On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Mike Toews wrote:
> While files are being renamed in the main repo, is it possible to
> rename install-win32.sgml ? "win32" implies a 32-bit windows
> architecture, which is dated and misleading.
>
> Could I suggest:
> git mv doc/src/sgml/install-win32.sgml doc/src
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>>> I always assumed "PL/pgSQL" was correct, but does anyone know for
>>> sure? Anyone interested in making consistent all these mentions of
>>> PL/pgSQL in
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> I always assumed "PL/pgSQL" was correct, but does anyone know for
>> sure? Anyone interested in making consistent all these mentions of
>> PL/pgSQL in the source (I can send in a patch if needed)?
>
> Sure, it shoul
Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> I happened to notice this while reading the 9.0 release notes. Most
> places, "PL/pgSQL" is capitalized (correctly?) like so:
> $ find postgresql/ | xargs grep "PL/pgSQL" | wc -l
> 476
>
> But I also see a decent number of references to this alternate capitalizatio
Greg Smith writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> BTW now that they are pestered with the PgFoundry commit messages, the
>> pgsql-committers archive do not seem a very useful resource anymore.
>> The Git "shortlog" seems much better, so maybe we should point to that.
> I missed why that happened in t
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
BTW now that they are pestered with the PgFoundry commit messages, the
pgsql-committers archive do not seem a very useful resource anymore.
The Git "shortlog" seems much better, so maybe we should point to that.
I missed why that happened in the first place, but based o
I happened to notice this while reading the 9.0 release notes. Most
places, "PL/pgSQL" is capitalized (correctly?) like so:
$ find postgresql/ | xargs grep "PL/pgSQL" | wc -l
476
But I also see a decent number of references to this alternate capitalization:
$ find postgresql/ | xargs grep
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:25, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Uh, why only back to 8.2?
>
>> Based on the "the others are discontinued just over a month from now
>> anyway"...
>
> Yeah, but they will each have a final release. Do
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:25, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Uh, why only back to 8.2?
> Based on the "the others are discontinued just over a month from now
> anyway"...
Yeah, but they will each have a final release. Don't we want to have
the updated info in the final releases
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander writes:
I suggest just wiping those and replacing them with the same git
instructions we have now. Objections?
>>>
>>> Works for me.
>
>> Appl
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander writes:
>>> I suggest just wiping those and replacing them with the same git
>>> instructions we have now. Objections?
>>
>> Works for me.
> Applied.
Uh, why only back to 8.2?
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> Looking at backpatching this, I realized the major changes we made to
>> it a while ago was only backpatched to 8.4. 8.3 and earlier has the
>> much more complex cvs instructoins.
>
>> I suggest just wiping those and repl
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> BTW now that they are pestered with the PgFoundry commit messages, the
> pgsql-committers archive do not seem a very useful resource anymore.
> The Git "shortlog" seems much better, so maybe we should point to that.
Hmm ... do we have a search engine for the shortlog? An
Magnus Hagander writes:
> Looking at backpatching this, I realized the major changes we made to
> it a while ago was only backpatched to 8.4. 8.3 and earlier has the
> much more complex cvs instructoins.
> I suggest just wiping those and replacing them with the same git
> instructions we have now
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mié sep 22 13:29:00 -0400 2010:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:35, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander writes:
> >>
> >
> > This comment should be updated, or deleted entirely.
>
> Given that I don't even understand what it means and what it does
>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 19:29, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:35, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> I didn't attempt to read the changes in sourcerepo.sgml ... as you well
>> know, I find diff -u format utterly unreadable for more than one-liner
>> changes.
>
> S
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:35, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>>
>>
>> -
>> +
>>
>>
>>
>
> Please keep the filelist entries in alphabetical order.
Ack.
>>
>
> This comment should be updated, or deleted entirely.
Given that I don't even understand what it means and wh
Hi,
While files are being renamed in the main repo, is it possible to
rename install-win32.sgml ? "win32" implies a 32-bit windows
architecture, which is dated and misleading.
Could I suggest:
git mv doc/src/sgml/install-win32.sgml doc/src/sgml/install-windows.sgml
and fix chapter_id references
Magnus Hagander writes:
>
>
> -
> +
>
>
>
Please keep the filelist entries in alphabetical order.
>
This comment should be updated, or deleted entirely.
I didn't attempt to read the changes in sourcerepo.sgml ... as you well
know, I find diff -u format utterly unreadable for mor
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 16:10, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 22 September 2010 15:07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander writes:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two othe
On 22 September 2010 15:07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander writes:
>>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane wrote:
A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
references to CVS in docs and comments, w
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>>> up in HEAD, but probably not
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.
> Agreed.
> What about the mess
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thom Brown writes:
>> Do references to the CVS need removing now that everything is on GIT?
>
> The chapter about CVS obviously needs to be replaced. I was talking
> to Magnus about that earlier, and we both felt that that needs to be
> back-patch
24 matches
Mail list logo
