Re: Fwd: FOSDEM - perl 6 critic

2011-02-24 Thread Steffen Schwigon
language. Whatever Perl 6 will turn out to be, it won't be a small language. And just to complement the many answers: There *are* small variants of Perl6: Perlito and NQP. Kind regards, Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon s...@renormalist.net Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/

Re: benchmarking against other languages

2011-02-14 Thread Steffen Schwigon
. Kind regards, Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon s...@renormalist.net Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/

Re: Production Release - was Re: Questions for Survey about Perl

2011-01-06 Thread Steffen Schwigon
in the history of mankind. If this was a real world project it would have been dead sometime ago. Don't worry too much. Python 3000 took about 8 years. (Though not sure about betas for testing.) Kind regards, Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon s...@renormalist.net Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden

Re: Production Release - was Re: Questions for Survey about Perl

2011-01-06 Thread Steffen Schwigon
. The language has everything I need, I just can't hack all the things I regularly use from CPAN. Kind regards, Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon s...@renormalist.net Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/

Re: Perl6 Modules - Documentation

2010-07-30 Thread Steffen Schwigon
toolchain doing that. Kind regards, Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon s...@renormalist.net Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/

Re: Perl 6 IDEs

2009-12-07 Thread Steffen Schwigon
repository. Kind regards, Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon s...@renormalist.net

Re: rakudo-current loop 2-3 orders of magnitude slower than perl 5?

2009-06-05 Thread Steffen Schwigon
appreciated. Kind regards, Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon s...@renormalist.net Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/ Deutscher Perl-Workshop http://www.perl-workshop.de/

Re: rakudo-current loop 2-3 orders of magnitude slower than perl 5?

2009-06-05 Thread Steffen Schwigon
Parrot Raiser 1parr...@gmail.com writes: If Sun's propaganda about Dtrace : http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/dtrace/ is anywhere near true Which I can confirm. DTrace *is* cool. Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon s...@renormalist.net Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/ Deutscher Perl

Re: Project Idea: Perl 6 Syntax Explainer

2007-07-10 Thread Steffen Schwigon
into one common place? If we had such a collection we would then format it in a second step into a structured collection and the third step is a frontend to that, the easiest part, IMHO. Step 1 is the real challenge, isn't it? Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dresden Perl Mongers http

Re: Embedded perl5 modules

2006-10-20 Thread Steffen Schwigon
, column 1-28 Is the perl6 wrong? I have also tested use perl5:Wx SimpleApp; Maybe an additional use perl5:Wx::SimpleApp; ? I'm just guessing... Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/

Re: the CGI.pm in Perl 6

2006-09-12 Thread Steffen Schwigon
itself with CGI in its name, it hadn't been that successful. In mankind's history, everything *not* named CGI had a chance to success, even PHP. It will be impossible to resurrect a hype around the word CGI. Because of the word. Not the api. IMHO. Of course. :-) GreetinX Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon

Re: cperl-mode.el: twigils and opers

2006-09-06 Thread Steffen Schwigon
Steffen Schwigon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I checked and indeed the twigils don't work. My test source file (which worked correctly some time ago) also highlights wrong. It's for sure a bug I introduced. I now did some things on cperl-mode (eg. syncing with original v5.20) and it seems

Re: cperl-mode.el: twigils and opers

2006-09-05 Thread Steffen Schwigon
Trey Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In a message dated Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Steffen Schwigon writes: First you could try an older revision, I recommend r7845 or r10822 of pugs repository. No, neither of those work. To see what I'm talking about, just create a file containing: use v6-alpha

Re: cperl-mode.el: twigils and opers

2006-09-04 Thread Steffen Schwigon
with high backwards compatibility is a big plus and there is much knowledge in original cperl-mode that progresses itself, even as we speak. Currently I wouldn't fork it. BTW, I work with XEmacs 21.4.7. What's your Emacs? GreetinX Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dresden Perl Mongers

Re: Stubborn coworkers

2006-08-30 Thread Steffen Schwigon
, not Perl6 with AnyOtherLanguage, because that's just the same old discussion since Perl's birthday. Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/

Re: Help getting pugs working?

2006-08-30 Thread Steffen Schwigon
of the easiness, although it's not RedHat-driven. GreetinX Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/

Re: a practical question

2006-08-23 Thread Steffen Schwigon
with @otherstuff (the same excuse as every year). If you start experimenting and writing down something, expect me to follow you. If we know and document something in an easy understandable form, wxWidgets or any other lib can be the next step. GreetinX Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon [EMAIL

Re: Mutil Method Questions

2006-06-26 Thread Steffen Schwigon
Thomas Wittek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steffen Schwigon schrieb: At least the many keywords seem to be necessary to map the complexity of different paradigms possible in Perl6. Multimethods are not just overloading as in C++. Second, the different keywords declare different behaviour you can

Re: 3 Good Reasons...

2006-05-25 Thread Steffen Schwigon
into the problem, just use it. Perl5 is already gluey enough to not force you into a decicion for *the only one* technology. Perl6 shouldn't change that. Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dresden Perl Mongers http://dresden-pm.org/