On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 12:53:17PM +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
> > Given the current version number scheme (year.month), it's highly
> > unlikely that we'll ever see a Rakudo 1.0.
> >
> > So I'd change that to "after a production release of
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 10:27 -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> - What was the first production release of Linux?
> - At what point was each of the above declared a "production
> release";
> was it concurrent with the release, or some time afterwards?
Linus declared what his goals for 1.0 w
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:05, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 10:27 -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> > - What was the first production release of Linux?
> > - At what point was each of the above declared a "production
> > release";
> > was it concurrent with the release, or s
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 18:25 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> At least have the decency to change the e-mail subject when the
> discussion's
> subject has changed!
IMO, the subject changed at the second post. I was just responding to P
Michaud who is the current principal developer of the s/w bein
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:33, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 18:25 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> > At least have the decency to change the e-mail subject when the
> > discussion's
> > subject has changed!
>
> IMO, the subject changed at the second post. I was just responding to P
>
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 06:25:18PM +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:05, Guy Hulbert wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 10:27 -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> > - What was the first production release of Linux?
> > - At what point was each of the above decl
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 18:45 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> You guys stopped discussing the questionnaire a LONG time before PM
> answered. There has hardly been a handful of helpful posts.
That's what I said and that was my first post.
>
>
> Getting back on topic, I, for one, would like to kn
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 19:02, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> Many people seem to be proposing questions which ask people's opinions
> of things which are factual and can be answered readily by reading the
> documentation.
>
> For example, your question can be partly answered by looking at the
> rakudo down
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 20:10 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> It does not, however, answer any of the question_s_ I wanted asked, and
> which others have wanted asked, not even partially.
I haven't seen any such requests from you on this thread. Is this
discussion happening elsewhere as well ?
>
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what 'TPF survey' is.
http://survey.perlfoundation.org/
Gabor
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> Out of curiosity (because I think it will illuminate some of the difficulty
> Rakudo devs have in declaring something to be a "production release"):
>
> - What constitues a "production release"?
The developers judge that the software is
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> I think freezing a subset of what you eventually want to have and then
> getting as close as you can on a fairly tight schedule is the best way
> to get buy-in from users.
That is generally what I expect to see in a production release, yes. I
d
(a mistakenly private exchange back to the list)
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 21:51 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I'm not sure wha
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 22:30 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> >> Thanks. Found that already. It does not list the questions asked and I
> >> can't figure out how to download the PDF report or to clone the
> >> repository it's in on github.
Jan Involdstadt suggested I look at TPF website and following
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 12:53:17PM +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
>> > Given the current version number scheme (year.month), it's highly
>> > unlikely that we'll ever see a Rakudo 1
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> On 01/01/2011 10:15 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>> So for example:
>>
>> I'll start learning Perl 6 (select one or more that fits your opinion)
>> *) when Larry Wall declares that Perl 6.0 is ready
>> *) after Rakudo 1.0 is released
>
> Given the cu
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Chas. Owens wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:39, Xue, Brian wrote:
>> I want to adding one more answer about what are people waiting for before
>> they
>> start using Perl 6.
>>
>> There hasn't an official release of PERL6.0, just Rakudo. I'm afraid of
>> Raku
17 matches
Mail list logo
