Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Warren Turkal
On Thursday 12 April 2007 00:56, you wrote: > IIRC, cmake is a replacement for make, not for configure. Or did I miss > something? CMake also has configure functionality. > And it would require rewriting all the unix makefiles in cmake format, > and it was one of the major requirements for this u

Re: [HACKERS] Benchmarking tools for the Postgres, EDB and Oracle Database

2007-04-12 Thread Josh Berkus
All, I would recommend the new semi-free version of SpecJAppserver, called EAStress.http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/ --Josh ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: [HACKERS] So are we calling it: Feature Freeze?

2007-04-12 Thread Jim Nasby
On Apr 2, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Should we announce? There is some web work etc.. to be done. Is that work documented anywhere? Seems it would be a GoodThing if it was... -- Jim Nasby[EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://ent

Re: [HACKERS] Benchmarking tools for the Postgres, EDB and Oracle Database

2007-04-12 Thread Greg Smith
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Jonah H. Harris wrote: - JDBCBench (http://developer.mimer.com/features/feature_16.htm) I wouldn't recommend this one unless you've got plenty of time to debug it and validate the results. There are multiple errors in the random number generation code, some other bugs I

Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code

2007-04-12 Thread Jim Nasby
On Mar 30, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Florian G. Pflug wrote: In realitly, however, I feare that most people will just create a script that does 'echo "select pg_stop_backup | psql"' or something similar. If they're a bit more carefull, they will enable ON_ERROR_STOP, and check the return value of pgs

Re: [HACKERS] Idle idea for a feature

2007-04-12 Thread Jim Nasby
On Apr 10, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: Referenced by: "loc_base_clin_loc_base_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (loc_base_id) BY wdm_networx.loc_base_clin(loc_base_id) /| \/|\ Referenced column(s) in *this* table

Re: [HACKERS] What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

2007-04-12 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Florian G. Pflug wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: Alexey Klyukin wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: But if you have a checked out tree, does it work to do an update after the tree has been regenerated? As far as I know, the repo is generated completely every few hours, so it wouldn't surprise me that

Re: [HACKERS] What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

2007-04-12 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Alexey Klyukin wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: But if you have a checked out tree, does it work to do an update after the tree has been regenerated? As far as I know, the repo is generated completely every few hours, so it wouldn't surprise me that the checked out copy is n

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update

2007-04-12 Thread Koichi Suzuki
Hi, Sorry, inline reply. Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote: Yup, this is a good summary. You say you need to remove the optimization that avoids the logging of a new tuple because the full page image exists. I think we must already have the info in WAL which tuple inside the full page image

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: RESET SESSION, plus related new DDL commands.

2007-04-12 Thread Neil Conway
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 11:45 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > This phrase is missing a verb: > [...] > I find this markup strange: > [...] > In ResetTempTableNamespace(void), shouldn't it be using myTempNamespace > instead of the SysCache lookup? All fair points: I've applied the attached patch. Than

[HACKERS] temporal variants of generate_series()

2007-04-12 Thread Andrew Hammond
I've written the following function definitions to extend generate_series to support some temporal types (timestamptz, date and time). Please include them if there's sufficient perceived need or value. -- timestamptz version CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION generate_series ( start_ts timestamptz , end_t

Re: [HACKERS] TOASTing smaller things

2007-04-12 Thread Tom Lane
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I would suggest that *all* of those TODOs are premature in the absence >> of experimental evidence about the effect of varying the parameters. > Isn't it obvious that the "right" value is going to depend extraord

Re: [HACKERS] TOASTing smaller things

2007-04-12 Thread Gregory Stark
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would suggest that *all* of those TODOs are premature in the absence > of experimental evidence about the effect of varying the parameters. > If we end up finding out that the existing settings are about right > anyway across a range of test cases, who n

Re: [HACKERS] TOASTing smaller things

2007-04-12 Thread Luke Lonergan
Hi Tom, On 4/12/07 1:40 PM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would suggest that *all* of those TODOs are premature in the absence > of experimental evidence about the effect of varying the parameters. > If we end up finding out that the existing settings are about right > anyway across a

Re: [HACKERS] TOASTing smaller things

2007-04-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Luke Lonergan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 4/12/07 9:24 AM, "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At this point I would be happy just to set the TOAST threshold to a >> value defined as optimal, rather than as the most minimal use of TOAST >> possible. > I agree that's a good startin

Re: [HACKERS] TOASTing smaller things

2007-04-12 Thread Luke Lonergan
Hi Bruce, On 4/12/07 9:24 AM, "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luke Lonergan wrote: >> Hi Bruce, >> >> How about these: >> >> - Allow specification of TOAST size threshold in bytes on a per column basis >> - Enable storage of columns in separate TOAST tables >> - Enable use of multi

Re: [HACKERS] Do we still need "log_invalid_page"?

2007-04-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Jacky Leng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Then if we come to the path "log_invalid_page", can I say there must be sth > wrong, and we should PANIC? No; you forgot about full_page_writes = off. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reviewers Guide to Deferred Transactions/Transaction Guarantee

2007-04-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > transaction_guarantee.v11.patch I can't help feeling that this is enormously overcomplicated. The "DFC" in particular seems to not be worth its overhead. Why wouldn't we simply track the newest commit record at all times, and then whenever the wal wri

[HACKERS] Do we still need "log_invalid_page"?

2007-04-12 Thread Jacky Leng
As the README for xlog says: There're two kinds of WAL records: * WAL record that contains enough information to re-generate the entire contents of a page; during recovery of these records, blocks are read with: buffer = XLogReadBuffer(reln, blkno, true); so it can be sure that the block will be

Re: [HACKERS] elog(FATAL) vs shared memory

2007-04-12 Thread Stuart Bishop
Jim Nasby wrote: > On Apr 11, 2007, at 6:23 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: >> FWIW, you might want to put some safeguards in there so that you don't >> try to inadvertently kill the backend that's running that function... >> unfortunately I don't think there's a built-in function to tell you >> the PID of th

Re: [HACKERS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?]

2007-04-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:57:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:03:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Well, the thing is, we've pretty much had it handed to us that > > >> current-command indicators that

Re: [HACKERS] Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?

2007-04-12 Thread Maxime Henrion
Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >If so, then your task is the following: > > > >Make SYSV semaphores less dumb about process wakeups. Currently > >whenever the semaphore state changes, all processes sleeping on the > >semaphore are woken, even if we only have released enough resource

Re: [HACKERS] Why need XLogReadBuffer have the paramter "init"?

2007-04-12 Thread Jacky Leng
Oh, I am wrong! "Jacky Leng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> дÈëÓʼþ news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> дÈëÓʼþ > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Jacky Leng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Cann't we remove this param? > > > > No. > > > > > We can rewrite like this: > > > 1.XLogReadBuf

Re: [HACKERS] Why need XLogReadBuffer have the paramter "init"?

2007-04-12 Thread Jacky Leng
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> дÈëÓʼþ news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Jacky Leng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Cann't we remove this param? > > No. > > > We can rewrite like this: > > 1.XLogReadBuffer: > > * remove init; > > * everytime we cann't read a block, just "log_invalid_page" it, and re

Re: [HACKERS] Query

2007-04-12 Thread nagsid
Hi, As a part of my university project, I am trying to modify the postgres code to support parallel system. As the first step I have partitioned the data on different processors. And have kept a master node to process all the query requests. Whenever my master node is queried I need to push my

Re: [HACKERS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?]

2007-04-12 Thread Maxime Henrion
Tom Lane wrote: > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forwards: > > Yes but there are still a lot of wakeups to be avoided in the current > > System V semaphore code. More specifically, not only do we wakeup all > > the processes waiting on a single semaphore everytime something changes, > > but we

Re: [HACKERS] Eliminating unnecessary left joins

2007-04-12 Thread Robert Haas
I have this exact problem a lot. There are actually cases where you can eliminate regular joins, not just left joins. For example: CREATE TABLE partner ( id serial, namevarchar(40) not null, primary key (id) ); CREATE TABLE projec

Re: [HACKERS] Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?

2007-04-12 Thread Maxime Henrion
Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >If so, then your task is the following: > > > >Make SYSV semaphores less dumb about process wakeups. Currently > >whenever the semaphore state changes, all processes sleeping on the > >semaphore are woken, even if we only have released enough resource

Re: [HACKERS] What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

2007-04-12 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Alexey Klyukin wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: But if you have a checked out tree, does it work to do an update after the tree has been regenerated? As far as I know, the repo is generated completely every few hours, so it wouldn't surprise me that the checked out copy is not compatible with the n

Re: [HACKERS] What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

2007-04-12 Thread Alexey Klyukin
Alvaro Herrera wrote: But if you have a checked out tree, does it work to do an update after the tree has been regenerated? As far as I know, the repo is generated completely every few hours, so it wouldn't surprise me that the checked out copy is not compatible with the new repo. I admit I hav

Re: [HACKERS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?]

2007-04-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:03:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Well, the thing is, we've pretty much had it handed to us that > >> current-command indicators that aren't up to date are not very useful. > >> So rate-limited updates stri

Re: [HACKERS] TOASTing smaller things

2007-04-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Luke Lonergan wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > How about these: > > - Allow specification of TOAST size threshold in bytes on a per column basis > - Enable storage of columns in separate TOAST tables > - Enable use of multi-row compression method(s) for TOAST tables At this point I would be happy just to

Re: [HACKERS] Benchmarking tools for the Postgres, EDB and Oracle Database

2007-04-12 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Jonah H. Harris wrote: On 4/12/07, Ranjan Sahoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am working on a project for testing the performance of Oracle, EDB, and postgres and looking for a OLTP benchmarking tool which can do the benchmarking on all these databases. Can anyone please help me on this? To

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: RESET SESSION, plus related new DDL commands.

2007-04-12 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Neil Conway wrote: > Log Message: > --- > RESET SESSION, plus related new DDL commands. This phrase is missing a verb: The default value is defined as the value that the parameter would have had, if no SET ever been issued for it in the current session. /pgsql/do

Re: [HACKERS] Makefile patch to make gcov work on Postgres contrib modules

2007-04-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 17:08 schrieb Gregory Stark: > Unless there's a makefile variable that is included in both CFLAGS and > LDFLAGS that the user could use instead? But then that wouldn't work on > architectures where ld is used instead of gcc for linking. Perhaps you should start by def

Re: [HACKERS] Eliminating unnecessary left joins

2007-04-12 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Jim Nasby wrote: > I agree with others that the way that query is constructed is a bit > odd, but it does bring another optimization to mind: when doing an > inner-join between a parent and child table when RI is defined > between them, if the query only refers to the child ta

Re: [HACKERS] Makefile patch to make gcov work on Postgres contrib modules

2007-04-12 Thread Gregory Stark
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > %.so: %.o > > ! $(CC) -shared -o $@ $< > > > sqlmansect = 7 > > --- 11,16 > > endif > > > %.so: %.o > > ! $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -shared -o $@ $< > > Surely CFLAGS should be irrelevant at link t

Re: [HACKERS] elog(FATAL) vs shared memory

2007-04-12 Thread Gregory Stark
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: > >> AFAICS, there are basically two ways we might try to approach this: >> >> Plan A: establish the rule that you mustn't try to clean up shared >> memory state in a PG_CATCH block. Anything you need to do like that >> has to be

Re: [HACKERS] What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

2007-04-12 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Alexey Klyukin wrote: > Hi, > > Florian G. Pflug wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm very excited that my project for implementing read-only queries > > on PITR slaves was accepted for GSoC, and I'm now trying to work > > out what tools I'll use for that job. > > > > I'd like to be able to create some sor

Re: [HACKERS] Benchmarking tools for the Postgres, EDB and Oracle Database

2007-04-12 Thread Jonah H. Harris
On 4/12/07, Ranjan Sahoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am working on a project for testing the performance of Oracle, EDB, and postgres and looking for a OLTP benchmarking tool which can do the benchmarking on all these databases. Can anyone please help me on this? To test all three, you'd ha

Re: [HACKERS] What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

2007-04-12 Thread Alexey Klyukin
Hi, Florian G. Pflug wrote: > Hi > > I'm very excited that my project for implementing read-only queries > on PITR slaves was accepted for GSoC, and I'm now trying to work > out what tools I'll use for that job. > > I'd like to be able to create some sort of branches and tags for > my own work (

Re: [HACKERS] Bug about column references within subqueries used in selects

2007-04-12 Thread Tom Lane
NikhilS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes this is fine, but in "select columnname from tablename" using column > references of the other involved table is what I am objecting to. You can object till you're blue in the face, but this behavior is not changing because it's *required by spec*. Outer

Re: [HACKERS] What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

2007-04-12 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Florian G. Pflug wrote: Hi I'm very excited that my project for implementing read-only queries on PITR slaves was accepted for GSoC, Congratulations. and I'm now trying to work out what tools I'll use for that job. I'd like to be able to create some sort of branches and tags for my own work

Re: [HACKERS] Bug about column references within subqueries used in selects

2007-04-12 Thread Bort, Paul
> > I don't think so...the columns of update_test are visible to the > scalar subquery...that way you can use fields from 'a' > to filter the > subquery... > select a, (select y from supdate_test where x = a) from > update_test; > > > Yes this is fine, but in "se

[HACKERS] Benchmarking tools for the Postgres, EDB and Oracle Database

2007-04-12 Thread Ranjan Sahoo
Hi AllJ I am working on a project for testing the performance of Oracle, EDB, and postgres and looking for a OLTP benchmarking tool which can do the benchmarking on all these databases. Can anyone please help me on this? Thanks in advance to all for you kind co-operation.

[HACKERS] What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

2007-04-12 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Hi I'm very excited that my project for implementing read-only queries on PITR slaves was accepted for GSoC, and I'm now trying to work out what tools I'll use for that job. I'd like to be able to create some sort of branches and tags for my own work (only inside my local repository of course).

Re: [HACKERS] Bug about column references within subqueries used in selects

2007-04-12 Thread NikhilS
Hi, On 4/12/07, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/12/07, NikhilS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Shouldn't the final command below cause a 'column "b" does not exist error'? > > create table update_test (a int, b int); > create table supdate_test(x int, y int); > insert into u

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] [Fwd: Index Advisor]

2007-04-12 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On 4/12/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Gurjeet Singh wrote: > The interface etc. may not be beautiful, but it isn't ugly either! It is > a lot better than manually creating pg_index records and inserting them into > cache; we use index_create() API to create the index (build is

Re: [HACKERS] elog(FATAL) vs shared memory

2007-04-12 Thread Jim Nasby
On Apr 11, 2007, at 6:23 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: FWIW, you might want to put some safeguards in there so that you don't try to inadvertently kill the backend that's running that function... unfortunately I don't think there's a built-in function to tell you the PID of the backend you're connect

Re: [HACKERS] Bug about column references within subqueries used in selects

2007-04-12 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 4/12/07, NikhilS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Shouldn't the final command below cause a 'column "b" does not exist error'? create table update_test (a int, b int); create table supdate_test(x int, y int); insert into update_test values (20, 30); insert into supdate_test values (40, 50); se

[HACKERS] Bug about column references within subqueries used in selects

2007-04-12 Thread NikhilS
Hi, Shouldn't the final command below cause a 'column "b" does not exist error'? create table update_test (a int, b int); create table supdate_test(x int, y int); insert into update_test values (20, 30); insert into supdate_test values (40, 50); select a, (select b from supdate_test) from update

Re: [HACKERS] elog(FATAL) vs shared memory

2007-04-12 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Tom Lane wrote: 2) if a SIGTERM happens to arrive while btbulkdelete is running, the next CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS will do elog(FATAL), causing elog.c to do proc_exit(0), leaving the vacuum still recorded as active in the shared memory array maintained by _bt_start_vacuum/_bt_end_vacuum. The PG_TRY b

Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Hiroshi Saito
src/include/pg_config.h.win32 /* Define to 1 if you have support for IPv6. */ // #define HAVE_IPV6 1 What do you think? It's defined ni the msvc build script, see http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-04/msg00148.php It is a meaning with win32.mak. Then, It is the outside of th

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update

2007-04-12 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
> I don't fully understand what "transaction log" means. If it means > "archived WAL", the current (8.2) code handle WAL as follows: Probably we can define "transaction log" to be the part of WAL that is not full pages. > 1) If full_page_writes=off, then no full page writes will be > written

Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 05:14:06PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote: > Hi. > > From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>So. Changes applied. > > Umm, I think that you should correspond here. > It seems to have been left. I remember it. > > src/include/pg_config.h.win32 > /* Define to 1 if you hav

Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:58:26AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 09:04 schrieb Magnus Hagander: > > The point is still what happens when you distribute a binary built on a > > system with ipv6 to a system that doesn't have it. > > I think the problem is that you ap

Re: [HACKERS] Eliminating unnecessary left joins

2007-04-12 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
> Maybe odd, but simpler to optimize this way. > > Your idea would be also a very good optimization, there was > already a discussion about that here: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-01/msg00 > 151.php, but that time Tom refused it because it was too > expensive and rare

Re: [HACKERS] Eliminating unnecessary left joins

2007-04-12 Thread Ottó Havasvölgyi
Jim, Maybe odd, but simpler to optimize this way. Your idea would be also a very good optimization, there was already a discussion about that here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-01/msg00151.php, but that time Tom refused it because it was too expensive and rare. Maybe now

Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 08:56 schrieb Magnus Hagander: > IIRC, cmake is a replacement for make, not for configure. Or did I miss > something? CMake might be considered a replacement for Automake. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end

Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 09:04 schrieb Magnus Hagander: > The point is still what happens when you distribute a binary built on a > system with ipv6 to a system that doesn't have it. I think the problem is that you appear to have an ambiguous and overly coarse definition of a "system with ip

Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi. From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So. Changes applied. Umm, I think that you should correspond here. It seems to have been left. I remember it. src/include/pg_config.h.win32 /* Define to 1 if you have support for IPv6. */ // #define HAVE_IPV6 1 What do you think? Regards, Hiroshi

Re: [HACKERS] Last chance to object to MVCC-safe CLUSTER

2007-04-12 Thread Csaba Nagy
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 18:09, Tom Lane wrote: > Awhile back Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Making cluster MVCC-safe will kill my back-door of clustering a hot > > table while I run a full DB backup. > > Are we agreed that the TRUNCATE-based workaround shown here > http://archives.postgre

Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Dave Page
Magnus Hagander wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:24:58AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: (FWIW, I had ipv6 on my list of things to make happen, but I didn't realise it would cause this issue on a machine with ipv6 on it, since I don't have one) The IPv6 support is finely

[HACKERS] A Survey on Defect Management Practices in Free/Open Source Software

2007-04-12 Thread Anu Gupta DCSA
Dear PostgreSQL Contributors, I seek help from designers, developers, testers,defect fixers,project managers or playing any other key role in Free/Open Source software development or maintenence in carrying out a study on practices and problems of defect management in various Free/Open Source

Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:24:58AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > (FWIW, I had ipv6 on my list of things to make happen, but I didn't > > realise it would cause this issue on a machine with ipv6 on it, since > > I don't have one) > > The IPv6 support is finely tuned to

Re: [HACKERS] Vista/IPv6

2007-04-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:06:12PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote: > On Wednesday 11 April 2007 12:24, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > If we could use configure for MSVC this would have Just Happened (tm). I > > wonder how many other little bits we miss out on? > > CMake anyone? IIRC, cmake is a replacemen