On 2024-04-02 Tu 15:38, Jacob Champion wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:53 PM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Anyway, here are new patches. I've rolled the new semantic test into the
first patch.
Looks good! I've marked RfC.
Thanks! I appreciate all the work you've done on this. I wi
file assumed
cl : Command line warning D9024 : unrecognized source file type
'Files\Microsoft', object file assumed
cl : Command line warning D9024 : unrecognized source file type 'Visual',
object file assumed
cl : Command line warning D9024 : unrecognized source file type
'C:\Program', object file assumed
cl : Command line warning D9024 : unrecognized source file type 'Files',
object file assumed
cl : Command line warning D9024 : unrecognized source file type
'(x86)\Windows', object file assumed
It looks like we need to get smarter about how we process the ldopts and strip
out the ccdlflags and ldflags
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
's not always an object
/ hash. Thus it's easy to reliably cast hstore to json but far less easy
to cast json to hstore in the general case.
What do you propose to do in the case or json consisting of scalars, or
arrays, or with nested elements?
cheers
andrew
--
s
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
fix
this problem with zero change in the callers, and also buy back a
little bit of the cost compared to this quick hack.
Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/60EF4E11-BC1C-4034-B37B-695662D28AD2%40justatheory.com
Makes sense
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
irly comprehensive set of JSON errors. I'll play with that.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
> On Mar 27, 2024, at 3:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> I am thinking "enable_alter_system_command" is probably good because we
>> already use "enable" so why not reuse that idea, and I think "command"
>> is needed because we need to clarify we are talking about the comma
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:12 PM Jacob Champion <
jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 4:02 PM Andrew Dunstan
> wrote:
> > Well, what's the alternative? The current parser doesn't check stack
> depth in frontend code. Presumably it too
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 9:14 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio
wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 14:06, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 4:30 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio
> wrote:
> > > That problem seems easy to address by adding a newline into the
> > > default prompt.
> >
> > Ugh. Please, no!
>
> I g
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 6:15 PM Jacob Champion <
jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:56 PM Andrew Dunstan
> wrote:
> > Thanks, included that and attended to the other issues we discussed. I
> think this is pretty close now.
>
> Ok
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 3:00 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> I have a patch in the queue [1] that among other things tries to
> reduce the number of XIDs consumed during pg_upgrade by making
> pg_restore group its commands into batches of a thousand or so
> per transaction. This had been passing tests, so
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 7:34 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> On the whole, I think we'd get more complaints about the default
> prompt having more-or-less doubled in length than we'd get kudos
> about this being a great usability improvement. Prompt space is
> expensive and precious, at least for people
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 4:04 PM Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 4:56 AM Andrew Dunstan
> wrote:
> > Reposting as the archive mail processor doesn't seem to like the Apple
> > mail attachment.
>
> I'm not really a fan of this. Right now my promp
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 5:29 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 20.02.24 08:57, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 18.02.24 00:06, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> >> I'm not sure that the cleanup which is done when changing a RTE's
> >> rtekind is also complete enough for this purpose.
> >> Things like i
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 6:21 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024-03-21 11:02:27 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 11:00, Andres Freund wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2024-03-20 17:49:14 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > > > First off this is on an ARM64 machine
> > >
> > > Uh, that'
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 6:07 PM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>
> It also removes the frontend exits I had. In the case of stack depth, we
> follow the example of the RD parser and only check stack depth for backend
> code. In the case of the check that the lexer is s
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 2:28 PM Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 3:52 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> > > Perhaps we could make that even better with a GUC though. I propose a
> > > GUC called 'configuration_managed_externally = true / false". If you
> se
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:12 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> I was looking at the documentation index this morning[1], and I can't
> help feeling like there are some parts of it that are over-emphasized
> and some parts that are under-emphasized. I'm not sure what we can do
> about this exactly, but I t
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 5:26 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I want to remind everyone of this from Gabriele's first message that
> started this thread:
>
> > At the moment, a possible workaround is that `ALTER SYSTEM` can be
> blocked
> > by making the postgresql.auto.conf read only, but the retu
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 2:28 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 21.02.24 08:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 14.02.24 17:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> A gentler way might be to start using some perlcritic policies like
> >> InputOutput::RequireCheckedOpen or the more general
> >> InputOutput::R
> On Mar 16, 2024, at 8:53 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On 15 Mar 2024, at 21:56, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 10:15 AM Tom Lane > <mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote:
>> Daniel Gustafsson mailto:dan...@yesql.se&g
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 10:15 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> > I can't see how refusing to free memory owned and controlled by someone
> else,
> > and throwing an error if attempted, wouldn't be a sound defensive
> programming
> > measure.
>
> I think the argument is about what
On 2024-02-27 Tu 19:19, Kori Lane wrote:
Here’s a patch for this.
Reposting as the archive mail processor doesn't seem to like the Apple
mail attachment.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml b/doc/src/sgm
On 2024-03-13 We 02:31, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-03-13 We 02:22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 13.03.24 07:11, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I and several colleagues have just been trying to build from a
tarball with meson.
That seems pretty awful and unfriendly and I didn't see anything
On 2024-03-13 We 02:22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 13.03.24 07:11, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I and several colleagues have just been trying to build from a
tarball with meson.
That seems pretty awful and unfriendly and I didn't see anything
about it in the docs.
At https://www.postgresq
n the docs.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
obody else does it I'll have a go, but it might take a while.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
aths, where in many cases the program will just exit anyway.
2. the fix is simple where it's needed.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2024-03-11 Mo 22:50, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:56 PM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-03-11 Mo 04:21, Oleg Tselebrovskiy wrote:
Greetings, everyone!
While running "installchecks" on databases with UTF-8 encoding the test
citext_utf8 fails because of Turkis
27;);
the output will be this:
lower
---
İ
(1 row)
Which I find strange since lower() uses collation that was passed
(default in this case but still)
Wouldn't we be better off finding a Windows fix for this, instead of
sweeping it under the rug?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
is particularly helpful when a test fails spuriously due to code
coverage spray on stderr.
Makes sense, thanks.
I'll have a fresh patch set soon which will also take care of the bitrot.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
%3Dfilename
[2]:
```
The target server must be shut down cleanly before running pg_rewind
```
Even though that is a difference I'd still rather we did more or less
the same thing more or less the same way across utilities, so I agree
with Euler's suggestion.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew D
give some more details about what this python gadget would buy
us? I note that there are a couple of CPAN modules that provide OAuth2
servers, not sure if they would be of any use.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
" work
"1066 And All That":
"For 'pheasant' read 'peasant' throughout."
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
te error
messages for
> string input as well, which currently has the following form:
>
> "string argument of jsonpath item method .%s() is not a valid
> representation.."
Agreed.
Attached are patches based on the discussion.
Thanks, I combined these and pushed the result.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2024-02-26 Mo 19:20, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-02-26 Mo 10:10, Jacob Champion wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 7:08 AM Jacob Champion
wrote:
As a brute force example of the latter, with the attached diff I get
test failures at chunk sizes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12.
But this time with the
hanks!
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
TAP test and this module does nothing.
More generally, the collection of logs etc. for pg_upgrade will improve
with the next release, which will be soon after I return from a vacation
in about 2 weeks - experience shows that making releases just before a
vacation is not a good idea :-)
ch
On 2024-02-22 Th 15:29, Jacob Champion wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 1:38 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Patch 5 in this series fixes those issues and
adjusts most of the tests to add some trailing junk to the pieces of
json, so we can be sure that this is done right.
This fixes the test failure
On 2024-02-20 Tu 19:53, Jacob Champion wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 2:10 PM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Well, that didn't help a lot, but meanwhile the CFBot seems to have
decided in the last few days that it's now happy, so full steam aead! ;-)
I haven't been able to track down
On 2024-01-26 Fr 12:15, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-24 We 13:08, Robert Haas wrote:
Maybe you should adjust your patch to dump the manifests into the log
file with note(). Then when cfbot runs on it you can see exactly what
the raw file looks like. Although I wonder if it's pos
d add explicit error checking at
the sites it points out. And then if we start using autodie in the
future, any inappropriate backpatching of calls lacking error checks
would be caught.
Yeah, that should work.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2024-02-12 Mo 11:44, Dave Cramer wrote:
Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-02-12 Mo 08:51, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 13:28, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 2024-02-10 Sa 12:20, Dave Cramer wrote
On 2024-02-12 Mo 08:51, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 13:28, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-02-10 Sa 12:20, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 11:19, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 2024-02-09 Fr 14:23, Dave Cramer wrote:
Dave Cramer
.
What is the difference between this and ActiveDirectory? AD is already
usable as an authentication mechanism. See for example
<https://www.crunchydata.com/blog/windows-active-directory-postgresql-gssapi-kerberos-authentication>
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB
On 2024-02-10 Sa 12:20, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 11:19, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-02-09 Fr 14:23, Dave Cramer wrote:
Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks <http://www.postgres.rocks>
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 07:18, Dave Cramer
<mailto:d
inion, though.
That seems fine as well. Let's leave that to the committer.
I edited slightly to my taste, and committed the patch. Thanks.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
stmaster[10672] LOG: all server
processes terminated; reinitializing
2024-02-09 13:31:11.034 -05 startup[6152] LOG: database system was
interrupted; last known up at 2024-02-09 13:31:01 -05
Yes, this is pretty much what I saw.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
not handling
read-only files in PGDATA.
This seems like the simplest solution. And maybe we should be fixing
pg_rewind regardless of this issue?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
elopers then it is like you say, far from guaranteed
to work.
+1 from me too. We kept 5.8 going for a while because it was what the
Msys (v1) DTK perl was, but that doesn't matter any more I think.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
x27;::text, 'date'::text
from cte
union all
select jsonb_path_query(s, '$.time_tz()')::text,'-8'::text,
'time_tz'::text from cte;
commit;
[0]
https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/commit/?id=66ea94e8e606529bb334515f388c62314956739e
ouch. Good catch. Clearly we need to filter these like we do for the
.datetime() method.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
::Utils::windows_os" used only once: possible typo at
t/003_extrafiles.pl line 85.
in v14. v15 and up are OK.
*sigh*
Have pushed a fix. Thanks for noticing.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2024-01-31 We 10:34, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 31.01.24 16:20, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
- PostgreSQL will only build for the x64 architecture on 64-bit
Windows. + PostgreSQL will only build for the x64 and ARM64
architecture on 64-bit Windows.
Are there any other 64-bit architectures for
On 2024-01-30 Tu 17:54, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 4:56 PM Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 2024-01-30 Tu 09:50, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 08:38, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 2024-01-29 Mo 11:20, Dave Cramer wrote:
Dave Cramer
On 2024-01-30 Tu 18:06, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
Pushed to all live branches. Thanks for the patch.
v12 and v13 branches aren't looking good:
Global symbol "$test_primary_datadir" requires explicit package name (did you forget to
declare "my $test_pri
On 2024-01-30 Tu 06:49, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-30 Tu 06:21, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to install newer Perl versions to Windows CI images and
found that 003_extrafiles.pl test fails on Windows with:
(0.183s) not ok 2 - file lists match
(0.000s) # Failed test
On 2024-01-30 Tu 09:50, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 08:38, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-29 Mo 11:20, Dave Cramer wrote:
Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks <http://www.postgres.rocks>
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 11:16, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 2024-01-29 Mo 11:20, Dave Cramer wrote:
Dave Cramer
www.postgres.rocks
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 11:16, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-26 Fr 09:18, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 07:36, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 2024-01-25 Th 20:32, Michael Paquier
ted.
Looks reasonable on the face of it. I'll see about pushing this today.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
hat at least I think there's close to unanimous agreement.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2024-01-26 Fr 09:18, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 07:36, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-25 Th 20:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:52:30PM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 16:32, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 2024-01-26 Fr 09:18, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 07:36, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-25 Th 20:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:52:30PM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 16:32, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
is far too narrow and would not cater for many use
cases I have had in the past.
I like your ideas upthread about \file_read and :{filename}
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
27;s still there, given that we disabled external
DTD access ages ago. I propose we just remove it.
In short, I suggest the attached.
Looks reasonable.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2024-01-25 Th 20:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:52:30PM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 16:32, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-25 Th 16:17, Dave Cramer wrote:
Yeah, I think the default Developer Command Prompt for VS2022 is set up
for x86 builds
rer and right
click, in the compatibility tab if the "Windows on ARM" is greyed out
it is an arm binary.
So far mine are not :(
Yeah, I think the default Developer Command Prompt for VS2022 is set up
for x86 builds. AIUI you should start by executing "vcvarsall x64_arm64"
e also late-model clang.
Anyway, I did note that the preceding line
res = jperOk;
is dead code and might as well get removed while you're at it.
OK, pushed those. Thanks.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2024-01-25 Th 15:56, Dave Cramer wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 14:31, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-25 Th 08:45, Dave Cramer wrote:
I tried running my buildfarm using my git repo and my branch, but
get the following error
Status Line: 492 bad branch parameter
On 2024-01-25 Th 15:33, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
On 2024-01-25 Th 14:31, Tom Lane wrote:
(The reported crashes seem to be happening later during a
recursive invocation, seemingly because JsonbType(jb) is
returning garbage. So there may be another bug after this one.)
I don&#
On 2024-01-25 Th 14:31, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
Thanks, I have pushed this.
The buildfarm is pretty widely unhappy, mostly failing on
select jsonb_path_query('1.23', '$.string()');
On a guess, I tried running that under valgrind, and behold it said
==00
On 2024-01-25 Th 14:31, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
Thanks, I have pushed this.
The buildfarm is pretty widely unhappy, mostly failing on
select jsonb_path_query('1.23', '$.string()');
On a guess, I tried running that under valgrind, and behold it said
==00
h the buildfarm, you need to let it set
up its own branches.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
erver. AFAICT
they still only sell versions for x86_64
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
nfirmation.
Attached merged single patch along these lines.
Thanks, I have pushed this.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2024-01-22 Mo 21:02, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-22 Mo 18:01, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-22 Mo 14:16, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-22 Mo 01:29, Peter Smith wrote:
2024-01 Commitfest.
Hi, This patch has a CF status of "Needs Review" [1], but it seems
there
?
The loss with csv could be blamed on the extra manipulations of the
function pointers, likely.
I don't think that's at all acceptable.
We've spent quite a lot of blood sweat and tears over the years to make
COPY fast, and we should not sacrifice any of that lightly.
cheers
e's a consensus that we want this. It should probably
be returned with feedback.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
uldn't be recommending any particular perl distro,
especially not ASPerl which now has annoying license issues.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
, but they do care about docs have
sensible structure.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
-liner
change needed to teach buildfarm animals to ignore READMEs.
- trigger_exclude => qr[^doc/|\.po$],
+ trigger_exclude => qr[^doc/|/README$|\.po$],
I've put that in the sample config file for the next release.
cheers
andre
On 2024-01-17 We 03:52, Laurenz Albe wrote:
On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 11:49 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2024-01-16 Tu 11:07, Laurenz Albe wrote:
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 16:51 +, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 14:35, Christoph Berg wrote:
Getting it print numeric/boolean
ed empty string, while an empty string data value is written
with double quotes ("").
CSV format with default settings is and has been from the beginning
designed to be round trippable.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
: 10, _b: 20
DROP PROCEDURE test_proc1;
Same problem in 17devel and 16. (Did not try the older branches yet.)
I can't reproduce this on my Ubuntu 22.04 ARM64 instance with perl
5.38.2 installed via perlbrew, nor on a fresh Debian unstable with it's
perl 5.38.2. In both insta
On 2024-01-09 Tu 13:46, Jacob Champion wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 8:49 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Quite a long time ago Robert asked me about the possibility of an
incremental JSON parser. I wrote one, and I've tweaked it a bit, but the
performance is significantly worse that that o
On 2024-01-03 We 10:12, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:59 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Say we have a document with an array 1m objects, each with a field
called "color". As it stands we'll allocate space for that field name 1m
times. Using a hash table we'd al
On 2024-01-03 We 08:45, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:57 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Yeah. One idea I had yesterday was to stash the field names, which in
large JSON docs tent to be pretty repetitive, in a hash table instead of
pstrduping each instance. The name would be valid
On 2024-01-02 Tu 10:14, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 11:49 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Quite a long time ago Robert asked me about the possibility of an
incremental JSON parser. I wrote one, and I've tweaked it a bit, but the
performance is significantly worse that that o
my $history_file = $params{history_file};
+ $history_file ||= '/dev/null';
+ $ENV{PSQL_HISTORY} = $history_file;
to just
$ENV{PSQL_HISTORY} = $params{history_file} || '/dev/null';
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2023-12-21 Th 18:20, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:43:32PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2023-12-21 Th 03:01, Michael Paquier wrote:
Andrew, was the original target of pgperlsyncheck committers and
hackers who played with the MSVC scripts but could not run sanity
n32.
I wonder who has actually run the script any time recently?
In any case, we can probably work around the syncheck issue by making
the module a runtime requirement rather than a compile time requirement,
by using "require" instead of "use".
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2023-12-20 We 11:05, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2023-12-19 Tu 08:57, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
The posted v5 seems like a good compromise
I reckon.
Andrew: When applying this, how do we synchronize with the buildfarm
to avoid
false negatives due to the BF using the wrong options?
The
On 2023-12-20 We 11:32, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:03 AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
This could perhaps be related to this patch removing the module in
src/tools/msvc/dummylib/Win32/Registry.pm ?
It is. I've fixed the buildfarm to stop checking this script.
Thanks!
On 2023-12-19 Tu 08:57, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 19 Dec 2023, at 14:51, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2023-12-18 Mo 11:14, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 13:42, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
I think this is pretty much ready to go, the attached v4 squashes the changes
and fixes
the module in
src/tools/msvc/dummylib/Win32/Registry.pm ?
It is. I've fixed the buildfarm to stop checking this script.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
t to run it.
In any case, as you say it's a different topic.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
On 2023-12-15 Fr 11:06, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
Here's more or less what I had in mind.
Do we really need the dependency on an install tree?
Can't we just find the executables (or .o files for Darwin)
in the build tree? Seems like that would simplify usage,
and
On 2023-12-14 Th 10:36, Tristan Partin wrote:
On Thu Dec 14, 2023 at 9:16 AM CST, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2023-12-13 We 15:59, Tristan Partin wrote:
> On Wed Dec 13, 2023 at 2:35 PM CST, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-12-12 Tu 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >
On 2023-12-13 We 15:59, Tristan Partin wrote:
On Wed Dec 13, 2023 at 2:35 PM CST, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 2023-12-12 Tu 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Tristan Partin" writes:
>> The big patch here is adding support for Mac. objdump -W doesn't
work on
>> Mac. So,
?
TBH I'd prefer to wait. But I have had a couple more urgent things on my
plate. I hope to get back to it before New Year. In the meantime I have
switched bowerbird to building only STABLE branches.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
ng. But note:
--show-diff doesn't apply the diff, it's intentionally non-destructive.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
201 - 300 of 1413 matches
Mail list logo
