oh look, a thread in p6l that's still going more than a fortnight later.
How unusual.
Is a long running thread considered a bad thing on this list?
I have grasped so far, that spawning a new thread after
some
TSa skribis 2005-09-27 10:15 (+0200):
Is a long running thread considered a bad thing on this list?
Just like how a post being Warnocked can have one or more of several
causes, a long running thread can.
Some are bad, some are good.
As a thread becomes longer and more fanned out, it becomes
TSa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HaloO,
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Meanwhile, in perl6-language
\(...)
Oh look, a thread in p6l that's still going more than a fortnight later.
How unusual.
Is a long running thread considered a bad thing on this list?
Nah, it's just hard to
I thought we'd switched to a Monday deadline for the summary and a Sunday night
roll over. I just noticed your last summary ended on a Monday night.
--
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bofh.org.uk/
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-09-25
Hello all. It's another Monday afternoon, which means I'm writing
another summary. There's no cricket to distract me this week, so I'm
letting iTunes Party Shuffle attempt to distract me instead.
This week in perl6-compiler
Nobody
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 18:12:23 +0100, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Allomopherencing
Not satisfied with inventing Exceptuations, Yuval invented
Allomopherencing as well. Just don't ask me what it means because I
don't know.
It was just a bad joke on Exceptuation's expense ;-)
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-09-12 through 2005-09-19
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary, this time brought to you with a
shorter pause (::grumble:: $WORK ::grumble::) and assisted by cookies.
Perl 6 Compilers
Circular Preludes for Fun and Confusion
Yuval Kogman posted
The Perl 6 Summary from 2005-08-24 to 2005-09-11
It's been a while hasn't it?
We'll start as usual with perl6-compiler
This week in perl6-compiler
Changed ??:: to ??!! in Pugs
Following discussion of the ternary operator in perl6-language, Benjamin
Smith altered pugs to use
On Aug 23, 2005, at 3:43, Matt Fowles wrote:
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-08-15 through 2005-08-22
Java on Parrot
I vote for Jot.
That's already occupied by another language
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iota_and_Jot.
Perl 6 Language
Type Inferencing in Perl 5
Autrijus
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:43:41PM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
Java on Parrot
Tim Bunce asked some preliminary questions about Java on Parrot. I
provide preliminary answers, and Nattfodd and Autrijus posted links to
related work. The important question of what it should be
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-08-15 through 2005-08-22
All~
Welcome to another monday summary, which hopefully provides some
evidence that mondays can get better. It always feels like writing
summaries is an uphill battle, perhaps I should switch to writing about
Perl 6 Language
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20050814
As you will note from the date in the title, it's been a short week.
We're switching back to a midnight Sunday/Monday rollover in order to
make life easier for the perl.com types. So, if I can avoid being
distracted too much
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-08-02 through 2005-08-10
All~
Welcome to another summary, brought to you by chinese food. The
attentive among you will notice that this summary is a day late, because
I did not feel like doing it yesterday. If only I could do that at
work...
Perl 6
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-07-19 through 2005-07-26
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary brought to you by microwaved chinese
food and air conditioning. I love the modern era. Without further ado, I
bring you
Perl 6 Compilers
Grégoire Péan announed the release of PxPerl
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-07-19
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary, brought to you by the words
'displacement' and 'activity'. So far today I've caught up with
everything unread in NetNewsWire, my Flickr groups, every other mailing
list I'm subscribed
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:14:57PM -0600, John Williams wrote:
: Actually I took his question to be:
:
: If I explicitly name my invocant in the method signature, does that give
: the compiler enough assurance that I'm not going to use .method to mean
: $?SELF.method, and it will allow me to
Damian Conway wrote:
Important qualification:
Within a method or submethod, C.method only works when C$_ =:=
$?SELF.
C.method is perfectly legal on *any* topic anywhere that $?SELF
doesn't exist.
Just to be clear, this includes any method/submethod with an explicitly
named invocant,
Dave Whipp skribis 2005-07-13 8:44 (-0700):
Within a method or submethod, C.method only works when C$_ =:=
$?SELF.
C.method is perfectly legal on *any* topic anywhere that $?SELF
doesn't exist.
Just to be clear, this includes any method/submethod with an explicitly
named invocant, I
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-07-05 through 2005-07-12
All~
Welcome to another summary from the frog house. A house so green it can
be seen from outerspace (according to google earth).
Perl 6 Compiler
Building Pugs Workaround
Sam Vilain posted a useful work around to the error
Matt Fowles summarized:
Method Call on Invocant
Now ./method is gone, and .method only works when $_ =:= $?SELF .
Important qualification:
Within a method or submethod, C.method only works when C$_ =:= $?SELF.
C.method is perfectly legal on *any*
The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2005-07-05
My, doesn't time fly? Another fortnight gone and another summary to
write. It's a hard life I tell you!
This week in perl6-compiler
Where's everyone gone?
It seems that most of the Perl 6 compiler development is being discussed
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:11:24PM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
Parrot Loses with Fedora Core 4
Patrick reported that Fedora Core 4 and Parrot don't get along well. Leo
suggested a possible solution. No response from Patrick.
An update:
Patrick submitted a patch based on Leo's
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-06-21 through 2005-06-28
All~
Long time no see... err, write... uh, read... um... this. Yeah, long
time no this. As Piers hinted, two weeks ago I moved. Moving sucks. For
those of you who care, I am still in Cambridge, for those of you who
care more, I
The Perl 6 summary for the fortnight ending 2005-06-21
Surprise! It's me again. You may be wondering what happened to last
week's summary (I know I was) and where Matt had gone. Well, I'm not
entirely sure where exactly he is now, but last week was moving week for
him.
Those
The Perl 6 summary for the fortnight ending 2005-06-21
Surprise! It's me again. You may be wondering what happened to last
week's summary (I know I was) and where Matt had gone. Well, I'm not
entirely sure where exactly he is now, but last week was moving week for
him.
Those
The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2005-06-07
Crumbs. I've remembered to write the summary this week. Now if I can
just remember to bill O'Reilly for, err, 2003's summaries. Heck, it's
not like waiting for the dollar to get stronger has paid off.
Ah well, no use crying over
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-05-24 through 2005-05-31
All~
Welcome to another Perl 6 summary, brought to you by Aliya's new
friends, Masha Nannifer and Philippe, and my own secret running joke.
Without further ado, I bring you Perl 6 Compiler.
Perl 6 Compiler
method chaining
Thank you for the summary, Matt
I have a correction, though:
subrules tests
Dino Morelli provided a patch adding tests for subrules to PGE. Warnock
applies.
http://xrl.us/f955
This and my other two patches to p6rules tests (RT #35950, 35971, 35994)
have not yet been applied
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:58:12PM -0400, Dino Morelli wrote:
Thank you for the summary, Matt
I have a correction, though:
subrules tests
Dino Morelli provided a patch adding tests for subrules to PGE. Warnock
applies.
http://xrl.us/f955
This and my other two patches
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-05-24
Note to self: It's generally not a good idea to go installing Tiger on
the day you return from holiday. It's especially not a good idea to fail
to check that it didn't completely and utterly radish your Postfix
configuration
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-05-03 through 2005-05-17
All~
Welcome ot another fortnight's summary. Wouldn't it just figure that I
can't think of anything sufficiently non-sequiterish to amuse myself.
Perhaps I need a running gag like Leon Brocard or chromatic's
cummingseque
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Matt Fowles wrote:
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-04-26 through 2005-05-03
^^
^^
Wow!
Michele
--
Why should I read the fucking manual? I know how to fuck!
In fact the problem is that the fucking manual only gives you
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-04-26 through 2005-05-03
All~
Welcome to another weeks summary. This week I shall endeavor not to
accidentally delete my summary or destroy the world. So here we go with
p6c.
Perl 6 Compilers
implicit $_ on for loops
Kiran Kumar found a bug
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-04-26
It's my turn again. What fun.
What, I hear you all ask, has been going on in the crazy mixed up
world of Perl 6 design and development? Read this summary and,
beginning with perl6-compiler, I shall tell you.
This week in perl6
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Matt Fowles wrote:
Python on Parrot
^^
Kevin Tew wondered what the state of pyrate was. Sam Ruby provided a
general explanation.
(I'm not on all of the lists, so this may have come out before and I
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-04-12 through 2005-04-19
All~
Sadly, a slip of the mouse cause me to delete a partially completed
summary, so I am going to push ahead on the rewrite without a witty
intro. Feel free to make one up for yourself involving stuffed animals,
musicians
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-04-12
Whoa! Deja vu! Where'd Matt go?
Don't worry, Matt's still writing summaries. As you may have noticed,
Matt's been writing summaries every two weeks. And now so am I. Because
we love you, we've decided to arrange things so I write
-for-adds --summary` to find the offending files.
http://xrl.us/fogb
BEGIN {} time
Autrijus wondered when BEGIN was supposed to run. Markus Laire posted a
useful summary of when the various CAPITAL things were run. Larry
confirmed Autrijus suspicion.
http://xrl.us/fogc
YAML
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pugs too lazy
Miroslav Silovic noticed that closing a file handle in pugs did not
force all the thunks associated with the file. While this was a bug in
pugs, it led to conversation about whether = should be lazy or eager.
Larry thinks that it will be safer
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-03-07 through 2005-03-22
All~
Welcome to yet another fortnights summary. I believe this is the highest
volume I have ever seen the three lists at simultaneously. Hopefully
they will keep it up, because good work is being done. To aid in the
epic
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-02-22 though 2005-03-07
All~
Welcome to yet another fortnight summary. Once again brought to you by
chocolate chips. This does have the distinction of being the first
summary written on a mac. So if I break into random swear words, just
bear with me
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-02-08 through 2005-02-22
All~
Welcome to yet another fortnight summary. Lately p6l has been out
stripping p6i in volume. While this used to be the norm, lately it has
become a rare occurrence. Strange... Anyway, this summary would be
brought to you buy
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Larry Wall wrote:
roadblocks thrown in their way. That's true not only for LP, but
also for FP, MP, XP, AOP, DBC, and hopefully several other varieties
^^ ^^^
^^ ^^^
1. 2.
Ehmmm... sorry for the ignorance, but...
1.
MD == Michele Dondi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MD On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Larry Wall wrote:
roadblocks thrown in their way. That's true not only for LP, but
also for FP, MP, XP, AOP, DBC, and hopefully several other varieties
MD ^^ ^^^
MD ^^ ^^^
John Macdonald wrote:
The basic problem is that a junction does not work well with
boolean operations, because the answer is usually sometimes
yes and sometimes no and until you resolve which of those is
the one you want, you have to proceed with both conditions.
Well, just patch the boolean
Uri Guttman wrote:
[...]
i think so but i can't read larry's mind (nor would i want to! :)
XP = extreme programming
DBC = design by contract (or even designed by conway :)
MP = ??
Modular Programming
David
Aaron Sherman wrote:
So hold on to your socks... what about:
@x @y;
This reminds me of AWK's string concatenation behaviour:
print this $1 that $2
This was nice feature at the time, but caused problems down the track
when they wanted to add functions to the language in a subsequent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think so but i can't read larry's mind (nor would i want to! :)
XP = extreme programming
DBC = design by contract (or even designed by conway :)
MP = ??
Modular Programming
David
I think it's Metaprogramming. :)
Miro
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 12:32:21PM +0100, Miroslav Silovic wrote:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: i think so but i can't read larry's mind (nor would i want to! :)
:
: XP = extreme programming
: DBC = design by contract (or even designed by conway :)
: MP = ??
:
:
: Modular
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Matt Fowles wrote:
pipe dreams
Juerd wondered if he could mix = and == in a sane way. The answer
appears to be no. Once you bring in == you should stick with it.
Huh?!? It doesn't seem to me that the answer is 'no'. In fact C ==
is supposed to be yet another operator,
Michele Dondi wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Matt Fowles wrote:
pipe dreams
Juerd wondered if he could mix = and == in a sane way. The answer
appears to be no. Once you bring in == you should stick with it.
Huh?!? It doesn't seem to me that the answer is 'no'. In fact C ==
is supposed to be
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:04:48AM +0100, Michele Dondi wrote:
: On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Matt Fowles wrote:
:
: pipe dreams
:Juerd wondered if he could mix = and == in a sane way. The answer
:appears to be no. Once you bring in == you should stick with it.
:
: Huh?!? It doesn't seem to me
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Larry Wall wrote:
Yes, you can certainly intermix them as long as you keep your
precedence straight with parentheses. Though I suppose we could go
as far as to say that = is only scalar assignment, and you have to
use == or == for list assignment. That would
Larry Wall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:04:48AM +0100, Michele Dondi wrote:
: On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Matt Fowles wrote:
:
: pipe dreams
:Juerd wondered if he could mix = and == in a sane way. The answer
:appears to be no. Once you bring in == you should stick with it.
:
: Huh?!? It
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 06:04, Rod Adams wrote:
Larry Wall wrote:
Yes, you can certainly intermix them as long as you keep your
precedence straight with parentheses. Though I suppose we could go
as far as to say that = is only scalar assignment, and you have to
use == or == for list
--- Matt Fowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Logic Programming in Perl 6
Ovid asked what logic programming in perl 6 would look like. No
answer
yet, but I suppose I can pick the low hanging fruit: as a
limiting case
you could always back out the entire perl 6 grammar and insert
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:57:17AM -0800, Ovid wrote:
: --- Matt Fowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: Logic Programming in Perl 6
: Ovid asked what logic programming in perl 6 would look like. No
: answer
: yet, but I suppose I can pick the low hanging fruit: as a
: limiting case
:
1 - 100 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
