On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Andreas Karlsson andr...@proxel.se wrote:
get_rule_expr() relies heavily on the catcache which to me does not look
like it could easily be (and probably not even should be) made to use the
current snapshot. Refactoring ruleutils.c to rely less no the catcache
On 2014-12-24 00:27:39 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
pgbench -S -T10 -c 4 -j 4
master:
tps = 9556.356145 (excluding connections establishing)
tps = 9897.324917 (excluding connections establishing)
tps = 9287.286907 (excluding connections establishing)
tps = 10210.130833 (excluding connections
On 19 December 2014 16:41, Amit Kapila Wrote,
One idea is to send all the stages and corresponding Analyze commands
to server in one go which means something like
BEGIN; SET default_statistics_target=1; SET vacuum_cost_delay=0;
Analyze t1; COMMIT;
BEGIN; SET default_statistics_target=10; RESET
On 2014-12-24 21:54:20 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
On 24 December 2014 at 07:41, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I have pushed patches 0001 through 0004, with some revisions. Only the
final part is missing.
Hi Alvaro,
Would you be able to commit the attached? It just
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
Thanks for your input.
+else
+memcpy(compression_scratch, page, page_len);
I don't think
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Firstly I'm thinking to commit the
0001-Move-pg_lzcompress.c-to-src-common.patch.
pg_lzcompress.h still exists in include/utils, but it
On 24 December 2014 at 00:24, Teodor Sigaev teo...@sigaev.ru wrote:
I've also attached some benchmark results using your original table from
up-thread. It seems that the caching if the page was seen as lossy is not
much
of a help in this test case. Did you find another one where you saw some
Hi all,
Commit 2c03216d has introduced RestoreBlockImage to restore a page
from a given decoding state. ISTM that this is a backend-only
operation but it has been added in xlogreader.c which could be used as
well by frontend utilities like pg_xlogdump.
Wouldn't it be better to declare it as a
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
head:
shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0
shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared: 0
I thought we got rid of the idea that 'Ts' means timestamp. Was this
On 12/22/14 5:40 PM, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
I think we should just use the UStar tar format
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_%28computing%29#UStar_format) and
allow long file names; all actively used tar implementations should be
able to handle them. I'll try to write a patch for that
On 12/22/14 10:00 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
There is already a patch [1] in this CF which will handle both cases, so
I am
not sure if it is very good idea to go with a new tar format to handle this
issue.
I think it would still make sense to have proper symlinks in the
basebackup if possible,
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Commit 2c03216d has introduced RestoreBlockImage to restore a page
from a given decoding state. ISTM that this is a backend-only
operation but it has been added in xlogreader.c which could be used as
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to declare it as a static routine in
xlogutils.c? If we keep it in xlogreader.c, I think that we should at
least
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to declare it as a static
On 25 December 2014 at 00:34, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-12-24 21:54:20 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
On 24 December 2014 at 07:41, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I have pushed patches 0001 through 0004, with some revisions. Only the
final part
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:00:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
head:
shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0
shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs shared: 0
I
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:30:19AM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-12-23 22:51:22 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Many of these are 64-byte aligned, including Buffer Descriptors.
In that case you need to change max_connections, some settings will lead
to unaligned BufferDescriptors.
Well,
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
I really wonder if we can't make msvc reliably recognize this kind of
scenario - especially this case is pretty trivial?
Even if MSVC did understand pg_unreachable(), there would be other
compilers that didn't, so we'd need to worry about suppressing
David Rowley dgrow...@gmail.com writes:
On 25 December 2014 at 00:34, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I really wonder if we can't make msvc reliably recognize this kind of
scenario - especially this case is pretty trivial?
The attached patch removes the warning, but likely can't
On 24/12/14 15:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:00:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I noticed this when looking at the allocated shared memory structures in
head:
shared memory alignment 64-byte of CommitTs Ctl: 0
shared memory
On 2014-12-24 10:00:05 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:30:19AM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-12-23 22:51:22 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Many of these are 64-byte aligned, including Buffer Descriptors.
In that case you need to change max_connections, some
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-12-24 00:27:39 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
pgbench -S -T10 -c 4 -j 4
master:
tps = 9556.356145 (excluding connections establishing)
tps = 9897.324917 (excluding connections establishing)
tps = 9287.286907 (excluding connections establishing)
All,
I want to revive this thread and continue to move these new role attributes
forward.
In summary, the ultimate goal is to include new role attributes for common
operations which currently require superuser privileges.
Initially proposed were the following attributes:
* BACKUP - allows role
Hi,
Currently the same message goes to server log and client app. Sometimes
it bothers me since I have to analyze server logs and discovered that
lc_messages is set to pt_BR and to worse things that stup^H^H^H
application parse some error messages in portuguese. My solution has
been a modified
On 12/23/14, 8:49 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
Em terça-feira, 23 de dezembro de 2014, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com
mailto:jim.na...@bluetreble.com escreveu:
On 12/23/14, 8:54 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
Right now a lot of people just work around this with
Alex Shulgin a...@commandprompt.com writes:
Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
I had a quick look, the patch does not apply cleanly anymore but it's
just release notes so nothing too bad.
Yes, there were some ongoing changes that touched some parts of this and
I must have missed the
On 12/24/14, 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-12-24 00:27:39 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
pgbench -S -T10 -c 4 -j 4
master:
tps = 9556.356145 (excluding connections establishing)
tps = 9897.324917 (excluding connections establishing)
tps = 9287.286907
On 25 December 2014 at 04:47, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
David Rowley dgrow...@gmail.com writes:
On 25 December 2014 at 00:34, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I really wonder if we can't make msvc reliably recognize this kind of
scenario - especially this case is
Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com writes:
On 12/24/14, 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
FWIW, I don't believe these results for one second. It's quite plausible
that there's a noticeable performance benefit, but a factor of three is
completely
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Fair enough. Anyway I wait for applying the patch which moves pg_lzcompress.c
until we will have reached any consensus about this.
Just to be clear (after sleeping on it), we still need pglz stuff in
src/common to offer
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Kouhei Kaigai kai...@ak.jp.nec.com
wrote:
I'm not certain whether we should have this functionality in contrib
from the perspective of workload that can help, but its major worth
is for an example of custom-scan interface.
worker_spi is now in
On 30 November 2014 at 15:02, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 02:31:15AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
It then dawned on me that every Windows build of PostgreSQL already has
a way
to limit connections to a particular OS user. SSPI authentication is
essentially the
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 11:55 AM, David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com wrote:
f6dc6dd seems to have broken vcregress check for me:
Having a look at the pg_hba.conf that's been generated by pgregress, it
looks like it only adds a line for IPv4 addresses.
Indeed. I can see this problem as well on my
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 03:55:02PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
f6dc6dd seems to have broken vcregress check for me:
FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host ::1, user David, database
postgres
...
FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host ::1, user David, database
postgres
Thanks. I bet this is
Hi.
Here's a proposed patch to use CPUID at startup to determine if the
SSE4.2 CRC instructions are available, to use them instead of the
slice-by-8 implementation (posted earlier).
A few notes:
1. GCC has included cpuid.h since 4.3.0, so I figured it was safe to
use. It can be replaced with
35 matches
Mail list logo
