[HACKERS] PATCH: Avoid use of __attribute__ when building with old Sun compiler versions

2016-09-02 Thread Andy Grundman
SPARC system, building 9.5.4 (+OpenSSL 1.1.0 patches). [1] Compiler features by release: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/systems/cccompare-137792.html [2] Pre-defined compiler macros: https://sourceforge.net/p/predef/wiki/Compilers/#oracle-solaris-studio Thanks, -- Andy Grundman // an

Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest problems

2014-12-16 Thread Andy Colson
o make mistakes. They know who they can contact for help. I think I like belts better (yellow, green, red, black). I think this gives me two things: 1) permission to mess up 2) ability to measure myself -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To

Re: [HACKERS] [REVIEW] prepare plans of embedded sql on function start

2011-09-10 Thread Andy Colson
y finger on it, I'm not 100% sold on the syntax. It is usable though, it does solve problems, so I'd use it. (I'm not 100% sure ANALYZE is better, either). I'm going to leave this patch as "needs review", I think more eyes might be helpful. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha 1 for 9.2

2011-09-10 Thread Andy Colson
t speak for others, but I find no benefit from a packaged alpha release. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] REVIEW proposal: a validator for configuration files

2011-09-10 Thread Andy Colson
On 09/10/2011 11:39 AM, Alexey Klyukin wrote: Hi Andy, On Sep 7, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Andy Colson wrote: Hi Alexey, I was taking a quick look at this patch, and have a question for ya. ... Where did the other warnings go? Its right though, line 570 is bad. It also seems to have killed the

Re: [HACKERS] WARNING: pgstat waiting

2011-09-10 Thread Andy Colson
On 09/10/2011 11:43 AM, Thom Brown wrote: On 10 September 2011 17:40, Andy Colson wrote: I'm playing with 9.2devel, and I can fill my logs with: WARNING: pgstat waiting for 5001623 usec (494 loops), file timestamp 368986878169601 target timestamp 368986897680812 last errno 0 WARNING: p

[HACKERS] WARNING: pgstat waiting

2011-09-10 Thread Andy Colson
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=79b2ee20c8a041a85dd230c4e787bef22edae57b So I was wondering if there is anything I can help with? Not sure if you need a reproducible case, or something you'd like me to try? -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgs

[HACKERS] REVIEW proposal: a validator for configuration files

2011-09-06 Thread Andy Colson
Where did the other warnings go? Its right though, line 570 is bad. It also seems to have killed the server. I have not gotten through the history of messages regarding this patch, but is it supposed to kill the server if there is a syntax error in the config file? -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-

[HACKERS] REVIEW Single pass vacuum - take 2

2011-09-06 Thread Andy Colson
also fixed the item.h comments to reflect the change. I think the patch is ready for a serious review now. Thanks, Pavan Hi Pavan, I tried to apply your patch to git master (as of just now) and it failed. I assume that's what I should be checking out, right? -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-

Re: [HACKERS] Review: prepare plans of embedded sql on function start

2011-09-06 Thread Andy Colson
then this script works fine: select * from test1(1); set plpgsql.prepare_plans to on_start; create or replace function test1(a integer) returns integer as $$ begin return a+1; end; $$ language plpgsql; -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make chang

Re: [HACKERS] Review: prepare plans of embedded sql on function start

2011-09-05 Thread Andy Colson
On 09/05/2011 05:27 PM, Andy Colson wrote: On 09/05/2011 05:04 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 09/05/2011 05:03 PM, Andy Colson wrote: Pavel, this patch: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=624 It applied clean and compiled ok, but I cannot get it to work at all. $ psql

Re: [HACKERS] Review: prepare plans of embedded sql on function start

2011-09-05 Thread Andy Colson
On 09/05/2011 05:04 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 09/05/2011 05:03 PM, Andy Colson wrote: Pavel, this patch: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=624 It applied clean and compiled ok, but I cannot get it to work at all. $ psql Timing is on. psql (9.2devel) Type "help

[HACKERS] Review: prepare plans of embedded sql on function start

2011-09-05 Thread Andy Colson
Pavel, this patch: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=624 It applied clean and compiled ok, but I cannot get it to work at all. $ psql Timing is on. psql (9.2devel) Type "help" for help. andy=# set plpgsql.prepare_plans to on_start; ERROR: unrecognized con

Re: [HACKERS] remove useless ccache searching

2011-09-05 Thread Andy Colson
Sorry, I have not used array's so not sure if there are memory limits on them) -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

[HACKERS] remove useless ccache searching

2011-09-05 Thread Andy Colson
ng to take a look at the cache? Should this be accepted as a short term fix (cuz someone will fix the cache later), long term fix (cuz the cache needs to say as-is), or not at all (because someone will fix cache right now now)? -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@post

Re: [HACKERS] regular logging of checkpoint progress

2011-09-05 Thread Andy Colson
On 09/05/2011 12:17 PM, Andy Colson wrote: Tomas, I cannot seem to see any of the patches you link here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=628 Looks like you need to take the < > out of the messageid. -Andy This patch seems to solve the problem of going back in t

[HACKERS] savepoint commit performance

2011-09-05 Thread Andy Colson
reworked: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-07/msg01041.php but that was posted Jul 19, 2011. And the Patch linked from commitfest is Jun 6, 2011. So is that an old patch? Or a new patch? I'm confused. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresq

[HACKERS] regular logging of checkpoint progress

2011-09-05 Thread Andy Colson
Tomas, I cannot seem to see any of the patches you link here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=628 Looks like you need to take the < > out of the messageid. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscr

Re: [HACKERS] pgbench internal contention

2011-07-30 Thread Andy Colson
mness use rand(), otherwise use next(), it would be way faster, and you dont really care what the number is anyway. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)

2011-03-05 Thread Andy Colson
On 03/05/2011 08:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Andy Colson wrote: Support unlogged tables. The contents of an unlogged table are WAL-logged; um.. are _not_ WAL-logged? Uh, yeah. It looks like I fixed that in the version I committed, but introduced another

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)

2011-03-05 Thread Andy Colson
On 03/05/2011 08:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote: On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Andy Colson wrote: Support unlogged tables. The contents of an unlogged table are WAL-logged; um.. are _not_ WAL-logged? Uh, yeah. It looks like I fixed that in the version I committed, but introduced another

Re: [HACKERS] Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)

2011-03-05 Thread Andy Colson
worth adding to the alpha4 release notes. Support unlogged tables. The contents of an unlogged table are WAL-logged; um.. are _not_ WAL-logged? -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mai

Re: [HACKERS] Perl 5.12 complains about ecpg parser-hacking scripts

2011-03-04 Thread Andy Colson
On 3/3/2011 6:49 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:33:35PM -0600, Andy Colson wrote: I thought Kris was going to work on this, but saw no progress, and I was bored the other day, so I started working on it. Here is a parse.pl, with some major refactoring. I named it with a

Re: [HACKERS] Perl 5.12 complains about ecpg parser-hacking scripts

2011-03-02 Thread Andy Colson
dback, suggestions, etc are welcomed. (oh, yeah, I probably need to go add some documentation) -Andy #!/usr/bin/perl # src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/parse.pl # parser generater for ecpg # call with backend parser as stdin # # Copyright (c) 2007-2010, PostgreSQL Global Development Group

Re: [HACKERS] Perl 5.12 complains about ecpg parser-hacking scripts

2011-01-23 Thread Andy Colson
On 01/23/2011 10:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 01/23/2011 10:16 AM, Andy Colson wrote: On 01/23/2011 08:29 AM, Andy Colson wrote: On 01/22/2011 09:28 PM, k...@shannon.id.au wrote: On 23 January 2011 13:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote: But there are quite a few perlheads around. ISTR Matt Trout

Re: [HACKERS] Perl 5.12 complains about ecpg parser-hacking scripts

2011-01-23 Thread Andy Colson
On 01/23/2011 08:29 AM, Andy Colson wrote: On 01/22/2011 09:28 PM, k...@shannon.id.au wrote: On 23 January 2011 13:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote: But there are quite a few perlheads around. ISTR Matt Trout was muttering about these scripts on IRC recently. Ok, so I've figured out what its pu

Re: [HACKERS] Perl 5.12 complains about ecpg parser-hacking scripts

2011-01-23 Thread Andy Colson
Oh! Perl is my favorite. Kris, if you're not going to, I'd love to work on this. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] plperlu problem with utf8 [REVIEW]

2011-01-16 Thread Andy Colson
On 01/16/2011 07:14 PM, Alex Hunsaker wrote: On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 14:20, Andy Colson wrote: This is a review of "plperl encoding issues" https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=452 Thanks for taking the time to review! [...] The Patch: == Applies cl

Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed!

2011-01-16 Thread Andy Colson
ark it as "ready for committer"? I marked my two reviews as ready for committer, but I feel like I've overstepped my bounds. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

[HACKERS] texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]

2011-01-16 Thread Andy Colson
This is a review of: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=468 Purpose: Equal and not-equal _may_ be quickly determined if their lengths are different. This _may_ be a huge speed up if we dont have to detoat. The Patch: == I was able to read and understand t

[HACKERS] plperlu problem with utf8 [REVIEW]

2011-01-15 Thread Andy Colson
This is a review of "plperl encoding issues" https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=452 Purpose: Your database uses one encoding, and passes data to perl in the same encoding, which perl is not prepared for (it assumes UTF-8). This patch makes sure data is encoded i

[HACKERS] page compression

2010-12-28 Thread Andy Colson
I know its been discussed before, and one big problem is license and patent problems. Would this project be a problem: http://oldhome.schmorp.de/marc/liblzf.html -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [HACKERS] unlogged tables vs. GIST

2010-12-17 Thread Andy Colson
really good use, then time can be put toward it). -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] unlogged tables

2010-12-02 Thread Andy Colson
the exact steps, but I wanted to get you #1 above. -Andy Ok, forget the time thing. Has nothing to do with it. (Which everyone already assumed I imagine). Its truncate. Create unloged table, fill it, truncate it, fill it again, restart pg, and the data will still be there. -Andy -- Sent

Re: [HACKERS] unlogged tables

2010-12-01 Thread Andy Colson
it clears the table), then fill it again, and vacuum complains. Here is a log: andy=# drop table ulone; DROP TABLE Time: 40.532 ms andy=# create unlogged table ulone(id serial, a integer, b integer, c text); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "ulone_id_seq" for serial colu

[HACKERS] unlogged tables

2010-11-30 Thread Andy Colson
that, I have a pgbench_accounts table (unlogged) that after a restart has data in it. andy=# select aid, bid, abalance from pgbench_accounts where abalance = 3305; aid | bid | abalance -+-+-- 3790226 | 38 | 3305 274130 | 3 | 3305 2169892 | 22 | 3305

Re: [HACKERS] unlogged tables

2010-11-21 Thread Andy Colson
579, 656 LOGS (full import) Total rows: 61,467,489 Total Seconds: 1,126.75 Total ins/sec: 54,552.60 After all this... there are too many numbers for me. I have no idea what this means. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to you

Re: [HACKERS] unlogged tables

2010-11-16 Thread Andy Colson
also have a "real world" test I can try (import apache logs and run a few stats). What other things would be good to test: indexes? analyze/stats/plans? dump/restore? Is "create temp unlogged table stuff(...)" an option? -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-ha

[HACKERS] unlogged tables

2010-11-15 Thread Andy Colson
ch already exists! Assume -R? [n] That didnt happen the first time... I'm almost positive. Not sure what I should do now. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] dividing money by money

2010-07-17 Thread Andy Balholm
On Jul 17, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2010-07-16 at 10:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> The other argument that I found convincing was that if the >> operator was defined to yield numeric, people might think that >> the result was exact ... which of course it won't be, either

Re: [HACKERS] dividing money by money

2010-07-16 Thread Andy Balholm
On Jul 15, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > * I didn't like this bit in cash_numeric(): > > result->n_sign_dscale = NUMERIC_SIGN(result) | fpoint; > > Not only is that unwarranted chumminess with the implementation of > numeric, it's flat-out wrong. If the result isn't exactly the righ

Re: [HACKERS] dividing money by money

2010-06-21 Thread Andy Balholm
On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Yes, although the line endings are Windows format (CR/LF). The line endings must have gotten changed in transit. My original diff used just LF. I made it on a Mac. > The only issue is with the general guideline to make the new code > blend

Re: [HACKERS] ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site)

2010-06-17 Thread Andy Balholm
Marc Fournier wrote: > But, I think you and I are exceptions here, in that we use the web interface > for moderation, and not just email ... Is it possible that the ones that use email for moderating the lists have aggressive spam filters? Then they might not receive most of the list postings t

Re: [HACKERS] dividing money by money

2010-06-01 Thread Andy Balholm
Thanks for the explanation of CommitFests. >> On May 30, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: >>> You would then generate a diff in context format and post to the >>> -hackers list with that file as an attachment. I made my diff with src/tools/make_diff, as suggested in the Developer FAQ. Bu

Re: [HACKERS] dividing money by money

2010-05-31 Thread Andy Balholm
On May 30, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > You would then generate a diff in context format and post to the > -hackers list with that file as an attachment. Here it is: dividing-money.diff Description: Binary data > Don't forget to add > it to the "CommitFest" page: > > https://comm

Re: [HACKERS] dividing money by money

2010-05-30 Thread Andy Balholm
On May 30, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > You would basically move the functions and their prototypes to cash.c > and cash.h, and then (instead of CREATE FUNCTION, etc.) add > corresponding entries to pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h. (If I'm > missing something, someone please jump in.) Of

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] dividing money by money

2010-05-28 Thread Andy Balholm
I'm not quite sure how to go about changing it from an add-on function to a built-in one. So if you want to do that, go ahead. If you'd rather I did, just tell me how it's done. Andy Balholm (509) 276-2065 a...@balholm.com On May 26, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: >

Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Minor notes in CLUSTER page

2010-05-07 Thread Andy Lester
> nly > one sentence I think we should add it adjacent to the existing > sentence discussing remembering the index. My proposed patch > attached; thoughts? As long as there's a pointer to the answer I'm happy. xoa -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.thewor

[HACKERS] PATCH: Minor notes in CLUSTER page

2010-05-06 Thread Andy Lester
I was looking for how to undo a CLUSTER call earlier today. Nothing on the CLUSTER page told me how to do it, or pointed me to the ALTER TABLE page. I figure a pointer to would help the next person in my situation. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.petdan

[HACKERS] PATCH: Minor doc addition to CLUSTER page

2010-05-06 Thread Andy Lester
I couldn't figure out how to get rid of the CLUSTER flag on an index. Once I got the answer from IRC, I wrote this patch to point future users to the answer. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/cluster.

Re: [HACKERS] Another try at reducing repeated detoast work for PostGIS

2009-08-18 Thread Andy Colson
the data right from the shapefiles, you can use a tool like qgis. .dbf is regular dbase file .shp is a shapefile (esri shapefile) .shx is an index -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2

2009-06-10 Thread Andy Colson
Josh Berkus wrote: Andy, 6) To the -hackers: I write the records and then refind them in the exact same order, would it be a better test to search for records in a more random order? would it make a difference? Would searching for some but not all make a difference? Are you on OpenSolaris

Re: [HACKERS] Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2

2009-06-10 Thread Andy Colson
ther operations on the table (vacuum, cluster, etc..)? 5) got any triggers or stored procs? 6) To the -hackers: I write the records and then refind them in the exact same order, would it be a better test to search for records in a more random order? would it make a difference? Would searching

Re: [HACKERS] sun blade 1000 donation

2009-05-28 Thread andy
Andy Colson wrote: Josh Berkus wrote: Andy, Yeah, when it shipped I think it was about 75 pounds. It is a tower, yes, and an impressively large box (my experience with servers is limited, this is the first I've ever gotten to play with, so it may not be out of the ordinary). I think my k

Re: [HACKERS] sun blade 1000 donation

2009-05-28 Thread Andy Colson
Josh Berkus wrote: Andy, Yeah, when it shipped I think it was about 75 pounds. It is a tower, yes, and an impressively large box (my experience with servers is limited, this is the first I've ever gotten to play with, so it may not be out of the ordinary). I think my kill-a-watt said, at

Re: [HACKERS] sun blade 1000 donation

2009-05-28 Thread Andy Colson
Greg Smith wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2009, Andy Colson wrote: Yeah, when it shipped I think it was about 75 pounds. It is a tower, yes, and an impressively large box (my experience with servers is limited, this is the first I've ever gotten to play with, so it may not be out of the ord

Re: [HACKERS] sun blade 1000 donation

2009-05-28 Thread Andy Colson
Jignesh K. Shah wrote: On 05/27/09 22:00, Josh Berkus wrote: Andy, I have a Sun blade 1000 that's just collecting dust now days. I was wondering if there were any pg-hackers that could find use for it. Its dual UltraSPARC III 750 (I think) and has two 36? gig fiber channel scsi disks

Re: [HACKERS] sun blade 1000 donation

2009-05-28 Thread Andy Colson
Greg Smith wrote: On Wed, 27 May 2009, andy wrote: I have a Sun blade 1000 that's just collecting dust now days...It weighs a ton. Bah, I know I picked one of those up myself once, which means it's far from being what I'd consider a heavy server as Sun hardware goes. Spe

[HACKERS] sun blade 1000 donation

2009-05-27 Thread andy
I have a Sun blade 1000 that's just collecting dust now days. I was wondering if there were any pg-hackers that could find use for it. Its dual UltraSPARC III 750 (I think) and has two 36? gig fiber channel scsi disks. It weighs a ton. I'd be happy to donate it to a good cause.

Re: [HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-05-01 Thread Andy Lester
I am saying is that my git repo does not have doc/FAQ_DEV. I didn't see it scroll by in the CVS repo that I'm rsyncing, either. -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql

Re: [HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-05-01 Thread Andy Lester
s. I wish there had been some in Tom's original mail. xoa -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-05-01 Thread Andy Lester
a bit of push-back. If he'd phrased it as "would this be a good idea?" then I would have reacted differently. But since he didn't, it's OK to be insulting? -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance -- Sent via pg

Re: [HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-05-01 Thread Andy Lester
Sure, and I'm sure there are plenty of projects that do use them to great effect, most notably Perl 5 and Parrot. Perl 5 specifically has had the mish-mosh of tabs-vs-spaces reduced by the addition of modelines. xoa -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com =

Re: [HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-05-01 Thread Andy Lester
ing on his end. I'd rather that volunteers, especially new volunteers, spend their time and brain cycles thinking about code, not messing with config files. xoa -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mai

Re: [HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-05-01 Thread Andy Lester
come. I think it tells me quite a bit about the Postgres world. -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/

Re: [HACKERS] GCC 4.4 compiler warnings

2009-05-01 Thread Andy Lester
watch for, the better. -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

[HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-05-01 Thread Andy Lester
I've got my git clone set up, a copy of GCC 4.4 (and other compilers) at the ready, and am glad to help out on low-level scut work. Anybody need anything done? splint? valgrind? Let me know. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com =>

Re: [HACKERS] Keyword list sanity check

2009-04-30 Thread Andy Lester
On Apr 30, 2009, at 2:11 PM, David Fetter wrote: Here's a patch that gets it to pass perlcritic -4 and still (as far as I can tell) work. Tell ya what. Let me at it and I'll give a larger, more inclusive patch. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.th

Re: [HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-04-30 Thread Andy Lester
do use vi, it enforces proper file formatting for the user without having to worry about local settings. And if you're an Emacs person, you can help figure out what the modeline should be for Emacs, and we can get that in there, too. xoa -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => w

Re: [HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-04-30 Thread Andy Lester
Getting our Perl into shape would be Really Good(TM). :) I will, but right now my #1 is getting some vi modelines in place so we can all be using the same tab/space settings. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance -- Sent

[HACKERS] Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

2009-04-30 Thread Andy Lester
I've got my git clone set up, a copy of GCC 4.4 (and other compilers) at the ready, and am glad to help out on low-level scut work. Anybody need anything done? splint? valgrind? Let me know. xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com =>

Re: [HACKERS] Keyword list sanity check

2009-04-30 Thread Andy Lester
#x27;ll prob'ly come up with a policy file for Perl::Critic and a make target for perlcritic. xoa -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscripti

Re: [HACKERS] Keyword list sanity check

2009-04-30 Thread Andy Lester
't be too tough. -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] benchmark farm

2008-08-13 Thread Andy Colson
. I did write a few perl scripts to play around with inserts and updates and compared a few timings on xfs vs ext2... and then kinda lost interest. -Andy -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Improved (De)Serialization Support

2008-02-24 Thread Andy Pavlo
On Saturday 23 February 2008 00:40, Tom Lane wrote: > Andy Pavlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have added support in readfuncs.c to write out Query and PlannedStmt > > objects using nodeToString() and then read them back in. We needed this > > so that we coul

Re: [HACKERS] 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison

2008-02-24 Thread andy
n a second connection could be created to start the CREATE INDEX's for that table, while the first connection went on to COPY the next table. Or something like that... -Andy ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

[HACKERS] Improved (De)Serialization Support

2008-02-22 Thread Andy Pavlo
ut of Postgres. Thanks! -- Andy Pavlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

2008-02-11 Thread Andy Colson
M2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support such a thing? I dont think the buildfarm needs to require CVS. The code can be changed in the buildfarm to just run 'svn up' or 'git up and go' (sorry, never used git so I had to guess at the command :-) ) rig

[HACKERS] benchmark farm

2008-01-21 Thread andy
Hello, Someplace I recall hearing about a benchmark/performance farm... is anyone working on that? It sounds kinda fun and I have a little time to help. I'm a perl/C/Java/Lua guy, hopefully there is something there I can help with. -Andy ---(end of broa

Re: [HACKERS] New to PostgreSQL

2007-11-13 Thread andy
Cedar Rapids, Iowa? -Andy ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Re: [HACKERS] pg 8.3beta 2 restore db with autovacuum report

2007-11-02 Thread andy
Alvaro Herrera wrote: andy wrote: with autovacuum enabled with default settings, cramd.sql is 154M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/back$ time pg_restore -Fc -C -d postgres cramd.sql real3m43.687s [...] Now I dropdb and disable autovacuum, restart pg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/back$ time

Re: [HACKERS] psql show dbsize?

2007-10-31 Thread andy
stead of putting it in \l, what if we had a \stats that print stuff just about the db your connected to, and it could probably find a bunch of other info to print besides just the dbsize. -Andy ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't fo

Re: [HACKERS] psql show dbsize?

2007-10-31 Thread andy
Tom Lane wrote: andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I know its way too late in the game, sorry, but it's a very small patch... (1) What's the performance impact? I should think that this makes \l orders of magnitude slower. (2) Doesn't this render \l entirely nonfunctiona

[HACKERS] psql show dbsize?

2007-10-31 Thread andy
bsize ---+--+--+----- andy | andy | LATIN1 | 4255 kB cramd | andy | LATIN1 | 526 MB postgres | postgres | LATIN1 | 4263 kB template0 | postgres | LATIN1 | 4136 kB template1 | postgres | LATIN1 | 4255 kB (5 rows) pretty nice, huh? -Andy --- src/bin/psql/describe.orig 2007-10-31

[HACKERS] pg 8.3beta 2 restore db with autovacuum report

2007-10-31 Thread andy
2519 pts/0S+ 0:12 pg_restore -Fc -C -d postgres cramd.sql 2521 ?Ss 1:04 postgres: andy cramd [local] CREATE INDEX waiting 2526 ?Ss 0:03 postgres: autovacuum worker process cramd 2571 ?Ss 0:01 postgres: autovacuum worker process cramd 2582 pts/1

Re: [HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-19 Thread andy
Oleg Bartunov wrote: Andy, seems you're a right person for writing migration guide. Oleg On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, andy wrote: Where would be an easy place to find all the renamed functions? My experience with fts is limited to one project, and I just used all the default dictionaries, so

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2api project

2007-10-17 Thread andy
here can be any automatic way to do that, but at the very least we need some documentation about what corresponds to what. I'm afraid the defaults have "just worked" for me, so I never played with any of the config stuff (old or new)... I don't know if

[HACKERS] 8.3 full text search docs

2007-10-13 Thread andy
I have two doc updates I'd like to offer. I see we have two example sections: creating rule-based dict's and creating parsers. When I was starting I would have liked to see an example usage. I'd like to offer: "example usage" and "Upgrading". This is my first draft, if anyone has suggestions

Re: [HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-11 Thread andy
Tom Lane wrote: andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: the operator = is not the 'normal =' is it? Its the 'tsearch2 =', right? That one probably is, but how is your sed script going to distinguish it from other user-defined '=' operators that might be in the

Re: [HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-11 Thread andy
rs? 1126; 2617 98028 OPERATOR public !! andy 1124; 2617 98024 OPERATOR public && andy 1112; 2617 98003 OPERATOR public < andy 1118; 2617 98017 OPERATOR public < andy 1113; 2617 98004 OPERATOR public <= andy 1119; 2617 98018 OPERATOR public <= andy 1117; 2617 98005 OPERATOR publi

Re: [HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-11 Thread andy
Florian G. Pflug wrote: andy wrote: Is there any chance there is an easier way to backup/restore? On one hand, its not too bad, and it'll only be once (correct?). Now that fts is in core future backup/restores will work, right? I think it's analogous to telling someone they ar

Re: [HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-11 Thread andy
Oleg Bartunov wrote: Andy, seems you're a right person for writing migration guide. Oleg On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, andy wrote: Where would be an easy place to find all the renamed functions? My experience with fts is limited to one project, and I just used all the default dictionaries, so

Re: [HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-10 Thread andy
Tom Lane wrote: andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom Lane wrote: Did the data transfer over? The declarations of the former contrib functions would of course fail, but type tsvector is still there. I would like to think that ignoring pg_restore's whining would get you most of th

Re: [HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-10 Thread andy
andy wrote: Andy Colson wrote: Hi All, You knew it was coming I tried doing a pg_dump --schema-only and restoring just that, but still got a bunch of errors (those above). If I clean that up of all the old text search stuff, and then run it, then do the data, will that work ok

Re: [HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-10 Thread andy
Tom Lane wrote: Andy Colson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I have an 8.2 database that has full text searching. I tried to backup/restore it to 8.3 but got lots of errors: ... I didn't really expect it to totally work, but I'm not sure how to move my db. Did the data tra

Re: [HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-10 Thread andy
Andy Colson wrote: Hi All, You knew it was coming I tried doing a pg_dump --schema-only and restoring just that, but still got a bunch of errors (those above). If I clean that up of all the old text search stuff, and then run it, then do the data, will that work ok? Further to this

[HACKERS] full text search in 8.3

2007-10-10 Thread Andy Colson
en do the data, will that work ok? One more dumb question: I don't have to enable or install anything, do I? Thanks, -Andy ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] Vacuum error on database postgres

2006-09-16 Thread andy
soon as its common knowledge I think it could be avoided. Really, isn't it just bulk loads anyway where a person might do this? -Andy ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[HACKERS] Remove behaviour of postmaster -o

2006-05-06 Thread Andy Chambers
s the test script in the tools directory. Is there anything else this todo should address? Thanks, Andy ___ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.se

[HACKERS] Happy Holidays

2005-12-24 Thread Andy Astor
holiday season, and an incredible 2006.   All the best,   -- Andy   - Andy Astor, CEO EnterpriseDB Corporation 777 New Durham Road Edison, NJ 08817 Tel  732.331.1310 www.enterprisedb.com    

  1   2   >